You are on page 1of 37

Lateral Earth Pressures

N. Sivakugan
SIVA Copyright©2001

Contents
• Geotechnical applications
• K0, active & passive states
• Rankine’s earth pressure theory

From Theory to Practice

• Design of retaining walls

2
SIVA Copyright©2001

Lateral Support
In geotechnical engineering, it is often necessary to
prevent lateral soil movements.

Tie rod
Anchor

Sheet pile

Cantilever Braced excavation Anchored sheet pile 3


retaining wall
SIVA Copyright©2001

Lateral Support

We have to estimate the lateral soil pressures acting on


these structures, to be able to design them.

Gravity Retaining Soil nailing


Reinforced earth wall 4
wall
SIVA Copyright©2001

Soil Nailing

5
SIVA Copyright©2001

Sheet Pile

Sheet piles marked for driving


6
SIVA Copyright©2001

Sheet Pile

Sheet pile wall


7
SIVA Copyright©2001

Sheet Pile

During installation Sheet pile wall

8
SIVA Copyright©2001

Lateral Support

Reinforced earth walls are increasingly becoming popular.

geosynthetics

9
SIVA Copyright©2001

Lateral Support
filled with
Crib walls have been used in Queensland. soil
Good drainage & allow plant growth.
Looks good. Interlocking
stretchers
and headers

10
SIVA Copyright©2001

Earth Pressure at Rest


In a homogeneous natural soil deposit,
GL

v ’
h’
X

the ratio h’/v’ is a constant known as coefficient


of earth pressure at rest (K0).

Importantly, at K0 state, there are no lateral strains.


11
SIVA Copyright©2001

Estimating K0

For normally consolidated clays and granular soils,


K0 = 1 – sin ’

For overconsolidated clays,


K0,overconsolidated = K0,normally consolidated OCR0.5

From elastic analysis,


 Poisson’s
K0 
1 ratio

12
SIVA Copyright©2001

Active/Passive Earth Pressures


- in granular soils

Wall moves
away from soil

Wall moves A
towards soil
B

smooth wall

Let’s look at the soil elements A and B during the


wall movement. 13
SIVA Copyright©2001

Active Earth Pressure


- in granular soils

v’ = z
Initially, there is no lateral movement.
v ’ z
h’ = K0 v’ = K0 z
h’
A
As the wall moves away from the soil,
v’ remains the same; and
h’ decreases till failure occurs.

Active state
14
SIVA Copyright©2001

Active Earth Pressure


- in granular soils

As the wall moves away from the soil,


Initially (K0 state)


Failure (Active state)

v’ 
active earth
pressure decreasing h’
15
SIVA Copyright©2001

Active Earth Pressure


- in granular soils

WJM Rankine
(1820-1872)

[h’]active v’ 

[ h ' ]active  K A v '


Rankine’s coefficient of
1  sin active earth pressure
KA   tan 2 (45   / 2)
1  sin 16
SIVA Copyright©2001

Active Earth Pressure


- in granular soils
 Failure plane is at
45 + /2 to horizontal v’
h’
45 + /2 A

 90+

[h’]active v’ 

17
SIVA Copyright©2001

Active Earth Pressure


- in granular soils

As the wall moves away from the soil,

h’ decreases till failure occurs.

h’ K0 state
v’ z
Active
h’
A state

wall movement

18
SIVA Copyright©2001

Active Earth Pressure


- in cohesive soils

Follow the same steps as


for granular soils. Only
difference is that c  0.

[ h ' ]active  K A v '2c K A

Everything else the same


as for granular soils.
19
SIVA Copyright©2001

Passive Earth Pressure


- in granular soils

Initially, soil is in K0 state.

As the wall moves towards the soil,


v’ remains the same, and
v’
h’ increases till failure occurs.
h’
B
Passive state

20
SIVA Copyright©2001

Passive Earth Pressure


- in granular soils

As the wall moves towards the soil,



Initially (K0 state)
Failure (Active state)

passive earth
pressure

v’ 

increasing h’
21
SIVA Copyright©2001

Passive Earth Pressure


- in granular soils


v’ [h’]passive 

[ h ' ]passive  KP v '


Rankine’s coefficient of
1  sin passive earth pressure
KP   tan 2 (45   / 2)
1  sin 22
SIVA Copyright©2001

Passive Earth Pressure


- in granular soils
 Failure plane is at
45 - /2 to horizontal v’
45 - /2 h’
A

 90+

v’ [h’]passive

23
SIVA Copyright©2001

Passive Earth Pressure


- in granular soils

As the wall moves towards the soil,


h’ increases till failure occurs.

h’ Passive state


v’
h’
B
K0 state

wall movement

24
SIVA Copyright©2001

Passive Earth Pressure


- in cohesive soils

Follow the same steps as


for granular soils. Only
difference is that c  0.

[ h ' ] passive  K P v '2c K P

Everything else the same


as for granular soils.
25
SIVA Copyright©2001

Earth Pressure Distribution


- in granular soils
[h’]active
PA and PP are the
resultant active and
passive thrusts on
the wall

[h’]passive H

PA=0.5 KAH2

h PP=0.5 KPh2

26
KPh KAH
h’
Passive state

Active state
K0 state

Wall movement
(not to scale)
SIVA Copyright©2001

Rankine’s Earth Pressure Theory

[ h ' ]active  K A v '2c K A

[ h ' ] passive  K P v '2c K P

 Assumes smooth wall

 Applicable only on vertical walls

28
SIVA Copyright©2001

Retaining Walls - Applications

Road
Train

29
SIVA Copyright©2001

Retaining Walls - Applications

highway

30
SIVA Copyright©2001

Retaining Walls - Applications

High-rise building

basement wall

31
SIVA Copyright©2001

Gravity Retaining Walls

cement mortar
plain concrete or
stone masonry
cobbles

They rely on their self weight to


support the backfill
32
SIVA Copyright©2001

Cantilever Retaining Walls

Reinforced;
smaller section
than gravity
walls

They act like vertical cantilever,


fixed to the ground 33
SIVA Copyright©2001

Design of Retaining Wall


- in granular soils

2 2
Block no.

3 3
1
1

toe
toe

Wi = weight of block i
Analyse the stability of this rigid body with
xi = horizontal distance of centroid of block i from toe
vertical walls (Rankine theory valid) 34
Safety against sliding along the base
PP  {Wi }. tan 
soil-concrete friction
angle  0.5 – 0.7 
Fsliding 
PA

to be greater
than 1.5

2 2
PA H
3 3 PA
1
PP 1
S h PP
toe S
R
toe
y R
y

PP= 0.5 KPh2 PA= 0.5 KAH2


Safety against overturning about toe
PP h / 3  {Wi xi }
Foverturning 
PA H/3

to be greater
than 2.0

2 2
PA H
3 3 PA
1
PP 1
S h PP
toe S
R
toe
y R
y
SIVA Copyright©2001

Points to Ponder

How does the key help in improving the stability


against sliding?

Shouldn’t we design retaining walls to resist at-rest


(than active) earth pressures since the thrust on the
wall is greater in K0 state (K0 > KA)?

37

You might also like