Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Team Members
DASHBOARD
VARIABLE DESCRIPTION
Data Variables
Yearwise Year
Date
Sum of Actual Sales
Sum of Estimated Sales
Itemwise Year
Date
Item
Sum of Actual Sales
Sum of Estimated Sales
Customerwise Year
Customer Type
Sum of Actual Sales
Sum of Estimated Sales
Regionwise Year
Region
Sum of Actual Sales
Sum of Estimated Sales
SalesRep Year
Rep
Sum of Actual Sales
Sum of Estimated Sales
Doughnut Year
Rep
Sum of Actual Sales
Sum of Estimated Sales
Total Sales Year
Sum of Actual Sales
Sum of Estimated Sales
Category Sales Year
Item
Date
Grand Total
PROBLEM STATEMENT: To find out the difference between actual and estimated sales
and to work upon bridging the gap, especially in those regions where the differences have been
high by using different parameters as a tool.
March-
Ontario- In this region, there is a positive result in sales difference of actual and
estimated units but the result is slightly positive.
Quebec- In this region, there is a positive result in sales difference of actual and
estimated units.
Alberta- There is no sales difference as no selling is being made in this region.
YEAR- 2004
YEAR-2005
YEAR 2007-
YEAR 2008-
Monthly-Wise Sales Difference in year 2008-
January- In this month, 128 actual units are sold out of 195 estimated units, 26 actual units of
items are sold out of 98 estimated units, 131 actual units of pencil is sold out of 193 estimated
units.
February- In this month, 34 actual units of desk is sold out of 99 estimated units, 76 actual units
of Pen are sold out of 89 estimated ones, 42 actual units of pen set is sold out of 83 estimated
units and 137 actual units of Pencil is sold out of 204 estimated units.
March- In this month, 226 actual units of Binder is sold out of 186 estimated units and 24 actual
units of Pencil is sold out of 92 estimated units of Pencil.
Conclusion- Only March has shown positive result in Alberta region.
Region-Wise Sales Difference in Year 2008-
January-
Ontario- The sales difference between actual units and estimated units is below.
Quebec- The sales difference between actual and estimated units is below and huge
difference is there as compare to other two regions.
Alberta- There is no sales difference between actual and estimated units as no selling is
involved.
February-
Ontario- The sales difference between actual and estimated units is below where items
sold actually is less than the estimated ones.
Quebec- The sales difference is low but the overall result is below.
Alberta- The sales difference between actual units and estimated units is below.
March-
Ontario- The sales difference between actual and estimated units is below where items
sold actually is less than the estimated ones.
Quebec- There is no sales difference between actual and estimated units as no selling is
involved.
Alberta- The Sales difference result is positive which means overall items are actually
sold more than estimated units.
Planet performs the best the maximum number of times compared to all the other customers
while enterprise performs the worst the maximum number of times in the consecutive years
2005, 2006 and 2007.
Year 2003 has the highest sales revenue with 501 actual sales generated by Galaxy.
Year 2003
January – Galaxy is the best performer with estimated sales 89 and actual sales 75. Planet
performs the worst. It has estimated sales of 105 while the actual sales were 74.
Enterprise didn’t perform in this year.
February- The best performance was given by planet wherein the estimated sales were
172 and the actual achieved was 159. Enterprise performed the worst with estimated sales
of 213 while actual sales was 107.
March- All the three customers achieved their targets. But Enterprise performed better
than others with estimated sales of 349 and actual sales of 393. The worst was Galaxy
with 275 estimated sales and 288 actual sales.
Also, March is the only month in which all the three customers achieved more than their
targets. Among all, Enterprise was the best.
Year 2005
January – Galaxy is the best performer with estimated sales 373 and actual sales 310.
Planet performs the worst. It has estimated sales of 119 while the actual sales were 32.
February- The best performance was given by Enterprise. Galaxy performed the worst
with estimated sales of 379 and actual sales was 253.
March – planet performed the best while worst performance was given by galaxy.
We can clearly see that January is the worst month as only 32 was achieved out of the estimated
sales of 119.
Year 2003 has been the best year so far as it had two best performers- Morgan and Jones. Also, it
had the less worst performers comparatively. Jones been the best performer sold the maximum in
region Ontario and Quebec. Maximum products sold by him were pens, binders and pencils.
Morgan sold the maximum in the region Quebec. His maximum selling products were pencils
and binders.
Parent was the only worst performer in this year. He sold the least in the region Quebec and his
least selling products were pen and pen set.
According to my analysis, Parent should be shifted from Quebec to some other region so that it is
able to improve its performance.
Talking about item, Parent should be given some other item as well keeping in mind the region
in order to improve his performance.
DONOUGHT INTERPRETATION
Year Maximum number of sales
by
2003 Jones
2004 Kivell
2005 Jardine
2006 Smith
2007 Sorvino
2008 Jones
From the above table we can see that Jones is the only representative that sold the maximum
number of times in two years i.e. 2003 and 2008.
Year 2003
Year 2008
Chart showing item wise list from the year 2003 to 2008
The list of items for each quarter contains binder, pen, pencil, pen set and desk.
Data Layers
In data layer we have different type of data variables like customer type, region, sales
representative, item, we have date of actual sales and estimated sales achieved.
In customer type we have galaxy, planet, enterprise.
In region we have Ontario, Quebec, Alberta.
Same we have various items and respective sales representative.
Analysis layer
Each analysis layers explains about the company performance where we have compared with
various variable with the company actual sales and estimated sales for example like sales
difference according to year wise, region wise, estimated and actual sales according to month
wise, sales representative and customer wise.
Year wise- In this analysis layer we have compared with actual and estimated sales in
reference of year and month wise.
Item wise- In this analysis layer we have compared item wise actual and estimated sales
according to year and month wise.
Customer wise- In this analysis layer we have categorized based on customer type and
comparing with actual and estimated sales according to year wise.
Region wise- In this analysis layer we have differentiated based on region wise and
compared actual and estimated sales.
Sale representative- In this analysis layer we have compared with actual an estimated
Prestation layer
The whole presentation layer combining all analysis layer we are communicating to particular
goal to find where the company is lagging and what all KPIs we need to focus more. We can see
what all faults on various layers and can act accordingly. This is the place where we can see
everything on single screen which makes the analysis simple.
Dashboard
Dashboard is simple and visual representation of data in whole. Here we have all analysis layer
on one roof and which is connected with each slicer.
Year wise- It is connected with year slicer.
Item wise- In this layer it connected to year and month slicer.
Customer wise- In this layer it connected to year and month slicer.
Region wise- In this layer it connected to year and month slicer.
Sale representative- It is connected with year slicer.