UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS Faculty of Pharmacy España, Manila
PHA6123 Laboratory Activity 4
Non-inferiority Trials Instructions: 1. Each group would have an assigned journal to read and work on. These journals will show the students on how a non-inferiority trial works, its difference from a regular randomized control trial and how can one treatment become non-inferior from the usual/innovator treatment. 2. Submit your output on the first hour of the next laboratory period (7 am – 3B Pharmacy, 1 pm – 3H Pharmacy) 3. Format: US Letter, size 12 normal margin, saved as pdf file; File Name and Heading of Email: Group Number, Section, Activity (eg. Group4_3BPharmacy_Activity4.pdf) 4. Submit to my email address: hpmanalili@ust.edu.ph 5. Read the assigned journal, and answer the following questions: (some journals are in their open access format: simply click the link, click download this article, and save directly on your desktop; some are google drive links which can be downloaded immediately). Please cite the location of your answer from the journal for checking (eg. P.3, Methodology); just indicate the heading of your answer if there is no page number in your assigned journal (eg. Methodology). Please cite all the additional reference/s that you have used to answer the more detailed questions. a. What is the objective of the study? b. What are the group/s that are being compared in your study? c. What is the type of study used? Was there randomization done? d. What are the parameters being measured in your study (including endpoints if mentioned)? e. In what way can you say that the test drug/s/procedure is/are non-inferior to the usual/innovator treatment? f. As the only pharmacist in the dermatology clinic, your dermatology consultant ask you to answer the questions based on the journal provided (Look at your Group Number). • Group 1: A 20 year-old Filipino female came in the clinic presenting with 20 tense blisters all over the body. Diagnosis is bullous pemhigoid. The dermatologist is wary of using high-dose prednisolone because of its side effects. Will you recommend doxycycline? Why or why not? • Group 2: A 70 year-old Filipino female who was a former market vendor came in the clinic presenting with a 0.2 cm friable ulcer on the trunk. Diagnosis was low risk superficial basal cell carcinoma. Given her age, would you recommend surgical excision or just topical imiquimod? Justify your answer. • Group 3: A 9 year old female from Papua New Guinea travelled back here in the Philippines. Her mother sought consult to the dermatology clinic because she noticed that her child had some multiple erythematous rubbery plaques on the upper and lower extremities. Clinical diagnosis was to consider yaws. If this were yaws, would you recommend an oral regimen (Azithromycin) or intramuscular one (Benzathine Penicillin G)? • Group 4: A 70 year-old Filipino diabetic female who was a former golfer came in the clinic presenting with a 0.5 cm friable ulcer on the face. Diagnosis was superficial basal cell carcinoma. Given her age, would you recommend photodynamic therapy or just topical imiquimod/fluouracil? Justify your answer. • Group 5: A 40 year old Filipino businesswoman had a 1 year history of recurrent generalized edematous plaques and wheals. Patient was diagnosed by the consultant with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Patient had elevated ASST and APST upon consult. Your consultant is contemplating on using Azathioprine to control the patient’s symptoms. Would you recommend giving Azathioprine? Why or Why not? • Group 6: A 40 year old male had a one year history of multiple erythematous plaques on the trunk and extremities. Diagnosis was chronic plaque psoriasis. Patient had a few episodes of recurrences because he is on a maintenance dose of phototherapy (three times a week) but was not able to go to the clinic because of the lockdown. Would you recommend a home ultraviolet B photherapy instead? Why or why not? • Group 7: A 5 year old male came in to the clinic for follow up. Patient is a clinically diagnosed case of atopic dermatitis presenting as multiple erythematous plaques on the antecubital and popliteal fossa already controlled with clobetasol ointment and oral erythromycin for 1 week. Your consultant would want to start the patient on a pro-active management to lessen the use of a class I steroid such as clobetasol ointment since the lesions are already controlled. Would you recommend using tacrolimus 0.03% ointment of fluticasone 0.005% ointment? Justify your answer. • Group 8: A 40 year old Brazilian who is in the Philippines for a vacation came in to the clinic because of multiple erythematous to violaceous plaques with ulcer on the trunk. Biopsy was done as well as HIV serology which revealed advanced Kaposi sarcoma and a positive western blot confirming HIV, respectively. Laboratory results showed the following results: absolute neutrophil count of 1000 cells per uL, hemoglobin of 9mg/dL, creatine clearance of 60 mL/minute, normal liver function tests and bilirubin. Patient was referred to Oncology for co- management. Among the choices in the journal (etoposide, paclitaxel, bleomycin, vincristine), which one can you recommend together with anti-retroviral treatment (ART)? Justify your answer. Group No. Title of Journal Link 1 Doxycycline versus prednisolone as an https://reader.elsevier.com/r initial treatment strategy for bullous eader/sd/pii/S014067361730 pemphigoid: a pragmatic, non-inferiority, 5603?token=7B91FA84CB8B6 randomized control trial 5D72230B5F34466F45705842 8D5E6505918FE4D9F3929A90 4870CEFF66B850609E594010 03E730C1858 2 Surgical excision versus imiquimod 5% https://reader.elsevier.com/r cream for nodular and superficial basal-cell eader/sd/pii/S147020451370 carcinoma (SINS): a multicentre, non- 5308?token=AA4FE3C99B5C8 inferiority, randomized control trial D5F811AD0DBEDDF04496576 FBD521BF0D35D20138191BD 763988EE113E0029687FBA18 4E7E6DA473778 3 Single-dose azithromycin versus benzathine https://drive.google.com/file/ benzylpenicillin for treatment of yaws in d/1tppJtUWL_bf4uFd96fa1pq children in Papua New Guinea: an open- 4oUSL80pya/view?usp=sharin label, non-inferiority, randomized trial g 4 Photodynamic therapy versus topical https://drive.google.com/file/ imiquimod versus topical fluorouracil for d/1uOl5wbV6CsKlkbNNU8AjC- treatment of superficial basal-cell lHAG0FgFgI/view?usp=sharing carcinoma: a single blind, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial
5 Comparing azathioprine with cyclosporine https://reader.elsevier.com/r
in the treatment of antihistamine refractory eader/sd/pii/S193945511930 chronic spontaneous urticaria: A 3667?token=A1E5CDF0375A7 randomized prospective active-controlled 47D381E369706247B3870F61 non-inferiority study 30248A4BB3E9DB62341F1905 541B15784A37DFD411567927 918B4400F5A 6 Home versus outpatient ultraviolet B https://www.bmj.com/conte phototherapy for mild to severe psoriasis: nt/bmj/338/bmj.b1542.full.p pragmatic multicentre randomized df controlled non-inferiority trial (PLUTO study) 7 Efficacy of tacrolimus 0.03% ointment as https://drive.google.com/file/ second-line treatment for children with d/15J_GNd0XPDxZm8rJPqmbZ moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: kOX8TaDFT2q/view?usp=shari evidence from a randomized, double-blind ng non-inferiority trial vs. fluticasone 0.005% ointment 8 Treatment of advanced AIDS-associated https://reader.elsevier.com/r Kaposi sarcoma in resource-limited settings: eader/sd/pii/S014067361933 a three-arm, open-label, randomized, non- 2222?token=B33906D9F1025 inferiority trial 36D85081ED66E0E9776FA59A DD03E3DA025D4FA549A201A 275F47744AD919BD450208D 0D150847EF718