Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aerofoil Design Parameters PDF
Aerofoil Design Parameters PDF
2280 W. Maple Road easy to use geometry model for axial flow turbine nozzles and rotors is
presented. To uniquely define an airfoil on a cylinder the acrodynami
Walled Lake, Ml 48088 USA
cist need only specify the number of blades, and at each radius of
Member, ASME interest: the axial and tangential chord, throat, 1mcovered turning,
leading and trailing edge radii, inlet and exit blade angles, and inlet
wedge angle. Default values exist for six of these geometric variables,
which proves useful when starting a design. Both the suction and th8
pressure surfaces are described entirely by analytical functions.
Sample airfoils are included that demonstrate the effect of each para
meter upon blade shape.
Introduction
single polynomial blade shapes [ 5 J. clnfortunately.
The creation of turbine blades is not an unsolved these methods either require a lot of data, need
engineering problem. But axial flow turbomachines are additional smoothing, control the camberline instead of
a common component of gas turbine engines, therefore, controlling the surfaces, cannot handle every case, are
the aerodynamicist is always looking for a better way time consuming, or the geometric parameters are hard to
to shape airfoils. Any turbine geometry model must be quant.Lfy. However, the aut110r's experience with
comprehensive, easy to use, and lend itself to the airfoil geometry led to the formulation of a new 1nethod
rapid, interactive computation of blade surface having none of these drawbacks. Presented here is a
velocities. A. literature search uncovered a variety of simplified version of a Rapid Axial �urbine Design
methods for generating individual airfoils including 'llgori thm, RATD, that does not require a cumoersome
wrapping a numerically-defined thickness distribution amount of input, but still has enough degrees of free
around a numberically-defined camberline [ 1], met'iods dom to be universally applicable. To uniquely define
with analytically-defined camber lines and/or an airfoil cascade on a cylinder requires only i;he
analytically-defined thickness distributions [2], the eleven meaningful blade parameters described in Figure
Joukowski transformation [3], inverse methods which 1, and the immediate result is a nozzle or a rotor with
start with the desired surface velocities [4], and analytically defined surfaces.
• AIRFOIL RADIUS
• AXIAL CHORD
• TANGENTIAL CHORD
• UNGUIDED TURNING
• INLET BLADE ANGLE
• INLETWEDGEANGLE
• LEADING EDGE RADIUS
TANGENTIAL • EXITBLADE ANGLE
CHORD
• TRAILING EDGE RADIUS
• NUMBER OF BLADES
• THROAT
A-39153A
NOMENCLATURE
A CROSS SECTIONAL AREA OF THE AIRFOIL Y-COORDINATE OF THE CENTER-OF-GRAVITY OF THE AIRFOIL
!max
MAXIMUM THICKNESS OF THE AIRFOIL SUBSCRIPTS
ABSCISSA in INLET
XO
X-COORDINATE OF THE CENTER OF A CIRCLE out EXIT
2
Downloaded from http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/GT/proceedings-pdf/GT1985/79382/V001T03A058/4456688/v001t03a058-85-gt-219.pdf by guest on 04 August 2020
A -41835
TIP
HUB
MEAN
INLET
I 12-WEDGE
ANGLE
IDEGI flN = 96.04-11.98R t 0.4115R2
RADIUS (cm)
A -41836 A-41052
Figure 2. A Typical RA TD Nozzle and Channel. Figure 4. A Typical Independent Parameter Radial Dependence.
3
Default Values for the Independent Blade Parameters Point No. 4
(Pressure Surface Leading Edge Tangency Point)
Of the 25 ( or more ) unique variables that can be asso
ciated with every airfoil, only eleven are independent Pin - Ein (11)
parameters. Furthermore, only five variables need to RLE • (1 + sinp4 ) (12)
be well known at the start of a design, because default
values can be used for the other six. The axial chord, ct - RLE • cosp4 (13)
for example, must be carefully controlled by the aero
dynamicist during the design of a turbine. But if the Point No. 5
axial chord is initially unknown it can be estimated by (Pressure Surface Trailing Edge Tangency Point)
assuming zero incidence, zero deviation, and reci,_uiring
Figure 5. The Five Key Points and the Five Surface Functions.
Point No. 1
(Suction Surface Trailing Edge Tangency Point, see Appendix B)
Pout - Eout (2) Mathematical Function Selection for the Airfoil Surfaces
ex - RTE • ( 1 +sin P1) (3) In or<ler to complete the airfoil description in the
R0-Z Plane, the five key points must be connected. And
RTE •cosp1 (4) the most natural way to connect them is by five mathe
matical functions. Logical choices for three of these
Point No. 2
(Suction Surface Throat Point)
functions are a leading edge circle, a trailing edge
circle, and a circular arc describing the uncovered
Pout - Eout+r (5) suction surface past the throat. The suction surface
from the leading edge tangency point to the throat, and
ex - R TE+ (o+RTE) • sin p2 (6) the entire pressure surface of the airfoil in Figure 5
2irR/N8 - (o +R TE) • cosp2
are both defined by third order polynomials. A variety
(7)
of mathematical functions were tried instead of the
Point No. 3 cubic, but a cubic is the most straight forward because
(Suction Surface Leading Edge Tangency Point) it provides four simple algebraic equations and four
unknown coefficient8, as shown in Appendix G. At the
Pin+Ein (8) points where they meet, all these functions and their
4
The Impact of Blade Parameters Upon Airfoil Shape
A-41056
A-41046
Figure 6. RATD Axial Turbine Design Flow Chart. Figure 9. Unguided Turn Study.
A 41053
A-41055
Figure 1. Axial Chord Study. Figu(e 70. Inlet 1/2 - Wedge Angle Study.
1n)
�
ct = 18.0 mm (0.709
in)��---
c 1 °15.0mm(0.591")
A-41054
A-41059
5
r10de 1, and the one weakness of this mode 1 is an occa
sional flat spot ( inflection point ) on the suction
surface near the leading edge.
Summary
Appendix A
A-41057
GIVEN: AT x = xl y = YJ
Figure 13. Trailing Edge Radius Study. '
x = x1 y = tan il 1
'
x = •2 y = tan il2
) )
these updates were incorporated in later versions of
the geometry model presented in this paper. However, ., - •2 cosiJ 1
(
180
(
--
it is possible to create unacceptable airfoils with any Y2 =
YJ + --- ' • In
il1 - il 2 1f cos
il 2
LINKS TO FLOW PROGRAM, A BOUNDARY LAYER MODEL, AND A LOSS MODEL '
,
'
'
- INTERACTIVE ON THE TEKTRONIX CRT '
'
'
- ROTATE AIRFOIL '
'
'
- STACK ON CG, LEADING EDGE, TRAILING EDGE, OR WITH COMPOUND LEAN '
'
'
- MIRROR IMAGE ' ,
- CUT FLAT SECTIONS ' ,
'
' \
- CREATE INSPECTION SHEET ' I
,,
- CREATE FINITE-ELEMENT INPUT FILE
6
A�pendix B Appendix D
Given the center of a circle, its radius, and the slope The mechanical properties of an airfoil can be deter
of a tangent line, what are the x,y coordinates of the mined by dividing that airfoil into triangular pieces.
tangency point? See Figure 15. NOTE: If the slope of Thus, given the vertices of a triangle, find its area
the tangent line is negative ( or positive ) then so is and its center-of-gravity. See Figure 17.
beta.
)
GIVEN: (x0 , y0), R, f3
1 y
X = XO - R sin {3
=
Yo + R cos{3
(x1 , v1l
A-41050
A-41048
Figure 11. The Mechanical Properties of a Triangle.
Figure 15. Leading Edge and Trailing Edge Tangency Points.
Appendix E
Appendix C
For reference, the dependent parameters defined by
tan·1 (18)
A L ai
(:: ) (19)
2 ct2
c
Jc x
+ (20)
(xl , Yt)
--��------ 47TR cosf3out
\_ ......... sin ({3in - f3outl (21)
GIVEN: AT X =
Xt Y = Yt
-......................... ',,
l/Jz
ex NB
• ·---
cosf3 in
c/s (22)
',� � �
a
AT X =
Xt y' =
tan{31 '
'
AT
AT
x = x2
x = x2
Y
y'
=
=
Y2
tan{3 2
' ,, ,
'
'
' Xcg =
L xi ai
(23)
2
'
A
a + bx + cx + d x3
'
Y
=
'
'
ai
'
' \
'
L Yi
'
'
\
\ Ycg = (24)
tan i3 1 + tan i3 2 ' \ A
THEN: ' \
d = 2
' '
lx1 - x2)
' ' 2RLE
,_,
/\·In = • 100 (25)
IYt - Y2) s • cosf3in
c 2
= lx1 - x2)
(27)
A-41049 (28)
Figure 16. A Cubic Determined From Two Points and Two Slopes. (29)
7
Appendix F
PROGRAM RATO
C ••• RAPID AXIAL TURBINE DESIGN PROGRAM. WRITTEN JANUARY OF 1984 BY LJ�
c •••INPUT FILE = 25, OUTPUT FILE = 16. SOME DEBUG WRITES COM"ENTEO our.
8
c ••• THE THIRD ORDER POLTNOl'llll CALL FOR SUCTl�N l!IU �RESSURE SURFACE
26 CALL CU BIC< X2.Y2,8ETA2.x3,Y3,8ETA3.AS•'BSH�S"oDSJ
CALL CUBIC(X4,Y4,BETA4,X5,Y5,8ETA5tAP,BPtCPoDP>
3 FOR·"AT<•l•>
C ••• THTS IS THE SUCTION AND PRESSURE SURFACE D£FlllfITION I 50 P O I NT S P1:R SIDE
XSCl >=XS
YS<ll=YB
XP<t>=X8
TP<I>=Y8
DXP=<K4-X8>19.
9
+!TAN!BIN•P il18D.>-TAN!BOUT• PI,180. I>
WRI TEl16.151 R .cx. c r.uGT.BIN. WEDGIN.RLE.BOUT.RT E .THROA T.ARE•. xc•
+,TCG
15 FORHAT!•o•.t5FB.4>
c 31 llRt TE< 16,2 I x O,TO ,R o,x1 ,Y1 ,BETA!.x2. T2,BETA2,1ChT3, BETA:lwX4ttt
c +tBETA4.x5,T5,BETA51X6,Y6,X11T71X8.T81X91T9.AS.BS.cs.os.AP.BP.cP.DP
WRITEl16•12>
12 FORHA T<•ON UHBER S UCT IO N PRESSURE•t/t
+• )( T )(
DO 13 I::lt50
13 WRITE <16,1�> I1XS IJ>.T S !I l ,XP C I >,T P !J)
10
CALL NUHBER<999. ,999.,.07,R,0.,31
CALL SYHBOL<G.Q,9.4,.07,3HCX=o0.,31
CALL NUHBER!399 •• 9 39 .,.0 1, c x , o .,31
CALL SYHBOL!6.0,9.3,.07,3HCT=,O.,JJ
CALL N UHBER < 999 . ,999 ••• 01.cr,o • • 3J
CAL L SYMBOL<6.0,9.2,.07,�HUGT:,Q, ,4J
CALL NUH BE R<9 99,,999 .,. 01. uG T , a •• 21
CALL STMBDL!6.o,9.t,.07,8HBETA TN=,o.,8)
CALL NUHBE R< 9 99••999••• 01,srN.o •• 11
CALL SYM80L(6.0,9 .o,.01.t4HHALF WEDGE IN=.a • • 1�1
11
Appendix G
TITLE
--- ·------------ ________ ___,
REFERENCE TURBINE AIRFOIL
- --- --- - - ------ ---- ----- ·----'
FACTOR ITRIG 1 51. 4. 3
5.500 1.102 0.591 0.0 6.50 35.0 9.00 0.0310 -57.0 0.0160
TITLE Up to 54 characters
N Number of airfoils to be generated
NB Number of blades (real)
FACTOR Plot scale factor
ITRIG Plot trigger (1;1 blade, 2;2 blades, 3;2 blades + channel,
4; C.G. stack)
R Radius of airfoil design cylinder
ex Axial chord (If CX ; 0.0, iJ; z is set to 0.8)
RLE Leading edge radius (II RLE ;;;., 2.0, RLE is inlet percent blockage) ,,,,
SE OUT•J.31.
21.2
BOUT Exit blade angle 1514
17K
.2.so
RTE Trailing edge radius (II RTE > 2.0, RTE is exit percent blockage) 0.111
•1 ·••.S
45
T 6
lllLET BLOCK•ll .17.
ALL DATA IS FREE FORMAT. EXU BLOCJ;•l.U
CA1'18ER AN•LE•l1.0
llfT COEFF•1.H
AN UNLIMITED NUMBER OF SECTIONS CAN BE INPUT. 4X_.S17E
12•37•40
ALL ANGLES ARE IN DEGREES, AND IF THE SLOPE IS POSITIVE (OR 27 AU; 14
A-41856.1
A-41105
Figure 18. RA TD User's Guide. Figure 19. Test Case Input and Output.
[3 ] Spiegel, M. , Gomplex Variables, McGraw-Hill, [ 7] Katsanis, T., "Fortran Program for Calculating
New York, 1964, p 224. Transonic Velocities on on a Blade-to-Blade Stream
Surface of a Turbomachine," NASA TN D-5427, 1969.
[ 4] Meauze, G., "An Inverse Time Marching Method for
the Definition of Cascade Geometry," ASME 81- [s] Horlock, J. H., Axial li'low Turbines, Krieger fub
GT-167. lishing Company, Huntington, New York, 1973.
12