Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Coefficients
Least Squares Standard T
Parameter Estimate Error Statistic P-Value
Intercept 117.177 20.0618 5.84081 0.0004
Slope -0.22844 0.108494 -2.10556 0.0683
Analysis of Variance
Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value
Model 2494.56 1 2494.56 4.43 0.0683
Residual 4501.44 8 562.679
Total (Corr.) 6996.0 9
So we have a two-tailed test. The value of t statistic is t=-2.105. We have to compare this value with the
critical values, which, in this case are ±tα/2;(n-2)= ±t0.025;8=±2.306.
Since the value of t-statistic is between the critical values then we cannot reject the null hypothesis (SEE
THE GRAPHS BELOW), meaning that the price do not have an effect on the quantity sold (which is odd
from the economic point of view).
In general, if the price increases then the quantity sold will decrease. It’s that so?
H0: B1=0
H1: B1<0
Now, in this case we have an one-tailed test to the left. The critical value is -tα;(n-2)=-t0.05;8=-1.860.
Since the value of the t-statistic is less than the critical one, we can reject the null hypothesis (SEE THE
GRAPHS BELOW), so the price has a negative impact on the quantity sold, with 95% confidence.
So, here is the strange thing. We don’t have a relationship (see the two tailed test), but we have also a
negative impact of the price on the quantity (see the one tailed test). So where is the mistake?
In fact, the mistake is in the way of thinking, in the way we state the hypothesis, and this way has to be
connected with the economic.
Acceptance
zone
-t-statistic +t-statistic
One-tailed test (right)
Rejection zone
Acceptance
zone
+t-statistic
Rejection zone
Acceptance
zone
-t-statistic
As we know, p-value is the smallest significance level at which the null hypothesis is rejected and it is not
connected with the level of significance in any way (do not depend on alpha which is always arbitrarily
chosen).