Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Magnet Division
Superconductivity
(A brief and limited overview)
Ramesh Gupta
Superconducting Magnet Division
Brookhaven National Laboratory
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 1 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Basic Superconductivity
Superconducting
Magnet Division
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 2 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Superconductivity
Superconducting
Magnet Division
Resistivity of Cu as a function First observation of “Superconductivity” by Onnes (1911)
of Temperature Resistance of Mercury falls suddenly below
measurement accuracy at very low temperature
Resistance (Ohms)
High purity copper has larger RRR
RRR=ρ(273K)/ρ(~4K)
Temperature (K)
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 3 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Superconducting Accelerator Magnets
Superconducting A Brief History
Magnet Division
1908 Heinke Kemerlingh Onnes achieves very low temperature (<4.2 K)
1911 Onnes and Holst observe sudden drop in resistivity to essentially zero
Superconductivity is born !
1914 Persistent current experiments
1933 Meissner-Ochsenfeld effect observed
1935 Fritz and London theory
1950 Ginsburg - Landau theory
1957 BCS Theory
1967 Observation of Flux Tubes in Type II superconductors
1980 Tevatron: The first accelerator using superconducting magnets
1986 First observation of High Temperature Superconductors
It took ~70 years to get the first accelerator with conventional superconductors.
How long will it take for HTS to get to accelerator magnets? Have patience!
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 4 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Critical Surface of Nb-Ti
Superconducting
Magnet Division
Critical Surface
The surface on 3-d (J,T,B) volume within which the material remains superconducting.
In a magnet, the
operating point must
stay within this
volume with a suitable
safety margin!
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 5 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Meissner Effect
Superconducting
Magnet Division
A remarkable observation in superconductors:
They exclude magnet flux lines from going through them.
Meissner and Ochsenfeld (1933)
Courtesy: Schmuser
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 6 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Type I and Type II Superconductors
Superconducting
Magnet Division
Normal phase
Courtesy: Schmuser
Type I:
Type II:
Also known as
Also known as “hard superconductors”.
“soft superconductors”.
Completely exclude flux lines up to Bc1
Completely exclude flux lines
but then part of the flux enters till Bc2
(Meissner Effect).
•Important plus: Allow much higher fields.
Allow only small field (<< 1 T).
•These are the one that are used in
Not good for accelerator magnets. building accelerator magnets.
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 7 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Critical Surface of
Superconducting Type I Superconductors
Magnet Division
0.9
Critical Field Bc (T)
Type I
0.6 superconductors
are obviously
NOT suitable for
high field magnet
applications.
0.3
0.0
Bc2 vs. Tc
A Reasonable
Assumption
for Nb-Ti:
3 T increase in
Bc between
4.2 K and 1.8 K
Courtesy:
P. Lee (U Of W-M)
All present superconducting accelerators operate at ~4.5 K and use Nb-Ti.
LHC magnets will operate at ~1.8 K, to generate higher fields, while still using Nb-Ti.
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 10 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Critical Current Density
Superconducting as a Function of Field
Magnet Division
10000
Performance of 0.8 mm dia wire
As of year 2000
BSCCO2212 (4.2K)
Jc(A/mm2)
Nb3Sn (4.2K)
1000
100
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
B(T)
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 11 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Low Temperature Superconductors
Superconducting (LTS) for Accelerator Magnets
Magnet Division
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 12 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Type I and Type II Superconductors
Superconducting London Penetration Depth and Coherence Length
Magnet Division
Ginzburg-Landau Parameter
κ = λL/ξ
Courtesy: Schmuser
• “London Penetration Depth” tells how field falls or the depth to which field may penetrate
• “Coherence Length” tells how Cooper pair density increases (indicates the range of
interaction between Cooper pairs) Note: Pure Niobium (Nb) is type II superconductor
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 13 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Current Transport in
Superconducting Bulk Superconductors
Magnet Division
Courtesy: Schmuser
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 15 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Difference Between the Superconductor
Requirements for Superconducting Magnets and
Superconducting Superconducting RF Cavities for Particle Accelerators
Magnet Division
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 16 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Flux Jumping
Superconducting
Magnet Division
Initially, when the field is raised, large screening currents are generated to oppose the
changes. These current densities may be much larger than Jc (critical current density
till which material remains superconducting) A current higher than Jc will create
Joule heating. However, these large currents soon die and attenuate to Jc, which
persists.
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 17 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Instability from Flux Jumping
Superconducting
Magnet Division
Courtesy: Wilson
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 19 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Persistent Current-induced Harmonics
Superconducting in High Field (Nb3Sn Magnets)
Magnet Division
Snap back
Either reduce the effective filament diameter or come up with a magnetic design
that minimizes the effect of magnetization in the magnets (LBL, FNAL, TAMU).
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 21 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Manufacturing of Nb-Ti Wires
Superconducting
Magnet Division
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 22 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Superconducting
A Typical Superconducting Cable
Magnet Division
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 23 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Stability of Superconducting Wire
Superconducting (Wire is Made of Many Filaments)
Magnet Division
Courtesy: Wilson
Magnetization :
Coupling of filaments (in changing field) is undesirable
4 because it increases effective radius.
M= Jc a
3π This brings back flux jump instability and magnetization.
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 24 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Superconducting
Twisting: The Key to Stability
Magnet Division
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 25 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Superconducting
Cable Measurement Set-up at BNL
Magnet Division
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 26 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Superconducting
Nb3Sn Cable in Cu- Channel
Magnet Division
40
20 V ∝ (I/Ic)n
LOCALLY DAMAGED CABLE.
Vs (µV)
10 n-value:
A good indicator of
the quality of cable.
0
A lower “n-value” means
a slow transition from
superconducting to
-10
SMOOTH CABLE normal phase, which
generally indicates some
sort of damage in the
-20
2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
cable.
Is (A)
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 27 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Conventional Low Temperature Superconductors (LTS)
Superconducting and New High Temperature Superconductors (HTS)
Magnet Division
Low Temperature Superconductor Onnes (1911)
Resistance of Mercury falls suddenly below
meas. accuracy at very low (4.2) temperature
New materials (ceramics) loose their resistance
at NOT so low temperature (Liquid Nitrogen)!
High Temperature Superconductors (HTS)
Resistance (Ohms)
Temperature (K)
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 28 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Popular HTS Materials of Today
Superconducting
Magnet Division
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 29 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Some Remarkable Properties of HTS
Superconducting (High Temperature Superconductors)
Magnet Division
HTS retains their
superconductivity to a
much higher temperature
R vs. T
HTS
ASC
now carry significantly higher current over 2.2 Field Perpendicular 64K
70K
64K
Nb3Sn (4.2K)
2.2 Field Parallel 70K
77K
1000
100 0.6
0.4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.2
B(T) 0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2
Parallel Magnetic Field (Tesla)
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 31 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
High Field Superconductors
Superconducting
Magnet Division
One has to be very careful in winding coils with these brittle material
or use an alternate design to minimize the damage on conductors.
One can also wind the coil before they become brittle (& superconducting) and
react the material after winding to make them superconductor.
This is referred to as “Wind and React” technique and it requires everything in the
coil to go through the high temperature (650 C or more) reaction process. One has
to be careful in choosing material, etc.
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 32 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL
Why Use Superconducting
Superconducting Magnets in Accelerators?
Magnet Division
Performance advantage
In interaction regions, a few high field and
high field quality magnets may significantly
enhance the luminosity of the machine. In
Courtesy: Martin Wilson this case magnet costs may be large but the
overall returns to experimentalists are high.
January 16-20, 2006, Superconducting Accelerator Magnets Slide No. 33 of Lecture 2 (Superconductivity) Ramesh Gupta, BNL