1.

calculate the performance under certain set standard

Category Z value
Outperformer O 1.28 to 3
Above Expectation AE 0.525 to 1.28
Meet Expectation ME -0.525 to 0.525
Below Expectation BE -1.28 to -0.525
Unsatisfactory U -3 to -1.28

Bell curve : 1. Professional knowledge and application

Rating Scores
Executives 𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ (𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ )2 Z values Gradings
(x)
E1 8 0.9 0.81 0.5205802 AE
E2 7 -0.1 0.01 -0.057842 ME
E3 7 -0.1 0.01 -0.057842 ME
E4 6 -1.1 1.21 -0.636265 BE
E5 6 -1.1 1.21 -0.636265 BE
E6 10 2.9 8.41 1.677425 O
E7 6 -1.1 1.21 -0.636265 BE
E8 10 2.9 8.41 1.677425 O
E9 5 -2.1 4.41 -1.214687 AE
E10 6 -1.1 1.21 -0.636265 BE
Total 71 26.9
Average 7.1
SD 1.7288403

Number of
Criteria Executive Code
Executive
Outperformer E6, E8 2
Above Expectation E9, E1 2
Meet Expectation E2, E3 2
Below Expectation E4, E5, E7, E10 4
Unsatisfactory - 0

The interpretation from the above bell curve clearly indicates that executive E6 and E8
are outperformer in the "Professional Khowledge and Application" attribute.

Officers E9 and E1 have performed above expectation while E2 and E3 meet expectation .
Officers E4, E5, E7 and E10 are Below Expectation
1. calculate the performance under certain set standard
Category Z value
Outperformer O 1.28 to 3
Above Expectation AE 0.525 to 1.28
Meet Expectation ME -0.525 to 0.525
Below Expectation BE -1.28 to -0.525
Unsatisfactory U -3 to -1.28

Bell curve : 2. Capacity to Achive results

Executives Rating Scores (x) 𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ (𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ )2 Z values Gradings
E1 7 0.5 0.25 0.2300895 ME
E2 6 -0.5 0.25 -0.230089 ME
E3 8 1.5 2.25 0.6902685 AE
E4 5 -1.5 2.25 -0.690268 BE
E5 5 -1.5 2.25 -0.690268 BE
E6 10 3.5 12.25 1.6106265 O
E7 4 -2.5 6.25 -1.150447 BE
E8 10 3.5 12.25 1.6106265 O
E9 5 -1.5 2.25 -0.690268 BE
E10 5 -1.5 2.25 -0.690268 BE
Total 65 42.5
Average 6.5
SD 2.1730675

Number of
Criteria Executive Code
Executive
Outperformer E6, E8 2
Above Expectation E3 1
Meet Expectation E1, E2 2
Below Expectation E4, E5, E7, E9, E10 5
Unsatisfactory - 0

The interpretation from the above bell curve clearly indicates that executive E6 and E8 are
outperformer in the "Capacity to Achive results" attribute.

Officer E3 have performed above expectation while E1 and E2 meet expectation. Officers
E4, E5, E7, E9 and E10 are Below Expectation
1. calculate the performance under certain set standard
Category Z value
Outperformer O 1.28 to 3
Above Expectation AE 0.525 to 1.28
Meet Expectation ME -0.525 to 0.525
Below Expectation BE -1.28 to -0.525
Unsatisfactory U -3 to -1.28

Bell curve : 3. Dependability

Executives Rating Scores (x) 𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ (𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ )2 Z values Gradings
E1 7 0.8 0.64 0.4140393 ME
E2 5 -1.2 1.44 -0.621059 BE
E3 6 -0.2 0.04 -0.10351 ME
E4 5 -1.2 1.44 -0.621059 BE
E5 6 -0.2 0.04 -0.10351 ME
E6 10 3.8 14.44 1.9666868 O
E7 5 -1.2 1.44 -0.621059 BE
E8 9 2.8 7.84 1.4491377 O
E9 4 -2.2 4.84 -1.138608 BE
E10 5 -1.2 1.44 -0.621059 BE
Total 62 33.6
Average 6.2
SD 1.9321836

Number of
Criteria Executive Code
Executive
Outperformer E6, E8 2
Above Expectation - 0
Meet Expectation E1, E3 and E5 3
Below Expectation E2, E4, E7, E9 and E10 5
Unsatisfactory - 0

The interpretation from the above bell curve clearly indicates that executive E6 and E8 are
outperformer in the "Dependability" attribute.

Officers E1, E3 and E5 meet expectation while Officers E2, E4, E7, E9 and E10 are Below Expectation
1. calculate the performance under certain set standard
Category Z value
Outperformer O 1.28 to 3
Above Expectation AE 0.525 to 1.28
Meet Expectation ME -0.525 to 0.525
Below Expectation BE -1.28 to -0.525
Unsatisfactory U -3 to -1.28

Bell curve : 4. Personality

Supplier 𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ (𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ )2 Z values Gradings
Rating Scores (x)
E1 6 -0.4 0.16 -0.225176 ME
E2 6 -0.4 0.16 -0.225176 ME
E3 7 0.6 0.36 0.337764 ME
E4 5 -1.4 1.96 -0.788116 BE
E5 5 -1.4 1.96 -0.788116 BE
E6 10 3.6 12.96 2.0265839 O
E7 6 -0.4 0.16 -0.225176 ME
E8 9 2.6 6.76 1.4636439 O
E9 5 -1.4 1.96 -0.788116 BE
E10 5 -1.4 1.96 -0.788116 BE
Total 64 28.4
Average 6.4
SD 1.7763883

Number of
Criteria Executive Code
Executive
Outperformer E6, E8 2
Above Expectation - 0
Meet Expectation E1, E2, E3 and E7 4
Below Expectation E4, E5, E9 and E10 4
Unsatisfactory - 0

The interpretation from the above bell curve clearly indicates that executive E6 and E8 are
outperformer in the "Personality" attribute.

Officers E1, E2, E3 and E7 Meet Expectation while Officers E4, E5, E9 and E10 are Below
Expectation
1. calculate the performance under certain set standard
Category Z value
Outperformer O 1.28 to 3
Above Expectation AE 0.525 to 1.28
Meet Expectation ME -0.525 to 0.525
Below Expectation BE -1.28 to -0.525
Unsatisfactory U -3 to -1.28

Bell curve : 5. Communication Skills

Supplier 𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ (𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ )2 Z values Gradings
Rating Scores (x)
E1 6 -0.6 0.36 -0.380319 ME
E2 5 -1.6 2.56 -1.014185 BE
E3 5 -1.6 2.56 -1.014185 BE
E4 7 0.4 0.16 0.2535463 ME
E5 6 -0.6 0.36 -0.380319 ME
E6 10 3.4 11.56 2.1551433 O
E7 5 -1.6 2.56 -1.014185 BE
E8 8 1.4 1.96 0.887412 AE
E9 7 0.4 0.16 0.2535463 ME
E10 7 0.4 0.16 0.2535463 ME
Total 66 22.4
Average 6.6
SD 1.5776213

Number of
Criteria Executive Code
Executive
Outperformer E6 1
Above Expectation E8 1
Meet Expectation E1, E4, E5, E9 and E10 5
Below Expectation E2, E3 and E7 3
Unsatisfactory - 0

The interpretation from the above bell curve clearly indicates that executive E6 is outperformer
in the "Communication Skills" attribute.

Officers E8 have performed above expectation while E1, E4, E5, E9 and E10 meet expectation .
Officers E2, E3 and E7 are Below Expectation
1. calculate the performance under certain set standard
Category Z value
Outperformer O 1.28 to 3
Above Expectation AE 0.525 to 1.28
Meet Expectation ME -0.525 to 0.525
Below Expectation BE -1.28 to -0.525
Unsatisfactory U -3 to -1.28

Bell curve : 6. Planning and organization abality

Supplier 𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ (𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ )2 Z values Gradings
Rating Scores (x)
E1 8 0.9 0.81 0.5642168 AE
E2 7 -0.1 0.01 -0.062691 ME
E3 8 0.9 0.81 0.5642168 AE
E4 5 -2.1 4.41 -1.316506 U
E5 8 0.9 0.81 0.5642168 AE
E6 9 1.9 3.61 1.1911244 AE
E7 7 -0.1 0.01 -0.062691 ME
E8 9 1.9 3.61 1.1911244 AE
E9 5 -2.1 4.41 -1.316506 U
E10 5 -2.1 4.41 -1.316506 U
Total 71 22.9
Average 7.1
SD 1.5951315

Number of
Criteria Executive Code
Executive
Outperformer - 0
Above Expectation E1, E3, E5, E6 and E8 5
Meet Expectation E2, E7 2
Below Expectation - 0
Unsatisfactory E3, E9 and E10 3

The interpretation from the above bell curve clearly indicates that executive E1, E3, E5, E6 and
E8 are Above Expectation in the "Planning and Organization Abality" attribute.

Officers E2 and E7 have performed meet expectation . While Officers E3, E9, E10 are
Unsatisfactory
1. calculate the performance under certain set standard
Category Z value
Outperformer O 1.28 to 3
Above Expectation AE 0.525 to 1.28
Meet Expectation ME -0.525 to 0.525
Below Expectation BE -1.28 to -0.525
Unsatisfactory U -3 to -1.28

Bell curve : 7. Judgement and Decision Making

Supplier 𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ (𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ )2 Z values Gradings
Rating Scores (x)
E1 7 -0.1 0.01 -0.057842 ME
E2 7 -0.1 0.01 -0.057842 ME
E3 8 0.9 0.81 0.5205802 ME
E4 6 -1.1 1.21 -0.636265 BE
E5 6 -1.1 1.21 -0.636265 BE
E6 10 2.9 8.41 1.677425 O
E7 6 -1.1 1.21 -0.636265 BE
E8 10 2.9 8.41 1.677425 O
E9 5 -2.1 4.41 -1.214687 BE
E10 6 -1.1 1.21 -0.636265 BE
Total 71 26.9
Average 7.1
SD 1.7288403

Number of
Criteria Executive Code
Executive
Outperformer E6, E8 2
Above Expectation - 0
Meet Expectation E1, E2 and E3 3
Below Expectation E4, E5, E7, E9 and E10 5
Unsatisfactory - 0

The interpretation from the above bell curve clearly indicates that executive E6 and E8 are
outperformer in the "Judgement and Decision Making" attribute.

Officers E1, E2 and E3 meet expectation while Officers E4, E5, E7, E9 and E10 are Below
Expectation
1. calculate the performance under certain set standard
Category Z value
Outperformer O 1.28 to 3
Above Expectation AE 0.525 to 1.28
Meet Expectation ME -0.525 to 0.525
Below Expectation BE -1.28 to -0.525
Unsatisfactory U -3 to -1.28

Bell curve : 8. Cooperation and Team Spirit

Supplier Rating Scores (x) 𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ (𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ )2 Z values Gradings
E1 8 1.3 1.69 0.8698945 AE
E2 6 -0.7 0.49 -0.468405 ME
E3 7 0.3 0.09 0.2007449 ME
E4 6 -0.7 0.49 -0.468405 ME
E5 6 -0.7 0.49 -0.468405 ME
E6 9 2.3 5.29 1.5390441 O
E7 6 -0.7 0.49 -0.468405 ME
E8 9 2.3 5.29 1.5390441 O
E9 5 -1.7 2.89 -1.137554 BE
E10 5 -1.7 2.89 -1.137554 BE
Total 67 20.10
Average 6.7
SD 1.4944341

Number of
Criteria Executive Code
Executive
Outperformer E6, E8 2
Above Expectation E1 1
Meet Expectation E2, E3, E4, E5 and E7 5
Below Expectation E9 and E10 2
Unsatisfactory - 0

The interpretation from the above bell curve clearly indicates that executive E6 and E8 are
outperformer in the "Cooperation and Team Spirit" attribute.

Officer E1 have performed above expectation while E2, E3, E4, E5 and E7 meet expectation .
Officers E9 and E10 are Below Expectation
1. calculate the performance under certain set standard
Category Z value
Outperformer O 1.28 to 3
Above Expectation AE 0.525 to 1.28
Meet Expectation ME -0.525 to 0.525
Below Expectation BE -1.28 to -0.525
Unsatisfactory U -3 to -1.28

Bell curve : 9. Adaptability

Supplier 𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ (𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ )2 Z values Gradings
Rating Scores (x)
E1 7 0.3 0.09 0.1541222 ME
E2 7 0.3 0.09 0.1541222 ME
E3 9 2.3 5.29 1.1816039 AE
E4 5 -1.7 2.89 -0.873359 BE
E5 7 0.3 0.09 0.1541222 ME
E6 9 2.3 5.29 1.1816039 AE
E7 6 -0.7 0.49 -0.359619 ME
E8 9 2.3 5.29 1.1816039 AE
E9 4 -2.7 7.29 -1.3871 U
E10 4 -2.7 7.29 -1.3871 U
Total 67 34.1
Average 6.7
SD 1.9465068

Number of
Criteria Executive Code
Executive
Outperformer - 0
Above Expectation E3, E6 and E8 3
Meet Expectation E1, E2, E5 and E7 4
Below Expectation E4 1
Unsatisfactory E9 and E10 2

The interpretation from the above bell curve clearly indicates that executive E3, E6 and E8
are performed Above Expectation in the "Adaptability" attribute.

Officers E1, E2, E5 and E7 have performed Meet expectation while E4 Below expectation .
Officers E9 and E10 are Unsatisfactory
1. calculate the performance under certain set standard
Category Z value
Outperformer O 1.28 to 3
Above Expectation AE 0.525 to 1.28
Meet Expectation ME -0.525 to 0.525
Below Expectation BE -1.28 to -0.525
Unsatisfactory U -3 to -1.28

Bell curve : 10. Leadership

Supplier 𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ (𝑥 − 𝑥ҧ )2 Z values Gradings
Rating Scores (x)
E1 9 1.4 1.96 1.1927199 AE
E2 8 0.4 0.16 0.3407771 ME
E3 7 -0.6 0.36 -0.511166 ME
E4 7 -0.6 0.36 -0.511166 ME
E5 8 0.4 0.16 0.3407771 ME
E6 9 1.4 1.96 1.1927199 AE
E7 7 -0.6 0.36 -0.511166 ME
E8 9 1.4 1.96 1.1927199 AE
E9 6 -1.6 2.56 -1.363108 U
E10 6 -1.6 2.56 -1.363108 U
Total 76 12.4
Average 7.6
SD 1.1737878

Number of
Criteria Executive Code
Executive
Outperformer - 0
Above Expectation E1, E6 and E8 3
Meet Expectation E2, E3, E4, E5 and E7 5
Below Expectation - 0
Unsatisfactory E9 and E10 2

The interpretation from the above bell curve clearly indicates that executive E1, E6 and E8 are
performed Above Expecttion in the "Leadership" attribute.

Officers E2, E3, E4, E5 and E7 have performed Meet expectation while E9 and E10
Unsatisfactory