Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The design of generation plant does affect its time response and the extent that it can con-
tribute to the regulation demands of the power system. Load following capabilities reflect in
the main the thermal mass of the central plant elements. Thus coal stations with large boilers
can take many hours to reach full output from cold. In contrast, gas turbines can reach rated
power in minutes and combined cycle plants lie somewhere between coal fired and direct gas
fired plant. Innovations in plant design aimed at improving conversion efficiency can have
the effect of reducing flexibility. This important issue is discussed in detail in Reference
[1].
Although the term nuclear power formally covers both fission and fusion, fusion power is
still decades away and may never be technologically viable or cost effective, and it certainly
cannot be regarded as conventional. Nevertheless, considerable international research
has been and continues to be directed towards this technology, in particular through the
recently agreed ITER consortium. In contrast fission based reactors have been generating a
significant proportion of electricity worldwide. It remains a controversial technology due to
the dangers of radiation and the challenge of radioactive waste disposal. A number of differ-
ent technologies have been developed including boiling water reactors and gas cooled
reactors.
Such plant sustain a fission chain reaction within a controlled environment. Fission takes
place in the reactor core which is normally contained within a pressure vessel safety shield.
Moderators, usually graphite or water, slow down the neutrons and help regulate the chain
reaction. Control rods are inserted into the core to regulate the nuclear reaction; these are
made of a material such as boron which absorbs neutrons. The core also comprises fuel rods
of fissile material. A coolant, normally water or gas, passes through the reactor. It then passes
to the boiler where steam is raised. Electrical generation is provided by steam turbines and
in this regard nuclear power stations are similar to large coal fired stations; it is simply the
source of heat for raising the steam that is different.
In general nuclear reactors are regarded as inflexible and they normally operate on base
load. The fact that capital and installation costs far outweigh fuel and operational costs is
further motivation for operating such plant as continuously as possible. Load factors are
around 80% but would almost certainly fall if they were used to any extent to load follow,
as advocates of nuclear power in France have claimed is possible. The activity of load fol-
lowing is sometimes confused with the steady reduction of nuclear power station output over
some weeks, which is possible, indeed advisable, if the station is being run down prior to
maintenance.
The storage of water in the reservoir allows generation to be timed to meet the demands
of the power system. Energy storage capacity5 is limited so the aim is usually to generate at
times of high load and so maximize the income generated. Since water availability is limited
and seasonal, complex algorithms making use of rainfall prediction are used to optimize hydro
operation. Some countries, for example Norway and Switzerland, have bountiful hydro
resources and as a result there are times when electricity is so cheap it is almost given away.
This has encouraged the development of industries that require abundant cheap electricity.
Energy intensive processes such as aluminium smelting and silicon production are often
located in countries with plentiful hydro resources for exactly this reason.
Dams are attractive because they can provide a large head (equal to the fall in height of
the water) but whether they can be built depends on the local topography. Rivers are the
natural way in which water loses potential energy and it is possible to extract a proportion
of this by means of so called low head schemes which are usually small scale. It is also pos-
sible to place turbines in a river flow directly with no dams or penstocks,6 extracting only a
very small amount of the predominantly kinetic energy as the river flows by. Such turbines
operate at effectively zero head and the installations are known as run of river schemes.
5
Capacity for a store is the energy that can be stored (i.e. MW h), rather than the rating.
6
A penstock is a sluice or gate used to control the water together with the pipe to take the water to the turbine.
Features of Conventional and Renewable Generation 25
developing countries [2]. The optimal way of integrating this technology in power systems
has been covered in many books and scientific papers published over the last century and
will not be dealt with further here. Reference [3] presents an up to date approach to hydro
scheduling.
• For two months in the summer the flow dropped to very low values, less than 1 m3/s.
• The river flooded (over 20 m3/s for this river) on several occasions.
• The river level tends to rise fairly quickly but this level reduces gradually; i.e. there is a
sharp ‘leading edge’ followed by a slow decay. This is a general characteristic of rivers.
Mean Daily Flow on River Barle (Somerset) Jan - Dec for 1980
35
30
25
Flow m3/s
20
15
10
Figure 2.1 The mean daily flow on the River Barle at Dulverton Somerset in 1980. (Provided by
Robin Cotton for CREST MSc notes, Loughborough University, 1998)
26 Renewable Energy in Power Systems
Small scale hydro schemes show little variability in output from minute to minute, but can
change substantially over hourly or daily cycles due to sudden rainfall. As already mentioned,
the output is also highly sensitive to the time of year.
If a large number of small scale hydro schemes are connected to an integrated electricity
network their influence on the minute to minute operation of the power system would be
negligible due to the statistical smoothing effect due to the aggregation of uncorrelated short
term variations.
Turbine Designs
All hydo systems exploit the potential energy of the water. Engineers use the term head, H,
for the height through which the water is allowed to fall; often in practice this becomes the
net or effective head, reflecting frictional losses. Potential energy is simply mgH where g is
the acceleration due to gravity; for a volume V of water density ρ this is VρgH. The power
in kilowatts associated with a flow rate Q m3/s falling through an effective head of H metres
is thus given by:
P = Qρ gH
Two different approaches to turbine design exist: impulse turbines like the Pelton wheel
extract kinetic energy from the flow through impact on cups mounted on the turbine wheel,
while reaction turbines like Francis and Kaplan designs, which in contrast to impulse turbines,
operate submerged in water. Impulse turbines are suited to high pressure/head and can have
efficiencies around 90%, whereas reaction turbines run faster and are suited to lower heads
and have higher efficiencies. Turbine efficiency is conventionally plotted, as in Figure 2.2,
as a function of the specific speed NS = n (P)H5/4, where P is the output power in kW, H is
the effective head in metres and n is the rotational speed in revolutions per minute (rpm).
The formula for the specific speed can be understood by considering a turbine scaled down
to produce 1 kW of power at a head of 1 m for then its runner will rotate at the specific speed
equal to its speed in rpm, i.e. NS = n.
Figure 2.2 shows example efficiency curves for different turbine types. The speed of the
runner blade relative to the water striking it is critical for the efficiency of the turbine. Propel-
ler type turbines run best when their blade tips move faster than the water. In the case of the
96
94
92
Efficiency, %
90
88
86
84
Francis turbines Kaplan turbines
82
1 - jet Pelton turbines
80
0 76 152 228 304 380 456 532 608 684
Kaplan, the blades should move at twice the water velocity, whereas the skirted Francis is
most efficient when the two speeds are roughly equal. The Pelton theoretically performs best
when its blades are moving at half the water velocity.
Reaction turbines use guide vanes at the rotor inlet to adjust the direction of the inlet flow
and the flow rate in order to vary the shaft power in response to the electrical load. The turbine
runner has a series of vanes whose complicated geometry is designed to extract maximum
power under design conditions. These vanes cannot be moved instantaneously, which has
implications for the power quality achievable from such turbines. For standalone applications
where fast control is essential, electronic control of the loads is used to maintain turbine
speed.
From Figure 2.2 it is clear that efficiency depends critically on specific speed, and this in
turn depends on the effective head. Thus if the effective head varies significantly, the speed
of the rotor needs to be adjusted to maintain high efficiency. Most turbines, however, operate
at a fixed speed and efficiencies may thus vary to some extent.
Small hydro systems can be grid-connected by driving an appropriately sized induction
generator (see Chapter 4) provided that there is sufficient flow control. Flows should be con-
trolled by the guide vanes to limit the output of the generator to the rated value.