Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Written Assignment
Submit a written paper which is 3-4 pages in length (no more than 4-pages), exclusive of the
reference page. Your paper should be double spaced in Times New Roman (or its equivalent)
font which is no greater than 12 points in size. The paper should cite at least three sources in
Please describe the circumstances of the following case study and recommend a course of
action. Explain your approach to the problem, perform relevant calculations and analysis, and
supported.
Case Study:
A manufacturing company is evaluating two options for new equipment to introduce a new
product to its suite of goods. The details for each option are provided below:
Option 1
$65,000 for equipment with useful life of 7 years and no salvage value.
Materials in Year 1 are estimated to be $15,000 but remain constant at $10,000 per
$85,000 for equipment with useful life of 7 years and a $13,000 salvage value
Maintenance costs are expected to be $3,500 per year and increase by 3% in Year 6
Materials in Year 1 are estimated to be $20,000 but remain constant at $15,000 per
Management has turned to its finance and accounting department to perform analyses and
make a recommendation on which option to choose. They have requested that the three main
capital budgeting calculations be done: NPV, IRR, and Payback Period for each option.
For this assignment, compute all required amounts and explain how the computations were
performed. Evaluate the results for each option and explain what the results mean. Based on
Articulate how the calculations were performed, including from where values used in
Evaluate the results computed and explain the meaning of the results, including why
Be sure to use APA formatting in your paper. Purdue University’s Online Writing Lab
(OWL) is a free website that provides excellent information and resources for understanding
and using the APA format and style. The OWL website can be accessed
here:
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_style_introduction.html
This assignment will be assessed using the BUS 5110 Unit 6 Written Assignment rubric.
Introduction
Heisinger & Hoyle (n.d.) state that the required rate of return or the hurdle rate is the
minimum profit an investor will accept for an investment that pays off for a certain level of
risk whereas the cost of capital is the weighted average costs related to debt and equity
utilized in financing long-term investments. They further add that the time value of money
concept states that cash obtained today has more value compared to cash obtained at a
particular instance in the future. According to Accounting Tools (2018), present value
computations inform us of the value of cash flows in the present time’s dollars. The Net
present value (NPV) method sums the present value of all cash inflows and deducts the
present value of all cash outflows associated with a long-term investment. Investments are
acceptable in cases where NPV is greater than or equal to zero, otherwise, the investment is
rejected (Heisinger & Hoyle, n.d.). For a series of cash flows, the Internal Rate of Return
(IRR) is the rate necessary to yield an NPV of zero. When the IRR is more than or is
equivalent to the firm’s required rate of return then the investment is acceptable and vice
versa (Heisinger & Hoyle, n.d.). The payback method estimates the time required to recover
an initial investment and is usually given in years (Heisinger & Hoyle, n.d.). Accounting Rate
of Return (ARR) refers to the percentage rate of return projected on investment as connected
to the initial investment cost. ARR is found by dividing the average income from an asset by
the company's initial investment to yield a ratio or return which is projected over the lifespan
Calculating the ARR: Determine the average annual profit from the investment, which
could comprise of revenue less any annual costs of executing the investment. Then, if the
investment is a fixed asset, deduct any depreciation cost from the annual revenue to arrive at
the average annual profit. Third, divide the average annual profit by the initial cost of the
investment and multiply by 100 to get the percentage return (Murphy, 2020). Below is the
summary of results
Option 1 Option 2
NPV $ (11,482.56) $5,374.57
IRR 6% 9%
Payback Period 5.9834 years 5.906 years
ARR 26.28% 29.17%
Option 1
$65,000 for equipment with useful life of 7 years and no salvage value.
Maintenance costs are expected to be $2,700 per year and increase by 3% in Year 6
onwards
Materials in Year 1 are estimated to be $15,000 but remain constant at $10,000 per
Cash
Flows
(65,000
Purchase Price ) - - - - - - -
Maintenance
Costs - (2,700) (2,700) (2,700) (2,700) (2,700) (2,781) (2,781)
(65,000 (87,700
Net Cash Flows ) ) (9,800) 13,037 35,809 58,514 56,070 53,635
NPV IRR
(11,483) 6%
ARR
This option has an IRR lower than the
Year 0 (65,000)
Year 1 (152,700)
Year 2 (162,500)
Year 3 (149,463)
Year 4 (113,654)
Year 5 (55,140)
Year 6 930
Year 7 54,566
Option 1 has an ARR equal to the company's required rate of return without
considering TVM which indicates the project should be accepted (versus IRR).
Option 2
$85,000 for equipment with useful life of 7 years and a $13,000 salvage value
Maintenance costs are expected to be $3,500 per year and increase by 3% in Year 6
Materials in Year 1 are estimated to be $20,000 but remain constant at $15,000 per
Year
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 7
95,00
- 80,000 0 130,000 140,000 150,000 160,000
Cash
Flows
(85,00
Purchase Price 0) - - - - - - 13,000
Maintenance
Costs - (3,500) (3,500) (3,500) (3,500) (3,500) (3,605) (3,605)
NPV IRR
5,375 9%
Option 2 has an IRR higher than the company's required rate of return, indicating
Year 5 (56,048)
Year 6 5,790
Year 7 88,542
Option 2 has an ARR greater than the company's required rate of return without
considering TVM.
Discussion of Results
Option 2 produced a higher NPV than option 1 and because the NPV is greater than
zero for option 2, the investment will generate a return greater than the company’s required
rate of return of 8 percent. IRR considers the time value of money to evaluate investments
just like NPV. However, the IRR offers surplus information that aids companies assess long-
term investments. If the IRR is higher than or equivalent to the company’s required rate of
return the investment, then the investment is accepted, hence, option 2 with an IRR of 9% is
accepted instead of option 1. ARR is useful for calculating the annual percentage rate of
standing than option 2. ARR however, doesn't put into consideration the time value of money
and it does not consider into account the effect of cash flow timing. Option 2 has a lower
payback period of 5.906 years compared 5.983 years for option 1. This means that option 2 is
in a better standing. However, the payback method has some weaknesses including: It does
not put into consideration the time value of money, the cash inflows beyond the payback
period are not considered as part of the study and lastly, it is not a measure of profitability
therefore is not good for company’s at verge of bankruptcy. In this case both the NPV and
IRR methods can be used as they match the profitability of each investment by putting into
consideration the time value of money for all cash flows associated to the investment.
It is recommended that the company goes for option 2 as all its values are in a better
standing than option one as seen from the results discussion section. The qualitative factors
that may outweigh the quantitative factors in making a decision include strategic importance
to the company, industry leader in innovation, social benefits and new product line on sales
References
http://oer.org/mods/en-boundless/www.boundless.com/accounting/index.html
Accounting Tools. (2018, April 27). The time value of money concept. Retrieved from
https://www.accountingtools.com/articles/the-time-value-of-money-concept.html
https://www.accountingtools.com/articles/2017/5/14/present-value
Heisinger, K., & Hoyle, J. B. (n.d.). Accounting for Managers. Retrieved from
https://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/accounting-for-managers/index.html
Murphy, C.B. (2020, January 28). Accounting Rate of Return – ARR Definition. Retrieved
Walther, L. M. & Skousen, C. J. (2018). Managerial and Cost Accounting. Retrieved from
https://my.uopeople.edu/pluginfile.php/616278/mod_resource/content/3/managerial-
and-cost-accounting-compressed.pdf