Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. INTRODUCTION
Stockbridge-type vibration dampers are widely used to
control wind-induced conductor vibrations (aeolian
vibrations) to safe levels. Conventional Stockbridge-type
dampers are attached to the conductor with bolted clamps
(Fig. 1). They need to be designed with sufficient structural
strength to withstand the clamping forces needed for a firm
and secure grip of the clamp on the conductor. For that
reason, these clamps are usually relatively heavy.
When applied to optical ground wires (OPGW), clamping
forces exerted by bolted clamps may jeopardize proper Fig. 2. Stockbridge-type vibration damper with low mass clamp and
function of the incorporated telecommunication unit because attachment by means of helical factor-formed rods.
optical fibers are sensitive to radial pressure.
A clamp using helical factory-formed rods (Fig. 2)
circumvents any problems due to clamping strains.
Furthermore, such dampers are easy to install as no tools are II. THEORETICAL ANALYSIS
required, and proper installation can easily be inspected from
the ground with binoculars as it suffices to make sure that the Wave impedance analysis as first introduced by [1], later
rods are in place. on refined by [2], was used to model the conductor and its
A side effect is a substantial reduction in clamp mass interaction with the vibration damper attached to it. The
(99 grams for a clamp as per Fig. 2 versus 393 grams for a dynamic properties of the vibration damper were
bolted clamp made of forged aluminium with a steel bolt). characterized by its complex impedance taking into account
To explore the effect of that "low mass" clamp on the its translatory motion transverse to the conductor axis. Clamp
dynamic characteristics of the damper, an analytical approach mass is reflected in the imaginary part of the complex damper
was taken in the first step. In a second step, tests were carried impedance which will increase with increasing clamp mass.
out on a laboratory test span to validate the results obtained For "low clamp mass" dampers compared to conventional
by theoretical analysis. "bolted clamp" dampers, parameter studies predict improved
/ I
. (9
.
lOSm 4m
Fig. 4. Measured coefficients of absorption vs vibration frequency -
OPGWI
comparison Stockbridge-type damper with "low mass" clamp and
conventional bolted clamp, respectively.
In 1 11 111
A
-e,- 015 m/S
,z'b 10
-&-0,175 m/s
by the incoming wave and the outgoing wave reflected at the -Fz Q---50
Q)
0,2 m/s
span end with the damper. The CoA will be 1 for total
rr
somewhere in between. The objective of the design engineer Fig. 6. Imaginary part of damper impedance.
will be to make it as close to 1 as possible.
The CoA was computed using the previously developped REFERENCES
analytical model. Damper impedance for intermediate clamp
velocities was interpolated based on the measured impedance [1] J. S. Tompkins, L. L. Merril, and B. L. Jones, "Quantitative
values. The respective results are shown in Figs. 7 and 8 for Relationships in Conductor Vibration Damping". AIEE Transactions
on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. 75, pt III, pp 879-894, 1956.
the "low clamp mass" damper and for the damper with the [2] P. Hagedorn, "On the Computation of Damped Wind-Excited
clamp mass of the equivalent conventional bolted clamp. Vibrations of Overhead Transmission Lines". J. of Sound and
Vibration, Vol. 83(2).
[3] "IEEE Guide for Laboratory Measurement of the Power Dissipation
1 _
Characteristics of Aeolian Vibration Dampers for Single Conductors".
IEEE Std 664-1993.
.g~
0,82
07- I v ' .0
/
,
7\<
.
.
[4] J. T. Schmidt, G. Biedenbach, H. J. Krispin "Laboratory Measurement
of the Power Dissipation Characteristics of Aeolian Vibration
Dampers". IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp.
0,5__ _ _
1614-1621, October 1997.
0
04
* "low mass" clamp, measured values 0
0
03-
- "low mass" clamp, computed values
0,2 t
0,1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Frequency [Hz]
0,9 w
n7 - X
0'5 I 6
\
a, 0,4-
.0
a) 0,3- 0 conventional clamp, measured values
02 - conventional clamp, computed values * t
0,1
u
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Frequency [Hz]
IV. CONCLUSION