You are on page 1of 5

Janine C.

Laggui ABM-A

1. Samples of forty-two (42) college students are considered for


study and were categorized according to year level.
The data set is

Junior Freshman Sophomor Sophomor Freshman Junior Sophomor


e e e
Sophomor Senior Senior Freshman Senior Sophomor Sophomor
e e e
Freshman Sophomor Freshman Freshman Sophomor Junior Senior
e e
Senior Sophomor Freshman Freshman Junior Junior Freshman
e
Sophomor Freshman Sophomor Junior Junior Junior Freshman
e e
Freshman Senior Junior Freshman Freshman Freshman Sophomor
e

Construct a frequency distribution for the data.

Class Tally Frequency Relative Percentage


Frequency
Freshman IIIII-IIIII- 15 0.36 36%
IIIII
Sophomore IIIII-IIIII- 12 0.29 29%
II
Junior IIIII-IIII 9 0.21 21%
Senior IIIII-I 6 0.14 14%
Total 42 42 1 100%

Bar Chart
16
College Students
College
College Students
Students
16
14
Number of college studnets

14 Senior
12 14%
Number of college studnets

12
10
10 8 Freshman
8 6
36%
Junior
6 4 21%
4 2
0
2 Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior
0 Year level
Sophomore
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior
29%
Year level

Pareto Chart

Pie Chart
2. Thirty-six customers were categorized according to civil
status. The data set is

Widow Single Single Married Single Single Married Single Single

Married Married Single Single Widow Single Married Single Single

Widow Single Single Married Married Married Married Married Widow

Single Single Single Married Married Single Married Single Widow

Construct a frequency distribution for the data

Class Tally Frequency Relative Percentage


Frequency
Single IIIII-IIIII- 18 0.5 50%
IIIII-III

Married IIIII-IIIII- 13 0.36 36%


III
Widow IIIII 5 0.14 14%
Total 36 36 1 100%
20 Customers
Customers
20 18
Number of customers

18 16
16 14
Number of customers

14 12
12 10
10 8
8 6
6 4
4 2
2 0
Single Married Widow
0
Single Married Widow
Civil Status
Civil Status

Bar Chart

Pareto Chart
Customers
Widow
14%

Single
Married 50%
36%

Pie Chart

You might also like