Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Phase detection plays an integral role in radio frequency (RF) systems found in particle
accelerators. Since accelerating a beam requires a specific phase in the period, phase detection is
necessary to determine if an accelerating cavity is at resonance with the applied RF signal.
Superconducting technology has led to smaller accelerating cavities which operate at higher
frequencies making phase detection a bit more complex. A phase detector was designed using a
double-balanced mixer with the RF input signals passing through an ultra-fast comparator before
the mixer. Analog Devices’ ADCMP572 ultra-fast comparator was selected for testing of a high-
frequency phase detector due to its very short propagation delay (150 picoseconds) [1].
Figure 3
Basic block diagram of planned circuit
Figure 2 Development
© 2007 Gary L. Burt
Once the phase detector was designed, we
then began evaluation of our circuit. First, the
Therefore, Analog Devices’ ADCMP572 comparator evaluation boards were wired and
ultra-fast comparator was selected due to its terminated as necessary. Then the square
low propagation delay (150 picoseconds). wave output from the comparators was tested
The ADCMP572 is capable of switching logic with an oscilloscope. Due to the short
states at least three times quicker than the propagation delay that was seen from the
next fastest comparator on the market signal (see Figure 1 in appendix), it was
(MAX9600), which made it the best choice confirmed that the comparator would be
for a high frequency phase detector. sufficient for our phase detector. However, it
After the signals are converted to a square was still possible that the comparator’s
wave, they are put through a mixer. The response could change as more components
mixer performs the vital function of the phase were added. It was also observed that the
detector and allows us to compare the phase signal had a direct current (DC) component.
of the two signals. The output from the mixer This would have to be removed before the
generates new signals that include the sum signals could be fed into the mixer. To fix
and the difference of the two signals this, a DC blocking capacitor was added to
according to the equation: cos(ω1)cos(ω2) = the circuit after each comparator. The signals
[cos(ω1 +ω2)]/2 + [cos(ω1 –ω2)]/2 [3]. Since were then fed into the mixer and the output
the signal generated by the sum of the two was measured using an oscilloscope. After
frequencies will be much higher frequency seeing irregularities in the output of the
than the difference signal, it can be filtered
mixer, it was apparent that there wasn’t length was added to one signal path before it
sufficient power to drive the mixer. reached the mixer. Also, overshoot in our
Therefore, it was necessary to amplify the signal was observed following the DC
signals before they reached the mixer. After blocking capacitors (appendix Figure 3). This
calculating the gain needed to drive the mixer, was leading to a very slight curve in the
amplifiers were added following the signal following the mixer. To rectify this, a
comparators. These were successful in different output was used from one of the
amplifying the signals to the level necessary comparators, which caused the overshoot in
to drive the mixer (7 dBm), and as a result, one signal to precisely mirror the other. Once
the desired linearity was seen from the mixer fed through the mixer again, these
output. However, the signal still contained irregularities canceled each other out,
higher order harmonics that would need to be producing the desired linearity. It should be
filtered for an accurate reading. A Butterworth noted, however, that this correction is not
low-pass filter was designed with a cutoff ideal in all situations and this capacitance
frequency of 5 megahertz (mHz). This was issue may require further research for future
then added to our circuit after the mixer, and projects.
produced the desired filtering of any higher
order harmonics present in the signal Conclusion
(appendix Figure 2). The output from the The phase detector designed using the
mixer at this point was roughly 630 millivolts ADCMP572 shows promise in its application.
(mV) peak to peak. However, we wanted to The comparators performed according to
amplify this output and generate two outputs.
expectations in regard to their propagation
One would have an output of 4 V peak to
delay. This performance could allow for more
peak, and the second would have an output of
20 V peak to peak. This amplification would accurate and reliable phase detection in future
be achieved in two stages to allow for a high-frequency applications, along with better
researcher to use either output, depending on performance in standard phase detection.
the application. A used circuit board was However, due to the time frame available for
repurposed for the phase detector, and, using the design and assembly of the phase detector,
the potentiometers (variable resistors) already there is still much to be determined. For
present within it, the necessary amplification
instance, due to some of the components
was achieved with great precision.
present in our phase detector, it was not
Testing possible to test its response to frequencies
With the phase detector assembled, further larger than 100 Mhz. Further research would
testing was required. It was observed that a involve replacing these components with ones
significant DC offset was present from our that would operate at the higher frequencies.
mixer. This meant that with only one signal However, due to the proof of concept
feeding the mixer, an output voltage was still
obtained here, these objectives could be
present. To correct this, additional circuit
realized with little delay and a high-frequency
phase detector could be designed quickly in References
response to a researcher’s need for one. [1] Analog Devices. "Analog Devices
ADCMP572 Datasheet." N.p., 2009. Web.
Acknowledgements 22 July 2013.
This work was supported in part by the [2] "Comparator." Wikipedia. Wikimedia
Foundation, 25 July 2013. Web. 26 July
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of
2013
Science, Office of Workforce Development [3] Breed, Gary. "The Mathematics of Mixers:
for Teachers and Scientists (WDTS) under the Basic Principles." High Frequency
Community College Internships (CCI) Electronics. N.p., Jan. 2011. Web. 26 July
Program. 2013.
Appendix
Figure 3: Overshoot in the rise/fall response of the signal following the DC blocking capacitor.