Supplier risk score card

Supplier base 12

Risk domains

Regulatory risks
 Labor unrests
 Environmental incidents

Geographic risk
 Supplier location

Logistical risk
 S-OTD
 Single source

Security risks
 IP protection
  DATA security

Financial risks
 Revenue
 Cash from operations
 Credit rating

Score card rationale

 Weighted risk domains
 Each risk domain was weighted based on the importance

 Scoring is based on 0-100

100 is perfect score

Each of these are weighted in importance with financial was the most importance and geographic and
regulatory was the less importance

So based on information contains in data exhibit 1 and back to the information above we can draw table
below:

Current suppliers:12

Highest risk: Plaxian, Boavidro, RealGlass, Shale, Opticful, PharmyLeaf

Lowest risk: MedicMetric

 suppliers
Risk Weight Plaxia Gutes Boavid Saa Real Optiki Best Medic Shal Opti Basic PharmyLeaf
n Glas ro n ch Glas et O Metri e c ful Phar
domain per s Glass c m
domai
n

regulatory 10% 6 10 10 9 3 10 10 10 5 10 10 10

geographi 10% 10 10 6 9 8 9 10 10 8 9 10 9
c
logistics 25% 22 21 15 23 18 20 17 23 21 24 20 19

security 25% 20 17 18 20 25 20 22 20 17 10 20 18

financial 30% 21 26 24 21 23 24 21 27 22 21 25 22

total 100% 79 84 73 82 77 83 80 90 73 74 85 78

GlasWork Analysis

Current on hand:

Current on hand¿ ∑ On−hand stock (i)

Current on hand¿ 46 M $
Total demand per month:

Total demand per month=∑ APU

Total demand per month=4.47 M units

Demand value:

Demand value=∑ Std . Price× APU

Demand value=49.6 M

Anticipate demand:

Anticipate demand=∑ (On−hand stock + APU Trend ×On−hand stock)

Anticipate demand=6.54 M units

Adjusted demand value:

Adjusted demand value=∑ Std . Price ×( APU + APU × APU Trend )

Adjusted demand value=70.7 M $

So demand increase of: 2M units

Impact

 Original difference in inventory : -3,659,622.75 $

 Adjusted Difference in inventory: -24,710,452.31 $

Obsolete impact:
 Any SKU that had lead time more than 150 days has a higher chance of becoming obsolete (16SKU)
 Estimate value of 974,601 $

Inventory sizing in Switzerland

a=on−handstock × APU Trend et b=Lead time(day)

if a< 0∧b<30 THEN shatter ELSE do not shatter

Total SKUs to be shattered Money saved from first shattering

436 979,406.89 $
Evaluating the capacity of fabricadas

process The time to meet demand for The actual capacity to

Q2 2021(hours) produce per hours
tubing 975 890

Hot-forming 1500 880

washing 2715 1780

packing 3480 2640

total 8670 6190

Based on data ,we calculated the hours in need in order to meet the demand of quarter Q2/2021,the
cap city is inadequate because they don’t have time to providing products in order to meet requirement
for Q2 2021=> that’s why the plant manager feel

Capacity restraints

Demand Q3 2020 actual Q4 2020 hours Q1 2021 -hours Q2 2021 -hours

projections -hours
ampoules 900 3300 3600 3900

Vials 315 1200 1890 2205

syringes 570 1995 2280 2565

Fabricadas Available plant hours

 Working days out of 365

 Assumed 24-hours workday
 Equal distribution of hours per quarter

Working Hrs for the Hrs per

Unit
days years qurater
Tubing #1 225 5400 1350
Tubing #2 220 5280 1320
Forming #1 225 5400 1350
Forming #2 215 5160 1290
Washing #1 225 5400 1350
Washing #2 220 5280 1320
Washing #3 220 5280 1320
Washing #4 225 5400 1350
Packing #1 220 5280 1320
Packing #2 220 5280 1320
Packing #3 215 5160 1290
Packing #4 225 5400 1350
Packing #5 220 5280 1320
Packing #6 220 5280 1320

Fabricadas hour distribution

 Overall capacity utilization

1. Q4 : 53.6%
2. Q1 : 66.5%
3. Q2 :72.5%
 Overflow hours transferred to available units

Ampoules vails syringes

Tubing 2 Tubing 2 Tubing 1

Form 1 Form 2 Form 2

Wash 2 Wash 2 Wash 1

Wash 4 Wash 4 Wash 3

Pack 5 Pack 1 Pack 2

Pack 6 Pack 2 Pack 3

Pack 6 Pack 4

Product
plant Q4 Q1 Q2
distribution
Tubing #1 syringes 1056 1026 996
Tubing #2 Ampoules,vails 597 477 402
Forming #1 Ampoules 534 474 414
Forming #2 Syringes,vails 534 399 309
Washing #1 syringes 468 378 288
Washing #2 ampoules 96 6 -84
Washing #3 syringes 438 348 258
Washing #4 vails 615 405 300
Packing #1 vails 480 204 120
Packing #2 vails 1320 204 120
Packing #3 syringes 114 -6 -126
Packing #4 syringes 1350 1344 1224
Packing #5 ampoules -312 -432 -552
Packing #6 ampoules 1008 888 768
Conclusion

 The supplier with the highest risk are : Shale, Opticful, Boavidro

 GlassWork s change in inventory:

o Original difference in inventory : -3.7M $

o Adjusted difference in inventory : -24.7M$

 Potential obsoletes : 974,601 $

 No capacity constraints in fabricadas

o Equal distribution of hours per quarter

o Give priority to single product units
o Transfer overflow hours to multi product units