Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LABORATORY REPORT
No. Experiment 1
Partner’s name
Instructor’s name
Objectives:
1) To compare the heat capacities of a coffee cup calorimeter and a copper calorimeter.
Data
1) Graph Temperature°c vs Time,min of coffee cup calorimeter
2) Graph Temperature°c vs Time,min of copper calorimeter
3) Graph Temperature°c vs Time,min of Mg and HCl
4) Graph Temperature°c vs Time,min of MgO and HCl
Discussion
Heat capacities of coffee cup calorimeter and copper calorimeter:
The capacity of both calorimeter have different temperature change, this is because copper
conducts heat more effectively than coffee cup. The calorimeter will carry heat away to the
surrounding faster than the coffee cup.
The heat reaction for reactions 2 and 3 :
Chemical Equation:
Mg + 2HCl → MgCl2 + H2
Q = mc∆T + c∆T
= (50)(4.18)(63.5 - 24.5) + (39.9)(63.5 - 24.5)
= 9679.41 J
= 9.68 k J
∆Hrxn = -Q / n
= -9.68k J / 0.0422 mol
= - 229.38 kJ mol-1
Q = mc∆T + c∆T
=(50)(4.18)(43.0-24.5) + (39.19)(43.0-24.5)
=4591.515 J
=4.59 k J
∆Hrxn = -Q / n
= -4.59 kJ / 0.04116 mol
= -111.52 kJ mol-1
∆H =mc∆T (Hydrogen)
= -285.8 kJ mol-1
Chemical equation 2,3,4 can be added to formed equation 1:
Solution:
Based on the calculation, the standard enthalpy formation of MgO is -403.66 kJ mol-1
= 67.08%
Conclusion
This experiment conducted to compare the heat capacities of a coffee cup calorimeter and a
copper calorimeter which is 39.19 J and 12.29 J respectively. The standard ethalpy of
formation of magnesium oxide, ∆H also can be determined during this experiment. The ∆H°f
of magnesium oxide is found to be -403.66 kJ/mol. Thus, the objectives of this experiment is
successfully achieved.
References