20201121-PRESS RELEASE Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

ISSUE –
The elaborate cover up of the Afghan and Iraq (mass)murders

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.

* Gerrit, despite the Brereton report in your view there is an elaborate cover up?
**#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, I hardly read anything of the report but what I did read to me
indicates some cover up regarding the Afghan issue.
* Now I be interested to find out why you came to that conclusion.
**#** Well, I came across this statement that somehow those officers higher up couldn’t be held
responsible. Well to me that is utter and sheer nonsense. But let us start from the beginning.
Why were Australian soldiers first of all in Afghanistan and subsequently in Ira killing anyone?
* Well, they went to war, didn’t they?
**#** To war against whom? After all to my knowledge the Governor-General at the time never
published a DECLARATION OF WAR either to invade Afghanistan or Iraq. The question
therefore is who authorized those soldiers to be there in the first place?
* Wasn’t that John Howard as Prime Minister, way back in 2001?
**#** You then have to ask by what Authority did he have this power?
* ANZUS treaty?
**#** Any treaty is just that but cannot give power to someone where the power ultimately is
with the Governor-General to declare WAR.
*.Are you saying that if some foreign power was to attack Australia then the Government first
requires to have the Governor-General to issue a DECLARATION OF WAR first?
**#** The Framers of the Constitution made clear that where a foreign force was to invade you
do not have to wait until the guns are booming, as their conduct itself is considered a
DECLARATION OF WAR. As such you already have the enemy having involved itself in a act
of war. As such the Government of the Day is entitled to act immediately. With Afghanistan and
indeed Ira I am not aware they in any shape or form were attacking Australia.
*. But wasn’t it an act of war with September 11 in 2001 with the planes flying into the world
trade centre buildings, etc?
**#** I have watched some video’s and to me what appeared to be a particular plane never could
have been. More like some missile dressed up as a plane. This as no nose cone of a plane could
get through a building and at the other side of the building be still undamaged. To me it was a so
called dam buster bomb/rocket that exploded once the nose cleared at the otherwise of the
building. In any event whomever was behind that attack it was not upon Australia itself and no
ANZUS treaty can invoke any Australian Government to then invade another country.
p1 21-11-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
What was needed at the time was for the Minister of Defense to request the then Governor-
General to publish in the Gazette a DECLARATION OF WAR naming Afghanistan to invade
this country. To my knowledge this never eventuated and so without a DECLARATION OF
WAR and no direct attack upon Australian soil it was unconstitutional for Australian troops to
invade Afghanistan. Hence, in my view the Brereton report that to me appears to shield the high
ranking officers is wrong as the very top in officers rank who authorized or otherwise
participated in the invasion into Iraq in the first place must be held accountable. Actually the
same is with the invasion into Iraq in 2001.
*.Didn’t the UN (United Nations) authorize the invasion?
**#** I understand it didn’t specifically but regardless if it did or didn’t it didn’t give any powers
to the Australian Government to authorize the invasion. Again only the Governor-General had
this power to publish a DECLARATION OF WAR naming Iraq. And, there is more to this. I
challenged the validity of the 200 Federal election regarding the writs issued on 8 October 2001.
This case was railroaded with the Counsel for the Commonwealth deceiving the court but
nevertheless I was not deterred and in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka on 19 July 2009 in both successful
appeals representing myself proved (and so unchallenged) that the writs were invalid. This means
that the then purported Federal Election regarding the House of Representatives and Territories
never was. It means that John Howard while commissioned to be Prime Minister after the
purported election no longer was after months and I view was impersonating to be a Prime
minister. Likewise, with all and any other Minister of the House of Representatives. Meaning we
had NO Government to go to War!
*. Are you saying that none of the Attorney-Generals challenged your submissions and evidence?
**#** That is correct. And as it was unchallenged then for all purposes and intent it is deemed
admitted. Therefore, if there was no lawful authorization to invade Ira either then why are the
high ranking officers not held legally accountable? After all whatever was done to the Kurds in
the and every was blamed on President Saddam Hussein as he was then the President. Well, let
us then apply the same account of responsibility to whatever eventuated in Afghanistan and Iraq.
As a matter of fact way back in July 2002 I actually wrote to the then General Cosgrove making
clear that without a DECLARATION OF WAR published by the Governor-General naming a
particular country no invasion was permitted. He appeared to have ignored this.
*. Are you seeking to lay the blame of any killings to the superiors only?
**#** Absolutely not. In my view the Nuremberg trial of “Following orders is no excuse” should
be adapted, that superior officers who acted without the legal authority to invade in the first place
must be held legally liable and so also for what their soldiers did as to war crimes, etc.
As such what eventuated in Afghanistan long after John Howard no more was a Member of
parliament and/or Prime minister is not going to get him off the hook, as after all if he in the first
place had not unconstitutionally authorized the invasion into Afghanistan and later Iraq then the
2012 and other years of killings may never have eventuated.
*.What about the Minister for Defense?
**#** In my view, each of them and in fact those who from time to time were in the Cabinet also
must be held legally accountable. And obviously my question is was Brereton ever participating
in any invasion into Afghanistan/Iraq? After all it might be self-serving if he so to say gets the
high ranking officers of the hook and so by this I view there be an implied bias.
*. If the report doesn’t cover what you just outlined then should there be an independent
investigation?

p2 21-11-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
**#** In my view it should. After all, without seeking to excuse the conduct of any crimes that
might have been committed, the high ranking and others in Government at the time must equally
be held legally accountable.
*. Hypothetical you were Prime Minister, you really would pursue that?
**#** I also would go after the judges who I view are misusing/abusing their judicial power. We
need to clean up the bench of the court and stop this abuse of judicial power. After all, the
moment you stop the misuse of judicial power you may find others to be careful of committing
any crimes. And when you have barristers perverting the course of justice and obstructing the
administration of justice and judges aware of this do absolutely nothing and by this blatantly
disregard their legal obligation to there and then charge the offender, then this allows a gross
misuse and abuse of the legal processes.
*. I notice that you have not specifically quoted the Framers of the Constitution in this article.
**#** I did so plenty in the past and try to keep it simple for the readers.
*. Is your message that by all means go after the law breakers but include high ranking officers
and members of the Government in it also?
**#** That is correct.
We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)

p3 21-11-2020 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati