Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by
WELL LOGGING
• Formation Evaluation
• Well Logs
Keywords
HOIP Estimation
Petrophysical Parameters
Logs
Formation Evaluation
Goal
• Well logs measure the total porosity (Φt), while the effective
porosity (Φe) is computed through an empirical relationship
concerning Φt, Φe e Vsh (shale volume)
Water on clay
Non-clay Clay surfaces Small Large Isolated
matrix layers & interlayers pores pores pores
Neutron porosity
Density porosity
NMR porosity
Sonic porosity
Image Log
Sample
Permeability
• Sand / Shale
– Stratification
– Grain size distribution and sorting
– Clastic bodies shape and orientation
– Packing
– Cementation
– Shale content volume
• Carbonates
– Digenesis
– Porosity development
– Presence, size and orientation of fractures
Relationship Between Porosity and
Permeability
K (m D)
10.000
1.000
0.100
0.010 Aggregate 1
Aggregate 4
0.001
10000.000 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Phi (%)
South Pars
1000.000 K vs. PHI Plot
100.000
K (mD)
10.000
1.000
0.100
0.010 Aggregate 2
Aggregate 3
0.001
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Phi (%)
Water Saturation (Sw)
Sh = 1 - Sw
PHI = 100%
Rw = V/I1
PHI = 30%
Sw = 100%
Ro = V/I2
Ro > Rw
PHI = 30%
Sw = 20%
Rt = V/I3
Rt >> Ro
Formation Factor
F = R0 / Rw
F = a / Φm
Formation Factor: porosity/resistivity relationship
Sw Evaluation
Archie Equation for “Clean Rocks”
Rt = (F* Rw / Swn),
where F = (1 / φt m) in compacted formations,
Nomenclature
Rt = true formation resistivity;
Rw = formation water resistivity;
Sw = formation water saturation (pores volume filled by formation water);
F = formation factor;
φt = total formation porosity;
m = cementation exponent (@ 2 in Archie experiment);
n = saturation exponent (@ 2 in Archie experiment).
Resistivity
Keywords
What are they? What do they measure?
Well Logs: What Are They?
Caliper - GR Resistivity Density/Neutron
Well Logs: What Can They Be Used For?
Field Log Quality Editing
Digital Data Control Normalization
Signals Interpretation
Formation
Well Logs: What Can They Be Used For?
• Texture
– Image logs, Sonic, Dipmeter
• Structure
– Image logs
• Fluids
– Resistivity, SP, EPT, Neutron, Density, NMR, Sonic
• Permeability
– Resistivity, SP, EPT, Neutron, Density, NMR, Sonic, Caliper
Well Logs: When?
Low resolution
- Self Potential
shales (PSsh)
sands (PSsd)
Vsh = A / B
A Vsh = (PS-PSsd)/(PSsh-PSsd)
log (PS)
B
To derive LITHOLOGY:
- Self Potential
GR
GRsd
(GR-GRsd)
Vsh = -----------------
(GRsh-GRsd)
Gamma Ray energy and calibration
K = 4%
Th = 24 ppm
High activity Cement U = 12 ppm
200 GAPI
- Self Potential
- SP
- Resistivity
Lines of flux
potential on a surface is function
i of the intensity i and of the distance
A
equipotential surfaces
A
r
VM1 Absolute Potenziale (Normal)
M1
M2
Not focused electrode resistivity tools
Induction Tool
Laterolog tool
Spherically Focused Log
Resistivity in clastic formations
Microresistivity
How do we choose the fit-for-purpose
resistivity tool?
• Mud properties
– Oil Base Mud
– Fresh Water Mud
• Tool characteristics
– Induction vs galvanic
• Thin layers
• Shoulder effects
• Anomalous invasion profiles
• Incoherent measurements
Inductive, galvanic
A catalogue of
Dual tools, array tools resistivity problems
Two logging companies
• Different mud systems
Water base mud
Oil base mud
Environmental Effects Corrections
• DIELECTRIC
• NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Density Log
Austin Limestone
Austin Limestone
Low density Rho =2.21 g/cc
Rho =2.21 g/cc
Long Spaced Detector count rate
Measured Rhob
Bedford Limestone
Bedford Limestone
Rho = 2.42 g/cc
Rho = 2.42 g/cc
Vermont Marble
High density Vermont Marble
Rho = 2.675 g/cc
Rho = 2.675 g/cc
Φ = ρma−ρb / ρma−ρf
Gas Effect
APS
Electronic sourece
14 MeV
•Hole diameter
•Salinity
•Mud weight
•Temperature
•Pressure
GAS effect
Oil
Oil
Water
Lithology from Density/Neutron combination
Xplot Density Neutron
POROSITY (Φ), defines the “storage” capacity of a
reservoir.
The following logs are used to evaluate the porosity:
• DENSITY
• NEUTRON
• SONIC
• DIELECTRIC
• NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Sonic Log
Detection level
BHC records only compressional waves
t
Dt
Gas effect
Cycle Skipping
Sonic Log in clastic formations
Sonic Log BHC
CYCLE SKIPPING
in gas bearing zone
Sonic Porosity
Wyllie Time-Average
Equation
Sonic Logs: Digital Tools
Array Sonic
•Shear wave
•Stoneley wave
Wave Form Analysis – STC Slowness-Time Coherence Technique
Capillary bound
water Free fluid
Clay bound
water
In a water saturated rock, the relaxation time, T2, is related to the pore size: the
smaller the pore, the faster the relaxation.
On the basis of T2, the porosity can be divided into
• Clay-bound water (T2 < 3 ms)
• Capillary bound water (3 ms < T2 < T2 cut-off)
• Free fluid (T2 > T2 cut-off)
Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance
• The technology uses sensors and tools integrated in the BHA, close
to the bit, collecting data downhole and sending them to the surface
• It is possible to measure:
RESERVOIR PETROPHYSICAL
CHARACTERIZATION
WLL ADVANTAGES WLL DISADVANTAGES
Gas effect on
LWD neutron
porosity and
density, masked
on WLL logs
due to invasion
LWD ACQUISITION KEY POINTS
DATA TRANSMISSION up to the surface using the “MUD PULSE”
system
The sampling rate must be selected for each bit run to match the
conditions anticipated and to be adequate for the formation
evaluation
Logging While Drilling Telemetry
I I INSIDE
INSIDECASING
CASING
IIII CASING
CASING
III
III CEMENT
CEMENT
Formation evaluation
IVIV FORMATION
FORMATION through casing
Casing
• The casing is a steel pipe cemented in place in an oil or gas well as the drilling
progresses or when the well is completed.
• The casing serves several purposes:
– (1) to prevent the formation walls from caving or squeezing into the hole
during drilling
– (2) to protect one formation from damage when heavy mud weights are
required in drilling another
– (3) to provide a means to isolate porous and permeable formations at the
wellbore
– (4) to prevent contamination of shallow aquifers by drilling muds.
Why to cement the casing ?
• To fill the annulus between the casing and formation with cement to support the
casing, improve zonal isolation and to prevent migration of fluids between
permeable zones.
• A Cement Evaluation log is run, in the cased interval, in order to evaluate the
cement bond
Cement Channels
2 3
1
4
5
Cement Bond Log (CBL)
Sonic (CBL/VDL) principle
Casing
Cement Formation
Mud
Transmitter
Bonded cement
t
5 ft Receiver
VDL
0 100 CBL
amp
CBL : qualitative
interpretation of the
Amplitude curve
Cased Hole Logging: TDT
The Thermal Decay Log (TDT) is based on
the capture capacity of the thermal
neutrons: τ
Chlorine is a great thermal neutron
absorber, therefore the TDT measurement is
practically proportional to the quantity of
water in the formation (Sw).
The following parameters must be
considered during the interpretation process:
• formation water salinity;
• porosity;
• shale volume.
The main measurement is the decay time
(τ), which is the input to evaluate the
capture coefficient (Σ) proportional to the Sw
(Σ = K/τ).
Sigma - Principle of Measurement
• The source emits bursts of fast neutrons into the borehole with energy of
14 MeV.
• Neutrons collide with atoms, mainly Hydrogen, loosing energy and velocity
and reaching the following stages:
Sigma [Cl]
• [Cl] is function of
Salinity of formation water
Volume of water Φ
Sw
PULSED NEUTRON CAPTURE
Principles of the measurement
Low Porosity
Low Σ Fresh Water
Low Sw
High Porosity
High Σ High Water Salinity
High Sw
Cased Hole Logging Interpretation: CRA
Other Logs in Cased Hole applications:
- PERFORATIONS
- PRODUCTION LOGS
- CORROSION
Origin
• electrochemical
– contact of metals with formation water;
– metal in contact with different fluids (pH,
salinity and dissolved gas);
• mechanical abrasion (solids);
• Deformations due to stress in sito
Corrosion
Corrosion monitoring
The measurements are in “time lapse” in
comparison with runs at different times, and
consist of the evaluation of the metal loosing
and thickness variation of the casings
through:
• mechanic caliper (multifinger caliper);
• acoustic caliper (BHTV);
• electromagnetic measurements (METT);
• downhole video.
Multifinger caliper
Gravel Pack Log
Il is a density log
Other Logs in Open Hole-Cased Hole applications:
- FORMATION TESTER
Wire Line Formation Testing
“Formation Testing” tools are generally run
in Open Hole and measure:
Pressure
• Pressure measurements at desired depth;
• Pressure gradient and fluid density;
• Fluids contacts;
• Fluids mobility (proportional to permeability
and viscosity);
• Fluids connectivity;
Sampling
• The samples of formation fluid can be analysed
in laboratory;
Wire Line Formation Testing: Modular Dynamic Tester (MDT)
Pressure measurements While Drilling (PWD)
Keywords
Formation Evaluation
CPI
Data Quality Control & Integration
Formation Evaluation
Goal
Output
Outputdata
data
Input
Inputdata
data MATEMATHICAL (log
MATEMATHICAL
MODEL
(loginterpr.
interpr.
(logs
(logsand
and MODEL results:
(tool
(toolresponse
responseequations)
results:Sw,
Sw,
parameters)
parameters) equations)
PHIE,
PHIE,VSH,
VSH,
VMAT
VMAT
Quantitative Interpretation of Well Logs
using Deterministic Models
LOG DATA AFTER ACCURATE QUALITY CONTROL
DEPTH MATCHING
ENVIRONMENTAL CORRECTION
(GR, RHOB, NPHI, Rt)
ZONATIONS
POROSITY DETERMINATION
XPLOT
DISADVANTAGES
• porosity determination is limited to the use of simple one or two
dimensional petrophysical correlations (Xplot Dens/Neut. or
Sonic/Neutron);
• the input petrophysical parameters are selected by the analyst
one by one and possibly modified by trial-and-error to obtain the
“most satisfactory” solution (this solution is very subjective!).
ADVANTAGES
• the program follows, step by step, the typical sequence used for
the manual interpretation; the approach is simple, easy to
understand and to repeat several times.
Quantitative Interpretation of Well Logs using
Deterministic Models
PetroView Plus
Quantitative Interpretation of Well Logs
using
Probabilistic Models
Display results:
Well Log Measurements Phit & Phie,
(after QC, Editing & Env. Corr. Sw, Sxo, RHGA
Volumes of minerals
Petrophysical Model
(Volumes of Por., Lith.,
Fluids, Equations, Tool Response Functions Synthetic logs
parameters & uncert.
INVERSION
Measured logs
Quantitative Interpretation of Well Logs using
Probabilistic Models
R V= Vector of Volumes
Sor
Sw=Swi
Swi_core
Sw log
Sw core
Clay
bound
Free
fluid
sw
Irr.water
swi
CPI - ELAN
Clay
bound
Free
fluid
sw
Irr.water
swi
Many Thanks, and
Have a Nice Day