Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RT estimation
Notes
1
© Schlumberger 1999-2001 1
Rt Estimation Resistivity is resistance per unit length. We can often employ electrical
analogies when dealing with resistivity tools measuring in the formation.
Resistivity Theory This was the first type of measurement ever made and it is still the only
way to find and evaluate the hydrocarbons in a reservoir.
Notes
Porosity gives the volume of fluids but does not
indicate which fluid is occupying that pore space.
2
2
Rt Estimation The flow of current can only be carried by ions in the formation. The ions
are only present in the pore space and only in the water. The more ions
(more water) the lower the resistivity. The higher the salinity (more ions)
Resistivity Theory 2 the lower the resistivity.
The formation water has a resistivity of Rw. The formation containing
only water has a resistivity of Ro. This is a definition.
Current can only pass through the water in the
formation, hence the resistivity depends on:
Notes
3
3
Rt Estimation Most tools read in the invaded zone, hence only parameters here are
required. Resistivity tools have to measure both the invaded and virgin
zones. This means that the the parameters for both zones have to be
Resistivity Model defined. The borehole also contains components which are “seen” by the
tools.
These three zones have resistivities, Rm, Rmc, Rmf, Rw of the fluids
involved. There are also the resistivities of the formations, Rxo and Rt.
The water saturations of both zones also need to be defined as this
determines the resistivity, Sxo and Sw. Finally the diameter of the
invaded zone, di is needed to compute the contribution from this zone.
Some of these parameters are measured, others are calculated.
Notes
4
4
Rt Estimation The simple electrical tool theory forms the basis of all electrical tools. The
tool has a current source which creates a series of equipotential spheres
centred on the source. The measure electrode measures the voltage at a
Old Tools distance from the source. This voltage is dependent on the spacing and the
resistivity of the formation between the two electrodes.
Notes
5
5
Rt Estimation
Notes
6
6
Rt Estimation The problem of a resistive bed with lower resistivity beds on either side is
that in the old tools the current takes the easiest path.
Laterolog Principle The solution is to focus the measure current into the formation. This is
done using a current emitted from electrodes above and below the
measure electrode.
This forces the current to flow in a sheet directly into the formation in
front of it with little deviation.
Notes
RAB Correction
Notes
9
9
Rt Estimation The objective of this tool is twofold, firstly to better the vertical resolution
and secondly to look all around the borehole.
Azimuthal Laterolog principle This is achieved using a set of twelve electrodes much smaller than the
standard ones set in a ring around the tool. This means each electrode
looks at a 30Þ region.
As the tool can be run eccentred in the borehole each electrode will have a
different borehole correction. To be able to perform this correctly a very
shallow measurement is made giving an electrical radius of the hole in
front of every electrode. This is used to correct the raw readings. It can
also be used to provide a borehole profile.
Notes
Focused Currents
Notes
Conductive Bed
11
11
Rt Estimation Drilling in the late 1940s started to use oil based mud, which meant that
the traditional resistivity measurements were no longer of any use. The
objective of an induction type measurement was to measure in these
Induction history conditions. The evolution, as with many other tools, increased the
accuracy and resolution of the measurement.
The problem for the induction measurement as with the deep electrical log
The idea for the tool developed out of mine is that it has to be able to read through the invaded zone into the virgin
detector work done by Henri Doll during the zone.
Second World War.
12
12
Rt Estimation The tool frequency is around 20kHz. At this level the measured field is
proportional to the conductivity. The signal at the receiver coils is a
combination of the formation, R, signal and the direct coupled X signal.\
Induction Principle The R signal contains the information on the formation. The X has
information on how the signal has been affected in transit. Both are
measured in modern tools, with the X signal being used to correct the R.
An Induction tool uses a high frequency
The tool works best when the borehole fluid is an insulator such as oil-
electromagnetic transmitter to induce a current based mud.
in a ground loop of formation. Pairs of coils are combined to obtain improved vertical and radial
characteristics, i.e. focusing in both directions.
This, in turn, induces an electrical field whose The standard tool uses 6 coils to achieve the maximum effect.
magnitude is proportional to the formation
conductivity.
Notes
13
13
Rt Estimation
Notes
14
14
Rt Estimation As the tool react to conductivity the formation effects are the opposite to
the electrical tools.
Borehole Effects The best readings of the conductivity of the virgin zone, Ct (or in
resistivity Rt) are obtained when the conductivities of the mud, Cm, mud
cake, Cmc and the invaded zone Cxo are as low as possible. This means
oil based mud is ideal hence the objective of the tool has been met.
Induction tools measure Conductivity.
The mud cake is once again taken as negligible.
Induction tools measure resistivity in Parallel.
Thus Induction tools see the borehole
environment as:
16
16
Rt Estimation The standard induction tool has a depth of investigation affected by the
conductivity of the invaded and virgin zones. The multiple spacings of
Array Induction depth of the Array Induction tool allows the depth of investigation to be computed
independent of the conductivities.
investigation The deepest reading of the older tool is around 60”, the new tool at 90
goes far beyond this value.
The AIT has set radial depths of investigation
which are not affected by changes in conductivity.
17
17
Rt Estimation This is the same example as the previous slide this time showing a
comparison between the Array Induction Tool and the older Dual
Induction tool.
Example The invasion profile as has been noted is very clear on the former tool, all
curves separating. The older tool is ambiguous with some separation, but
the same separation in the non-porous zone above this as well.
ARC Measurement
Notes
19
19
Rt Estimation
This log
shows a
resistivity
increase
around 7980ft.
This could be
an oil bearing
zone. All the
curves are
showing Notes
approx. the
same value
suggesting
low invasion.
20
20
Rt Estimation
Attenuation Log
21
21
Rt Estimation
CDR Corrections
Notes
22
22
Rt Estimation
Borehole Effects
Notes
23
23
Rt Estimation Except for the Microlog tool all the others were/are focused to pass
through the mud cake and read only the invaded zone. They are all
resistivity devices. All are pad tools pushed against the wall by a powered
Microresistivity Devices caliper device.
24
24
Rt Estimation This is the very oldest microresistivity device. It has been used for a
number of years to measure the “sand” zones i.e.. the permeable layers.
The absolute value of the resistivity is not of interest, only the separation
Microlog Uses between the two curves.
A number of synthetic micrologs have been devised using some of the
currents output by the more sophisticated tools.
Microlog is used to identify permeable zones.
Notes
If the zone of investigation is shale (no invasion),
both curves read the same.
If the zone is sand (with invasion), Microinverse
reads mud cake plus some of the formation and
Micronormal reads some mud cake plus the
formation (slightly higher).
We are only interested in the separation between
these curves and so scales are chosen to show this
and not the rest of the readings.
25
25
Rt Estimation A focusing current flowing between the A0 and A1 electrodes passes
mainly through the mud cake.
MSFL Principle In this way, the measuring current is constrained to the formation and
importantly to the invaded zone.
The exact depth investigated depends on the mud cake thickness and the
resistivities of the mud components. However, it is normally around 6
inches.
Notes
Notes
Uses and Limits Knowing Rxo the deep measurements can be inverted to give the true
virgin formation resistivity Rt.
As with all pad type tools bad hole conditions will badly affect the
measurement quality.
Uses:
Rxo measurement in water- based
muds.
Correction for deep resistivity
tools.
Sxo determination.
Limits: Notes
Rugose hole.
Oil-based mud.
Heavy or thick mud cake.
28
28
Rt Estimation “Resistivity tools” come in two varieties complementing each other in the
possible environments.
*It is possible if some conditions are met:
Induction v Laterolog Hole is small and in gauge.
Resistivity is low (contrast Rt/Rm is low).
Laterolog Induction Tool position is well known.
OBM no yes **It is possible if the resistivity is high, i.e. the contrast Rt/Rm is high.
***If string correction applied.
Notes
30
30
Rt Estimation After correction for the borehole effects the apparent resistivity, Ra, seen
by the tool is composed of some signal coming from the invaded zone and
some from the virgin zone. The proportion depends on the diameter of
Pseudo Geometrical Factor invasion, di.
This is taken into account in the fraction J, the pseudo-geometrical factor.
This describes how much of the signal comes from the invaded zone.
Once corrected, the log can be evaluated to find
If J=1, the entire signal comes from the invaded zone, this is the case for
Rt. the very shallow reading tools. If J=0, all the reading comes from the
virgin zone. In practice even for the deep Laterolog J is never zero, but a
small number.
Neglecting the mud and mud cake resistivities
(corrected log), the tool response equation is:
Ra = J(di)Rxo + (1-J(di))Rt
31
31
Rt Estimation Once corrections for the borehole readings have been made the reading of
the tools is a combination of the virgin and invaded zone resistivities. The
proportion of the measurement coming from each zone depends on the
Rt/Rxo determination geometrical or pseudo-geometrical factors.
The typical logs available are a deep, medium and very shallow reading
which in combination give enough data to find the true resistivities.
The Deep reading tools must be corrected for the
invaded zone effect.
Three measurements are usually available:
Very Shallow
log
Invaded zone
Virgin Zone
Relative investigations
32
32
Rt Estimation The simplest invasion model supposes that the invading mud filtrate
enters the formation in a piston like movement. There is a definite
boundary between the invaded and virgin zones.
Invasion Model The depth of invasion is defined by the diameter of invasion di.
Hence there are three unknowns in this model.
Notes
Notes
34
34
Rt Estimation If the geometrical factors for each measurement are known the
measurements can be “inverted” to give the required Rt, Rxo and di. The
procedure can be made using a computer or by charts. The charts are
Tornado charts called Tornado or butterfly charts.
The computerised method is much more accurate. It is possible with field
computers. A large number of charts exist depending on the tool
The simple invasion model is used to solve for the combinations that are being used.
three unknowns Rt, Rxo, di.
Notes
36
36
Rt Estimation The transition is a zone of diffusion between the two saline fluids present,
the mud filtrate and the connate water.
Invasion Revisited
Invasion is can be more complex than a simple
step model.
To make the picture more realistic two zones are
added:
Transition zone:
The cross-over between the invaded and
virgin zones.
The pattern can be shown as a ramp.
Notes
Annulus zone:
A mixed zone where the oil has been
moved but some formation water remains,
causing a drop in resistivity.
37
37
Rt Estimation The slide shows the two possible cases, Rxo>Rt and Rxo<Rt. The
transition zone in both is a gradual change from one value to the other.
The shape of this change is unknown but is probably a simple ramp
Invasion 2 between the two values.
This profile has 4 unknowns, Rt, Rxo, plus inner and outer diameters of
invasion. Hence there has to be four measurements to solve.
Notes
39
39
Rt Estimation The theory here is that in invading the filtrate pushes back oil and water.
If the formation water is saltier than the invasion water a zone with an
excess of formation water will exist and give an apparent low resistivity
Annulus Invasion region..
Notes
40
40
Rt Estimation The phenomena of “ irregular “ invasion was first noted by Henri Doll on
SP profiles in the 1950,s. The note describes how the profile changes
between two runs.
Gravity and Invasion The experiment to verify the theory was carried out using a CAT scanner
to measure the invasion progress. The process appears as follows,
invasion in a piston like manner, followed by a drop as the horizontal
layer forms. This in turn pulls fluid from the top zone to give the curved
layer.
The curved layer thickness is determined by the porosity , time since
circulation of the vertical permeability . Knowing the others the vertical
permeability can be computed.
Log Response The deep measuring resistivity tool will have no problem, it is reading the
virgin zone in any case so will not be affected by the horizontal layer. The
Resistivity
very shallow Rxo tool will react to the curved layer. trying to read Rt at
this point. The thickness of the curved layer can be found from this curve.
Shale
Curved
Layer
Measured
Rt
Notes
Measured
Rxo
Shale
42
42
Rt Estimation The example shows the invasion of a lighter fluid (fresher filtrate) into a
salt water zone. The “ curved layer “ is found at the bottom. The shallow
reading MSFL curve reads the same as the deep curves at this point.
Example of Gravity Effect
MSFL
Notes
43
43
Rt Estimation
Vertical Permeability
The equation to derive the vertical permeability
from the curved layer thickness is;
hv µ filφ
kv =
t log g∆ρ
where,
hv = curved layer thickness Notes
44
44
Rt Estimation
Resume
The outputs of the full chain of resistivity will be:
45
45