DAM REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (DRIP)

Phase II
(Funded by World Bank)

UKAI DAM

ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL DUE DILIGENCEREPORT

(PIC:GJ04HH0222)

August 2020

Office of Chief Engineer (South Gujarat) and Additional Secretary

Narmada, Water Resources, Water Supply and Kalpsar Department
Government of Gujarat
Gujarat-382010 Tel: 079-23251664, e-mail: cesg13@gmail.com
 CONTENTS
Page No.
Executive Summary 1
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 2
1.2 SUB-PROJECT DESCRIPTION – UKAI DAM PROJECT 2
1.3 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT AND SCHEDULE 10
1.4 PURPOSE OF ESDD 10
1.5 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY OF ESDD 10

CHAPTER 2: INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND CAPACITY ASSESSMENT

2.1 POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK 12
2.2 DESCRIPTION OF INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK 12

CHAPTER 3: ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CONDITIONS

3.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 14
3.2 PROTECTED AREA 15
3.3 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT 15
3.4 CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT 17

CHAPTER 4: ACTIVITY WISE ENVIRONMENT & SOCIAL SCREENING, RISK AND

IMPACTS IDENTIFICATION
4.1 SUB-PROJECT SCREENING 18
4.2 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION 22
4.3 DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY OF RISKS AND IMPACTSFROM ACTIVITIES BASED ON SCREENING 25
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 CONCLUSIONS 28
5.1.1 Risk Classification 28
5.1.2 National Legislation and WB ESS Applicability Screening 28
5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS 29
5.2.1 Mitigation and Management of Risks and Impacts 29
5.2.2 Institutional Management, Monitoring and Reporting 30
 List of Tables
Table 4.1: Summary of Identified Risks/Impacts in Form SF-3 21
Table 5.1: WB ESF Standards applicable to the sub-project 28
Table 5.2: List of Mitigation Plans with responsibility and timelines 29

List of Figures
Figure 1.1: Selected Photographs of Improvement/Intervention area 8
Figure 1.2: Project Area showing major intervention locations 9
Figure 3.1: Land Use and Land Cover Map of 5 km radius around Dam site 14

List of Annexures
Annexure I: Form SF1 32
Annexure II: Form SF2 34
Annexure III: List of Participants 38
 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AIDS : Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
BOQ : Bill of Quantities
CA : Conservation Area
CCA : Culturable Command Area
CDSO : Central Dam Safety Organisation
CE : Chief Engineer
COVID : Coronavirus Disease
CPMU : Central Project Management Unit
CWC : Central Water Commission
DHARMA : Dam Health and Rehabilitation Monitoring Application
DRIP : Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Project
DSRP : Dam Safety Review Panel
E&S : Environment & Social
EAP : Emergency Action Plan
EE : Executive Engineer
ESCP : Environmental and Social Commitment Plan
ESDD : Environmental and Social Due Diligence
ESF : Environmental and Social Framework
ESIA : Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
ESMF : Environment and Social Management Framework
ESMP : Environment and Social Management Plan
ESS : Environmental and Social Standard
FRL : Full Reservoir Level
GBV : Gender Based Violence
GCA : Gross Command Area
GIDC : Gujarat Industrial Development Corporation
GIS : Geographic Information System
GRM : Grievance Redressal Mechanism
HIV : Human Immunodeficiency Virus
IA : Implementation Agency
IPF : Investment Project Financing
IS : Indian Standard
MCM : Million Cubic Meter
MIS : Management Information System
MWL : Maximum Water Level
NOF : Non-Overflow
NRSC : National Remote Sensing Centre
NWRWS&K : Narmada, Water Resources, Water Supply and Kalpsar
OHS : Occupational Health & Safety
PAP : Project Affected Person
PDO : Project Development Objective
PMC : Project Management Consultancy
PMF : Probable Maximum Flood
PPE : Personal Protective Equipment
PST : Project Screening Template
RET : Rare Endangered and Threatened
RFB : Request for Bids
SC : Scheduled Castes
SCADA : Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
SDSO : State Dam Safety Organisation
SEA : Sexual Exploitation and Abuse
SEAH : Sexual Exploitation Abuse and Harassment
SEF : Stakeholder Engagement Framework
SEP : Stakeholder Engagement Plan
SF : Screening Format
SH : Sexual Harassment
SPMU : State Project Management Unit
ST : Scheduled Tribes
WB : World Bank
WQ : Water Quality
 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Ukai, a multipurpose and major terminal project on river Tapi, has proposed to undertake

rehabilitation measures (structural, non-structural, instrumentation and basic facility
enhancement) under the proposed Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Project (DRIP II) with a
view to increase the safety and to strengthen dam safety management. 
 
The Environment and Social Due Diligence has been conducted for decision-making on the sub-
project with a view to identify, evaluate and manage the environment and social risks and impacts
in a manner consistent with the World Bank ESF. ESDD has been prepared by studying the sub-
project information and proposed interventions, assessing the magnitude of E&S risks and impacts
with respect to key baseline data in immediate vicinity area; and conducting preliminary
stakeholder consultations. Detailed consultations with communities living downstream/vicinity of
the dam, could not be held in the current circumstances due to COVID19 and these shall be held as
soon as situation is conducive for holding such consultations. 
 
Activity wise environment and social screening has been carried out to identify risks and impacts
to classify the sub-project based on risk level (low, moderate or substantial and high) and
recommend commensurate plans/measures to meet identified risks and impacts.
 
As per the ESDD exercise, risks/impacts that have been identified relate to Water Quality,
Fisheries, Physical Environment, labour and SEAH/GBV. Environment risks of air, water, noise, and
resource use as well as social risks of labour, civil work within the dam body and road work are
Moderate along with environment and social risk of labour camp and disposal of debris. Risk of all
other activities has been identified as Low. Hence the overall risk of this sub-project Dam is
categorized as Moderate. OHS is a substantial risk activity and is being treated separately through
OHS plan in accordance with WB ESHS guidelines.
 
Since risks and impacts are low to moderate category, a standard ESMP customised to sub-project
will be prepared in accordance with the ESMF. The customised ESMP will address the following: 
 Gender Based Violence or SEA/SH related actions (ESS1)
 Labour Management Procedure (ESS2)
 Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention (ESS3)
 Community Health and Safety (ESS4)
 Tribal Development Plan (TDP)
 Stakeholders Engagement Plan (ESS10)
 
Overall, the proposed activities within this dam sub-project have low to moderate risks resulting in
the overall sub-project to be categorized as Moderate risk category.  These risks and impacts can
be effectively mitigated with effective implementation of mitigation plans by SPMU/IA,
Contractors and monitoring by EMC, SPMU and CWC.
 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Ukai, a multipurpose and major terminal project on river Tapi, has proposed to undertake
rehabilitation measures (structural, non-structural, instrumentation and basic facility
enhancement) under the proposed Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Project (DRIP II) with a
view to increase the safety and to strengthen dam safety management.

The Environment and Social Due Diligence has been conducted for decision-making on the sub-
project with a view to identify, evaluate and manage the environment and social risks and impacts
in a manner consistent with the World Bank ESF. ESDD has been prepared by studying the sub-
project information and proposed interventions, assessing the magnitude of E&S risks and impacts
with respect to key baseline data in immediate vicinity area; and conducting preliminary
stakeholder consultations. Detailed consultations with communities living downstream/vicinity of
the dam, could not be held in the current circumstances due to COVID19 and these shall be held as
soon as situation is conducive for holding such consultations.

Activity wise environment and social screening has been carried out to identify risks and impacts
to classify the sub-project based on risk level (low, moderate or substantial and high) and
recommend commensurate plans/measures to meet identified risks and impacts.

As per the ESDD exercise, risks/impacts that have been identified relate to Water Quality,
Fisheries, Physical Environment, labour and SEAH/GBV. Environment risks of air, water, noise, and
resource use as well as social risks of labour, civil work within the dam body and road work are
Moderate along with environment and social risk of labour camp and disposal of debris. Risk of all
other activities has been identified as Low. Hence the overall risk of this sub-project Dam is
categorized as Moderate. OHS is a substantial risk activity and is being treated separately through
OHS plan in accordance with WB ESHS guidelines.

Since risks and impacts are low to moderate category, a standard ESMP customised to sub-project
will be prepared in accordance with the ESMF. The customised ESMP will address the following:
 Gender Based Violence or SEA/SH related actions (ESS1)
 Labour Management Procedure (ESS2)
 Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention (ESS3)
 Community Health and Safety (ESS4)
 Tribal Development Plan (TDP)
 Stakeholders Engagement Plan (ESS10)

Overall, the proposed activities within this dam sub-project have low to moderate risks resulting in
the overall sub-project to be categorized as Moderate risk category. These risks and impacts can
be effectively mitigated with effective implementation of mitigation plans by SPMU/IA,
Contractors and monitoring by EMC, SPMU and CWC.

1
 Chapter
INTRODUCTION
1
1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The proposed Dam Rehabilitation and Improvement Project (DRIP II) would complement
the suite of ongoing and pipeline operations supporting India’s dam safety program. The
project development objective (PDO) is to increase the safety of selected dams in
participating States and to strengthen dam safety management in India.

Project Components include:

Component 1: Rehabilitation and Improvement of Dams and Associated Appurtenances
(US$ 577.14 million);
Component 2: Dam Safety Institutional Strengthening (US$45.74 million);
Component 3: Incidental Revenue Generation for sustainable operation and maintenance
of dams(US$26.84million);
Component 4: Project Management (US$68.13 million).
Component 5: Contingency Emergency Response Component (US$0 million).

The primary beneficiaries of the project are the communities that live in dam breach flood
inundation areas and the communities that depend on water, irrigation and electricity
services provided by the dams that could be compromised by poor dam performance or
failure. In addition to saving lives, improved dam safety will avoid potential flood damage
to houses, farm areas, infrastructure (roads, bridges, other public and private
infrastructure) and industrial and commercial facilities. Improved dam safety will also
reduce the likelihood of service interruptions due to dam failure as well as potentially
improving dam service provision, overall efficiency and storage capacity, including during
drought periods.

1.2 SUB-PROJECT DESCRIPTION – UKAI DAM PROJECT

Ukai is a multipurpose and major terminal project on river Tapi located at Ukai village,
Taluka Songadh, District Tapi; located at Latitude 21 015’N and Longitude 73035’E. It is
harnessing river yield for benefits of irrigation, hydro power and other facilities such as
cooling water to thermal power station. River Tapi is second largest west flowing river of
India. The river has total length of 724 km of which 214 km lies in Gujarat. The project was
commissioned in 1972.

The projectcomprises of a composite dam with main earthen dam in River gorge, NOF,
Spillway and Power block on the left bank of river Tapi. Ukai dam is a composite dam with
maximum height of 80.7 m above its deepest foundation.The total length of dam is 4,926
m of which 4,058 m is earthen dam of zoned filled type. Masonry gravity dam, including
425 m long spillway and power dam occupies the remaining length.Ukai reservoir has live
storage of 6730 MCM at FRL of 105.156 m. It spreads for about 600 sq. km with maximum
length of 112 km.

2
 Salient features of the project area are reported below:

LOCATION
State Gujarat
District Tapi
River/ Basin Tapi River
Nearest city and airport VYARA; SURAT
Nearest railhead SURAT/VYARA
Lat/Long 21014’ 53.67’’/73035’ 21.87’’
Type of project MULTI PURPOSE
Gross Command Area (GCA) 539457 ha
Cultivable Command Area (CCA) 331557 ha
Hydropower installed capacity 305 MW
Average Annual Energy Generation 670 MU
Annual Water Supply 650 MCM
Food protected area 32652 ha
Main Dam
Type MASONRY
Total length of main dam 4926.83 m
Length of Embankment dam 4058 m
Length of Masonry/Concrete dam 868.83 m
Top width of Embankment Dam 9.144 m
Top width of Masonry/Concrete Dam 9.144 EXCEPT SPILLWAY / 6.706 SPILLWAY
Elevation of top of Embankment dam 111.252 m
Elevation of top of Masonry/Concrete Dam 111.252 m
Elevation of top of Upstream Solid Parapet 112.25 m
Wall
Height of Embankment Dam above Lowest 68.58 m
River Bed Level
Height of Masonry/Concrete Dam above 68.58 m
deepest foundation level
Lowest River Bed Elevation 42.67 m
Deepest Foundation Elevation 30.482 m
Saddle Dam
Type ZONED EARTH FILL
Length of the Saddle dam 1192.38 m
Top width of Saddle Dam 9.14 m
Elevation of top of Saddle Dam 111.252 m
Spillway
Type of Spillway OGEE
Length of Spillway 425.196 m
Location of Spillway Left Side of River
Spillway Crest Level 91.135 m
Number of Bays 22
Type of Spillway Gate RADIAL
Size of Spillway Gate 15.544 m wide * 14.782 m high
Total Discharging Capacity at MWL 46270 cumec
Bypass Outlet
No. of Sluices & Sill Level 4 Nos., 71.628 m
Size of Sluice 1.524 m wide x 2.743 m high
Discharging Capacity of Sluice at FRL 79.3 cumec
Main Penstock Outlet
Location Between left NOF and Spillway (Power
Dam)
Number 4
Sill level 63.764 m

3
Dia 7.01 m
Discharging Capacity 190.99 cumec
Reservoir
Catchment Area at Dam site 62225sq km
Maximum Water Level 106.704 m
Full Reservoir Level 105.156 m
Minimum Draw Down Level 82.296 m
Gross Storage Capacity 7414.29 MCM
Live Storage Capacity 6729.90 MCM
Reservoir Spread Area 600.95sq km
Date of Starting the Construction 1966
Date of Completion 29/01/1972

Proposed Interventions/ Activities and Intended Outcomes

Government of Gujarat, Narmada, Water Resources, Water Supply and Kalpsar
(NWRWS&K) Department plans to undertake the repair, rehabilitation and modernization
work of UkaiDam under World Bank aided DRIP-II & III schemes. The Dam Safety Review
Panel (DSRP), constituted for the purpose of inspection of the projects with a view to
improve the safety and performance of dam and associated appurtenances in a sustainable
manner, and also to strengthen the dam safety institutional set-up. DSRP made a visit to
UkaiDam on 23/10/2019 for inspection.

The objectives of the project are to be achieved through investments for physical and
technological improvement activities, managerial upgrading of dam operations,
management and maintenance, with accompanying institutional reforms. The project will
improve the safety and operational performance of dam and mitigate risks to ensure safety
of downstream population and property. The following rehabilitation proposals as
described in the PST have been formulated based on DSRP recommendations and these
proposals form the basis for preparation of present ESDD report.

Structural Rehabilitation Works

Civil works
 Restoration of Original Section of Earth Dam
 Strengthening of Weak / Seepage Portions of Earthen Dam
 Masonry Dam – Concrete Works
 Grouting Works in Drainage Gallery, Bypass Outlet Well and Head Regulator Well
 Protection Works on Guide bunds
 Scour Pool Concrete Works (anchoring, grouting, wall & base concrete etc.)
 Grouting Works in Dam Area
 Repair of Damaged Underwater Concrete surfaces using special chemicals and
additives
Hydro mechanical works
 Penstock Intake Gates & Stoplogs
 Hydraulic Hoist Mechanism for Penstock Gates (all 4)
 Penstocks Replacement(presently 1 out of 4 considered for replacement, others
considered for repairs)

4
  Spillway and Head Regulator Gates Trunnion, Operating Mechanism and other Up
gradation Works
 Gantry crane at top of dam(60 T and 20 T)with rails replacements.
 Painting for H-M Works
 Other Miscellaneous H-M Works
 Erection and Commissioning
Non-structural Measures
 Road Strengthening, Black-topping, Culverts and minor bridge
 Civil Works to facilitate Up gradation of Hydro-Mechanical and Instrumentation
Works
 Water Supply & Sprinkler system for slope turf maintenance
 Access Arrangements for various structures (STAIRS / ELEVATOR/ RAMP etc.)
 Upgradation/revival/augmentation/ of Surface drains, L-drains, Cross Drains and
Outfall Drains
 Additional Turfing for Downstream Slopes
 Repair and Replacement of Drainage and Dewatering Systems in Dam body
 Office and Guest House Buildings, Building repair and Architectural / Finishing
Works

Basic Facilities Improvement

 Illumination system – drainage galleries, top of dam and berms, galleries, walkways,
near gates and area lighting as required.
 New electrification on roads/berms of dam and in dam premises
Instrumentation, SCADA, Surveillance system, etc.
 Evaluation of communication system in dam complex at various locations and
elevations (EPABX, PA, Wireless etc.)
 Fire Fighting System Works
 Up gradation and modernization of electrical cabling control panels and SCADA
system for remote operation of all gates, valves, gantries and other dam related
equipment
 Integrated CCTV based surveillance system for the entire dam complex including
centralized operation and monitoring from control room
 Up gradation and operationalizing of a centralized control room for dam operation
 Other Electrical Works not covered under other heads
 Instrumentation Works – devices to measure uplift pressure, water pressure,
temperature variation, strain computation, deflection measurements, stress
distribution and water pressure measurements, seismological parameters, pore
pressure etc.

Figures 1.1 and 1.2 provide photographs of key infrastructure proposed for rehabilitation
works and also major interventions locations.

5
Minor Erosion to the Bucket face of spillway Minor Crack & seepage on D/s surface of Power
dam

Longitudinal drain & measuring device needs Seepage on downstream face of power dam
to be provided at Downstream of power dam

Non-functional Stand Pipe Piezometer

6
 Slushy land observed near Right Bank Rock Toe

Destrubed Rip-Rap on U/s of Right bank at Erosion observed at Right Bank on D/s Dam
CH-15000

Damaged pointing at Power Dam Non-functional SCADA System Configuration of

Gates Control-Screenshot

7
Cut-throat flume not properly installed in the Drainage on D/s of R/B Earth dam Nr Envelopes
Drainage Gallery with faulty V-Notch

Figure 1.1: Selected Photographs of Improvement/Intervention area

8
Figure 1.2: Project Area showing major intervention locations

9
1.3 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT AND SCHEDULE
As can be seen from the list of activities proposed under dam rehabilitation project; these
activities can be divided into civil work,hydro-mechanical work,infrastructure
developmentwith a view to improve dam safety. Civil work will be carried out by
contractor(s) as these are labour intensive activities and would be completed over a period
of 72 months. SPMU/IA will hire contractor(s) based on national open competitive
procurement using a Request for Bids (RFB) as specified in the World Bank‘s
―Procurement Regulations for IPF Borrowers, July 2016,Revised August 2018 Procurement
Regulations), and is open to all Bidders as defined in the Procurement Regulations.
Following is the overall implementation schedule:

Proposed Starting of implementation : 12/2020

Proposed Ending of implementation : 12/2026
Implementation Duration (months) : 72 months

1.4 PURPOSE OF ESDD

The overall project (DRIP II) was categorized as High Risk as per the internal Environment
and Social Risk Classification of the Bank. The Environment and Social Due Diligence has
been conducted to use it as a tool for decision-making on the sub-project with the
following specific objectives:
i. To identify, evaluate and manage the environment and social risks and impacts of the
sub-project in a manner consistent with the ESSs;
ii. To adopt a mitigation hierarchy approach to the project’s E&S risks i.e. a) anticipate
and avoid risks and impacts; b) minimize or reduce risks and impacts to acceptable
levels, if not avoidable; c) once risks and impacts have been minimized or reduced,
mitigate; and (d) where significant residual impacts remain, compensate for or offset
them, where technically and financially feasible;
iii. To help identify differentiated impacts on the disadvantaged or vulnerable and to
identify differentiated measures to mitigate such impacts, wherever applicable;
iv. To assess the relevance and applicability of environmental and social institutions,
systems, laws, regulations and procedures in the assessment, development and
implementation of projects, whenever appropriate; identify gaps, if any exist, and
v. To assess borrower’s existing capacity, gaps therein, and identify areas for enhanced
capacity towards management of E&S risks.
vi. Based on the categorization of Environment and Social risks and impacts of the Dam
sub-project, to determine whether ESIA is to be carried out using independent third-
party agency or a generic ESMP customized to mitigate E&S risks and impacts will
suffice.

1.5 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY OF ESDD

The following approach has been adopted for ESDD:
i. Study sub-project information, proposed interventions, their magnitude and locations
and carry out assessment of each proposed intervention to identify the magnitude of
E&S risk and impacts;

10
 ii. Review relevance and applicability of national and state legal requirements and
Bank’s ESF policy, standards and directives and preliminary assessment of
applicability of legal requirement and ESS framework (2-8)
iii. Conduct site visit to understand baseline environment and social settings, proposed
activities under the sub-project, their location and sensitivity, if any.
iv. Present key baseline data essential for impact assessment in immediate vicinity area
of proposed interventions from secondary sources, such as land-use, protected areas
in vicinity, ascertain presence of indigenous (schedule tribe)/vulnerable people, etc.
v. Undertake institutional assessment to identify existing capacities & relevant gaps to
manage E&S risks and impacts
vi. Conduct preliminary stakeholder consultations to help identify potential
stakeholders; to provide information on the proposed interventions; to identify issues
and concerns; and ascertain appropriate mechanisms for continued engagement
vii. Carry out activity wise environment and social screening and identify risks and
impacts. Classify the sub-project based on risk level (low, moderate or substantial and
high) and recommend commensurate plans/measures to meet identified risks and
impacts.

Detailed consultations with communities living downstream/vicinity of the dam, could not
be held in the current circumstances due to COVID and these shall held as soon as situation
is conducive for holding such consultations.

11
 Chapter INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND
2 CAPACITY ASSESSMENT
2.1 POLICY AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK
India has well defined environmental and social regulatory framework. The regulation
applicability depends on nature of work and location of work. Broadly legislation can be
divided into four categories viz. environmental, forests, wildlife conservation and social. The
applicability analysis of regulations pertaining to all the above four categories was carried
out. The applicability of World Bank ESF comprising, 10 ESSs (ESS1 to ESS10) to the
proposed rehabilitation proposals and Standard specific requirements were analysed.
Further, a comparison of national environmental and social regulations versus World
Bank’s ESS was been carried out along with the gap analysis. Applicability of Indian
regulations, World Bank’s ESS along with comparison and gap analysis is discussed in ESMF.

Central Water Commission, Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India has prepared
“Operational Procedures for Assessing and Managing Environmental Impacts in Existing
Dam Projects” as a guiding document for the dam owners to systematically address in
advance the environmental safeguard requirements and have discussed in detail all
applicable legal requirement. Reference has been drawn from this document as well, while
carrying out applicability analysis.

Indian environmental regulations requiring environment clearance is for new dam projects
specifically for the purpose of hydropower generation and/or irrigation projects and vary
with generation capacity for hydropower projects and culturable command area served by
irrigation projects. Forest related clearances become applicable, if new or any modification
in any existing project requires diversion of forest land for non-forestry purposes. Wildlife
Clearance process gets triggered if the project is in proximity to protected area or activities
are proposed within protected or conservation areas (CA).

Therefore, for the proposed dam rehabilitation activities at Ukai Dam Project, regulatory
clearances will not be applicable as per Indian regulation. Other applicable regulatory
requirement is discussed in ESMF.

2.2 DESCRIPTION OF INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

The sub-project will be implemented by Narmada, Water Resources, Water Supply and
Kalpsar Department (NWRWS&K), Gujarat. The department is headed by Secretary (Water
Resources). The mandate of NWRWS&K is:
 Effective planning of usage of the water sources available as per the Water Policy of the
State
 Prepare Water Policy of the State and review it periodically
 Obtain quantitative, timely and qualitative information and review it from time to time
 Utilise the water resources available for increasing irrigational benefits and agricultural
production and increase life standard of the farmers of the State thereby
 Increase the underground water recharge in required areas

12
 Salinity ingress in the gulf areas
 Consumptive use of water resources for maintaining water balance
 Transfer water to the scarcity hit areas and areas facing acute shortage of water

The sub-project will be implemented by EE, Ukai Division No.1. NWRWS&K has established
a formal system of dealing with public complaints and grievances. Its website (https://guj-
nwrws.gujarat.gov.in/) provides a public information section where various instruments for
public information are provided. It further provides the list of designated Public
Information Officers for various functions along with their addresses and phone numbers.
Appellate authority over PIOs have also been listed along with their addresses and phone
numbers. Procedures for registering complaints is provided, including that for Ukai project
circle. All the information is available in local language (Gujarati) also.

Further, as committed in ESCP, a Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) will be established

and operated by the contracted agencies to address Project workers workplace concerns.
SPMU will have oversight responsibility on the functioning of the GRM.

SPMUwill designate Nodal Officer(s) (full time in-house engineering staff with E&S
expertise) to coordinate and supervise E&S activities. They shall be at the level of Executive
Engineer/ Deputy Directors and shall provide commensurate time to comply with E&S
related activities. Brief TORs for these Nodal E&S officers is included in ESMF. The SPMU, in
case in-house expertise not available, will hire the qualified staffs on need basis to support
management of E&S risks including Environmental and Social Experts for ensuring
compliance with the Bank’s ESF and ESS’s and ensuring that these activities shall be
implemented as per the procedures.

13
 Chapter ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
3 AND SOCIAL CONDITIONS
Assessment of physical, ecological and socio-economic conditions at dam site and
immediate surrounding has been carried out based on secondary information and site
observations; as discussed below.

3.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT

Land Use/ Land Cover

The project surrounding area’s land use and environmental sensitivity was analyzed using
GIS techniques.Land use/ land cover map within 5 km radius of dam is presented at Figure
3.1. As can be seen from the map, scrub forest, agriculture/fallow land and water body
(reservoir) dominate the landuse in project surrounding area. In addition, there are few
patches of scrub land and scattered habitation on both the banks of river. Proposed
rehabilitation work will be confined to dam area and no structural interventions are
proposed beyond existing dam boundaries. Nine major villages are identified in dam
surrounding (within 5 km) viz. Serulla, Limbi, VadiBhensrot, Vadda P Bhensrot, Patharda,
Silatvel, Bhurivel, Ukai and Bhimpura.

[(Source: Digital data on land use/land cover maps using Bhuvan prepared by National Remote Sensing Centre
(NRSC) with further refinement using Google Earth]

Figure 3.1: Land Use and Land Cover Map of 5 km radius around Dam site

14
 Natural Hazards
Potential of natural hazards such as flooding and earthquake has been assessed.

The gross storage capacity Ukai dam is 7414.29 MCM and height of dam is 68.58 m.As per
the Indian Standard IS11223:1985 classification criteria, Ukai Dam is classified as a large
dam and, accordingly qualifies for “PMF (Probable Maximum Flood)” as the design
flood.The total discharging capacity of the spillway arrangement is 46270 cumec at MWL.
The design flood review studies have been submitted to CWC for approval. Review and
approval of the revised design flood by the Hydrology unit of CWC will decide, if any
structural measures are needed to safely handle the revised peak inflow flood and
ensuring the free board requirement as per codal provisions with the revised MWL. The
present designed MWL is 106.70 m and with the top dam level being 111.252 m, available
free board is 4.552 m, which is more than the minimum acceptable free board of 1.50 m.
After the designed flood is revised the revised MWL shall be calculated and if required a
solid parapet wall of 1 to 1.5 m shall be provided over the embankment dams. The
masonry dam and the spillway are already having 1 m high solid parapet wall.

Project falls in earthquake zone III and same was considered at the time of design and
there is no need for seismic design review. Bureau of Indian Standards [IS 1893 (Part
I):2002], has grouped the country into four seismic zones, viz. Zone II, III, IV and V. Zone II
is the least active and Zone V is the most active.

3.2 PROTECTED AREA

Dam is not in proximity to any protected area (National Park, Wildlife Sanctuary or
Conservation Reserve) as declared under Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. Nearest protected
area is ShoolpaneswarWildlife Sanctuary at 32 km and Purna Wildlife Sanctuary at 34 km.  

3.3 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT

The Ukai dam is located at Ukai village in Songadh taluka (tehsil) in district Tapi of Gujarat
state. The proximity villages i.e. villages which fall within 5 km distance from damare
Serulla, Limbi, VadiBhensrot, Vadda P Bhensrot, Patharda, Silatvel, Bhurivel, Ukai and
Bhimpura. The Songadh taluka of district Tapiis a notified Schedule V 1area of Gujarat state
due to significant Scheduled tribe population.

The Tapi district was carved out from Surat district by the government notification dated
29/09/2007. The district came under hot and semi-Arid South Eastern Agro climate Zone. It
is surrounded by Surat and Narmada district on the North and West, The Dangs and
Navsari districts in the South and the Maharashtra state in the East. It has five (05) talukas
(Tehsils) namely Nizar, Uchchhal, Songadh, Vyara and Valod. This district has 488 villages
out of which 451 are inhabited villages and there are 4 towns in the district.

1
Scheduled Areas are areas in India with a preponderance of tribal population subject to a special governance mechanism wherein
the central government plays a direct role in safeguarding cultural and economic interests of scheduled tribes in the area.

15
 The economy of the district and source of livelihood for people of the district are primarily
dependent on agriculture sector and allied activities. According to the 2011 Census, 79.9%
of the total working population of the district is engaged in agriculture, as against 49.6% in
the State as a whole. The agricultural activities in the district by & large influenced by the
natural resources. The main crops grown in the area are paddy, jowar, tuver, sugarcane,
wheat and groundnut. Animal Husbandry (particularly surti buffalo) is the main section of
the farming system in Tapi district. Dairy is an essential component of rural areas of the
district. There is a long tradition of rearing dairy animals by the farmers in the district.
Large number of landless families is also engaged in dairy rearing. Fish culture is being
accepted by the farmers as one of the subsidiary occupation in the district. The fish farming
in Tapi is mostly being done in village/ Panchayat ponds on lease. Agro-based industries
(sugar manufacturing, paper-based industries) and textiles (modern spinning with captive
power generation, manufacturing of fabrics, modern energy efficient textile processing) are
main focused industries in the district. Four Industrial Estates set up by the Gujarat
Industrial Development Corporation (GIDC) are located in Tapi district at different locations
viz., Doswada, Ukai, Vyara and Songadh.

The district is well connected with various locations within the state and outside through a
network of national and state highways. Almost all the Talukas (Tehsils) of the district are
well connected through rail network. The district has a well-developed network of sub-
stations and power stations to cater the requirements of electricity for industrial and
residential purposes.

The brief demographic characteristic of the district is given in the table below:
No. of Households 177,091 Household Size 5
Total Population 807,022 Population (0-6 age) 89,075
Male 402,188 Boys (0-6 age) 45,619
Female 404,834 Girls (0-6 age) 43,456
Sex Ratio 1,007 Sex Ratio (0-6) 953
Population (SC) 8,168 Population (ST) 679,320
(1.01%) (84.18%)
Male 4,139 Male 335,958
Female 4,029 Female 343,362
Literates 490,036 Literacy Rate (in %) 68.26
Male 269,007 Male 75.44
Female 221,029 Female 61.16
No. of Workers 450,902 Cultivators 105,726
(23.45%)
Male 251,049 Agricultural Labours 254,786
(56.51%)
Female 199,853 Household Industrial 9,679 (2.15%)
Workers
No. of Main Workers 337,579 Other Workers 80,711 (17.90%)
No. of Marginal 113,323
Workers
Source: Census of India, 2011 (District Handbook)
The project taluka is a notified Schedule V areas of the state. There is large scheduled tribe
population in the district (84.18%) and there are Scheduled Tribe households in the project
surrounding and downstream areas. The main tribes found in this region are Vasava Bhil,
Dubla, Gamit, Choudhri, Kokna, Dhodia, Warli, Bhil, Naika, Kolga, Kathods, and

16
 Kotwalia&Valvi-Padvi. The tribal in these regions are a heterogeneous people dialectically,
socially and culturally. Each group has had a different history and a different rate of
development.
No physical interventions are planned outside the dam area and engagement of scheduled
tribe households is not envisaged during the structural rehabilitation work. ST households
downstream of dam, will be taken into account during stakeholder engagement and
implementation of Emergency Action Plan for Ukai Dam appropriately in line with tribal
management plan.

3.4 CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT

As per list of National Monuments in Gujarat and list of State Protected monuments in
Gujarat; there are no protected monuments in and around dam site i.e. within 10 km
radius of dam site.

17
 ACTIVITY WISE ENVIRONMENT & SOCIAL
Chapter
SCREENING, RISK AND IMPACTS
4
IDENTIFICATION
4.1 SUB-PROJECT SCREENING
The subproject screening is undertaken following a three step screening methodology as
described in ESMF. Process of risk /impacts identification is done using screening process
considering the proposed interventions at each dam as provided in the Project Screening
Template using first screening format (SF-1). Applicable interventions are further classified
based on their location i.e. within dam area or outside the dam area. Each activity is
reviewed for the applicability under-sub project, location of applicable activity and likely
risks and impacts. The SF-1 format is used to ascertain the types of E&S risks for each of the
proposed rehabilitation activity e.g. Risk/Impact on Water Quality, Fisheries, Conservation
Area, Protected Area, Ecology, Physical Environment, Cultural Environment, Tribal
Presence, Private Land/Assets/Encroachers/Squatters, Labor, Migrant Labor and GBV risks
– each of these corresponding to the ESS 2-8.

The second format (SF-2) is used to assess the extent of risk/impact intensity for each of
the identified E&S risk and is used to categorize the risk level as
Low/Moderate/Substantial/High. Finally, using a third E&S risk summary format (SF-3), the
risk categories for all different types of E&S risk and impacts is summarized and the highest
of the risk categories is assigned as overall risk category for the given Dam sub-project.
Based on the above findings, the ESDD report recommends Risk category of the Dam sub-
project – whether it is Low/Moderate/Substantial/High and types of instruments that need
to be prepared as part of the ESMP along with the responsibilities and timelines.

Outcome of three stage screening exercise is discussed below.

Step I Screening (using Form SF-1): Sub-Project Component, Construction Support

Preparatory Intervention related vs Nature of risk/impact

Screening indicated that all project components related activities are limited to within the
dam area/premises. Due to nature of these activities, likely impacts will be on physical
environment in terms of air pollution, noise pollution and waste generation. None of the
proposed structural interventions involve acquisition of private land and/or private assets.
These activities in no way cause restriction on access to land or use of resources by local
communities and there is no economic displacement envisaged due to the sub-project.
Activities interfacing with water bodies – river/reservoir will have risk of spillage of
construction material and debris leading to water pollution and impacts on fishes.

Pre-construction and construction stage major auxiliary or preparatory intervention are

within dam area and beyond dam area. Operation of concrete mixture and heavy pumps
will be within dam area and other activities such as labour camp and debris disposal will be

18
beyond dam area. Transportation of material, debris disposal and labour camp are likely to
generate pollution and impact on physical environment.

Project will involve project managers and supervisors, contracted workers – these would
also include migrant workers as all the required labour will not be fully supplied locally for
a number of reasons, such as worker unavailability and lack of technical skills and capacity.
Construction contractors are expected to stay at/near dam, set up construction equipment
and machinery near work location at pre-determined/approved sites. Influx of skilled
migrant labour, albeit few in numbers, for construction works is likely. The labour will stay
outside the dam premises, hence risk of SEA/SH is likely.

Proposed non-structural interventions include Emergency Action Plan, Early Warning

System and Flood Forecasting System, etc. During implementation, project will reach out to
downstream population including disadvantaged and vulnerable persons and tribal
households. During implementation of EAP, population in vulnerable areas under different
release scenario will be identified and contacted through public consultation meetings.
Communities will be made aware about the warning systems and do’s and dont’s during
such scenarios.

Output of this screeningis enclosed as Annexure I.

Step II Screening (using Form SF-2): All applicable activities identified as having potential
risks/impacts that were identified through Step I screening, are screened for associated
sub-activity and evaluated for the extent of risk. Sub-activity’s Risk/Impact intensity is
further categorised as Low (L), Moderate (M), Substantial (S) or High (H) based on following
criteria:

Low: Localized, temporary and negligible

Moderate: Temporary, or short term and reversible under control
Substantial: Medium term, covering larger impact zone, partially reversible
High: Significant, non- reversible, long term and can only be
contained/compensated

Occupational Health and safety: OHS is a substantial risk activity in almost all cases and is
not being considered under screening criteria. Occupational health and safety is considered
an important requirement of every project irrespective of size and type of the projects. It
will be part of Contractor’s ESMP.

Analysis of extent of risk/impact for sub-activities resulted in identification of most of the

activities proposed as Low risk, except for following which have been assessed as having
Moderate Risk/impact.
 Restoration of Original Section of Earth Dam
 Masonry Dam – Concrete Works
 Road strengthening, black topping, culverts and minor bridges
 Setting up of Labour Camp
 Disposal of Large amount of debris
19
None of the activities for this sub-project is having substantial or high risk. The outcome of
Screening is enclosed as Annexure II. In case of GBV/SEAH, this site was assessed as Low
risk.

Step III Screening (using Form SF-3): This is one of the important screening template which
brings out the risks identified in the SF-2. These risks are distributed in to environmental
and social risks to complete a matrix to bring out a complete scenario of risks and their
classification in a matrix format. Any of the activity comes an H or S will make the sub
project a high risk sub project and will undergo a detailed ESIA. Low to moderate will
prepare Standard ESMP.

Based on consideration of all the above, summary of Risk/Impact in SF-3 for major sub-
project activities is given at Table 4.1 below.

20
 Table 4.1: Summary of Identified Risks/Impacts in Form SF-3
Project Activity Environment Risks Social Risks
Air, water, Pollution General Protected Area Other RET Fish and Land Triba Labou Cultural GBV/SEAH
noise, land downstream Ecology (Wild Life species (flora Aquatic l r heritage
use, Soil, and upstream Sanctuaries, and fauna) life within
Resource National Park and outside dam
use other natural protected water
habitat even if not areas body
protected)
Civil (within Dam M M L None None L L L M L L
Boundary) 
Hydro Mechanical  L L L None None L L L L L L
Instrumental SCADA, L L L None None L L L L L L
surveillance
Painting M L L None None
Road work   M L L None None L L L M L L
Safety measures (Siren, L L L None None L L L L L L
Lighting)
Major Civil Work like NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Additional Spill Way
Major Hydraulic NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Structure (tunnelling)
Major Civil Work NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
extending beyond Dam
Area Like training
Structure
Additional activities for NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Tourism /Solar/Fisheries/
Water recreation
enhancement
Criteria for Risk Evaluation:
Low: Localized, temporary and Negligible
Moderate: temporary, or short term and reversible under control
Substantial: medium term, covering larger impact zone, partially reversible
High: significant, non-reversible, long term and can only be contained/compensated
Occupational Health and safety: OHS is a substantial risk activity in almost all cases and is being treated separately through OHS plan in accordance with WB ESHS guidelines and shall
be applicable to all sub-projects. Hence is not being considered under screening criteria.

21
4.2 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION
In light of the COVID 19 pandemic, Government of India has announced a country wide
lockdown between March 23 till May 31, 2020, that constrained holding of consultation
meetings. Large Public gatherings is not permitted even today during the Unlock phase. .
However, to ensure the participation of stakeholders in ESDD preparation and record their
views, stakeholders were contacted ensuring social distancing and their views recorded. A
formal consultations will be held and outcomes documented at opportune time.. Two sets
of questionnaires are prepared, one for each category of stakeholders – direct workers and
community stakeholders. Direct workers included Engineers/staff working at dam (present
or working from home) – full time or contracted and community stakeholders included
local people from vicinity villages.

The stakeholder consultation questionnaire is filled up after consulting available Dam

Engineers/staff, villagers residing in nearby villages as well as workers at dam site after one
to one interactions/ group video calling facilities and their responses are compiled.

Stakeholder consultation was conducted as part of environmental and social due diligence,
with a purpose to:
a. provide initial information to the communities on the proposed project interventions
and particularly the non-structural interventions, if any;
b. Help identify potential stakeholders who are involved at this stage and will be involved
a later stage.
c. assess their responses in understanding the potential risks and prepare mitigation plan
to address their concerns

Following is the outcome of the stakeholder consultation exercise. List of participants is

enclosed as Annexure III.

A. Interaction with Dam Engineers/Staff

Questions Responses provided / Observations
Please confirm whether all proposed structural All proposed structural rehabilitation
rehabilitation activities for this dam are limited to activities for this dam are limited to dam
dam compound only or any activities are proposed compound only.
beyond dam complex like catchment area,
treatment plan, stabilization of reservoir rim area,
slope stabilization, de-silting etc.? Please specify if
any possibility of local community interference exist
during the implementation of rehabilitation
measures; including stakeholders consultation
meetings planned for dissemination of emergency
action plans which is a non-structural measure.
Is there any unsettled issues (legacy) related to No
displacement or resettlement, pending since time of
dam construction? If yes, please give a brief detail.
Any unauthorized encroachers or squatters living No unauthorized encroachers or squatters
within the dam premise? If yes, are these not a living within the dam premise.
threat for dam security and dam premise, any official
action taken in the past, does the state government
22
Questions Responses provided / Observations
have legalized these squatters and these have full
right in the property of dam authorities.
What is the proposed institutional arrangement to Dam authorities will be dealing with
deal the Environment and Social activities within the Environment and Social activities based on
scheme i.e. in-house team of experts/hired agency issues. Individual Experts will be hired on
or Individual Experts? need bases
Who will be in charge of E&S related activities at At dam site, Superintending Engineer of
dam site and at SPMU level? Ukai Dam, and at SPMU level, Nodal
Officer SMPU, Gandhinagar will be in
charge of E&S related activities.
How do communities contact dam officials? Is there Dam authorities have robust interaction
any existing mechanism known to communities to with local communities in catchment and
contact dam officials (through telephone/mobile/e- command area. As part of EAP all local
mail/official website? government administrative officials and
Sarpanch are part communiqué.
Further, the communities can directly
interact with dam officials by way of Phone
and mobile including written communiqué
at below mentioned Address:
The Executive Engineer,
Ukai Division No.1, Ukai
Taluka: Sonagadh, District: Tapi
Gujarat: 394680
Phone No. (02624) 233 221
Email ID:eeukaidn1@gmail.com
Website: guj-nwrws.gujarat.gov.in
What is existing mechanism to communicate with A written Communication by Revenue
downstream communities/public on unregulated Depart at time of Flood Released to Local
releases of water during high flood time & downstream Dist. Administrations.
siren/written communication to district authorities/ Mobile, wireless & Telephonic
telephone/mobile/text messages or any other mode communication & Coordination to
of communication? Regional flood cell as well as State Level
Flood Cell-SWDC Gandhinagar, Distt.
Collector/Local Administrations during
Flood & Monsoon. Communities and
public at large are alerted by Siren/Hooter
which has intensity of 5 Km radius of Dam
Site.
How do you ensure that downstream community is Awareness Program, Announcements
fully aware of the above existing mechanism? through & Information sharing with locals
through Dist./Panchayat Administrations
through Revenue Department officials are
done at regular basis .
Are there women employees at the dam site? No
Is there any existing Grievance Redressal Mechanism Existing mechanism of grievance redressal
(GRM) within the department to address any kind of is in- house where the Executive Engineer
grievance/complaints by general public? is over all responsible for redressal of such
grievance or complains. For major
complain or grievance the Superintending
Engineer is also intervene as per situation
or nature of complain.
Details of any grievances received lately related to No grievances are received lately related
this new Scheme? to this new Scheme

23
 Questions
Is dam premise a restricted area or has open access
to general public?
Are there tribal’s living in the surrounding area of
dam complex? Which tribes are these? Please give
brief detail.
Does the dam have any tourism/water recreation
facilities? If yes, how many approximate tourists
visits annually, annual revenue generated, whether
any portion of this generated revenue is diverted to
regular O&M of this dam.
Do you engage any Local laborer’s for routine dam
maintenance work? If yes, what is the process of
engaging these locals for work at dam, whether
through Government approved contractor or hired
individually?
Responses provided / Observations
Dam premises is restricted for General
Public
Tribal population is residing in the 9
Villages Surrounding Up stream and 6
Villages at Downstream of the Dam. The
tribal population belongs to the tribes
namely,(1)Gamit, (2)Vasava, (3)Chaudhari,
and (4) Kokani
Being restricted zone no such activities are
permitted by Dam authorities
Local laborers are engaged for O&M and
other works through Government
approved contractor

B. Interaction with Local Community

Questions Responses provided /Observations
How many villages are in immediate downstream Nine (9) villages are in immediate
vicinity? downstream vicinity.
Out of 9 villages, 2000 villagers of 7 Villages
Are they dependent on dam in any way for their
are depends on fishing for their livelihood
livelihood?
from dam.
Does any of these villages were displaced and
None of villages of the above 9 villages are
rehabilitated during the construction of Ukai Dam.
displaced.
Are there any pending compensation issues?
Is there any R&R (Rehabilitation & Resettlement)
No R&R (Rehabilitation & Resettlement)
affected person known to you who is currently
affected person is currently working with
working with the dam authorities? If so, in what
the dam authorities
capacity (Employee/Direct Worker/Contractor)
2000 villagers of 7 Villages are depends on
Are you aware of any fishing communities living
fishing for their livelihood from dam. All of
immediately downstream of dam whose livelihood
these families of Fisherman are living
are directly linked with the fishing activities of this
immediately in downstream in 1.5 KM of
dam?
radius
Fisheries Dept. issues permitted to
Are you aware of fishing working seasons, revenue
designated contractor for fishing activities
earning, any access to general public for fishing, any
in reservoir area. general public is
suggestion etc.
prohibited for such activities
Are you aware of local women affected in any way
No
by dam operations?
Are you aware of any early flood warning system for
this dam, or any other system wherein downstream
Yes
communities getting regular update during flood
season for any uncontrolled release of water?
Are you aware of any dam related incident
No fatal incidence has happened at dam
happened in the past wherein some loss of life
site.
encountered? If yes, brief summary may be given

24
 Questions Responses provided /Observations
Dam authorities are available on Mobile/
Phone and also by other means of
If you have to contact the dam authorities; how will
communiqué. Office Address and contact
you contact, through telephone/mobile/e
details are available by way of Label
mail/personally?
Boards, flood Memorandum and by
accessing web site of department
This dam is one of major dams in South
part of Gujarat which is catering the need
of Irrigation (3,31,517 Ha. of 1110 villages
through canal), 11 developed Sugar
Give your views about Ukai dam, how this dam is factories, 11 developed rice factories, 42
helping Country, State, district or local communities agriculture based industries, Drinking
in meeting its objectives, any specific concern can Water (1 Municipal Corporation, 7
also be given? Nagarpalika, 18 GWSSB, 5 GIDC, 100 other
industries,), Fisheries, Flood Control, &
Hydro Power(305 MW) and thereby
helping the Nation in water, power,& Food
security.
Are you aware of any document named Emergency
Yes
Action Plan (EAP) of the dam?
If yes, do dam authorities conduct any annual mock
Yes, nearby communities are educated by
drill or consultation meeting on dam site and invite
way of meeting and multimedia displays on
all stakeholders to inform about various protocols in
general precaution and safety measures
place and consequences in case dam fails?
In future, during stakeholder’s consultation
meeting, would you like to be a part of these
Yes
consultation and mock drill activities to be
conducted by dam authorities?
Office of The Executive Engineer, Ukai
If yes, how to contact you, please give the
Division No.1, Ukai
corresponding address along with all details to
Email Id : eeukaidn1@gmail.com Phone
receive the official communication.
No: (02624) 233 221
Are you a regular follower of official website of dam
authorities as a general public, in case you are a
Yes, Sometimes
contractor, do you follow various tenders’ notices
being invited for various maintenance of this dam?
Any suggestion to improve overall system by dam
Nil
authorities in any way, please give in brief?

4.3 DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY OF RISKS AND IMPACTSFROM ACTIVITIES BASED ON

SCREENING
Based on the above screening analysis, potential impacts and risks from the sub-project are
summarised below:

Environmental Impacts and Risks

1. Environment risks and impacts, as assessed above, for various project activities under
this sub-project are categorised as Low and Moderate due to localised nature of
proposed activities i.e. activities remain limited to dam area except for road work,
transportation, labour camp and muck/debris disposal.
2. Execution of civil and hydro-mechanical work within dam body will generate localised
impacts on physical environment and resource use.
25
3. Civil work interfaced with water body such as restoration of original section of earth
dam, strengthening of weak / seepage portions of earthen dam, masonry dam –
concrete works,grouting works in dam area etc pose risk of water pollution and impact
on fish fauna.
4. Construction and demolition waste and debris require careful disposal at pre-identified
and approved site (by E&S Experts of SPMU/IA) to minimise the risk of pollution on this
count.
5. Waste generation from labour colony can pollute drinking water sources of community,
risk is low and can be mitigated by providing adequate sanitation facilities.
6. No impact on general ecology is envisaged.
7. Rehabilitation work would require labour to work on various sections of dam involving
working at height, working in confined spaces, working on reservoir side, etc; further,
workers will also be exposed to dust and noise and will have to handle chemicals/gases
for some of the works; these will lead to occupational health and safety risks.

Social Impacts and Risks

1. As the interventions are within the dam premises and on the dam structure, there shall
be no adverse impacts on land and assets due to any sub-component or sub-activities
2. The dam is located in the Schedule V area, with substantial Scheduled Tribes
households in project surrounding and downstream area, triggering applicability of ESS
7. Although there will be no physical interventions outside the dam body, these ST
households will be engaged as part of EAP implementation.
3. Influx of migrant labour will be low as these works require only few but very skilled
labour. Also these workers will mostly operate from labour camps within the dam
premises/proximity and hence there would be minimal interface with communities and
therefore significantly lower SEAH/GBV risks.
4. No impacts are envisaged on cultural heritage as none located in project vicinity
5. Labour related risk would include:
 Safety issues while at work like injuries/accidents/ fatalities leading to even death,
while at work; Occupational health and safety risks due to exposure of workers to
unsafe conditions while working at heights, working using lifts, handling of
equipment and machinery, exposure to air and noise pollution etc. will be
addressed through OHS guidelines.
 Short terms effects due to exposure to dust and noise levels, while atwork
 Long term effects on life due to exposure to chemical /hazardous wastes
 Inadequate accommodation facilities at work force camp, including inadequate
sanitation and health facilities
 Sexual harassment at work
 Absence or inadequate or inaccessible emergency response system for rescue of
labour/workforce in situations of natural calamities.
 Health risks of labour relating to HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases
 Non-payment of wages
 Discrimination in Employment (e.g. abrupt termination of the employment, working
conditions, wages or benefits etc.)
 Unclear terms and conditions of employment

26
 Discrimination and denial of equal opportunity in hiring and
promotions/incentives/training opportunities
 Denial for workers’ rights to form worker’s organizations, etc.
 Absence of a grievance mechanism for labour to seek redressal of their
grievances/issues

27
 Chapter CONCLUSIONS AND
5 RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 CONCLUSIONS

5.1.1 Risk Classification

As per the ESDD exercise, risk/impacts that have been identified relate to Water Quality,
Fisheries, Physical Environment, labour and SEAH/GBV. The summarised environmental
and social risks of identified activities with level of risk is presented in previous
chapter.Environment risks of air, water, noise, and resource use as well as social risks of
labour, civil work within the dam body and road work are Moderate. Similarly,
environment and social risk of labour camp and disposal of debris has been identified as
moderate. Risk of all other activities has been identified as Low. These risks are low to
moderate and localised, short term and temporary in nature which can be managed with
standard ESMP and guidelines.

Hence the overall risk of this sub-project Dam is categorized as Moderate. OHS is a
substantial risk activity and is being treated separately through OHS plan in accordance
with WB ESHS guidelines.

5.1.2 National Legislation and WB ESS Applicability Screening

The applicability analysis of GoI legal and regulatory framework indicates that while, there
are various legislation which will have to be followed by the contractor for the protection
of environment, occupational health and safety of workers and protection of workers and
employment terms. None of Indian legislation is applicable warranting obtaining clearance
prior to start of construction/improvement work.

In addition to overarching ESS1, fiveESS standards are found relevant to this sub-project as
per reasons given in Table 5.1 below:

Table 5.1: WB ESF Standards applicable to the sub-project

Relevant ESS Reasons for Applicability of the standard

ESS2: Labour and Working Due to engagement of Direct worker, Contracted workers and
Conditions Community workers (likely for EAP and other non-structural
interventions) for rehabilitation work
ESS3: Resource Efficiency, Civil and hydro-mechanical work including resource consumption;
Pollution Prevention and requiring protection of physical environment and conservation of
Management resources

ESS 4: Community Health Rehabilitation work, although limited to dam complex, can increase
and Safety community exposure to risk and impacts; directly or indirectly.
ESS 7: Indigenous The whole taluka is a Schedule V area, even though the project
Peoples/Sub-Saharan African interventions do not directly or indirectly impact schedule tribe.
Historically Underserved There are scheduled tribe population in the downstream, who will
Tradition Local Communities be engaged during implementation of Emergency Action Plans.
ESS 10: Stakeholder For engagement of stakeholders in all structural and non-structural
Engagement Plan interventions e.g. Early flood Warning system, siren systems,
28
 Relevant ESS Reasons for Applicability of the standard

broadcasting facilities, Emergency Action Plan etc.

5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS

5.2.1 Mitigation and Management of Risks and Impacts

Since risks and impacts are low to moderate category, a standard ESMP customised to sub-
project will be prepared in accordance with the ESMF. It shall cover the following aspects:

a. SPMU shall customise the standard Environmental and Social Management plan (ESMP)
that has been provided in the Environmental and Social Management Framework
(ESMF) and make it part of bid document for effective adherence by contractors.

b. ESMP will provide due measures for labour management and protection of
environment quality and resource conservation (during handling of resources) in line
with ESF standard ESS2 and ESS3 respectively. Likewise, due attention will be given to
Occupational Health and Safety of workers and community in line with the
requirements of ESS4 and World Bank Group guidelines on Occupational Health and
Safety (OHS). SPMU/IA shall customise the standard ESMP in line with outline provided
in the ESMF and ensure its adherence by contractor. The customised ESMP will address
the following:

 Gender Based Violence or SEA/SH related actions (ESS1)

 Labour Management Procedure (ESS2)
 Resource Efficiency and Pollution Prevention (ESS3)
 Community Health and Safety (ESS4)
 Tribal Development (ESS7)
 Stakeholders Engagement Plan (ESS10)

c. Contractor shall submit commitment to comply with ESMP of the sub-project.

Mitigation plans to meet requirements for relevant Standards with responsibility and
stages are given in Table 5.2 below:

Table 5.2: List of Mitigation Plans with responsibility and timelines

WB-ESS Triggered Mitigation Responsibility Timelines
Instrument
ESS1: Assessment and  Gender Based Dam Authority Before mobilization of
Management of Violence or contractor
Environmental and SEA/SH related
Social Risks and actions
Impacts
ESS2: Labour and  Labour Dam Authority Before mobilization of
Working Conditions Management contractor
Procedure (LMP)
including OHS
management plan
29
 WB-ESS Triggered Mitigation Responsibility Timelines
Instrument
ESS3: Resource  Pollution Dam Authority Before mobilization of
Efficiency, Pollution Prevention and contractor
Prevention and Environment
Management Quality
Management Plan
(PPEQMP)

ESS 4: Community  Community Dam Authority Before mobilization of

Health and Safety Health and Safety contractor
Management Plan
(CHSMP)
ESS 7: Indigenous  Tribal Development Dam Authority Before Mobilization of
Peoples/Sub-Saharan Plan Contractor
African Historically
Underserved Tradition
Local Communities
ESS 10: Stakeholder  SEP in accordance
Engagement Plan with project SEF SPMU/IA By negotiation

ESDD and ESMP will be placed on the www.damsafety.inwebsite as well as other accessible
locations such as office of Engineer in Charge at Dam site as well at SPMU for reference
and record. These documents would be disclosed/disseminated through other appropriate
means like project meetings, workshops etc. Each IA will translate these documents in
their local language, if required, and will upload in their respective websites and also make
available at other accessible locations.

5.2.2 Institutional Management, Monitoring and Reporting

ESMP will be customized for the sub project by SPMU/IA from standard ESMP included in
ESMF and shall be shared with CWC by SPMU for their review/endorsement and approval
before including in the bid document.

SPMU/IA will designate Nodal Officer(s) (full time in-house engineering staff with E&S
expertise) to coordinate and supervise E&S activities. They shall be at the level of Executive
Engineer/ Deputy Directors and shall provide commensurate time to comply with E&S
related activities. Brief TORs for these Nodal E&S officers is included in ESMF. The SPMU, in
case in-house expertise not available, will hire the qualified staffs on need basis to support
management of E&S risks including Environmental and Social Experts for ensuring
compliance with the Bank’s ESF and ESS’s and ensuring that these activities shall be
implemented as per the procedures.

SPMU/IA shall advise contractors about applicable legislative requirements and ensure that
contractors prepare its own ESMP (C-ESMP) as outlined in ESMP for this sub-project and
submit compliance reports to SPMU/IA on quarterly basis. SPMUs will share regular
implementation status of ESMPs to CWC and The World Bank in line with ESMF on
quarterly basis.

SPMU/IA shall establish and operationalize a grievance mechanism to receive and facilitate
resolution of complaints and grievances, from the communities and other stakeholders
30
including implementation partners. GRM works within existing legal and cultural
frameworks and shall comprise project level and respective State level redressal
mechanisms. Most Project related grievances could be minor and site-specific.

EMC (Engineering and Management Consultant) for the project will have sufficient staff
with skills on Environment and Social aspects. Awareness raising and capacity building on
the new Environmental and Social Framework (ESF) need to be carried out for the
environment and social staff engaged and this will be an area of continued focus, with a
view to generate awareness at to dam level. EMC will develop formats for regular
supervision and monitoring on E&S issues and undertake site visits/ inspections of the dam
sites to monitor for compliance; collate and review QPRs and set up a monitoring and
reporting system on E&S issues.

Overall, the proposed activities within this dam sub-project have low to moderate risks
resulting in the overall sub-project to be categorized as Moderate risk category. These
risks and impacts can be effectively mitigated with effective implementation of mitigation
plans by SPMU/IA, Contractors and monitoring by EMC, SPMU and CWC.

31
 Annexure - I: Form SF1
S. No Project Component Applicable Environment Likely Nature of Risk/Impact
(A) , Not and Social Water Quality (WQ), Fisheries
Applicable Risk (F), Conservation Area (CA),
(NA) Associated Protected Area (PA), Ecological
within dam (E), Physical Environment (PE),
area (DI), Cultural (C), Tribal Presence (T),
Beyond Dam Impact on private
Area (DE) land/assets/encroachers/squatte
rs (LA), Labor (L), GBV risks (G),
(Write whichever is applicable)
1 2 3 4 5
A Nature of Project Component and      
related sub activity Related
1 Reservoir Desiltation NA    
2 Major structural changes – Spillway NA    
construction (Improving ability to
withstand higher floods including
additional flood handling facilities as
needed.)
3 Structural strengthening of dams to NA    
withstand higher earthquake loads
4 Structural Improvement/Repair work A DI WQ, F, PE, L, G
upstream of Dam site (interfacing dam
reservoir) (like resetting of Rip-Rap,
repair of training walls, treatment of
Honeycombed etc.)
5 Structural Improvement/Repair work A DI WQ, PE, L, G
-Downstream of Dam site (with no
interfacing with dam reservoir) (like
repair of parapet walls, damage
spillway crest, downstream training
walls, etc.)
6 Re-sectioning earth dams to safe, NA    
stable cross sections
7 Hydro-mechanical activities with A DI PE, L, G
interface with dam reservoir
8 Hydro-mechanical activities A DI PE, L, G
Downstream of Dam site (with no
interfacing with dam reservoir)
9 Instrumentation, General lighting and A DI PE, L, G
SCADA systems
10 Basic Facilities (like access road A DI PE, L, G
improvement, renovation of office,
etc)
11 Utility installation like standby NA
generator, or setting up solar power
systems
12 Painting of dam u/s or d/s or both A DI WQ, L,G
faces
13 Water recreation activities NA    
14 Tourism Development NA    
15 Installation of Solar power/floating NA    
solar
16 List any other component not listed      
above
i Protection Works on Guide bunds A DI PE, L, G

32
 S. No Project Component Applicable Environment Likely Nature of Risk/Impact
(A) , Not and Social Water Quality (WQ), Fisheries
Applicable Risk (F), Conservation Area (CA),
(NA) Associated Protected Area (PA), Ecological
within dam (E), Physical Environment (PE),
area (DI), Cultural (C), Tribal Presence (T),
Beyond Dam Impact on private
Area (DE) land/assets/encroachers/squatte
rs (LA), Labor (L), GBV risks (G),
(Write whichever is applicable)
1 2 3 4 5
B Pre-construction and construction      
stage major auxiliary or preparatory
intervention
1 Acquisition (diversion of forests land NA    
for non-forest purposes) of forest land
2 Acquisition of private land NA    
Resettlement and Rehabilitation
(including physical or economic
displacement/impact on livelihood;
3 Temporary loss of business or NA    
Damages to crops or trees or
structures outside the ROW during
Construction activities by Contractor
4 Borrowing earth to meet Borrow NA    
materials requirement
5 Sourcing of Quarry materials NA    
6 Blasting NA    
7 Setting up Labour Camps (location A DE L, G
within dam premises or outside)
8 Heavy machinery deployment and NA    
setting up maintenance workshop
9 Setting up Hot mix plant NA
10 Deployment of Concrete mixture and A DI   PE, L
heavy pumps
11 Temporary land acquisition NA    
12 Need of Tree felling/ vegetation NA
clearance
13 Disposal of large amount of Debris A DE PE, L, G
14 Transport of large construction A DE PE, L, G
material
15 Utility shifting NA    
16 Discharge of reservoir water (lowering NA    
of reservoir water involved)
List any other not listed above      

Note : Occupational Health and Safety aspects / impacts/ risks are considered important part of any dam project
and this risk is separately classified. It shall be managed as per defined OH&S plans in every project
irrespective of size and type of project.

33
 Annexure – II: Form SF2
S. No Applicable Sub-Project Nature of Risk Elaborate cause (risk) and its effect Risk/Impact
Component/ Construction (Conforming to (Impact) on environment /social intensity for
preparatory Work related Column 5 of each type of
Sub activity ( As per SF-1) SF-1) and risk/impact
nature of sub Low (L) ,
activity Moderate
(M),
Substantial
(S), High (H)
       
1 2 3 4 5
A Project Component Related      
1. Structural      
Strengthening/Improvemen
t/Repair work -upstream of
Dam site
a Restoration of Original WQ, F, PE, L, G Air pollution, noise pollution, risk of M
reservoir water contamination and
Section of Earth Dam impact on fishes, generation of
construction debris, Labour and
GBV risk
b Strengthening of Weak / WQ, PE, L, G Air pollution, noise pollution, risk of L
reservoir water pollution, Labour
Seepage Portions of Earthen and GBV risk
Dam

c Masonry Dam – Concrete WQ, PE, L, G Air pollution, Noise pollution, water M
pollution, Labour and GBV risk
Works

d Grouting Works in Drainage WQ, PE, L, G Air pollution, noise pollution, risk of L
reservoir water pollution, Labour
Gallery, Bypass Outlet Well and GBV risk
and Head Regulator Well
e Grouting Works in Dam Area WQ, PE, L, G Air pollution, noise pollution, risk of L
reservoir water pollution, Labour
and GBV risk
2. Structural      
Improvement/Repair work
-Downstream of Dam site
(with no interfacing with
dam reservoir) (like repair
of parapet walls, damage
spillway crest, downstream
training walls, etc.)
a Scour Pool Concrete Works WQ, L, G Risk of water pollution, generation L
(anchoring, grouting, wall & of construction debris, Labour and
base concrete etc.) GBV risk

b Turfing on D/S slope PE, L, G Air pollution, noise pollution, L

c Repair of Damaged
Underwater Concrete
surfaces using special
chemicals and additives
generation of construction debris,
Labour and GBV risk
WQ, L, G Risk of water pollution, generation L
of construction debris, Labour and
GBV risk

d Protection Works on Guide PE, L, G Air pollution, noise pollution, L

bunds construction debris, Labour, GBV

34
S. No Applicable Sub-Project Nature of Risk Elaborate cause (risk) and its effect Risk/Impact
Component/ Construction (Conforming to (Impact) on environment /social intensity for
preparatory Work related Column 5 of each type of
Sub activity ( As per SF-1) SF-1) and risk/impact
nature of sub Low (L) ,
activity Moderate
(M),
Substantial
(S), High (H)
       
1 2 3 4 5
risk
e Road Strengthening, Black- PE, L, G Air pollution, noise pollution, M
topping, Culverts and minor construction debris, Labour, GBV
bridge risk
f Office and Guest House PE, L, G Air pollution, noise pollution, L
Buildings, Building repair construction debris, Labour, GBV
and Architectural / Finishing risk
Works

g  Civil Works to facilitate NO IMPACT

Up gradation of Hydro-
Mechanical and
Instrumentation Works
 Water Supply &
Sprinkler system for
slope turf maintenance
 Access Arrangements
for various structures
(STAIRS / ELEVATOR/
RAMP etc.)
 Upgradation/revival/au
gmentation/ of Surface
drains, L-drains, Cross
Drains and Outfall
Drains
 Repair and
Replacement of
Drainage and
Dewatering Systems in
Dam body
3. Hydro-Mechanical activities      
Downstream of Dam site
(with no interfacing with
dam reservoir)
a Penstocks Replacement WQ, PE, L, G Noise pollution, Water L
(presently 1 out of 4 pollution,Labour and GBV risk
considered for replacement,
others considered for
repairs)

b  Penstock Intake Gates & WQ, PE, L, G Noise pollution, Water pollution, L
Stoplogs Labour and GBV risk
 Hydraulic Hoist
Mechanism for
Penstock Gates (all 4)
c Spillway and Head Regulator L, G Labour and GBV risk L
Gates Trunnion, Operating
Mechanism and other Up
gradation Works
d Gantry crane at top of dam L, G Labour and GBV risk L
35
S. No Applicable Sub-Project Nature of Risk Elaborate cause (risk) and its effect Risk/Impact
Component/ Construction (Conforming to (Impact) on environment /social intensity for
preparatory Work related Column 5 of each type of
Sub activity ( As per SF-1) SF-1) and risk/impact
nature of sub Low (L) ,
activity Moderate
(M),
Substantial
(S), High (H)
       
1 2 3 4 5
(60 T and 20 T) with rails
replacements.
e Painting for H-M Works WQ, L, G Water pollution, Labour and GBV L
risk
4. Instrumentation, General  
lighting and SCADA systems  
a Evaluation of  
communication system in NO IMPACT
dam complex at various
locations and elevations
(EPABX, PA, Wireless etc)
b Fire Fighting System Works
c Up gradation and
modernization of electrical
cabling control panels and
SCADA system for remote
operation of all gates,
valves, gantries and other
dam related equipment
d Integrated CCTV based
surveillance system for the
entire dam complex
including centralized
operation and monitoring
from control room
e Other Electrical Works not
covered under other heads
f Instrumentation Works –
devices to measure uplift
pressure, water pressure,
temperature variation,
strain computation,
deflection measurements,
stress distribution and water
pressure measurements,
seismological parameters,
pore pressure etc.
g Up gradation and
operationalizing of a
centralized control room for
dam operation
5 Basic Facilities
Improvement
a Illumination system – NO IMPACT
drainage galleries, top of
dam and berms, galleries,
walkways, near gates and
area lighting as required.
b New electrification on
roads/berms of dam and in
36
 S. No Applicable Sub-Project
Component/ Construction
preparatory Work related
Sub activity ( As per SF-1)
1 2
dam premises
B. Pre-construction and
construction stage major
auxiliary or preparatory
intervention
1 Setting up Labour Camps
(location within dam
premises or outside)
2 Heavy machinery
deployment and setting up
maintenance workshop
3 Deployment of concrete
mixture and heavy pumps
4 Disposal of large
amount of Debris
5 Transport of large
construction material
Criteria for Risk Evaluation:
Low: Localized, temporary and Negligible
Moderate: temporary, or short term and reversible under control
Substantial: medium term, covering larger impact zone, partially reversible
High: significant, non- reversible, long term and can only be contained/compensated
Occupational Health and safety: OHS is a substantial risk activity in almost all cases and is being treated separately
through OHS plan in accordance with WB ESHS guidelines and shall be applicable to all sub-projects. Hence is not
being considered under screening criteria.
Nature of Risk Elaborate cause (risk) and its effect Risk/Impact
(Conforming to (Impact) on environment /social intensity for
Column 5 of each type of
SF-1) and risk/impact
nature of sub Low (L) ,
activity Moderate
(M),
Substantial
(S), High (H)
3 4 5
     
WQ, PE, L, G Wastewater generation from M
domestic activities, waste
generation, risk of tree, GBV risk
within labour and involving
community.
PE, L, G Heavy machinery will be deployed L
for repair and maintenance of gates
and hoists and for other activities -
waste, wastewater and air
emissions from machines
operations, hazardous waste
generation from oil waste, labour
and GBV risk
PE, L, G Concrete mixture and pumps will L
be deployed for road repair and
other civil works and dewatering -
waste generation, wastewater and
air emissions from operations,
hazardous waste generation from
oil waste, labour and GBV risk
PE, L, G Debris will be generated from M
various repair activities. - air and
noise emissions from debris
handling and transportation, water
pollution risk due to debris finding
its way to water body, and GBV risk
due to labour involvement
PE, L, G Material will be transported from L
various vendors and suppliers to
site for civil, electromechanical
work and instrumentation - loading
and unloading; ,air and noise
emissions from transportation,
Labour and GBV risk due to labour
involvement
37
38
 Annexure – III: List of Participants
S. Name Relation with Dam-Staff, Mobile No. Address
No Contractor, Worker Full (at least Village
. Time/Part Time, Local Name)
NGO…
1 Shri J. M. Patel Executive Engineer 9429276205 Ukai Dam
2 Shri G. S. Kokni Deputy Executive Engineer 9824645774 Ukai Dam
3 Shri J. R. Jariwala Assistant Engineer 9106988188 Ukai Dam
4 RameshbhaiChimanbhaiGamit W.C.Karkoon 7874350529 Pipalkuwa
5 ChimanbhaiBabliyabhaiGamit W.C.Helper 9913215133 Ghoda
6 SattarbhaiGabajibhaiGamit W.C.Helper 9687037011 Chacharbunda
7 SumanbhaiKasanjibhaiGamit W.C.Labour 8980333452 Moti Khervan
8 IbrambhaiSingabhaiVasava D.W.Labour 9327894852 Ukai
9 DhimabhaiRevjibhaiVasava D.W.Labour 8980337594 Ukai
10 JahgubhaiDevnabhaiVasava W.C.Labour 9909535630 Limbi
11 KuvarjibhaiGurjibhaiVasava VadiD.W.Labour 9512677398 Sherula
12 VanabhaiUmariyabhaiVasava VadiD.W.Labour 8469865258 Sherula
13 JamnabenBachubhaiGamit VadiD.W.Labour 9099443969 Single Khanch
14 MethabenDevliyabhaiVasava VadiD.W.Labour 7567762898 Munkiya
15 IndubenLaxmanbhaiGamit VadiD.W.Labour 9979665964 Vadada
16 ManibenNaranbhaiGamit VadiD.W.Labour 8469658357 Limbi
17 GomibenGangjibhaiGamit VadiD.W.Labour 9979318845 VadiBhesroat
18 ChitubenNavlabhaiGamit VadiD.W.Labour 9537594434 SinglKhanch
19 AatubenKaniyabhaiGamit VadiD.W.Labour 9727524451 Siletvel
20 ShivajibhaiGimlabhaiGamit W.C. Labour 9925604130 Ghoda
21 KarmabhaiJethiyabhaiGamit W.C. Labour 7567988031 Ghoda
22 VasantjiJatariyabhaiGamit W.C. Labour 8758139397 Ghoda
23 BhagubhaiJagnbhaiGamit W.C. Labour 9825442963 Single Khanch
24 PunabhaiSukhabhai More W.C. Kadiya 9925722746 Ukai
25 NapuriyabhaiLakhmabhaiGamit W.C. Labour 7567836581 Borpada
26 ShantabhaiBhukiyabhaiGamit W.C. Labour 9978971566 Devlpada
27 GamanbhaiChaganbhaiGamit W.C. Labour 9099836804 Ghoda
28 BholiyabhaiKutiyabhaiGamit W.C. Labour 9726551656 Pathrda
29 RaghubhaiNurjibhaiVasava W.C. Labour 9825909689 Sherula
30 RuvaibhaiKatudiyabhaiVasava W.C. Labour - Sherula
31 DhuljibhaiPanabhaiGamit W.C. Labour 8980412691 Limbi
32 Mohanbhai Babubhai Gamit W.C. Labour 9727818838 Ukai
33 RatilalChaganbhaiGamit W.C. Labour - Limbi
34 NurjibhaiGovlabhaiVasava W.C. Labour - Sherula
35 BachubhaiPosaliyabhaiGamit W.C. Labour - Single Khanch
36 ChampakbhaiSitarambhaiMaha W.C. Kadiya 9537420407 Ukai
le
37 N. F. Mahida W.C. Work Assistant - Ukai
38 SomabhaiBhilabhaiDhivre Villager 8238919005 Bhimpura
39 KashinathbhaiSukhlalabhai Patil Villager 6355176833 Ukai
40 ChanganbhaiRamabhaiGamit Villager 9638376801 Vadada
41 RaysingbhaiKathudiyabhaiGami Villager 6352871001 Lakhadkot
t
42 NiteshbhaiChanabhaiVasava Villager 9016316790 Limbi
43 Sunilbhai Babubhai Vasava Villager 9512540642 Limbi
44 HemantbhaiKantilalaVasava Villager 7575053252 Limbi
45 SukariyabhaiBuchiyabhaiGamit Villager 7069215958 Pathrda
46 ArpanabhaiDilipbhaiGamit Villager 7069672926 Bhurivel
47 JasubenGovindbhaiGamit Villager 9913797288 Bhurivel
48 BhulibenSukaiyabhaiGamit Villager 7069215958 Pathrda
49 ZinibenSureshbhaiGamit Villager 8469135871 Pathrda
50 MamtabenChandubhai Parmar Villager 9913077587 Pathrda
51 IndubenAvinashbhaiPawar Villager 7573935653 Pathrda
39
S. Name Relation with Dam-Staff, Mobile No. Address
No Contractor, Worker Full (at least Village
. Time/Part Time, Local Name)
NGO…
52 RameshbhaiChaganbhaiGamit Villager 8469135269 Vadada
53 RohitbhaiJaswantbhaiGamit Villager 8469626201 Vadada
54 AashishbhaiRavindrbhaiGamit Villager 7574981142 Vadada
55 YogeshbhaiChunilabhaiGamit Villager 9879091031 Vadada
56 EleshbhaiKisanbhaiGamit Villager 9687870782 Siletvel
57 SandipbhaiSingabhaiGamit Villager 7874933846 Siletvel
58 JemsbhaiKamnabhaiGamit Villager 7433076526 Siletvel
59 MayurbhaiDhanjibhaiGamit Villager 9727250954 Siletvel
60 MayurbhaiRameshbhaiGamit Villager 7574030816 Siletvel
61 AjaybhaiLalajibhaiGamit Villager 7567581184 Siletvel
62 NileshbhaiPantyabhaiGamit Villager 8320397917 Siletvel

40