Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Crime.
Methodology
As we know the law enforcement agencies are governed differently in states and union territories with
the state executive having direct jurisdiction over the police force whereas in the union territories the
police is governed by the union government. To compare the violent crimes between states and union
territories we do not compare the absolute values but bring them to the same scale. To bring them to
the same scale we divide the total violent crimes by population.
Sample size: We selected the 5 most populous states and union territories to get a more accurate
representation of the entire data set (national data)
5 states
Maharashtra
Uttar Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh
Bihar
Madhya Pradesh
5 Union Territories
Delhi
Pondicherry
Chandigarh
Andman and Nicobar islands
Dadra and Nagar Haveli
Methodology to calculate population: In India population census data is collected once in every 10 years
so to get the population for 7 successive years (2010 to 2016) we use linear interpolation using the data
of the 2011 census and considering the national growth rate of 1.2%.
States:
With the exception of Andhra Pradesh the absolute number of total violent crimes have increased over
the years for every state.
Union territories:
Amongst the union territories Delhi has the lion’s share of crime data though the recent past has shown
an encouraging trend of reduction in violent crimes.
Comparative Analysis:
The visual representation above shows the comparative data of the states and UTs in absolute terms
and as the data clearly shows it is unfit for comparison, analysis or any kind of conclusion.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Years
After dividing the total violent crimes by population we are able to bring the data to the same scale and
hence compare. The trend line clearly shows that the crime committed per capita is higher for union
territories when compared to the states.