SBM SCORING MATRIX

A. IMPROVEMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES 60 %

a.1. Access (Enrolment Increase) 45 %

a.2. Efficiency (Completion Rate, Cohort
Survival Rate, Drop-Out Rate) 25 %
a.3 Quality NAT 30%

B. SBM PRACTICES (D-O-D) 40 %

============
100 %
STEP 1 – DETERMINE PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

 Access - Enrolment Increase - (45%)

 Efficiency - Drop-out Rate (DR), Completion Rate (CR) - (25%)
 Quality - NAT MPS (30%)

A. Access (45%)
INCREASE ENROLMENT RATE
Rating Description Indicator
1 Marginal 1 – 3.00% increase
2 Average 3.01 – 5.00% increase
3 High 5.01 % - up increase

B. EFFICIENCY (25%)
DECREASE DROP OUT RATE
Rating Description Indicator
1 Marginal 0.01 – 2.0% decrease
2 Average 2.01 – 4.0% decrease
3 High more than 4% decrease

INCREASE COMPLETION RATE

Rating Description Indicator
1 Marginal 1 – 3.00% increase
2 Average 3.01 – 5.00% increase
3 High 5.01 % - up increase
C. QUALITY AND RELEVANCE (30%)
INCREASE ACHIEVEMENT RATE
Get the average of NAT for the last three (3) years, use the rating scale below
to determine the MPS.
Rating Description Indicator
1 Marginal 26 – 50%
2 Average 51 – 75%
3 High 76 – 100%

STEP 2 : Compute for Validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)

CUMULATIVE SCORES OF
SBM PRINCIPLES WEIGHT RESULTS
VALIDATORS PER PRINCIPLE
Leadership &
30%
Governance ___________x 0.30
Curriculum &
30%
Learning ___________x 0.30
Accountability &
Continuous
25%
Improvement ___________x 0.25
Resource
15%
management ___________x 0.50
SUB TOTAL 100%

STEP 3: Compute for Final Rating

AREAS WEIGHT COMPUTATION RESULTS

A. Performance
60% 2.65 x 0.60 1.59
Improvement
B. SBM Assessment
40% 2.50 x 0.40 1.00
Score
TOTAL 100% 2.59
SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE ADVANCED

SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE

NUMERICAL RATING SCALE DESCRIPTION

0.50 – 1.49 Developing
1.50 – 2.49 Maturing
2.50 – 3.0 Advanced