You are on page 1of 11

Appendix A.

Typical Spacing Tables

The following comments should be applied to the Tables contained in Appen-


dix A.
NA = Not applicable. No measurable distance is appropriate.
NM = No minimum spacing requirement has been established for rea-
sons of fire protection. Use engineering judgment for spacing and
provide access for fire fighting and maintenance.
S = Spacing is based on security needs and not on fire, explosion, or
toxic concerns.
CAUTION:
1. Tables A through E include typical spacing values. Explanatory text
is included in Chapters 5 and 6.
2. The typical spacing distances cited in Tables A through E are based
on potential fire consequences (explosions and toxic concerns may
require greater spacing). Variations in spacing may be warranted
based on site-specific hazards and risks. Distances may be reduced
or increased based on risk analysis or when additional layers of pro-
tection are implemented (such as: fire protection or emergency shut-
down systems).
3. These tables are not applicable to enclosed process units.
Miscellaneous typical spacing values are included in Table E.
NOTES:
1. Distances are measured horizontally.
2. Typical horizontal distances between buildings, process equipment,
and property lines are shown and apply to the closest edge to closest
edge dimensions.
3. Where unusual conditions require closer spacing, appropriate risk
reduction measures should be considered.

139
Appendix A. Typical Spacing Tables 143
144 Guidelines for Facility Siting and Layout
Appendix A. Typical Spacing Tables 145

ter

.
146 Guidelines for Facility Siting and Layout

You might also like