Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This in-course assignment comprises of two distinct parts. Part 1 is individual work with the
aim of preparing you for the recruitment process and Part 2 is group work.
1. Introduction
a. Company background – a brief background of the organization
2. Project Management
a. High-level Planning - describe your team’s plan to meet the objective of the
assignment. A Gantt Chart is required.
3. Main Body
a. Organizational Culture – explain the culture practiced by the organization with your
justifications
b. Recruitment process – explain the recruitment steps. Describing the top three
employability skills sought by the organization
c. Professional or Career Development Plan – career progression within the organization
d. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) – how the organization creates business value
while promoting positive social change
4. Group evaluation – critical evaluation of the above (including activity evidence)
5. Conclusion
B. Presentation
Your presentation will be assessed as follows:
1. Delivery: speed, eye contact, clarity
2. Content: well organized and explains key ideas well
3. Response to questions: able to answer questions well
The assignment must draw upon the materials taught in lectures, any research deemed
appropriate and your wider reading. Your group should consist of four members, however,
additional team members will be allowed based on the discretion of the module lecturer. The
word limit for Part A is 3,500 words.
Performance Criteria
Group Component (60%)
Fully Partially Not
Performance Criteria
Distinction (51 – 60 marks)
All credit criteria fully met
Produced professional group report with critical evaluation
Conclusion is well structured, shows in depth thought and reflection
Excellent quality documentation that adheres to Harvard Referencing
Credit (31 – 50 marks)
All pass criteria fully met
Citing and referencing are accurate
Conforms completely to Report Guidelines
Group work has Introduction, Main Body, Evaluation, Conclusion written in detail
Adequate research with understanding, analysis and critical appraisal
Satisfactory documentation with minimal grammatical mistakes and spelling errors
Pass (0 – 30 marks)
Table of Contents
Group work attempted
Conclusion is attempted
Citation and References have been attempted
Individual Component (40%)
Name Student 1 Student 2 Student 3 Student 4 Student 5
Grade
All topics
Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
addressed
(10 marks per
criteria below)
Presentation
Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not
Job
Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not
Advertisement
Cover Letter
Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not
CV
Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not Fully Partially Not
Additional Comments
Marking Criteria
Demonstrated comprehensive research with detailed evidence. High level of analysis performed,
exceptional and thorough knowledge and understanding displayed with regard to application. This
includes analysis and evaluation of facts followed by results of evaluation. Good quality
documentation with no spelling or grammatical errors, presented in a professional manner, following
proper sequencing and flow. Displayed evidence of critical appraisal.
Adequate research conducted with fair detail of evidence presented. Moderate level of understanding,
analysis and knowledge displayed. Some level of relevance included in terms of application. Moderate
level of analysis and evaluation of facts followed by results comparison. Good level documentation
presented. Some level of reflection was evident in the documentation. Moderate level of critical
appraisal.
Low level research conducted. Some evidence of research displayed. Basic level of understanding and
knowledge analysis displayed. Satisfactory level of documentation. No evaluation and analysis of
facts, no results comparison performed. Satisfactory or low level of reflection displayed. No level of
critical appraisal demonstrated.
B. Report Guidelines