At the end of the session, the learner should be able to: 1. Differentiate the various types of research design. 2. Identify the major components of a research design. 3. Determine the suitable/ appropriate research design for a chosen problem. 4. Determine the appropriate statistical tools to use given a particular research design. A plan or course of action the researcher takes to solve the research problem NOT the method of collecting data Strategy or approach by which the research questions can be answered How to go about in solving the problem … describes what will be done to answer the research question. PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF RESEARCH DESIGN 1. Choice of study population 2. Selection and classification/assignment of subjects 3. Assessment or observation of variables 4. Processing and analysis of data Descriptive Analytic An inquiry into the nature of an unknown phenomenon or the occurrence of an event Seeks to know the characteristics of the phenomenon or event and categorize it into some descriptive variables It does NOT explain relationships but seeks knowledge for better understanding of the nature of the subject of the study Describes/documents the distribution of different diseases and the groups of populations most affected in terms of place, person and time characteristics. Identifies possible determinants, problems, risk factors which could be used as bases for hypothesis formulation and subject to further analytic studies 1. Case study and case series 2. Cross-sectional studies (or prevalence studies) Describe characteristics and clinical features of a single patient (case report) or a group of patients with similar manifestations (case series); Patients in a case series may occur in a relatively short period of time; Cases of very rare conditions Cases which are epidemiologically unusual As part of surveillance and investigation activities Designed to test a hypothesis of relationship 1. Observational – Cross-sectional Case-Control Cohort 2. Experimental – Test the hypothesis of relationship between at minimum one independent variable (exposure) and one dependent variable (disease) We determine whether the exposure is related with the disease. Exposure must precede the disease. Compare the number of subjects who develop the disease among the exposed versus the unexposed Also called “survey” or Prevalence studies Examines the relationship between disease and exposure as they exist in a defined population at one particular point in time Measures the prevalence of the disease To examine the relationship between the exposure and the disease, we compare the prevalence of the disease among the exposed vs the unexposed. Tests the hypothesis of relationship between the exposure and the disease We select a study population and subject the members to a preliminary screening. Those who already have the outcome (the disease) are excluded Those who qualify are grouped into two: a. the exposed b. the unexposed The two groups are followed up for a given period of time to identify members who will develop the disease (re- examination or surveillance) Measures the incidence of the disease. Compares the incidence of the disease among the exposed vs unexposed. Other names: Risk ratio, Relative Risk (RR) Measures the risk of the disease among the exposed vs the unexposed. Measures the risk of the disease among the exposed relative to the unexposed A type of study that attempts to capture the advantages of both the cross-sectional study and the cohort study. It tries to eliminate temporal ambiguity of the cross-sectional study while at the same time shorten the duration of the study. Weselect the cases from a target population. Cases are a group of individuals with the outcome or disease Then select another group of individuals without the outcome or disease as Controls Go back in time (retrospective) to determine exposure in the cases and in the control Compares the exposure status among the cases and among the controls Measuresthe odds of the disease. Compares the odds of the disease among the exposed vs unexposed. Provides the strongest evidence of causal relationship of all the study designs Affords the most control over the study situation Enables the researcher to isolate the observed effect of the exposure or intervention Researcher chooses a study population without or free of the outcome Assigns the subjects into two groups by scientific technique Introduces the intervention to one group and withhold it from the other A. Clinical Trials 1. Therapeutic trial- radical mastectomy for breast cancer 2. Intervention trial- antihypertensive drugs to reduce the risk of developing stroke 3. Preventive trial- BCG vaccination for tuberculosis B. Community trials or experiments Can be likened to a cohort study Measures are called Risk Ratio (RR), Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR), Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) and Numbers Needed to Treat (NNT). Calculation for RR is the same as that for the cohort study Macario F. Reandelar, Jr., MD, MSPH, FPAFP anact of studying or examining only a segment of the population to represent the whole. It is cheaper It is faster It has better quality of information It can obtain more comprehensive data It is the only possible method for destructive procedures Evaluating health status of a population Investigating the factors affecting health Evaluating the effectiveness of health measures Assessing specific aspects in the administration of health services Evaluating the reliability and completeness of record systems The sample to be obtained should be representative of the population The sample size should be adequate Practicality and feasibility of the sampling procedure Economy and efficiency of the sampling design There are a number of basic sampling designs that a researcher can choose from. The specific design that is best for a particular study depends upon the nature of the variables and the population being studied the purpose for which the research is undertaken, as well as the availability of information relevant to the sampling procedure itself, like the sampling frame. Of two types: ◦ Probability and Non-probability sampling designs The probability of each member of the population to be selected in the sample is difficult to determine or cannot be specified. Types: ◦ Judgement or purposive sampling ◦ Accident or haphazard sampling ◦ Quota sampling ◦ Snowball technique sampling Therules and procedures for selecting the sample and estimating the parameters are explicitly and rigidly specified The most basic type It’s main characteristic is that every element in the population has an equal chance of being included in the sample A variation of SRS A sampling interval ‘K’ is first determined where ‘K’ is the ratio of the population size (N) to the sample size (n) 𝑁 ◦𝐾= 𝑛 The population is first divided into non-overlapping groups called strata. A simple random sampling is then selected from each stratum. When a sampling frame for the elementary units is not readily available, or when cost considerations are important, cluster sampling is often resorted to. ◦ Steps: The population is first divided into clusters, which serve as the sampling units and a sample of units is selected. ◦ Steps: ◦ Every element found in each sampling unit drawn as a sample may or may not be included in the study; if only a subset of the sampling units in the cluster is selected, we have a multi-stage sampling design. ◦ If all the sampling units in a cluster are selected, we have a Single-stage Cluster Sampling Design. When the sample survey to be conducted has a wide coverage as in a nationwide surveys, a multi- stage sampling design is generally used. ◦ Steps: ◦ The population is first divided into a set of primary or first-stage sampling unit. A sample of each unit is selected. Steps: Each primary sampling unit included in the sample is further subdivided into secondary or second-stage sampling units from which a sample will again be taken. The procedure continues until the desired stage is reached Macario F. Reandelar, Jr., MD, MSPH, FPAFP At the end of the session, the students must be able to: Classify data as to source Identify and differentiate the methods of data collection Describe the qualities of data Basic requirements for research data are that they must be reliable and accurate. That is why Data Collection is an important aspect of any type of research study. Because inaccurate data collection can have an impact on the results of a study leading to invalid results. As to Characteristics of data ◦ Variables ◦ Constants Those that change from person to person, from time to time, and from place to place Examples ◦ Age, Sex, Height in meters, BMI, Religion, Cholesterol level, Hemoglobin Those that do not change We only collect Variables. We do not collect Constants! As to Source ◦ Primary data ◦ Secondary data Data obtained by the investigator himself Data obtained are those he intends to use according to the objectives of the study Examples ◦ Results obtained from a laboratory examination ◦ Responses of participants in a questionnaire Data obtained by persons other than the investigator. Existing data previously obtained for purposes not necessarily for the investigator’s objectives Examples ◦ Data taken from the medical records of patients in a hospital or clinic ◦ Data taken from a database ◦ Data obtained from the school records Review of records Use of questionnaire Observation Data may be obtained from: ◦ Census ◦ Registries of vital events ◦ Reports from notifiable diseases ◦ Annual Demographic Yearbook from the United Nations and Weekly Bulletin Epidemiologic Report of the WHO ◦ Locally from Philippine Health Statistics and Weekly Disease Bulletin of the DOH Self-administered ◦ Assisted ◦ Unassisted Interview type Forms ◦ Physical examination ◦ Blood extraction ◦ Use of instruments or equipment ◦ Observation of a behavior, procedure or of an environment Timelines – the interval between the date of occurrence of the different events considered and the time the data is ready to be used and disseminated Completeness – in coverage and completeness in accomplishing all the items in the form Relevance – consistency of the data produced with the needs of the data users Adequacy – the extent to which the data provide all the basic information needed to meet the requirements of the user Accuracy – how close the measurement or data collected is to the true value Precision – the extent to which similar information is obtained when a measurement is performed or an observation is made more than once One page 12 point Times New Roman font 1 inch margin on all sides Working Title Background Hypothesis(es) and Objective(s) Design Potential Impact Description of what the paper is all about Discuss magnitude of the problem Describe the rationale and significance of the study Provide supporting documentation for the importance of addressing this question, problem or need. Use statistical data to support the problem statement Describe what is not known about the problem (Research gaps) that the proposal intends to address State the hypothesis(es) Then describe the aim(s) or objective(s) Description of the basic design Description of the study participants including eligibility criteria Data collection procedure Description of Outcome/s and how they will be measured Description of how results will benefit the target population, will influence decisions or practices, will improve health
Multidimensional Mathematical Demography: Proceedings of the Conference on Multidimensional Mathematical Demography Held at the University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, March 23-25, 1981, Sponsored by the National Science Foundation
How To Design and Report Experiments Andy Field How To Design and Report Experiments and Graham Hole Sage No of Pages - 400 18.99 0761973834 0761973834 PDF