Angi

Each year, a lot of / many animals experience pain as a consequence of scientific research addressed
to carried out for the cosmetic industry; research is done for makeup, body creams, shampoos and
amongst others. For some societies, animal experimentation has been ‘ethically’ justified in
cosmetics/ for testing beauty products industries in order to prevent human’s skin issues (such as
allergies, eye irritation, etc) in humans and thus, offer them good and quality-like products, by
imposing an efficient service ? not sure what you mean here, better just to add- safe products. While
a lot of people think animal testing as something indispensable, others disagree with this because
they see it as an unnecessary pain. Therefore, it is important to discuss the alarming effects as well
as the benefits of animal testing. (positives and negatives aspects) on this field.Personally I believe
that testing products on animals is extremely cruel and unethical to animals. This introduction mixes
a for and against essay statement and a personal opinion one… you do need to look at both sides,
but be careful to be clear that it is an opinion essay.

One of the main reasons researches test beauty products on animals is to avoid any type of harm to
humans. As cosmetics involve a number of mixtures of chemicals, researchers need to prevent
possible damage and/or dramatic changes into the skin that could affect a human’s life completely.
Animals undergoing experimentation allows researchers to be aware of chemical’s risks on to skin,
to modify errors and therefore, to take prevention to prevent any adverse reaction. Thus, animal
testing on beauty products should offer safety to the consumer the best possible goods and services.
?Does not follow what you were saying. Additionally, scientists have argued that animal
experimentation is an important and necessary part of the procedure process, so they recommend it
extensively before releasing the products to the public. The process summarizes their aim to protect
human’s health; therefore, Testing cosmetics in animals prevents people to from being exposed to
any harmful chemicals or toxins, by therefore decreasing health risks for the consumer. Inversely,
cosmetics will not be healthily accessible because people would be exposed to potentially harmful
products. This paragraph repeats itself a lot and half of it is unnecessary.

On the other hand ,there are some people who disagree with that point of view animal testing as
they claim that it causes unnecessary pain to innocent animals. Animals are exposed to really
potentially harmful situations products that will make the animal experience cause suffering and
distress. We, as humans, are more developed than animals, but we do not have the right to treat
them like they are useless. They belong to the earth as well as us, we do not have the right to kill
them. Another limitation is that , and we don’t do not even know how it is going to the animal will
react to the product and if it is comparable to human’s reaction. Animals’ bodies are different than
to those of humans bodies, so it is a waste of time to try the same product on so many animals if we
never try have no intention of testing on a human. , but However, as an egocentric society, we only
think by about ourselves and our needs, believing we are more superior to them. Animals are
unfairly mistreated.

For doing The nature of animal testing means it is necessary to have animals, therefore they lock
them up animals creating fear and stress on in them leading to influence in which influences the
results of the experiment. How? Animals pull out their hair, bite their own skin, and after all they still
are still killed, so there is no point on using them if the results are not accurate because an external
factor is influencing them. This point is not explained so that I can understand it fully.

Against Animals Testing For Cosmetics/Beauty Products

I do not understand what you have done to your opinion essay now… it is like you have started again
and are writing more arguments against… you already start with some against in the first part. Some
of the words are exactly the same as before??

1. Humans share with animals the same right to grow and reproduce

It causes pain. Animal testing nowadays it is not only used in the medical industry but also in the
cosmetic industry, which could be used on humans instead. Animals are exposed to really harmful
situations that will make the animal experience suffering and distress. We, as humans, are more
developed than animals, but we do nothave the right to treat them like they are useless. They
belong to the earth as well as us,we do not have the right to kill them, and we

don’t

even know how it is going to react.Animal bodies are different than human bodies, so it is a waste of
time to try on somany animals if we never try on a human, but as an egocentric society we only think
byourselves and our needs, believing we are more superior to them.

2. Animals are unfairly mistreated

For doing animal testing it is necessary to have animals, therefore they lock upanimals creating fear
and stress on them leading to influence in the results of theexperiment. Animals pull out their hair,
bite their own skin, and after all they still arekilled, so there is no point on using them if the results
are not accurate because anexternal factor it is influencing them.

In conclusion, the benefits of animal testing do not outweigh the consequences that the ls have to
pass through during of animal experimentation, so we can say that animal testing should be banned,
even though it can help and improve the human’s live humans’ lives, it is not ethically justified to do
it because animals do not deserve to suffer in order to follow allow for scientific achievements and
to find good results. We are as much as important as animals, otherwise, animals wouldn’t exist.
Animals are as important as us, otherwise they would not exist. We both belong to the same natural
environment, and we are the same creatures of the nature, and truly deserve deserving truly to
exist. Again, like the introduction, your conclusion looks more like the wording of a for and against
essay. Please be careful with this.

The wordcount was 771 before I made any corrections. This is over double the expected amount and
would not be possible in 30 minutes or even the new 45 minutes which you will have from May.

You should now be trying to do timed essays Angi to practice for the exam.