Oneway

Descriptives
Defects

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum

Machine 1 53 10.528 8.4730 1.1639 8.193 12.864 1.0 34.0

Machine 2 54 5.722 4.6719 .6358 4.447 6.997 .0 23.0
Machine 3 54 9.852 8.0433 1.0946 7.656 12.047 1.0 34.0
Total 161 8.689 7.5193 .5926 7.519 9.860 .0 34.0

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

Defects

Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

6.044 2 158 .003

ANOVA
Defects

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 727.616 2 363.808 6.910 .001

Within Groups 8318.856 158 52.651
Total 9046.472 160

Robust Tests of Equality of Means

Defects

Statistica df1 df2 Sig.

Welch 9.532 2 96.645 .000

Brown-Forsythe 6.886 2 133.780 .001

a. Asymptotically F distributed.

Post Hoc Tests

 Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Defects
Scheffe

Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval

(I) Machine (J) Machine (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Machine 1 Machine 2 4.8061* 1.4030 .003 1.339 8.273

Machine 3 .6765 1.4030 .890 -2.791 4.143

Machine 2 Machine 1 -4.8061* 1.4030 .003 -8.273 -1.339
*
Machine 3 -4.1296 1.3964 .014 -7.580 -.679
Machine 3 Machine 1 -.6765 1.4030 .890 -4.143 2.791
Machine 2 4.1296* 1.3964 .014 .679 7.580

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Homogeneous Subsets

Defects
Scheffea,b

Subset for alpha = 0.05

Machine N 1 2

Machine 2 54 5.722
Machine 3 54 9.852
Machine 1 53 10.528
Sig. 1.000 .890

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 53.663.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the
group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not guaranteed.
 Univariate Analysis of Variance

Between-Subjects Factors

Value Label N

Machine 1 Machine 1 53

2 Machine 2 54

3 Machine 3 54

Descriptive Statistics
Dependent Variable: Defects

Machine Mean Std. Deviation N

Machine 1 10.528 8.4730 53

Machine 2 5.722 4.6719 54
Machine 3 9.852 8.0433 54
Total 8.689 7.5193 161

Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa

Dependent Variable: Defects

F df1 df2 Sig.

6.044 2 158 .003

Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the

dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + Machine

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: Defects

Type III Sum of Partial Eta

Source Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Squared

Corrected Model 727.616a 2 363.808 6.910 .001 .080

Intercept 12187.362 1 12187.362 231.475 .000 .594
Machine 727.616 2 363.808 6.910 .001 .080
Error 8318.856 158 52.651
Total 21203.000 161
Corrected Total 9046.472 160

a. R Squared = .080 (Adjusted R Squared = .069)

 Estimated Marginal Means

Machine
Dependent Variable: Defects

95% Confidence Interval

Machine Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound

Machine 1 10.528 .997 8.560 12.497

Machine 2 5.722 .987 3.772 7.672
Machine 3 9.852 .987 7.902 11.802
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Defects
Post Hoc Tests Scheffe

Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval

Machine
(I) Machine (J) Machine (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
*
Machine 1 Machine 2 4.806 1.4030 .003 1.339 8.273

Machine 3 .676 1.4030 .890 -2.791 4.143

*
Machine 2 Machine 1 -4.806 1.4030 .003 -8.273 -1.339
*
Machine 3 -4.130 1.3964 .014 -7.580 -.679
Machine 3 Machine 1 -.676 1.4030 .890 -4.143 2.791

Machine 2 4.130* 1.3964 .014 .679 7.580

Based on observed means.

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 52.651.
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
 Homogeneous Subsets

Defects
a,b,c
Scheffe

Subset

Machine N 1 2

Machine 2 54 5.722
Machine 3 54 9.852
Machine 1 53 10.528
Sig. 1.000 .890

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are

displayed.
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 52.651.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 53.663.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of
the group sizes is used. Type I error levels are not
guaranteed.
c. Alpha = .05.

Results:

A one-way analysis of variance was conducted on the influence of defects on an independent variable (Machine) while operating. Machine type includes three levels
(Machine1, Machine2 & Machine3). All effects were statistically significant at the .05 significance level. The effect of Machine type yielded an F ratio of F(2,158)=6.910,
p<.001, this clearly indicates that there is a significant difference between the defects of Machine 1 (M=10.528, SD=8.4730) to Machine 2 (M=5.722, SD=4.6719) and to
Machine 3 (M=9.852, SD=8.0433). To Summarize, these results suggests that high defects has an effect on the operations of machine1, 2 and 3.