C0306 S02 Ecb RP 30034 Ac PDF

Responsible Division Responsible Discipline Document Type Document Status
C0306 Structures-Bridges Report General Issued for Approval
ETIHAD RAIL STAGE 2 PROJECT

C0306 - PACKAGE 2C
Design & Build Contract (Dubai)
DCP3 Design Report – Substructure – DMB/JBL – DMB 72
to 73 and JBL 0 to 3 – Underbridge at 1+971
Rakesh Chowdhury
Prepared Associate Director -Structures Team 10-NOV-2020
Leader/ WSP
Xu Yue
Verified 10-NOV-2020
Technical Director / CRGT
Ubaidullah Khan
Quality Process Approval 10-NOV-2020
Project QA/QC Manager / CRGT
Sun Shangxing
Approved 10-NOV-2020
Project Director / CRGT
Name Signature Date
Document Number Issued Date 10-NOV-2020
Location/
Contract No. - - Discipline - Type - Sequence Number - Revision
Subdivision
C 0 3 0 6 - S 0 2 - E C B - R P - 3 0 0 3 4 - A C
This document including its attachments is the property of Etihad Rail. It contains confidential proprietary information and may be legally privilege. The
reproduction, distribution, utilization or communication of this document, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited unless expressly permitted by Etihad Rail.
UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE, THIS PRINTED COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNCONTROLLED AND FOR REFERENCE PURPOSE ONLY
C0306-S02-ECB-RP-30034-AC PAGE 1 OF 22
Version Log - Internal
Version Date Name Description of Review Changes

AA1 01-JUN-2020 Rakesh Chowdhury Preparer
AA2 01-JUN-2020 Xu Yue Verifier
AB1 29-AUG-2020 Rakesh Chowdhury Preparer
AB2 29-AUG-2020 Xu Yue Verifier
AC1 10-NOV-2020 Rakesh Chowdhury Preparer
AC2 10-NOV-2020 Xu Yue Verifier
Revision Log – To Client
Revision Date Description of Changes

AA 01-JUN-2020 First Release
AB 25-AUG-2020 Second Release
AC 10-NOV-2020 Third Release
This document including its attachments is the property of Etihad Rail. It contains confidential proprietary information and may be legally privilege. The
reproduction, distribution, utilization or communication of this document, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited unless expressly permitted by Etihad Rail.
DCP3 DESIGN REPORT –
SUBSTRUCTURE – DMB/JBL – DMB
72 TO 73 AND JBL 0 TO 3 –
UNDERBRIDGE AT 1+971
Table of Contents
Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 4
1 Reference Documents ................................................................................................................ 5
2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6
2.1 Intent of this Design Report ............................................................................................ 7
2.2 Existing Condition........................................................................................................... 7
2.3 Description of Rail Network ............................................................................................ 8
2.4 Outline Scope ................................................................................................................. 9
2.5 Engineering Disciplines ................................................................................................... 9
3 Review of Existing Data ............................................................................................................ 10
4 Topographic and Geotechnical Surveys .................................................................................... 11
4.1 Topographic Surveys .................................................................................................... 11
4.2 Geotechnical Investigations .......................................................................................... 11
5 Stakeholder Engagement ......................................................................................................... 12
6 Design Development for the DCP Stage ................................................................................... 13
6.1 Design Basis Report ...................................................................................................... 13
6.2 Design Update from DCP2 ............................................................................................ 13
7 Structure Details ...................................................................................................................... 14
7.1 Underbridge JBL CH: 1+971 .......................................................................................... 14
8 Interface Management............................................................................................................. 15
9 Risk and Opportunity ............................................................................................................... 16
10 Next Steps ................................................................................................................................ 17
11 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 18
Appendices
Appendix A Design Calculations
Appendix B Risk Register
Appendix C List of Drawings
Tables
Table 1: Reference Documents
Table 2: Package 2C Design Packaging
Table 3: Risk and Opportunities
Figures
Figure 1: Project Layout
Figure 2: Package 2C Layout
Figure 3: Midas Model Snap
Figure 4: Plan
Figure 5: Elevation
Acronyms and Abbreviations

Please find below the list of acronyms or abbreviations used in this document, and their definitions:
AASHTO American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials
BS British Standards
BS EN British European Standards Specifications
CAD Computer Aided Design
DBR Design Basis Report
DC Document Control
DCP Design Control Point
DSR Document Submittal Register
DM Dubai Municipality
EPFM Electronic Plant and Facilities Management
ER Etihad Rail Company PJSC
ERS Etihad Rail Standard
GCC Gulf Cooperation Council
ICE Independent Checking Engineer
ISA Independent Safety Assessor
JV Joint Venture of China Railway Construction Corporation and Ghantoot Contracting
MSE Mechanically Stabilised Earth
NADD New Abu Dhabi Datum
NOC No Objection Certificate
PMC Project Management Consultant
PEP Project Execution Plan
QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Compliance
RAMS Reliability Availability Maintainability Safe
RTA Road & Transport Authority, Dubai
ROW Right of Way
TDM Technical Design Manual
TMP Transport Master Plan
TTM Temporary Traffic Management
UTM Universal Transverse Mercator
UAE United Arab Emirates
WGS World Grid System
1 Reference Documents
The following inputs from the Contract have been considered in the development of this Design Report as
below but not limited to:
Table 1: Reference Documents
Ref. Document Title Document Number Date

No
[1] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 3 C0306-S02-GDM-FS-00001-01 09 December 2018
[2] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 4 Annex B C0306-S02-GEI-FS-00003-04 01 April 2019
[3] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 5 C0306-S02-GER-PQ-00001-03 13 March 2019
[4] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 5 Annex 1 C0306-S02-GER-PQ-00002-03 13 March 2019
[5] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 5 Annex 2 C0306-S02-GER-PQ-00003-03 13 March 2019
[6] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 6 C0306-S02-GCM-PQ-00001-01 09 December 2018
[7] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 8 C0306-S02-EGE-FS-00003-04 13 May 2019
[8] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 11 C0306-S02-GPC-FS-00001-04 07 May 2019
[9] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 13 C0306-S02-GQA-FS-00001-01 09 December 2018
[10] Exhibit D2-1 Technical Specification X0231-UAE-GDM-PO-00002-00 29 May 2019

CAD Standards Manual
[11] Interface Management Plan C0306-S02-GEI-PL-00001-00 20 October 2019
[12] Quality Plan C0306-S02-GQA-PL-00001-00 31 October 2019
[13] Document Management Plan C0306-S02-GDM-PL-0000-00 31 October 2019
[14] Stakeholder Management Plan C0306-S02-GEI-PL-00002-AC 30 October 2019
[15] Configuration Management Plan C0306-S02-GCM-PL-00001-00 03 November 2019
[16] Requirements Management Plan C0306-S02-GCM-PL-00002-00 28 October 2019
[17] System RAM Plan C0306-S02-GER-PL-00001-AC 28 October 2019
[18] System Safety Management Plan C0306-S02-GER-PL-00002-AB 28 October 2019
[19] Design Basis Report – Road & Highways C0306-S02-ECH-RP-00001-00 31 October 2019
[20] Design Basis Report – Bridges & Railway Structure C0306-S02-ECB-RP-00001-AB 20 October 2019
[21] Design Basis Report – Geotechnical & Earthwork C0306-S02-EBB-RP-00001-AB 13 November 2019
[22] Design Basis Report – Rail C0306-S02-ERA-RP-00001-AB 11 November 2019
[23] Design Basis Report – Utilities C0306-S02-EUT-RP-00001-00 28 October 2019
[24] Design Basis Report – Hydrology & Drainage C0306-S02-EBH-RP-00001-AC 30 October 2019
[25] Design Basis Report – Sand Mitigation C0306-S02-ELS-RP-00001-AB 14 November 2019
[26] Design Management Plan C0306-S02-GEM-PL-00002-00 31 October 2019
2 Introduction
The Overall Etihad Rail Network comprises a proposed railway network, which will link freight facilities and
passenger stations, and form a part of the planned Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) railway network. It will
run from the Saudi Arabian border at Ghweifat in the west, via or close to the cities of the Gulf coast, to the
Northern Emirates and the East coast. There will also be a line running from Abu Dhabi to Al Ain, with and
intended connection into the Sultanate of Oman, as well as an existing branch line to the gas facilities at
Shah and Habshan.
The Etihad Rail network is planned to be developed in four main stages as shown in Figure 1 below:
Stage 1: The Shah Habshan Ruwais rail line is currently under operation and is used for the transport of
sulphur from the gas fields at Shah and Habshan to an export facility at Ruwais;
Stage 2: (Sections A, B1, B2 and C) Extends the Stage 1 railway network to the border with Saudi Arabia as
well as to Khalifah Port, Jebel Ali Port and Oman Border.
Stage 3: (Sections A, B and C) Extends the railway to Port Saqr, Al Hamriyah, Al Hamra, Fujeirah as well as
connecting the quarries of the northern emirates
There is also Stage 4 proposed which is to add dedicated lines as well as passenger stations to the network.
The passenger network definition is at feasibility stage
This project and design report focuses on Stage 2C which extends through Dubai and connects to Stage 2B
and 2D. The network comprises of mainly at grade rail network with numerous highway crossings. The scope
of works includes all the rail network along with associated earthworks, bridges, roads, utility diversions,
environmental and geotechnical aspects.
Figure 1: Project Layout
2.1 Intent of this Design Report

This report is produced for the specific design package detailed in the title of this report. The intent of the
report is to give an overview of the DCP3 stage and the work carried out since DCP2.
For reference the packaging of the works is as shown below as a separate design report will be issued for
each area for consistency with the design drawings.
Table 2: Package 2C Design Packaging
Package Chainage/ Location
Package 1 DMB 1 - 47+140.319 to 59+000
Package 2 DMB 2 - 59+000 to 69+000
Package 3 DMB 3 - 69+000 to 72+000
Package 4 Delta Area - DMB 72+000 To End of DMB and JBL 0+000 To
3+000
Package 5 JBL 1 - 3+000 to 8+000
Package 6 JBL 2 - 8+000 to 11+150
Package 7A JBL 3 (A) - 11+150 to 14+000
Package 7B JBL 3 (B) - 14+000 to 17+600
Package 8 JBL 4 - 17+600 to End of JBL
Package 9 JBL 5 - JART
Package 10A DMC 1 (A) - 0+000 to 7+000
Package 10B DMC 1 (B) – 7+000 to 10+000
Package 11 DMC 2 - 10+000 to 20+000
Package 12 DMC 3 - 20+000 to 32+000
Package 13A DMC 4 (A) - 32+000 to 38+000
Package 13B DMC 4 (B) - 38+000 to End of DMC
2.2 Existing Condition

The Stage 2C network comprises three main alignments which are DMB, DMC and JBL. The alignments DMC
and DMB are mainly in open desert that has future developments planned. The JBL line connects the
DMB/DMC alignments with Jebel Ali port. This alignment has numerous interfaces with existing road
networks, interchanges and developments. The key interfaces are as follows:
• Jebel Ali Port
• E11, E311 and E611 Crossing RTA Corridors
• DEWA Overhead High Voltage Lines
• DIP Road Corridor which is currently under construction
• Desert Mainlines parallel to the E611
• Existing Utilities and Structure Interfaces
• The rail corridor proposed has a varying ROW width due to all these constraints
• Utility interfaces with roads are listed in Appendix D: Utility Interface Schedule
2.3 Description of Rail Network

As mentioned above the network within Package 2C consists the alignments below and the summary of
each section. Figure 2 below illustrate the Package 2C network.
Figure 2: Package 2C Layout

DMB consists of +/-26km of double track, with 14 turnouts and further alignment provisions for another 19
turnouts. The key interfaces within this part of the alignment are:
• the connection to Package 2B
• passive provision for Dubai South passenger station
• Various underpasses and bridge constructions (refer to appendices for overview)
DMC consists of +/-49km of double track, with 12 turnouts and further alignment provisions for another 23
turnouts. The key interfaces within this part of the alignment are:
• the connection to Package 2D
• 2 set off tracks with bufferstops
• Various underpasses and bridge constructions (refer to appendices for overview)
JBL consists of +/-19km of predominantly single track with 2 passing loops, with 5 turnouts and further
alignment provisions for another 6 turnouts. The key interfaces within this part of the alignment are:
• the connection to package Jebel Ali Rail Terminal
• Various underpasses and complex bridge constructions crossing major highways (refer to appendices
for overview)
2.4 Outline Scope

The scope of the services on the project are below and are covered in more detailed in the approved design
management plan:
• DCP 1 – Preliminary Design: 30% Design
• DCP 2 – In Process Design: 66% Design
• DCP 3 – Pre-Final Design: 95% Design (This Design Report)
• DCP 3F – Final Design: 100% Design with full approvals
• Stage Gate Reviews
• Gaining approvals of for the design.
• Geotechnical design and review of the Geotechnical Factual Report.
• Design Services During Construction, Shop Drawings and As Builts
2.5 Engineering Disciplines

The DCP3 submission of the C306 Project requires but not limited to, the following key engineering
disciplines:
• Rail Alignment and Track
• Geotechnical, Earthworks and Ground Improvement
• Sand Mitigation
• Utilities Diversions and Protection
• Structural Design - Bridges and Viaducts
• Drainage and Hydrology
• Roads and Highways
• Line Side Works
• Security
• Environmental
• Interfaces
• Systems Assurance
3 Review of Existing Data

Throughout the course of the project, WSP have carried out technical reviews of existing data. It is key to
note that the WSP design team were also the same team that developed the tender design for the JV and
there is a full history of the existing data. The key areas of focus have been:
• SLR Records to Identify the Authority Requirements – This has been supplemented by the issue of NOI
applications to all authorities at DCP1 stage. The received information is included in the DCP2 packages.
• Review of Existing Topographic Surveys – WSP have reviewed the existing topo surveys and
subsequently updated the design with the additional topo surveys
• Review of Existing Geotechnical Investigation – WSP have produced a gap analysis of the existing GI data
and subsequently produced an additional GI spec and drawings for the JV. The JV are in the process of
applying for borehole NOC
• NOC Conditions – WSP have reviewed the NOC conditions from the preliminary design to identify areas
of concern for future design development
• EIA Review – WSP have carried out an EIA review to facilitate production of the CEMP. This EIA review
has identified areas of the alignment that have impacts on design and construction. The CEMP has been
issued and preconstruction surveys are ongoing
• Interdisciplinary Reviews – WSP have carried out inter discipline reviews to ensure design clashes have
been adjusted and updated in the DCP2 submission. Priority being the structures interface with the rail
alignment to try to get confident with the vertical alignment
• ROW Assessment – Review of the horizontal alignment and current ROW and identify if clashes are
present with the existing ROW
• Meetings with authorities have occurred based on the NOI and the preliminary NOC.
4 Topographic and Geotechnical Surveys

4.1 Topographic Surveys
The contractor carried out additional topographic surveys during September and October 2019. All of these
surveys are complete and survey reports and drawings have been issued by the JV for the development of
detailed design.
The updated topographic surveys are included within the DCP3 designs.
4.2 Geotechnical Investigations

The JV has engaged a contractor to carry out the additional GI and DCP3 design is based on the
interpretation of existing and new factual data. For details, respective geotechnical notes and reports to be
referred.
5 Stakeholder Engagement
The JV have appointed a dedicated stakeholder team for the project and with the designer WSP have already
applied for Information NOC from the relevant authorities
6 Design Development for the DCP Stage

This section of the report describes the specific design development through the DCP2 stage
6.1 Design Basis Report

Design Basis Report for Structures and Bridges has been prepared and issued to the Engineer in accordance
with the relevant authority standards and project requirements. This report is reviewed and approved by
the Engineer. This report includes the key technical standards and specifications that have been used for
the design
6.2 Design Update from DCP2

The design issued at DCP3 was the basis of the preliminary design with updated GA drawings.
Through the DCP1 to DCP3 stages, the following activities have been carried out:
• Structural GA Drawings updated with the refined rail alignment which includes the additional
topographic surveys and interpretation of additional GI Factual data.
• Workshops with the contractor to confirm constructability requirements and methods of construction
• Structural Modelling of the superstructure and substructure designs. The models are included in the
package for review with the detailed design calculations
• Coordination with the Geotech, utilities and roads team to ensure clashes with existing or future
authority assets are resolved
• Coordination with the Geotech team regarding existing ground condition parameters.
• For architectural elements like parapet and MSE wall patterns, latest version of Bridge Aesthetic Report
shall be referred.
• The proposed drainage system for the rail is covered in the crossing road package. Please refer Section
3.8 Drainage design Report (C0306-S02-ECH-RP-30006-AA-DCP3-Roads-JBL0).
7 Structure Details
7.1 Underbridge JBL CH: 1+971
Cross sections of UB at JBL CH: 1+971 contains single cell continuous box-girder. Sub-structure is formed on
pier supported on piles. Connection between super and sub structure is formed by bearings and monolithic
pier between span-2 and span-3. Abutment is formed on piled foundation with MSE wall provided to
support soil fill pressure behind the abutment.
Figure 3: Midas Model Snap
Figure 4: Plan
Figure 5: Elevation
8 Interface Management
As identified in Section 6 the main interfaces that have arose between DCP2 and DCP3 are the following:
• Existing Utilities Interface with the Structure – Existing Data all received and trial trenches data for the
majority of site have been obtained.
• Additional GI carried out at site – Final Factual Report and has been issued by JV and geotechnical
assessment is based on existing and additional data.
• Systems Contractor – Space provisions on the structures decks is confirmed
9 Risk and Opportunity

Table 3 below presents risks and opportunities identified during DCP3 stage.
Table 3: Risk and Opportunities
Risk / Opportunity Impact Action and Mitigation
- - -
10 Next Steps
The design for DCP3 will reflect the detailed design stage and will be the basis for the ultimate final design
for the construction drawings submission DCPF. The next stage of design submission (DCP3F) will include a
100% detailed design after obtained NOC from all concerned authorities.
The next steps of the design are as follows:
• Review the DCP3 package with the engineer and go through any comments on the models, calculation
report and drawings.
• Submission of the package to concerned authorities and independent checker to get the CAT-III check
certificate.
• Final detailed drawings for authority approvals with final structural sizes
11 Conclusion
The report is a summary of the works carried out between DCP2 and DCP3. This report also describes the
specific design standards and parameters that are used for structures in the development of the DCP3. For
the proposed designs, considerations have been given to the appropriate design criteria for different
categories of processes including constructability, environmental and sustainability issues.
All the elements of the proposed design elements in the DCP3 design are developed for the project’s
requirements in accordance with the relevant authority standards. All key interfaces have been identified
and have been reviewed in detail considering the discipline design requirements and these have also been
updated with the latest Information NOCs, existing conditions, latest topographical survey and any other
updated information.
The next steps through to DCP3F will be the full final designs and engagement for detailed design approvals
with the authorities.
Appendix A Design Calculations
C0306-S02-ECB-RP-30034-AB PAGE 19 OF 22
Project Job Ref.
Etihad Rail - Package 2C 37463520
Part of Structure Status
Under Bridge Rail Structure - JBL CH: 1+971 DCP-3
Calculated by Date Checked by Date Sheet no Rev. no
YH Nov-20 FH Nov-20 D01
Ref. Calculations Output
ETIHAD RAIL NETWORK

PACKAGE-2C
UNDER-BRIDGE JBL CH: 1+971
SUB-STRUCTURE DESIGN REPORT
Page 1 of 31
Project Job Ref.
Etihad Rail - Package 2C
37463520
Table of Contents
1 - Introduction
1.1 - Structure Design Basis
1.2 - Loading Matrix
1.3 - Material Properties and Design Parameters
1.4 - Cross-Section
1.5 - Bearing Articulations
2 - Type of Loadings, Load Intensity & Load Application

2.1 - Applied Loads
2.1.1 - Self Weight of Structure
2.1.2 - Train Live Load
2.1.3 - Superimposed Dead Load
2.1.4 - Bearing Friction and Restraint
2.1.5 - Wind Load on structure
2.1.6 - Wind Load on Live Load
2.1.7 - Longitudinal Load
2.1.8 - Seismic Forces
2.1.9 - Centrifugal Force
2.1.10 - Pedestrian Live Load
2.1.11 - Earthfill on Pilecap
2.1.12 - Misc. Load on Abutment PC
2.1.13 - Vehicle Collission
2.1.14 - Nosing Force
2.2 - Load Combinations
2.3 - Horizontal Modulus of Subgrade Reactions for Piles
3 - Pier Design
3.1 - Pier Stiffness Calculation for P01, P02 & P03
3.2 - Pier Slenderness Check For P01 & P03
3.3 - Pier Design for Pier - P01 & P03
3.4 - Pier Slenderness Check For P02
3.5 - Pier Design for Pier - P02
3.6 - Pier Design Forces comparision with RSI Outputs
3.7 - Pier-Cap Design for Pier P01 & P03
4 - Pile Design
4.1 - Pile Design for Abutment - A1 & A2
4.2 - Pile Design for Pier - P01 & P03
4.3 - Pile Design for Pier - P02
5 - Pile-Cap Design
5.1 - Pile-Cap Design for Pier - P02
5.2 - Pile-Cap Design for Pier - P01 & P03
5.3 - Punching Shear Check
Page 2 of 31
Project Job Ref.


Types of Loading, Load Intensity &

Load Application
Page 3 of 31
Project Job Ref.
37463520
2.1.12 Misc. Load on Abutment PC
Load on Abutment Pile-Cap
1.) Back Wall Load (0.5x(4.15+0.5))*(13.35-1)*25*1.1

BW Load = 790 kN
2.) Back Wall Tapp. (1*1+1*1/2)*25*(13.35-1)

BWT Load = 463 kN
3.) Wing Wall (14.45 x 0.5 x 2.55)* 25 * (2)

WW Load = 921 kN
4.) Fill Load on Abutment Front (2.55*13.35*1*20)

Load = 681 kN v
5.) Fill on back-1 (14.45 x 1.55)*20*(13.35-1)
Fill Load-1 = 5532 kN
6.) Fill on back-2 (9.8-1.5)*1*20*(13.35-1) e

Fill Load-2 = 2050 kN
Total Load on Abutment PC:
Total Load 'v' = 10437 kN
Total Eccentricity of Load on Abutment PC:
Total Eccentricity 'e' = 1.80 m
Load Application on MIDAS Model
SLS-1 Reaction Output

Page 4 of 31
Project Job Ref.
37463520
SLS-All Reaction Output
Note: Pier Piles output removed for clarity purpose
SLS-1 Load Reaction on Piles
Pile Number Load Case Maximum Reaction

- - kN
Abt-1 Pile-1 Group-1-SLS(max) 6509
Maximum Reaction (kN) 9454

Pile Capacity (kN) 10300 OK
For Pile Capacity kindly refer to foundation drawing "C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31254"
Page 5 of 31
Project Job Ref.
37463520
SLS-All Load Reaction on Piles
Pile Number Load Case Maximum Reaction

- - kN
Abt-1 Pile-1 SLS 1-6 Env(max) 7422
Maximum Reaction (kN) 10442

Pile Capacity (kN) 12875 OK
For Pile Capacity kindly refer to foundation drawing "C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31254" and AREMA section
24.1.4.b
Page 6 of 31
Project Job Ref.


Pier Design
Page 7 of 31
Project Job Ref.



3.5 Pier Design Forces (For P02)
PIER - ELEVATION
Pier Design Forces from MIDAS at Bottom of Pier (For Service Limit State Case)
MY- Longitudinal Direction MZ - Transverse Direction
Page 8 of 31
Project Job Ref.


Pier Design Forces from MIDAS at Bottom of Pier (For Ultimate Limit State Case)
FZ- Longitudinal Direction FY - Transverse Direction
Page 9 of 31
Project Job Ref.


Axial Pier Design Forces from MIDAS
Ax - Axial Force (SLS)
Ax - Axial Force (ULS)
Page 10 of 31
Project Job Ref.


Pier Design Forces from MIDAS at Bottom of Pier (For Ext. Event with PGA 0.08g Case)
Ax - Axial Force
Page 11 of 31
Project Job Ref.


Pier Design Forces from MIDAS at Bottom of Pier (For Ext. Event with PGA 0.15g Case)
FZ- Longitudinal Direction Ax-Axial FY - Transverse Direction
Page 12 of 31
Project Job Ref.


From Moment Magnification Factor
For Pier Long Direction (Transverse Moments) ds= 1.0 (Moments enhanced neligible)
For Pier Short Direction (Longitudinal Moments Moments) ds= 1.0 (Moments enhanced neligible)
Where,
Load case 'EQ-Service' is represents Design Forces for Level-1 Ground Motion (0.08 PGA).
Load case 'EQ-Ultimate' is represents Design Forces for Level-2 Ground Motion (0.15 PGA).
MIDAS Ouput Enhanced by Moment Magnification
Load case Axial (kN) My (kN-m) Mz (kN-m)
SLS_Env 44000 63000 39000
ULS_Env 44000 88000 59000
SLS EQ (PGA=0.08) 34000 108000 125000
ULS EQ (PGA=0.15) 34000 194000 226000
Seismic Forces Modified with Response Modification Factor
Load case Axial (kN) My (kN-m) Mz (kN-m)
SLS_Env 44000 63000 39000
ULS_Env 44000 88000 59000
SLS EQ (PGA=0.08) 34000 108000 125000
ULS EQ (PGA=0.15) 34000 97000 113000

30% of Mz taken for bi-
ULS EQ (PGA=0.15) 34000 97000 33900
axial ULS design
30% of My taken for bi-
ULS EQ (PGA=0.15) 34000 29100 113000
axial ULS design
Page 13 of 31
Project Job Ref.


Page 14 of 31
Project Job Ref.


Design for SLS Load Case

Longitudinal Direction
Allowable stress Limit for Concrete = 0.4*f'c*1.25 MPa

For f'c (40 MPa) = 20.0 MPa
Page 15 of 31
Project Job Ref.


Design for SLS Load Case

Provided cover cover = 100 mm

dc 'dis. bw ext. ten. fibre to closest tension bar centeriod' = 70 mm
Concrete cylindrical strength f'c = 40 Mpa
Reinforcement yield strength fy = 420 Mpa
Provided Reinforcement (1st Layer) dia = 40 1256 Spacing 150
Provided Reinforcement (2nd Layer) dia = 32 803.8 Spacing 150
Provided Reinforcement (3rd Layer) dia = 32 803.8 Spacing 150
Centeriod of Reinforcement C = 130.6 mm
Equivalent Layers as per largest bar layers = 2.280 -
Service Moment Ms = 63000 kNm
Axial Force Ax = 44000 kN
Exposure Factor γ = 0.47 -
Allowable Crack Width = 0.20 mm
Corresponding Z Factor Z = 15278 N/mm
Check for distribution reinforcement (AREMA 2.39)
A 'eff. tension area of conc. Surrounding tension rft.' = 17188 mm2

fs (allowable service stress in reinforcement) fs = 143.6 Mpa (EQ 2-60)
fs from SAM output fs = 109.1 Mpa
Section is adequate
Page 16 of 31
Project Job Ref.


Design for Level-1 Ground Motion (0.08 PGA)

Stresses for Concrete and Reinforcement are less than allowable stress limits
Page 17 of 31
Project Job Ref.


Design for ULS Load Case

For My = 59000 kNm
Maximum Moment in Longitudinal Direction
Page 18 of 31
Project Job Ref.



For My = 34000 kNm (30% of 113,0000kNm)
Maximum Moment in Longitudinal Direction
Page 19 of 31
Project Job Ref.



Shear in Longitudinal Direction
Provided Shear Links (18 T16 Legs @ 100) = 36.18 mm2/mm
Page 20 of 31
Project Job Ref.


Displacement-Based Method
The Displacement-Based Method (DBM), unlike the FBM, does not calculate a specific design force for the
yielding elements. Instead, the designer is free to proportion the yielding system as necessary to ensure
that the displacement demand is less than the displacement capacity at each pier, provided that a
minimum lateral strength threshold is provided for each pier and that all of the non-seismic load cases are also
satisfied. Thus, the designer simply proposes a lateral load system and corresponding element strengths,
and then checks to ensure that the displacement capacity is adequate, i.e. that ∆capacity > ∆demand.
Calculation of Design Force Level and Dispalcement Demand in Displacement-Based Method
Calculation of Displacement Capacity
Displacement Capacity Diagram
Page 21 of 31
Project Job Ref.


Moment Curvature Diagram of RC Pier / Column
Page 22 of 31
Project Job Ref.



Pier Deflection Diagram from MIDAS
∆ Demand (For P02) = 67 mm (Difference of ∆ at Top and at Bottom)
Page 23 of 31
Project Job Ref.



Page 24 of 31
Project Job Ref.



Height of Pier (L) = 10.2 m 401.57 in

∆ Demand = 67 mm 2.64 in
Axial Force = 34000 kN
Fy = 420 MPa 60.9 Ksi
Equivalent Dia. of Bar used as Pier R/f = 65.0 mm 2.56 in
Φy (curvature at first yeild) = 0.0009 Rad/m 0.000023 Rad/in
Φu (curvature at ultimate) = 0.0041 Rad/m 0.000104 Rad/in
Φp (plastic curvature) = 8.01E-05 Rad/in
∆y (Yield displacement) = 1.26 in
Lp (Plastic hinge length) = 55.51 in
∆p (Plastic displacement) = 1.663 in
∆u (Total displacement capacity) = 2.92 in
∆u (Total displacement capacity) = 74 mm
Capacity is > Demand, Hence OK
Transverse Shear Force from MIDAS
Page 25 of 31
Project Job Ref.



Transverse Direction
The strong direction of pier is desgned as wall type pier. The factored shear resistance, Vr, in the pier dhall be
taken as the lesser of the following;
Vr = 0.253 * λ * √f'c * b * d AASHTO LRFD 5.11.4.2-1
Vr = Φ * Vn AASHTO LRFD 5.11.4.2-2
where,
Vn = [ 0.063 * λ * √f'c + ρh * fy ] * b * d
f'c = 40 MPa 5.8 Ksi

fy = 420 MPa 60.9 Ksi
b = 3000 mm 118.11 in
d = 4500 mm 177.17 in
s = 100 mm 3.94 in
db = 16 mm 0.63 in
No. of Legs = 13
Φ = 0.9
Av = 4.052 in2
ρh = (Av/(b*s) 0.008707
Therefore,
Vn = 14271 Kips
Vr = ΦVn = 12844 Kips
Vr = 12750 Kips
Therefore, Governing Vr is;
Vr = 12750 Kips
Vr = 56712 kN
Design Shear (Vu) = 31000 kN
Since Vr is > Design Shear Vu, Design is Adequate
Page 26 of 31
Project Job Ref.


Ref. Calculations
Bearing Seats (AREMA : 1.4.7.4.1)
N = (305 + 2.5 * L + 10 * H) * (1 + 0.000125 * S2)
where,
L = 65 m
(Length of the bridge deck to the adjacent movement joint, or to the endof the deck)
H = 10 m
(At Abutments, H is the average height of piers supporting the bridge deck to the next movement joint, or
H=0 for single span bridges. At Pier, H is the height of pier)
S = 0 degree
(angle of skew measured froma line normal to span)
Therefore,
N = 569.5 mm
Provided seat for Conceret Girder is 2000mm, Hence adequate.
3.6 Pier Design Forces comparision with RSI Outputs
Location /
TU/TG/CR Cooper- Max.LL&B Temp+LL+ Max SF in
Pier / LM-71 Type
SH E80 R CR Piers
Abutment
Pier - 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Free
Pier - 2 14 8280 5559 8280 8294 8294 Mono
Pier - 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Free
Model forces = 8379 kN
Model forces are higher than RSI, therefore

model output are used for pier P02 design.
Page 27 of 31
Project Job Ref.
Etihad Rail - Package 2C -
Under Bridge Rail Structure - CH:1+971 - Substructure Design DCP-3

y z
3.7 Pier-Cap Design for Pier P01 & P03
Forces at Bearings
x
Fz = 46000 kN Maximum vertical reaction
Fy = 1600 kN Maximum horizontal transverse load
Cap geometry
bcap = 6250 mm
Lcap = 3500 mm
Lvol = 750 mm
Hcc = 750 mm
Hcv = 1560 mm
bbea = 1650 mm
lbea = 1650 mm
ebear = 1900 mm
bcol = 4500 mm
lcol = 2000 mm
Cap reinforcement
Provided clear cover cover = 60 mm

Transverse
Under Bearings
No. of layers of reinforcement layers = 2 -
Diameter bar d = 32 mm
Spacing bar s = 150 mm
Vertical spacing bar vs = 32 mm
Secondary
No. of layers of reinforcement layers = 2 -
Longitudinal
Side
Vertical
No. of bars bars = 8 -
Page 28 of 31
Project Job Ref.

Column
Transverse
Longitudinal
Pedestal
Outer longitudinal
Outer transversal
Inner
No. of layers layers = 3 -
Spacing longitudinal bar s = 150 mm
Spacing transversal bar s = 150 mm
Data for calculation
Center of reinforcement h rein = 150 mm
Under Bearings
Transverse Width wb tra = 1950 mm
Transverse Provided Reinforcement Ast = 22519 mm2 No. 28
Secondary
Longitudinal Width ws lon = 6250 mm
Transverse Width ws tra = 1550 mm
Secondary
Side Provided Reinforcement Ast = 2094 mm2 No. 6.667
Strut and Tie model
Tt
α
hcalc
Ct
%bcol
Height for calculation hcal = 2200 mm

%bcol = 15%
α = 81.60 °
Transversal tie force Tt = 8395 kN
Transversal compression force Ct = 57448 kN
Page 29 of 31
Project Job Ref.
Tie resistance
Φ factor for tension in strut and tie models = 0.9

Steel resistance fy = 420 MPa
Transversal tie force Φ Tnt = 8512 kN
Secondary Reinforcement
Secondary transversal reinforcement required Ast/4 At = 11259 mm2

Thermal and shrinkage longitudinal rein. req Al = 7938 mm2
Thermal and shrinkage transversal rein. req At = 4445 mm2
Thermal and shrinkage side rein. req As = 1270 mm2/m
Crack Control Reinforcement (Not necessary to satisfy)

Width Spacing As,min As
2
mm mm cm cm2
Vertical 1950 150 8.78 16.1 OK
Longitudinal 5750 150 25.88 32.2 OK
Transversal 1950 150 8.78 16.1 OK
Node resistance
Φ factor for compression in strut and tie models = 0.7

Concrete resistance f'c = 40 MPa
Eficiency Factors for Nodes: CCT

Bearing Face ν = 0.7
Back face ν = 0.7
Strut-to-Node In ν = 0.56
Confinement modification factor

A1 = 2722500 mm2
A2 = 3802500 mm2
m = 1.18 mm2
Transversal geometry Transversal resistance

ha = 300 mm ΦPn,BackF = 13551 kN
lb = 1650 mm ΦPn,BearF = 74529 kN
ϴs = 81.60 ° ΦPn,SIN = 60560 kN
wa = 1950 mm
ABackFace = 585000 mm2
ABearFace = 3217500 mm2
ASNI = 3268449 mm2
Pedestal
Outer Longitudinal Req (4%Fz) Aol,req = 4868 mm2

Outer Transversal Req (4%Fz) Aot,req = 4868 mm2
Inner Longitudinal Req (25%Fz(1-lbea/wa)) Ail,req = 4681 mm2
Inner Transversal Req (25%Fz(1-bbea/wa)) Ait,req = 4681 mm2
Page 30 of 31
Project Job Ref.

Check
Ties
Transversal Tu = 8395 kN Φ Tn = 8512 kN OK
Nodes
T. Back Face Pu = 8395 kN Φ Pn = 13551 kN OK
T. Bear Face Pu = 46000 kN Φ Pn = 74529 kN OK
T. SNI Pu = 57448 kN Φ Pn = 60560 kN OK
Secondary Reinforcement
Longitudinal As,r = 7938 mm2 As,p = 20617 mm2 OK
Transversal As,r = 11259 mm2 As,p = 17693 mm2 OK
Side As,r = 1270 mm2 As,p = 2094 mm2 OK
Pedestal
Outer Long Aolr = 4868 mm2 Aol,p = 5027 mm2 OK
Outer Trans Aotr = 4868 mm2 Aot,p = 5027 mm2 OK
Inner Long Ailr = 4681 mm2 Ail,p = 12252 mm2 OK
Inner Trans Aitr = 4681 mm2 Ait,p = 12252 mm3 OK
Summary
Longitudinal
Secondary D 25 @ 150
Transverse
Under Bearings 14 x 2 D 32 @ 150
Secondary 2 D 32 @ 150
Side
D 20 @ 150
Page 31 of 31
Appendix B Risk Register
C0306-S02-ECB-RP-30034-AB PAGE 20 OF 22
BMS: Project Delivery
T446: Design Risk Management Schedule Project No 37463520 Project Name Etihad Rail 2C
Guidance Notes (see guidance notes page for more details)
Design risk management should be an integral part of the overall design development and designers should think of it in terms of considering constructability, maintainability, etc. Designers only need to document their consideration of risks in this simple risk management schedule format. There is no requirement for quantitative design risk assessments to be carried out/documented and these should be avoided
* Risks should be considered in a logical sequence relating to the location/operational environment, constructability/installability, operability (normal/emergency), maintainability (inc routine cleaning, replacement, etc.), and alteration/decommissioning/dismantling/demolition, and should be categorised against those headings,
CIRIA guidance documents C755, C756, C686, C607, etc. provide a useful checklist and detailed guidance on the identification of risks to be considered during design and how those risks might be addressed - see detailed guidance notes for more details
§ Significant residual risks are those which are unusual, not obvious, difficult to manage, or where critical design assumptions apply. The documentation by designers of residual risks that cover well-known and understood hazards should be avoided.
Ref Risk Category* Work Element/Location Hazard or Risk Issue Identified Risk Management Design ERIc Action Required Significant Temporary Works Design Action Status/Final Resolution Notes Significant Date Logged/ Raised By
& Phase where appropriate, (where appropriate) Owner (e.g. hazard elimination/risk mitigation action, information to Requirements/Management Arrangements and/or (e.g. traceability of ERIc action, communication of § Reviewed
Residual Risk
e.g. location/environment, be provided to others) any Special Erection/Installation Sequences or significant residual risk, critical design criteria, etc. )
construction, operation, maintenance, Requirements
alteration/demolition
1 Construction Buried structure Rising ground water may impact the design of buried Designer Carryout assessment of the design ground water table as per None No 02/10/2019 Bridges
structure such as box culverts. the available information.
2 Design and Construction Structures Uplift of buried structures (esp. box culverts) due to Structurers designed such that self-weight is sufficient to Dewatering procedures/temporary works to be in No 02/10/2019 Bridges
buoyancy if structures remain buried for a sustained counter-act uplift. place and construction staging to take into
period of time. consideration buoyancy by keeping structures
ballasted.
3 Design Structures Bridge hit by over height vehicle will result in Designer Design bridge/ underpass with required vertical clearance No 02/10/2019 Bridges
structural damage, road closures, financial loss and as per local authority guidelines. Also provide signage for
disruption to normal operation of road network. the maximum headroom clearance in accordance with
local authority manual.
4 Design and Construction All Using As built & utilities information. As Built Not possible to eliminate hazard by design. Trial holes should be excavated by hand to locate Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
information is not sufficient or not provided and A site survey, liaison with other discipline for design and establish the type of existing services and their
cannot be guaranteed to be accurate. information and web available aerial photographs are depths.
Utilities information is not guaranteed to be required to reduce the risk.
accurate/up to date. Re-use of existing locations for columns and tie-in into
This could potentially cause errors in the design. existing electrical network have been based on
assumptions.
As built information to be verified by topo survey
information.
Design developed utilizing, correlating and reviewing the
information obtained.
5 Design and Construction Buried structure Unavailability of ground water table Designer/ Carryout assessment of the design ground water table as Deep Excavations may require extensive No 02/10/2019 Bridges
Contractor per the available information. dewatering
6 Design and Construction Structures Exact routing of buried services unknown therefore Designer/ Add warning note to relevant drawings. Contractor to confirm location of existing Services i. Proposed diversion of existing services has been Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
risk of damage to existing services during excavation Contractor Identify the existing services and carryout diversion prior before commencement of construction and carry shown on the design drawings
work. to deep excavation. out necessary utilities diversion before start of ii. Warning notes has been provided on relevant
main construction activities. drawings.
Iii. Carryout necessary utilities diversion before start
of main construction activities
7 Construction Structures Noise and generation of excessive dust as a result of Add minimum performance specifications on noise/dust etc. Contractor to prepare own Construction Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
construction works on General Notes drawing. Add requirements for Environmental Management Plan to identify
Construction Environmental Management Plan in design appropriate mitigation measures.
documents.
8 Operation and maintenance All Train derailment Provide containment for possible derailment Rail operator to follow the Standard Operating No 02/10/2019 Bridges
Procedure (SOP) in case of any derailment.
9 Design and operation Structures Vehicle Collision Design bridge supports for vehicle collision load. Provide No 02/10/2019 Bridges
appropriate offsets including sway allowance and barrier
protection. Provide the adequate headroom under the
bridges.
10 Design and operation Structures Expansion joints can reduce the durability. Where possible, small spans shall be design as integral No 02/10/2019 Bridges
bridges to avoid the maintenance requirement.
11 Design and operation Structures Unsuitable access causing inspection and maintenance Safe and adequate access to be provided at abutment gallery, No 02/10/2019 Bridges
hazards. inside the box girders, bearing plinths etc. for inspection and
maintenance.
12 Design and operation Structures Inspection and maintenance personnel struck by Provisions for areas with adequate space (e.g. verges and No 02/10/2019 Bridges
passing vehicles or falling from height (e.g. access shoulders) to accommodate mobile elevated access platforms
platforms/scaffolding) - injury or single death and/or scaffolding along with required traffic management.
Consider space provisions for maintenance vehicles and
junction level. Consult with ADM/RTA and requirements for
lane closures to be identified on drawings.
13 Construction Buried structure Rising ground water may impact the design of buried Designer Carryout assessment of the design ground water table as per None No 02/10/2019 Bridges
structure such as box culverts. the available information.
14 Construction and Structures Route and condition of buried services unknown Designer/ Add warning note to relevant drawings. Carryout necessary utilities diversion before start of i. Proposed diversion of existing services has been Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
Alteration/Dismantling/Demolition therefore risk of damage to existing service during Contractor Identify the existing services and carryout diversion prior to main construction activities shown on the design drawings
excavation work. deep excavation. ii. Warning notes has been provided on relevant
drawings.
Iii. Carryout necessary utilities diversion before start of
main construction activities
15 Construction Structures Penetration of Chlorides and sulphates in structural Designer i. Provide sufficient concrete cover to the reinforcement. None No 02/10/2019 Bridges
concrete will affect the service life of structures. ii. Use concrete containing blast furnace slag and low water
cement ratio. Micro silica can be also used.
Iii. Waterproofing system shall be installed.
16 Construction Buried structure Leakage of water through expansion/ movement joints Designer Provide robust waterproofing system at expansion joint to None No 02/10/2019 Bridges
will affect the service life of structures. avoid any leakages.
17 Construction Structures Uncertain ground condition causing structural Contractor Carryout geotechnical investigation at foundation locations Remove soft spots prior to construction No 02/10/2019 Bridges
failure and consider geotechnical parameters accordingly.
18 Construction Structures Deep excavation in sand induce risk of collapse. Contractor Side of excavation pit to be protected by temporary Temporary trench/ excavation pit sheeting Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
supports. designed by Contractor
19 Construction Structures High ground water level increase risk of collapse of Contractor Side of excavation pit to be protected by temporary Temporary trench/ excavation pit sheeting Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
excavation pit/ trench supports. designed by Contractor
T446- Design Risk Management Schedule Page 1 of 2
BMS: Project Delivery
T446: Design Risk Management Schedule Project No 37463520 Project Name Etihad Rail 2C
Guidance Notes (see guidance notes page for more details)
Design risk management should be an integral part of the overall design development and designers should think of it in terms of considering constructability, maintainability, etc. Designers only need to document their consideration of risks in this simple risk management schedule format. There is no requirement for quantitative design risk assessments to be carried out/documented and these should be avoided
* Risks should be considered in a logical sequence relating to the location/operational environment, constructability/installability, operability (normal/emergency), maintainability (inc routine cleaning, replacement, etc.), and alteration/decommissioning/dismantling/demolition, and should be categorised against those headings,
CIRIA guidance documents C755, C756, C686, C607, etc. provide a useful checklist and detailed guidance on the identification of risks to be considered during design and how those risks might be addressed - see detailed guidance notes for more details
§ Significant residual risks are those which are unusual, not obvious, difficult to manage, or where critical design assumptions apply. The documentation by designers of residual risks that cover well-known and understood hazards should be avoided.
Ref Risk Category* Work Element/Location Hazard or Risk Issue Identified Risk Management Design ERIc Action Required Significant Temporary Works Design Action Status/Final Resolution Notes Significant Date Logged/ Raised By
& Phase where appropriate, (where appropriate) Owner (e.g. hazard elimination/risk mitigation action, information to Requirements/Management Arrangements and/or (e.g. traceability of ERIc action, communication of § Reviewed
Residual Risk
e.g. location/environment, be provided to others) any Special Erection/Installation Sequences or significant residual risk, critical design criteria, etc. )
construction, operation, maintenance, Requirements
alteration/demolition
20 Construction Structures Excavation may damage unidentified underground Contractor Provide H&S information on drawings. Incorporate latest Contractor to use ground radar or similar to Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
utilities survey and avoid unnecessary services crossings check the excavation areas prior to digging. If
new services are identified, use hand digging to
avoid damages.
21 Construction Structures Inadequate formworks Contractor Minimum depth acquired for specific to be carried out. Contractor to ensure temporary formworks is No 02/10/2019 Bridges
properly designed and reviewed
22 Construction, demolition Structures Fall onto starter bars/exposed RB Contractor Cut the upright bars immediately or put Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
mushroom head or bend the exposed bars
23 Construction, demolition All Work over or close to existing oil and gas line Existing services should clearly shown on drawings. Contactor to liaise with stakeholders to find best No 02/10/2019 Bridges
Contractor to carryout utilities identification survey at solution for suggested closeness of works.
structure foundation location before execution of work at
site.
24 Construction All Transport, storage, use and disposal of hazardous Contractor Minimize and avoid specifying hazardous materials in Use of hazardous materials to be minimised as far No 02/10/2019 Bridges
materials (silica, asbestos, concrete impregnates, design as reasonably practicable. Appropriate assessment
fresh concrete etc.) will result in skin damage, to be carried out for each individual case.
burns, inhalation, eye damage, illness/ injury. Application or removal of potentially hazardous
materials to be carried out by fully qualified
personnel. Ensure correct use of personal protective
equipment including those near the works. Where
necessary, exclusion zones to be erected to protect
the general public. Safe working practice and health
and safety guidelines to be employed by contractor.
25 Operation and maintenance Structures Access to the bearing inspection gallery and interior Operating Authority Provide access openings of appropriate size and at Always implement a safe system of work when No 02/10/2019 Bridges
of the box for inspection and maintenance; fall from appropriate locations in accordance with the standards. entering the interior of the structure through access
height and risk associated with confined space Access to inside the box girder to be in the soffit to allow doors located at height and confined spaces. Submit
entry, could result in injury or fatality. mobile elevator work platform baskets to approach closely. relevant method statements and health and safety
risk assessments for review and approval prior to
the work. only suitably trained and experience
personnel to undertake confined space entry.
26 Construction Structures Stressing operations - breakage of pre-stressing Contractor Specify the appropriate number and type of tendons along Close quality control of stressing operations by the No 02/10/2019 Bridges
tendons, failure to recover damage tendons, with design prestressing force to ensure maximum supervision engineer. Submit post tensioning
insufficient prestressing or remaining tendons over- breaking load is not reached. method statements for review and approval prior to
stressed, leading to reduction in structural capacity. execution at site.
27 Operation and maintenance Structures Super-structure jacking for bearing replacement can Operating Authority Provide sufficient space for the placement of hydraulic Refer to structural drawings and authority No 02/10/2019 Bridges
result in failing jacking system or heavy bearing jacks at pier top and show locations for jacking points on specifications for the requirements of jacking
parts not adequately supported and falling onto drawings. Consider the provision of adequate space operations and bearing replacement. Only place
platforms and ground below can result in injuries or around piers to allow for the placement of lifting towers or hydraulic jacks or other form of lifting equipment at
loss of life. trestles, if required. designated locations.
28 Operation and maintenance Structures Concrete barrier/ fence removal or replacement on Contractor / Use pre-cast barriers and fence so that they can be Lifting hooks shall be provided. Closure of at- No 02/10/2019 Bridges
the bridges may result in falling of debris onto Operating Authority removed in the same section as they were installed. grade roads where necessary to minimize the risk
public or workforce below leading to injury or Provision of lifting holes to be provided in precast units. of injury to travelling public.
fatality.
29 Operation and maintenance Structures Fire incident on the bridge or in underpass can Designer Structure shall be design for fire resistance as per local No 02/10/2019 Bridges
result in damage to the structure, injury to bridge/ authority requirements. Provision of footpath for safe
underpass users and fatalities egress of commuters to be consider in design.
30 Operation and maintenance Structures Demolition of post-tensioned super-structure at the Operating Authority Consider adequate space provision to temporarily support No 02/10/2019 Bridges
end of its design working life. Destressing main the bridge deck during destressing. Specify that vehicles
bridge elements. Risk of sudden stress relief by should not pass under bridge during construction.
severing prestressing tendons, instability and
structural collapse.
Copy rows then insert above this line to ensure formula are copied Issue 3.0
T446- Design Risk Management Schedule Page 2 of 2

Appendix C List of Drawings
1st
Contract Location / Type of Sequence
Drawing/Document Number Package Sub Package Submission Discipline Revision Title Remarks
Number Subdivision Document Number
Activity
Drawing List - Structures - JBL 0 - Under Bridge 1+971 Substructure
C0306-S02-ECB-DG-30005 General Structure C0306 S02 ECB DG 30005 AC Revised
Structure Key Plan
C0306-S02-ECB-DG-30033 General Structure C0306 S02 ECB DG 30033 AA No Change
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31250 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31250 AC Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - General Arrangement Sheet 1 Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31251 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31251 AC Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - General Arrangement Sheet 2 Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31254 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31254 AB Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Foundation Layout No Change
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31256 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31256 AC Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Abutment Details - Concrete Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31258 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31258 AC Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Pier Details - Concrete Sheet 1 Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31259 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31259 AC Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Pier Details - Concrete Sheet 2 Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31274 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31274 AB Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Abutment Wall Details - Reinforcement No Change
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31276 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31276 AC Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Pier Details - Reinforcement Sheet 1 Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31277 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31277 AC Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Pier Details - Reinforcement Sheet 2 Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31279 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31279 AB Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Pile Reinforcement No Change
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31292 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31292 AB Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Construction Sequence Revised
END OF DOCUMENT

C0306 S02 Ecb RP 30034 Ac PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

C0306 S02 Ecb RP 30034 Ac PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Responsible Division Responsible Discipline Document Type Document Status

C0306 Structures-Bridges Report General Issued for Approval

ETIHAD RAIL STAGE 2 PROJECT

Document Number Issued Date 10-NOV-2020

Version Date Name Description of Review Changes

Revision Log – To Client

Revision Date Description of Changes

Acronyms and Abbreviations

Ref. Document Title Document Number Date

[1] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 3 C0306-S02-GDM-FS-00001-01 09 December 2018

[2] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 4 Annex B C0306-S02-GEI-FS-00003-04 01 April 2019

[3] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 5 C0306-S02-GER-PQ-00001-03 13 March 2019

[4] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 5 Annex 1 C0306-S02-GER-PQ-00002-03 13 March 2019

[5] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 5 Annex 2 C0306-S02-GER-PQ-00003-03 13 March 2019

[6] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 6 C0306-S02-GCM-PQ-00001-01 09 December 2018

[7] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 8 C0306-S02-EGE-FS-00003-04 13 May 2019

[8] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 11 C0306-S02-GPC-FS-00001-04 07 May 2019

[9] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 13 C0306-S02-GQA-FS-00001-01 09 December 2018

[10] Exhibit D2-1 Technical Specification X0231-UAE-GDM-PO-00002-00 29 May 2019

[11] Interface Management Plan C0306-S02-GEI-PL-00001-00 20 October 2019

[12] Quality Plan C0306-S02-GQA-PL-00001-00 31 October 2019

[13] Document Management Plan C0306-S02-GDM-PL-0000-00 31 October 2019

[14] Stakeholder Management Plan C0306-S02-GEI-PL-00002-AC 30 October 2019

[15] Configuration Management Plan C0306-S02-GCM-PL-00001-00 03 November 2019

[16] Requirements Management Plan C0306-S02-GCM-PL-00002-00 28 October 2019

[17] System RAM Plan C0306-S02-GER-PL-00001-AC 28 October 2019

[18] System Safety Management Plan C0306-S02-GER-PL-00002-AB 28 October 2019

[22] Design Basis Report – Rail C0306-S02-ERA-RP-00001-AB 11 November 2019

[23] Design Basis Report – Utilities C0306-S02-EUT-RP-00001-00 28 October 2019

[25] Design Basis Report – Sand Mitigation C0306-S02-ELS-RP-00001-AB 14 November 2019

[26] Design Management Plan C0306-S02-GEM-PL-00002-00 31 October 2019

Figure 1: Project Layout

2.1 Intent of this Design Report

Package Chainage/ Location

Package 1 DMB 1 - 47+140.319 to 59+000

Package 2 DMB 2 - 59+000 to 69+000

Package 3 DMB 3 - 69+000 to 72+000

Package 5 JBL 1 - 3+000 to 8+000

Package 6 JBL 2 - 8+000 to 11+150

Package 7A JBL 3 (A) - 11+150 to 14+000

Package 7B JBL 3 (B) - 14+000 to 17+600

Package 8 JBL 4 - 17+600 to End of JBL

Package 9 JBL 5 - JART

Package 10A DMC 1 (A) - 0+000 to 7+000

Package 10B DMC 1 (B) – 7+000 to 10+000

Package 11 DMC 2 - 10+000 to 20+000

Package 12 DMC 3 - 20+000 to 32+000

Package 13A DMC 4 (A) - 32+000 to 38+000

Package 13B DMC 4 (B) - 38+000 to End of DMC

2.2 Existing Condition

2.3 Description of Rail Network

Figure 2: Package 2C Layout

2.4 Outline Scope

2.5 Engineering Disciplines

3 Review of Existing Data

4 Topographic and Geotechnical Surveys

4.2 Geotechnical Investigations

6 Design Development for the DCP Stage

6.1 Design Basis Report

6.2 Design Update from DCP2

Figure 3: Midas Model Snap

9 Risk and Opportunity

1.) Back Wall Load (0.5x(4.15+0.5))(13.35-1)25*1.1

2.) Back Wall Tapp. (11+11/2)25(13.35-1)

4.) Fill Load on Abutment Front (2.5513.351*20)

6.) Fill on back-2 (9.8-1.5)120*(13.35-1) e