Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ID #:2017888019
Section #: 3rd
The sluice gate provides a convenient means of flow regulation, especially in irrigation and
drainage schemes where flow has to be distributed in networks of interconnected channels.
The gate is provided with a lifting mechanism so that the aperture beneath it may be set to any
desired position. When closed, the aperture is sealed so that no flow can pass through the gate.
In this experiment we measure the discharge under the gate and establish the effective coefficient
of discharge
Objective:
To determine the coefficient of discharge, the coefficient of velocity and the coefficient of
contraction due to vena contracts for a sluice gate
Apparatus:
1. Multi-purpose teaching flume
Procedure:
Ensure the flume is horizontal and that the downstream weir is at the bottom of its travel. Place
the adjustable undershot weir vertically in position with its bottom edge (mm) above the flume
bottom. Open the inlet valve and admit water until y, height, measure Q. y, and H Raise the weir in
increments to height of (maintaining y, at a height of say (weir record the values Q, y2, and hG.
mm. With y, at this mm), mm), by varying the flow of water. At each level of the Repeat the
procedure with a constant flow, Q allowing y1, to vary Record the values of y°. Y1, h
Data sheet for Sluice Gate and hydraulic jump
Q (Fixed) = 42 L / Min
b = 7.6 cm
HG Y1(m)(1) Y2(m)(2) Y3(m)(3) A2(m2)(4) Vact(5) Vtheo(6) Cv(7) Cc(8) Cd(9) Fg(10) Fa(11)
0.01 0.173 0.0075 0.05 5.7*10-4 1.228 0.3836 3.2014 0.75 2.4011 10.3136 9.9044
-4
0.012 0.143 0.009 0.048 6.8*10 1.023 0.4202 2.4354 0.75 1.8266 6.9215 6.3973
0.014 0.096 0.0105 0.04 7.98*10-4 0.877 0.4539 1.9326 0.75 1.4495 2.8476 2.5066
0.016 0.069 0.012 0.036 9.12*10-4 0.768 0.4852 1.5818 0.75 1.1864 1.2773 1.0471
Y3/Y2 Y3/Y2
V2(12) V3(13) exp(14) Theo(15) Nf2(16) Nf3(17) E2(18) E3(19) ∆E(20) Fs2(21) Fs3(22)
1.228 0.184 6.667 5.922 4.527 0.263 0.084 0.052 0.032 0.881 1.061
1.023 0.192 5.333 4.396 3.444 0.28 0.062 0.05 0.012 0.747 0.993
0.877 0.23 3.81 3.397 2.733 0.368 0.05 0.043 0.007 0.655 0.758
0.768 0.256 3 2.703 2.237 0.431 0.042 0.039 0.003 0.591 0.662
No, because of the errors in the experiment such as that water is not
distilled, errors in taking reading of y3 and y2, and rounding number
They are close, but fs3 is higher than fs2 the difference between them is
due to errors
5. From your Plot, what's the corresponding critical depth and the
critical Energy? And compare it to the calculated value.
Yc = 0.012m
Ec = 0.035
Yc (theo) = ((q2)/ ((gb2)) 1/3 = 0.0205m
E (theo) =Yc + V2/ (2g)
V = Q/ (Yc*b) = 0.4432 m/s
B = 0.076m
Q = 7*10-4 m3/sec
Ytheo > Yc
Ec > Etheo
Sample Calculation:
Conclusion:
From experiment conducted in lab, still found lacking of perfect result. The recommendations below
are some of the improvements that can be carried out for further study. Variety study scope such as
variable position sluice gate to see the effect against changing of flow found. The data which
conducted should be more and sufficient to find the best flow profile specially to get curve shape as
required. As for continuous study, suggest that, to get the flow profile through bigger amount of flow
rate and opening of sluice gate than the amount of this study. Other than blocking structure i.e. boxes,
pillar and bends put it in front of sluice gate can be suggested to see the changing of flow depth.
Design sluice gate and open channel model can be modified from square to triangle or trapezium.