omnedia wreetta wrstant orferanot (ase uftaes sit Tremet water) National Highways Authori ia — vet ftiiony weston oe nel rom ) ‘feet arate gar, Beam, 10-1, Waradl, SeeyT (A) 313001 RAAT Project Implementation Unit, Udaipur, 10-A, Panchwati, Udaipur (Raj) 313001] "===" HM Phone (0294 2412566, 2428004 $ He /Emal: daha ong sane tera NHAI/UDR/PKG-I/2019/ 3 FEZ, 08.03.2019 M/s UCHIT Expressways Pvt Ltd 3rd Floor, Westend Building, Above P. C. Jewelers, Plot No. 20, Residency Road, UDAIPUR - 313 001 Sub: _ Six Laning of Chittorgarh-Udaipur section of NH-76 from design chainage Km 214+870 to Km _308+370 in the state of Rajasthan (length-93.500 Km) on DBFOT (Toll) mode under NHOP Phase-V (Package-III)-: Minutes of meeting held on 08.02.2019. Ref: Regional Office, Jaipur Letter No. NHAI/12022/2/2019-ROJ/Tech. 15033 dated 27.02.2019 Sir, With reference to the subject cited above, it is to state that the Regional Office, Jaipur vide letter under reference above has forwarded the Minutes of meeting held on 08.02.2019 under the Chairmanship of CGM (T) cum RO, at Regional Office, wherein NHAl official, your representative & Independent Engineer were present. In the aforesaid MoM various’ issues discussed in the meeting pertaining to the subject contract package is mentioned. The copy of MoM dated 08.02.2019 is attached herewith for your information and taking hecessary action please. Yours faithfully, \ 6 (Sunil Yadav) General Manager (Tech.) Project Director Encl: As above. ‘Team Leader, M/s Aarvee Associates, Udaipur - for information and necessary action FAPACRAGE-IMUCHT-AINLCHIT EPL Voli.doex ors writer : wate S. oi-s wal 6, Saet-10, amar, ae feeel — 110075 Saane | hip/wwnhalgovin Corporate Office : Plot No. G-5 & 6, Sector - 10, Dwarka, New Delhi - 110075 Website = http/Aninw.nhai govintry Moif~ C6]os/ ‘ UW /Tel 0144-2292049 ade wesley wort wera orice (ew oRaes ea ont area) bara ax. :0141-2292%040 National Highways Authority of India ga /emait Fojaipuir@nhai org (Ministry of Road Transport & Highways) asia wwrafera (eon) /Regional Office (Rajasthan) W120, OTHE, ear Ie, UTTYR-302019 P-120, Janpah, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur-302019 NHAI/12022/2/2019-ROJ/Tech./5033 Date: 27.02.2019 Sh. Sunil Yadav Project Director NHAI, PIU-Udaipur 10-A Panchwati, Udaipur (Raj) Sub: Six laning of Chitforgarh-Udaipur section of NH-76 from Design Chainage km. 2141870 to km. 308+370 in the State of Rajasthan (length 93450 km.) on DBFOT {Toll) Mode under NHDP Phase-V (Package-II) ~ Minutes of Meeting: reg. Sir, |'am directed to convey Ihe Minutes of a Meeting held on 08.02.2019 in Regional Office, Jaipur under Chairmanship of CGM [I/RO (ab Annexure-I) for discussion regarding pening issue of Chittorgarh-Udeipur section of NH-76, which wos also attended by you, representative of Concessionuire & IE. You are requested fo ensure necessary campliance by all concemod parties to the directions/observailons of the CGM (T)/RO, Rajasthan, This issue th 11 of CGM Peas (Manoj Khoda) Manager (I) Encl: Annexure-1 Copy to: {) Sh. S.K, Mishra, CGM (Raj.) NHAI H@ for kind information please. fi) Independent Engineer M/s M/s Aarvee Associates architects engineers & Consuliants Pvl. Ltd. through concemed Project Director for necessary ‘compliance. fii) Concessionaire M/s Uchit Expressway Pvl. Lid through concerned Project Director for necessary compliance, Tests: chs ed 6, ree—10, arewr, 1g FRee=110076, GTN : 01425074100, 25074200 rH + O11 25099507 /Poomaare Corporate Office :G-8 & 6, Sector-10, Dwarka New Delhi-110078, Phone: 011-25074100, 2074200 Fax : 011.25083807/25009614National Highways Authority of India Regional Office, Jaipur _MINUTES OF MEETING ‘A meeting was held under the Chairmanship of CGM (1) cum RO, Jaipur in Regional Office, Jaipur on 08.02.2019 with representative of Concessionaire M/s Uchit Expressway Pvt. Ltd., Independent Engineer and NHAI official as per the list enclosed at ‘Annex-A for project of Chittorgarh-Udaipur section of NH-76 The issues were discussed for the subject project wise and outcome of the meeting is as under: ik ning of Approa of Structures at 4 locatt 3: The Concessionaire raised the issue of widening of approaches of Structure at Design Chainage 231, 232, 280 & 307 under Change of scope. The independent Engineer and PD, PIU, Udaipur informed that the structures width at Km 231, 292 & 260 ure mre Inari 10 mtr wide and thus has to be retained as per provision of Schedule-D. IE has mentioned that tne approaches of these three structures which are less than 10 m ore to be widened and are under the scope of Concessionare to widen the existing carriageway to é4ane. The Concessionaire submitted that as per provision of Schedvle-D the approaches of such structures (having carriageway width more than 10m) are to be retained hence if, these approaches are to be widened: it has to be considered under COS. Tha maiter was deliber Hed and it was decided that the Concessionaire shall commence the work of widening of approaches and the Matter will he referred to intorprotation committe, NIIAI TIO fix vJvnific align so as to avoid delay and ensure iimely completion of project highway. Further the iE and the Concessionaire was advised to expiore the possibilty of widening on inner side with providing proper tapering to minimize the cost and fo use available ROW, AS regard to structure at Km 307 (VIP with ROB). the IE informed that tho carriageway width of the VUP as mentioned in the Schedule-A of the CA is 11.35 m and hence no widening/reconstruction has been proposed in Schedule-B, However, at site the width of the VUP is 8.4m on LHS and 8.7 m on RHS and the width of approaches is 13.60 + 8.5 from ROB to VUP and 88 m from VUP to start of 2 approach towards Chittorgarh. PD/IE has expressed that the widening of this structure is must as it is less than 10m but the widening of this structure is not mentioned in Schedule-B of the CA. However, the widening of approaches is ‘covered under widening mandate of Concessionaire as per CA. It was directed to the Concessionaire and the IE to submit separate proposal for this location with Proper justification for appraisal & approval of the Competent Authority. 2. ision of PUP/CUP at Km 301 As per provision of the CA, PUP of size 7m x 4.5 mis to be constructed at Km 3014470. At this location there is Petrol pump on RHS and on LHS there is a smalll Village road which ends after 300 mis. The Hon'ble MP, Chittorgarh has desired vide VIP reference to construct one additional PUP at Sheesham Ki Ghati at km 302+360 as there is connecting road of 10 to 12 villages at this junction. A meeting in this regard was also held in the Ministry and was directed to resolve the matter. The residents of these 10 to 12 villages had ako staged Dhama for long time and only on the assurance by the Hon'ble MP, Chittorgarh the Dhama was called off. After deliberation uf the isue it was observed that upon shifting of the PUP from Km 301+470 to 302+360 (Sheesham ki Ghat jn.) there will be smooth passage of vehicular and pedestrian traffic coming Met>trom 10 to 12 villages. The proposal was agreed principally by Authority and asked Independent Engineer to submit detail justification to this effect and concessionaire fo submit the drawings accordingly for appraisal to C.A. and for approval The Competent Authority NHAI has conveyed approval for depositing Supervision charges and Shutdown charges of 08 Nos out of 11 Nos RRVPNL technically approved EHV line. 4s regard to (1) Modification of 220 KV D/C Debati-Madri line for NH crossing (NH ch. 304+670) (2) Modification of 132 KV S/C Debari-Sukher and 132 KV $/C Debari - Madi line for NH crossing (NH ch, 304+721 and 304+698) (3) Modification of 132 KV SIC Debari-HZl line for NH crossing (NH ch. 305+200), the matter was discussed along with Electrical expert. The Concessionaire informed that as per eatlier Proposal the proposed centerine [PCL] it was possible to construct 5.5 m wide Service Road (SR) on LHS and avoid shifling of EHV towers. However, wilh the fecent problem of Land Acquisition on RHS near canal crossing the PCL is 1o be shifted on LHS (towards the EHV Towers) by some 2.1 m to 2.5 m, thus there will be No space left for construction of Service Road on LHS. The Service road on RHS is Olready disconnected due to LA problem. Therefore, shifting of all the three lines is @ bare necessity for the construction of Service Road on LHS, which is aso compulsorily required for the diversion of traffic for construction of VUP including its approaches at Km 305+973. Ample space is available in ulity corridor for shifting of all the 3 EHV towers. The site was alka inspected by the Elwctrical oxpert along with the RRVPNIL staff and the shiffing wus fund lo be justified. In view of Ihe above, It was decided to consider the shifting of cbove mentioned 03 Nos of EHV lines, which has already been technically sanctioned by RRVENL. The PD was directed to re-submit the proposal for approval of the Competent Authority keeping in view of the actual site requirement, id for CUP by Hon'ble iP: The additonal structures as proposed by Hon'ble MP have alrecdy Leen approved under COS. Al his stoge, the Construction of further more additional structures demanded by Hon'ble MP under COS will not be feasible os it may require additional time from the slipulated period of completion. As regard to struciure at village-Delwas, the Hon'hie MP cluring sito Yhil OF .UI-2U1Y it wus Upiised thot possibilty will be explored for providing the service road to be extended along approach of Major bridge and connected through "st span of Major bridge. the Concessionaire was advised fo submit the Proposal along with technical justification, Additional Stucture in Village-Vane; in vilage-Vana there are already two existing CUP along with one proposed PUP within stretch of 300 mis. The matter wor discussed and the demand of villagers and Hon'ble MP for additional CUP in this stretch was not found technically feasible. The Concessionaire was advised to take fee esOrY administrative help from Distict administration if the work is stopped by the vilagers. it was also assured fo take up this issue with State Government during the nex! meeting of High Power Committee. we es in Nat llages: These two structures have been Proposed by Hon'ble MP. Chitforgarh under VIP reference and has already been opproved by Competent Authority NHAI under COS. The Concessionaire Informed the problem of land for access near the Suowoy eniry and exit point. The PD/IE was directed fo examine the site condition technically and take necessary action accordingly. Mae7. Works at Banloro Ka Kheca & Hazalkhedi; The land in tho ROW of Banjaro Ko Kheda on RHS side is Government land for which the occupants are demanding compensation of land whereas during the acquisition of land for 4-lane project no compensation was given for Government land. Ouring é-lane, the cost of the structures on the Govt. land has been sanctioned and deposited in the CALA account under Ex-gratia, Even affer the sanction of Ex-gratia amount the occupants are not vacating the land. The Concessionaire informed that they have Proposed two stage constructions of PUP approaches without any additional financial implication and ensuring proper safely of traffic within the given timeframe for which the IE has also consented, The PD was directed to liaison with District Administration for vacating the occupants from the acquired Govt. land in Banjaro Ka Kheda & for possession of land within ROW at Hazcikhedi. 8. Cross: uman Te id ns: It was advised to construct the Service road as per LA availability. Meanwhile, for slow moving traffic a 2.5m wide lane may be considered together with 3-lanes at Mazaar Location only. The service road to be constructed fo the full length on both sides of Temple, Mazacr and near Mazoar merges with MCW. Beyond mazaor towards Udaipur side the service oad shall be formed by hill cutting. The shifting of the Temple issue shall be taken with district administration. 9. Reduction in Service toad widths in cations: The concessionaire was advised to identify the stretches where there is hindrance in construction of Service road due to land acquisition. It was decided fo construct service road with width not less than 5.5 m in these locations and for the balance land, proposal for acquisition through gazette notification may be initicted at the earliest. And in cose ROW is not sufficient for even 5.5m service road then proposal under Purchase through mutual consent may be initiated and submitted for approval of Competent Authority as per the NHAI guidelines issued in this regard. 1. ing ended with v thanks to CGM [1)/RO. Mane