Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fuel
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fuel
h i g h l i g h t s
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: In this study hazelnut shell and olive residue were hydrothermally carbonized in a stainless steel auto-
Received 29 October 2015 clave. Chemical, structural and physicochemical properties of obtained hydrochars were investigated in
Received in revised form 29 April 2016 dependence of the reaction parameters and characterized by use of various techniques. Reaction temper-
Accepted 22 June 2016
ature was found to have a much stronger influence on hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of biomass than
Available online 27 June 2016
reaction time after 2 h. Hydrochar samples consist of spherical/semi-spherical particles in nano to micron
size with aromatic framework. Hazelnut shell based hydrochars have higher number of O-containing
Keywords:
reactive functional groups compared with the olive residue based hydrochars. Because of the knowledge
Hydrothermal carbonization
Waste biomass
gaps in hydrochar characterization, more comprehensive product characterization and reporting are
Carbonaceous spheres needed to advance our understanding of HTC processes, products and applications. By the help of the
Surface functionalities results of this study, it will be possible to choose the appropriate hydrochar characteristics in various
applications of hydrochars.
Ó 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.06.108
0016-2361/Ó 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Y.O. Donar et al. / Fuel 183 (2016) 366–372 367
In our previous work low temperature (180 °C) hydrothermal respectively. For instance, HTC-OR (260 °C, 4 h) refers to
carbonization of saccharides and waste biomasses were success- hydrothermally carbonized olive residue at 260 °C for 4 h.
fully performed and evaluated in terms of the char formation
mechanism [7]. In the present paper, the effects of operational con-
ditions on the chemical, morphological and structural characteris- 2.3. Analysis of hydrochars
tics of hydrochars obtained from the two bio-residues were
investigated. Even though the hydrothermal carbonization of bio- X-ray Diffraction analyses of biomass and hydrochar samples
mass has been investigated by various workers [14,15], this work were carried out by a Rigaku D/Max 2200ULTIMAN X-ray diffrac-
differs from those in regard to the use of wide variety of analysis tometer, using CuKa radiation. Elemental analysis of hydrochars
techniques to improve the understanding of operation conditions and biomass were determined using a LECO 932 CHNS elemental
on the chemical, structural, physicochemical properties and forma- analyzer. XPS spectra was recorded by a PHI-5000 Versaprobe
tion process of hydrochars. using Al monochromatic X-ray anode and Gaussian peaks for the
peak fitting. 13C CP-MAS NMR analyses were conducted by a Bru-
2. Materials and methods ker Avance 300 MHz (7T) spectrometer spinning at MAS rate
nMAS = 7 kHz. Raman spectra were obtained from a Horiva (Lab-
2.1. Materials Ram HR-800) analyzer with 532 nm laser in the range of 1000–
2000 cm 1. High resolution transmission electron microscope
Hazelnut shell (HS) and olive residue (OR) were used as car- (CTEM) analysis was performed with an FEI Tecnai G2 (at
bonaceous material precursors. Olive oil waste was provided from 200 kV) transmission electron microscope to determine the parti-
a local olive oil factory at Muğla from Turkey and formed the cle size and shape of the hydrochar particles. Scanning electron
remaining material after the oil extraction from the olive kernel. microscope (SEM) images were obtained using a QUANTA 400F
Hazelnut shell was supplied from the Black sea region in the north- Field Emission SEM device.
ern part of Turkey. The proximate and ultimate analysis of the raw
biomass samples (HS and OR) are given in Table S1 in supporting
information (SI). The air dried biomasses were milled and then 3. Results and discussion
sieved through a 425 lm mesh.
3.1. Recovered hydrochars yield
2.2. Hydrothermal carbonization experiments
The effects of reaction parameters on the solid product yield are
The hydrothermal carbonization experiments were carried out shown in Fig. 1. High carbonization rates lead to formation of gas-
in, a 1 L stirred pressure reactor (Parr, model 4571) under different eous and liquid products and solid product yield decreased with
reaction conditions changing the temperature (180, 220 and the separation of this by-products when compared with the initial
260 °C) and the reaction time (2, 4 and 6 h). In a typical run, 40 g weight of biomass. Hydrothermal carbonization of waste biomass
biomass was dispersed in 400 mL distilled water in the reactor may occur at 180 °C [7], even though cellulose and lignin do not
and heated with 4 °C/min. It took about 45, 60 and 75 min to reach undergo any significant changes below 220 °C temperature. It
180, 220 and 260 °C temperatures, respectively. After reaction can be explained by the thermally unstable hemicellulose content
solid product was separated from liquid via vacuum filtration. of the lignocellulosic biomass (Table S1 in SI). At 180 °C, olive resi-
The carbonaceous material was washed with distilled water 3 due has a low solid product yield (high conversion rate) compared
times and dried in an oven at 80 °C for 24 h. The obtained hydro- with hazelnut shell because of the higher hemicellulose content
chars from hazelnut shell (HS) and olive residue (OR) were labeled relative to hazelnut shell. Low concentrations have provided better
according to biomass type, reaction temperature and reaction time carbonization for waste biomasses.
Fig. 1. Effects of reaction parameters on the solid product yield, (a) 4 h and (b) 220 °C.
368 Y.O. Donar et al. / Fuel 183 (2016) 366–372
Table 1
Raman spectra information on hydrochar samples.
1 1
Sample ID ID IG cm (D band) cm (G band) ID/IG
HTC-HS (260 °C, 4 h) 5246.66 9171.01 1380.69 1581.03 0.57
HTC-HS (180 °C, 4 h) 1759.16 2848.4 1378.36 1586.93 0.62
HTC-OR (180 °C, 4 h) 6618.48 9782.54 1368.38 1578.86 0.68
HTC-OR (260 °C, 4 h) 15045.99 23783.71 1388.52 1588.66 0.63
ratio. A bigger ID/IG ratio indicates a lower graphitization degree given in Fig. 5. As a result of peak correction, five signals were iden-
[2]. The calculated ID/IG values of hydrochars are shown in Table 1. tified at 284.6 ± 0.2 eV (C1), 285.7 ± 0.2 eV (C2), 287.3 ± 0.2 eV (C3),
The graphitization degree of the other hydrochar samples range 289.1 ± 0.2 eV (C4) and 291.1 ± 0.2 eV (C5). These peaks corre-
from 0.57 to 0.68 indicating the amorphous carbon structure with spond to carbon group (C@C, CHx, CAC), hydroxyl groups or ethers
a large amount of lattice edges (defects) in plane terminations of (ACAOR), carbonyl or quinone groups (C@O), and carboxylic
disordered graphite of carbonaceous materials [23]. groups, esters, or lactones (@COOR) and p-p⁄ transitions, respec-
13
C CP-MAS NMR analyses provide reliable structural informa- tively [16,25]. The first four functional groups generated from
tion about cellulose, lignin, coals and different types of carbon- aromatization, dehydration, condensation, and esterification reac-
based materials as well as hydrothermal carbons [24]. 13C CP- tions respectively during hydrothermal carbonization process
MAS NMR spectra of hydrochars obtained at different tempera- [23]. The last one is the reason of condensate aromatic structure
tures are given in Fig. 4. The peaks which belong to unconverted formation. All other hydrochar samples have p-p* transitions
cellulose are still observed at hydrochar obtained at from low tem- owing to condensate aromatic structure.
peratures (180 °C) but when temperature was raised to 260 °C, no Hydrochar samples and biomass feedstock were analyzed semi-
peaks were observed in relation to unconverted cellulose (Table S2 quantitatively with the XPS analysis according to fitted peak areas
in SI). The intensity of the peak which indicates monocyclic/poly- (Fig. S2 in SI) [26]. No peaks belonging to C5 groups were observed
cyclic aromatic carbon of hydrochar is increased with decreasing in the hazelnut shells and olive residue. When they were
furanic structure peak intensity as a result of aromatization hydrothermally carbonized C5 group appeared at. The peak area
reactions. of C5 groups of olive residue based hydrochar increased with
Hydrochar has large amounts of functional groups on the outer increasing reaction temperature contrary to hazelnut shell based
layers and these functionalities were determined with X-ray pho- hydrochars. The presence of carbonyl/carbonate groups (C3) is also
toelectron spectroscopy (XPS). C1s core level spectra of raw bio- important for many applications [26]. The maximum C3 peak area
mass and hydrochars obtained from the two bio-residues are for hazelnut shell and olive residue is obtained at 180 and 220 °C,
13
Fig. 4. C CP-MAS NMR spectra of hydrochars.
370 Y.O. Donar et al. / Fuel 183 (2016) 366–372
respectively. When temperature was raised to 260 °C, C3 peak area shell and olive residue have different hemicellulose, cellulose and
can decrease because of the decarboxylation reactions, which is lignin contents (Table S1). High hemicellulose content improves
consistent with the C/H and C/O considerations. sphere formation and this phenomenon is proved with SEM images
of olive residue based hydrochars (Fig. 6). Olive residue contain
3.4. Physicochemical analysis and mechanistic consideration of more spherical particles compared to hazelnut shell. In spite of
hydrochar formation the fact that cellulose and lignin need higher temperatures
(P220 °C) to decompose, hazelnut shell and olive residue are dis-
SEM and TEM images of hydrochar samples obtained from the integrated at low temperatures (180 °C) as examined in the previ-
two biomass types are given in Fig. 6. Hydrothermal carbonization ous work [7]. These observations support that the first step of
of biomass is a complex process due to its complex structure which hydrothermal carbonization of waste biomass is hemicellulose
consists of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Thermal stability of degradation which is the reason of the sphere formation. After that,
these constituents is ranked as follows: hemicellulose < cellu- cellulose and lignin decompose respectively to form condensed
lose < lignin [20]. Hemicellulose is the least stable part of lignocel- aromatic structure with increasing temperature. This observation
lulosic biomass and hydrolyzed furfural like components are is also consistent with the results obtained from semi-
responsible for sphere formation at low temperatures. Hazelnut quantitative XPS analysis.
Y.O. Donar et al. / Fuel 183 (2016) 366–372 371
4. Conclusions Acknowledgement
Hydrochars were successfully prepared from waste biomass The authors would like to acknowledge TUBITAK (The Scientific
and the effects of different reaction conditions on the hydrochar and Technological Research Council of Turkey) for providing finan-
production and properties were identified. Hydrochars obtained cial support for this work through the Project ‘‘113Z635”.
under different hydrothermal conditions will have different chem-
ical and physical features because different reaction conditions Appendix A. Supplementary material
alter the thermodynamics and kinetics of the hydrothermal car-
bonization reaction. Reaction temperature is the main parameter Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
for the hydrochar preparation; however, reaction time has a slight the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.06.108.
influence. All hydrochar samples have aromatic structure and large
amounts of O-functionalities on the surface. The resulting hydro- References
char consists of micron/submicron size spherical and semi-
spherical particles, which are formed by the polymerization of fur- [1] Mohan D, Sarswat A, Ok YS, Pittman Jr CU. Organic and inorganic contaminants
fural species. From practical point of view, there is a number of bio- removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable
adsorbent – a critical review. Bioresour Technol 2014;160:191–202.
mass feedstocks which can be converted into hydrochar using HTC [2] Fan Y, Yang X, Zhu B, Liu P-F, Lu H-T. Micro-mesoporous carbon spheres
process. In addition, the HTC process can be further improved and derived from carrageenan as electrode material for supercapacitors. J Power
scaled up by investigating other factors of HTC like temperature Sources 2014;268:584–90.
[3] Klinghoffer NB, Castaldi MJ, Nzihou A. Catalyst properties and catalytic
and reaction time. Short reaction times adequate to large scale pro-
performance of char from biomass gasification. Ind Eng Chem Res
duction at high temperatures with regards to energy saving. How- 2012;51:13113–22.
ever further investigations about reaction kinetics study and [4] Fu X, Li D, Chen J, Zhang Y, Huang W, Zhu Y, et al. A microalgae residue based
carbon solid acid catalyst for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol
exergy analysis could be useful to obtain its maximum perfor-
2013;146:767–70.
mance. To do this, better reporting and standardization of hydro- [5] Liang X, Zeng M, Qi C. One-step synthesis of carbon functionalized with
char characteristics and production conditions are required as sulfonic acid groups using hydrothermal carbonization. Carbon
the characteristics of hydrochar depend highly on feedstock and 2010;48:1844–8.
[6] Lam E, Luong JHT. Carbon materials as catalyst supports and catalysts in the
process conditions. transformation of biomass to fuels and chemicals. ACS Catal 2014;4:3393–410.
372 Y.O. Donar et al. / Fuel 183 (2016) 366–372
[7] Aydıncak K, Yumak T, Sınağ A, Esen B. Synthesis and characterization of makes the difference, temperature or feedstock? Org Geochem
carbonaceous materials from saccharides (glucose and lactose) and two waste 2013;54:91–100.
biomasses by hydrothermal carbonization. Ind Eng Chem Res [18] Zhang L, Wang Q, Wang B, Yang G, Lucia LA, Chen J. Hydrothermal
2012;51:9145–52. carbonization of corncob residues for hydrochar production. Energy Fuels
[8] Kang S, Li X, Fan J, Chang J. Solid fuel production by hydrothermal 2015;29(2):872–6.
carbonization of black liquor. Bioresour Technol 2012;110:715–8. [19] Falco C, Baccile N, Titirici M-M. Morphological and structural differences
[9] Bergius F. Die Anwendung hoher Drucke bei chemischen Vorgängen und eine between glucose, cellulose and lignocellulosic biomass derived hydrothermal
Nachbildung des Entstehungsprozesses der Kohle. Die Naturwiss 1913;1:410. carbons. Green Chem 2011;13:3273–81.
[10] Sevilla M, Fuertes AB. The production of carbon materials by hydrothermal [20] Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C. Characteristics of hemicellulose,
carbonization of cellulose. Carbon 2009;47:2281–9. cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 2007;86:1781–8.
[11] Esen B, Yumak T, Sınağ A, Yıldız T. Investigation of photocatalytic effect of SnO2 [21] Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, et al. Features of
nanoparticles synthesized by hydrothermal method on the decolorization of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour
two organic dyes. Photochem Photobiol 2011;87:267–74. Technol 2005;96:673–86.
[12] Dai L, Wu B, Tan F, He M, Wang W, Qin H, et al. Engineered hydrochar [22] Navarro-Suarez AM, Carretero-Gonzalez J, Roddatis V, Goikolea E, Segalini J,
composites for phosphorus removal/recovery: lanthanum doped hydrochar Redondo E, et al. Nanoporous carbons from natural lignin: study of structural-
prepared by hydrothermal carbonization of lanthanum pretreated rice straw. textural properties and application to organic-based supercapacitors. RSC Adv
Bioresour Technol 2014;161:327–32. 2014;4(89):48336–43.
[13] Gökdai Z, Sınağ A, Yumak T. Comparison of the catalytic efficiency of [23] Gong Y, Wang H, Wei Z, Xie L, Wang Y. An efficient way to introduce
synthesized nano tin oxide particles and various catalysts for the pyrolysis hierarchical structure into biomass-based hydrothermal carbonaceous
of hazelnut shell. Biomass Bioenergy 2010;34:402–10. materials. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2014;2(10):2435–41.
[14] Lu X, Pellechia PJ, Flora JR, Berge ND. Influence of reaction time and [24] Baccile N, Falco C, Titirici M-M. Characterization of biomass and its derived
temperature on product formation and characteristics associated with the char using 13C-solid state nuclear magnetic resonance. Green Chem
hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 2013;138:180–90. 2014;16:4839–69.
[15] Kang S, Li X, Fan J, Chang J. Characterization of hydrochars produced by [25] Kundu S, Wang Y, Xia W, Muhler M. Thermal stability and reducibility of
hydrothermal carbonization of lignin, cellulose, D-xylose, and wood meal. Ind oxygen-containing functional groups on multiwalled carbon nanotube
Eng Chem Res 2012;51:9023–31. surfaces: a quantitative high-resolution XPS and TPD/TPR study. J Phys
[16] Sevilla M, Fuertes AB. Chemical and structural properties of carbonaceous Chem C 2008;112:16869–78.
products obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of saccharides. Chem – A [26] Zhong J, Chen F, Zhang J. Carbon-deposited TiO2: synthesis, characterization,
Eur J 2009;15:4195–203. and visible photocatalytic performance. J Phys Chem C 2009;114:933–9.
[17] Wiedner K, Naisse C, Rumpel C, Pozzi A, Wieczorek P, Glaser B. Chemical
modification of biomass residues during hydrothermal carbonization – what