Tank Inspection Report Template (28april2004)

Client :
IRS Job No.: Revision: 0
IRS Date Completed : Page : 1 of 37
LOCATION
TANK NO. ?
MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE FLOORMAPPING

CONTINUOUS CORROSION SCAN
OF FLOOR PLATES
ULTRASONIC THICKNESS INSPECTION
OF ROOF AND SHELL PLATES
TANK SHELL SETTLEMENT SURVEY
FLOOR PLATE SETTLEMENT SURVEY
INTERNAL EDGE SETTLEMENT SURVEY
VERTICALITY SURVEY
WITH VISUAL INSPECTION
INSPECTED BY : International Refinery Services Pte Ltd

INSPECTORS :
SINGAPORE MALAYSIA THAILAND
26 Ayer Rajah Crescent Lot 1353, 1st Floor 207/15 Moo 6, Soi Potisarn 4
#04-08 Singapore 139944 Lorong 3, Jalan Jee Foh Potisarn Road, Naklau,
Tel: (65) 67784637 Krokop 98000 Miri, Sarawak Banglamung Chonburi 20150
Fax: (65) 67784972 Tel: (60) 02-085 435095 Tel : (66) 038 727434
Email: irs@pacific.net.sg Fax: (60) 02-085 435092 Fax: (66) 038 414300
Website: www.irs-inspection.com Email:malaysia.branch@irs-inspection.com Email:irst@ptty.loxinfo.co.th
AUSTRALIA PHILIPPINES BRUNEI

33 Guara Grove No. 115 G/F LRI Business Plaza Lot 4608 Simpang 433 W4.1/2
Pimpama, Queensland 4209 210 Nicanor Garcia Street, Jalan Maulana
Australia Barangay Bel Air Negara Brunei Darussalam
Tel: (61) 7 5546 6542 Makati City, Manila, Philippines Tel : (673) 3 330 683
Fax: (61) 7 5546 6710 Tel: (63) 2 8902505 Fax: (673) 3 333 342
Email:aust.branch@irs-inspection.com Fax: (63) 2 8902504 Email: om_irs@brunet.bn
Email:philippines.branch@irs-inspection.com
The information supplied in this report is a reasonable assessment of the tank condition, but is not judged to represent the condition of the tank with
absolute certainty. Accordingly International Refinery Services, makes no warranty of any kind, expressed or implied. The tank owner must satisfy
itself as to the adequacy and accuracy of the evaluation and judge the value of the recommendations presented
This document may contain confidential information that is intended for the use of the parties to whom it is addressed. If you are not an intended
recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of information in this document is strictly prohibited. If you receive
this document in error please notify us at the telephone number indicated below. All information and attachments remain the property of
INTERNATIONAL REFINERY SERVICES and should be held as confidential.
Client :
ITEM CONTENTS PAGE
1 Scope of Inspection 3
2 General Tank Information 4
3 Inspection Report
4 Repair Recommendations / API 653 Assessment
5 Test Information
6 Tank In-Service Checklist
7 Tank Out-of-Service Checklist
8 Roof Plate Readings

 Roof Plate Layout with Number System
9 Minimum Shell Thickness Calculations
10 Shell Plate Readings

 Shell Plate Layout
11 Floor Plate Readings

 Floor Plate Layout with Number System
12 Shell Settlement Survey Results (External)

 Shell Settlement Survey Graphs
 Shell Settlement Survey Locations
13 Edge Settlement Survey Results (Internal)

 Edge Settlement Survey Locations
14 Photographs
Floor Plate Layout with Platemap Number System

15
Guidelines for the Interpretation of Floormap Data
16 Magnetic Flux Leakage Floormap Results :-

 Floor Plate Corrosion Plan
 Platemaps
Client :
SCOPE OF INSPECTION
 To carry out thickness measurements on floor plates with a minimum of five (5) readings per
plate.
 To carry out thickness measurements on roof plates with a minimum of five (5) readings per
plate.
 To carry out side wall inspection utilizing an Ultrasonic Crawler at eight (8) or sixteen (16) or
twenty-four (24) compass points with a minimum of five (5) readings per strake.
 To carry out corrosion scanning on the bottom 300 mm of the bottom strake with minimum of
3 vertical runs per plate.
 To carry out a tank shell settlement survey and calculate planar tilt and differential settlement.
 To carry out a Magnetic flux leakage floormap inspection supported by an ultrasonic

continuous corrosion scan of the floor plates.
 To carry out a continuous corrosion scan of the 100 mm band around the periphery of the tank
and areas where access to the floormap is restricted.
 To carry out an internal floor plate settlement survey and calculate maximum and minimum
settlement values.
 To carry out plumb bob readings and calculate maximum values of planar tilt.
 To carry out an internal tank edge settlement survey and calculate API and EEMUA limits.
 To carry out a general visual inspection and record any condition which may be detrimental to
the tank's serviceability.
 To compile a full report showing readings and locations of such readings. Review against API
653 and EEMUA 159, Engineering Integrity Assessment and comments shall also be included.
 Produce CAD Drawing of roof, shell and floor plate layout, identifying all existing fittings,
appurtenances and obvious tank modifications / repairs.
Client :
GENERAL TANK INFORMATION
 Client:
 Client Representative:  Tank Number:
 Locations:  Year Built:
 Field/Lease Name:  Original Manufacturer:
 Height:  Original Construction

Std:
 Service Height:  Material Spec.:
 Diameter:  Construction:
 Product Stored:  Drawing Ref:
 Specific Gravity:  Roof Type:
 Design Temp.:  Internal Pres.:
 Course Number:  Floor Plate Number:
 Roof Plate Number:  Floor Plate Thickness:
 Wind Girder:  Annular Plate Number:
 Insulated:  Annular Plate Thickness:
Previous Inspection History

 External:  Internal:  Bottom:
Client :
INSPECTION REPORT
A Visual Inspection and a non-destructive testing survey were conducted on this tank and the
following details are noted for your consideration:
DIKED AREA
 ?
FOUNDATION
 ?
SHELL
 ?
Client :
INSPECTION REPORT - Cont’d
Shell Plate Corrosion Rate/Course Calculations

Estimated yearly corrosion rate :
Original thickness - minimum mean wall loss ÷ years service
= Corrosion Rate / Year
Years of service life before Code "t" minimum is breached :
Minimum mean wall loss - Code "t" minimum ÷ Corrosion Rate / Year
= Year of service life remaining
Years before next scheduled inspection :
Minimum mean wall loss - Code "t" minimum ÷ 2 x Corrosion Rate
= Inspection Interval
Note : All calculations are based on minimum hydrotest requirements and maximum inspection intervals, as
in accordance with API 653.
SHELL APPURTENANCES
 ?
ACCESS STRUCTURE
 ?
Client :
ROOF (________)
 ?
Roof Plate Corrosion Rate Calculations

Original Thickness : __________ mm
Minimum remaining thickness : __________ mm
Estimated wall loss over __________ years service : __________ mm
Estimated yearly corrosion rate :
= estimated wall loss  years of service
= __________ mm  __________ years
= __________ mm / year
Remaining before next scheduled internal inspection :
= minimum remaining thickness - minimum allowable thickness at next inspection interval
= __________ mm - __________ mm
= __________ mm
Years of service life before next scheduled inspection:
= remaining before next scheduled internal insp  estimated yearly corrosion rate
= __________ mm  __________ mm
= __________ years (Maximum inspection interval of 15 years as per API)
ROOF APPURTENANCES
 ?
Client :
ROOF INTERNAL
 ?
SHELL INTERNAL
 ?
FLOOR INTERNAL (CONE UP or DOWN)
 ?
Client :
Floor Plate Corrosion Rate Calculations Annular Plate Corrosion Rate Calculations
Original Thickness : __________ mm Original Thickness : __________ mm
Minimum remaining thickness : __________ mm Minimum remaining thickness : __________ mm
Estimated wall loss over __________ years service : Estimated wall loss over __________ years service :
__________ mm __________ mm
Minimum remaining thickness at next inspection Minimum remaining thickness at next inspection
for coated or an uncoated floor Estimated yearly corrosion rate :
Estimated yearly corrosion rate : = estimated wall loss  years of service
= estimated wall loss  years of service = __________ mm  __________ years
= __________ mm  __________ years = __________ mm / year
= __________ mm / year Remaining before next scheduled internal
Remaining before next scheduled internal inspection :
inspection : = minimum remaining thickness - minimum
= minimum remaining thickness - minimum allowable thickness at next inspection interval
allowable thickness at next inspection interval = __________ mm - __________ mm
= __________ mm - __________ mm = __________ mm
= __________ mm Years of service life before next scheduled
Years of service life before next scheduled inspection:
inspection: = remaining before next scheduled internal insp 
= remaining before next scheduled internal insp estimated yearly corrosion rate
 estimated yearly corrosion rate = __________ mm  __________ mm
= __________ mm  __________ mm = __________ years. (Maximum internal
= __________ years. (Maximum internal inspection interval of 20 years as per API)
inspection interval of 20 years as per API)
Prepared By : Checked By :
Date : Date :
Note :Provided the items are within the Scope of Work, comments are only provided against items requiring action. If
no comment is made the item is deemed either visually acceptable or acceptable within the context of API 653 3 rd
Edition, Addm 1, September 2003.
Client :
REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS / API 653 ASSESSMENT
HOUSEKEEPING :
 ?
ON-LINE
 ?
Client :
REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS / API 653 ASSESSMENT – Cont’d
OFF-LINE
 ?
OTHERS
 ?
API 653 Authorised Inspector
Mr Azmi Hussain
MIAQP
API 653 Authorised Inspector
Dr. N.J.I. Adams

C. Eng., F.I. Mech. E.
M.A.S.M.E
Note :As per the FOREWORD of API 653, "the owner/operator may elect to modify, delete, or amplify sections of this
standard". This can be interpreted to permit the Owner/operator to waive or defer the recommendations made for repairs
provided by International Refinery Services.
Client :
TEST INFORMATION
Ultrasonic Thickness Inspection Magnetic Flux Floor Scan
 Test Specification: IRS/UM/001  Test Specification: IRS/TM/008

IRS/UM/005 IRS/TM/009
 Acceptance Criteria: API-653 Third Edition,  Acceptance Criteria: API-653 Third Edition,
December 2001, Addm 1, September 2003 December 2001, Addm 1, September 2003
 Surface Preparation: ________________  Surface Preparation: ________________
 Flaw Detector: ____________________ (S/N  Flaw Detector: IRS Floormap (S/N X_____)
________________) (Chassis S/N X_____)
(Electronics Module S/N X_____)
 Scanning Pattern: Single Spot / Single
Measurement & Continuous (Control Box S/N X_____)
(Sensor Head S/N. X_____)
 Scanning Position: Compressional (Magnetic Bridge S/N X_____)
 Couplant: Water  Calibration:
 Test Material: Carbon Steel 6.4 mm test plate with 20% - 80% artificial
defects (S/N X________)
 Calibration: 8.0 mm test plate with 20% - 80% artificial
5 - 15 mm or 6.35 - 25.4 (0.25 - 1.0") (S/N defects (S/N X________)
X______) 10.0 mm test plate with 20% - 80% artificial
Reference Sensitivity : 2nd back wall echo f.s.h. defects (S/N X________)
 Calibration Standard: A.S. 2083 Calibration

Blocks and Their Method of use in Ultrasonic
Testing
 Transducers:
B-Scan : 10 mm dia dual crystal (S/N X____)
Thickness : DA-301 5MHz, 10mm dia dual
crystal (S/N X______)
 Test Range:
A-Scan : 0 - 20 mm 0 - 50 mm
B-Scan : 0 - 20 mm 0 - 150 mm
Thickness : 0 – 10mm
Client :
TANK IN-SERVICE CHECKLIST
DIKED AREA 1 2 3 4 U/A NE N/A

1. Diked area condition (vegetation, debris, erosion):
2. Dike wall condition (erosion, cracks):
3. Flammable materials within the diked area (wood, oil)
4. Site drainage drains:
5. Standing water:
6. Pipe work (corrosion, paint)
TANK FOUNDATION 1 2 3 4 U/A NE N/A

7. Survey required (base on visual planar tilt):
8. Ring beam (cracks, breaks, spalling):
9. Bitumen cover (cracks, washouts, erosion):
10. Seal (deterioration, peeling):
11. Foundation (erosion, leaks, cond. API 650 5.5.5, API 653 10.5.6):
12. Water ingress/egress
13. Indications of bottom leaks:
14. Floor plate extension cond. (API 650 3.4.2, 3.5.2, API 653 4.4.7.7):
15. Floor plate extension welds (pitting, corrosion, undercut):
16. Earth grounding cables and connectors cond. (API 575. 7.2.6)
SHELL 1 2 3 4 U/A NE N/A

17. Coating or painting on tank walls (blisters, peeling, stains):
18. Insulation (cracks, leaks, moisture retention):
19. Shell pitted or corroded (API 653. 4.3):
20. Deformation of shell (banding, peaking)(API 653. 10.5.4, 10.5.5):
21. Bottom course deformation:
22. Shell lap patches (API 653. 9.3):
23. Indication of shell leaks:
24. Riveted joint condition (worn, corroded):
25. Riveted vertical joints full fillet lap welded:
26. Seam weld condition:
27. Tank plumb (API 653. 10.5.2):
28. Tank roundness (API 653. 10.5.3):
29. Seam weld undercut (API 653. 10.4.2.5):
30. Remnant weld tags (API650 3.8.1.2C)(API 652 4.3) (API 653
9.6.5):
31. Shell vertical seam weld spacing (API 650. 3.1.5.2):
32. Name plate attachment (API 650. 8.1, API 653. 13.1):
33. Shell misalignment (API 650. 5.2.3):
34. Weld reinforcement (API 650. 5.2.1.5):
Legend: 1 Good Condition 3 Requires Repair U/A Un-assessable

2 Satisfactory Condition 4 Poor, Requires Immediate Attention NE None Evident
N/A Not applicable
Client :
TANK IN-SERVICE CHECKLIST – Cont’d
SHELL APPURTENANCES 1 2 3 4 U/A NE N/A

35. Leakage around reinforcement welds:
36. Reinforcement tell tale holes (API 650 3.7.5, 3.7.6):
37. Reinforcement pad spacing (API 650 3.7.3):
38. Reinforcement pad size/thickness (API 650 3.7.2.1):
39. Reinforcement plates overlapping seam welds(API 650 3.7.3.4):
40. Two (2”) inch nozzle reinforcement (API 650 3.7.2):
41. Nozzle weld corrosion/undercut (API 650 6.5.1):
42. Excessive dimpling of shell plate or bowing of piping:
43. Indications of leakage around manifolds, flanges, or valves:
44. Indications of leakage around manways and nozzles:
45. Indications of leakage around flange bolts and welds:
46. Tank mixer mounting base (weld failure, damage):
47. Leakage around mixer shaft seal:
48. Condition of welds on davit clips (valve, mixers, cleanouts):
49. Wind girder, supports, handrails (corrosion, weld failure):
50. Wind girder, (product buildup, paint failure):
51. Shell attachments (API 650 3.8):
ACCESS STRUCTURE 1 2 3 4 U/A NE N/A

52. Ladder attachments to concrete base (corrosion, broken):
53. Bolts and fasteners on stairways and ladder stringers (corrosion):
54. Welds on stairways and ladder stringers (corrosion, broken):
55. Welds on spiral stairway to shell supports (corrosion, broken):
56. Stairways and ladders (corrosion, broken):
57. Stairways and ladders (coating or paint failure):
58. Attachment welds of handrails to stairways (corrosion, broken)
59. Stairway handrails (corrosion, pitting, paint failure):
60. Tread attachments to stringers (corrosion, broken):
61. Safety drop bar or safety chain provides adequate protection:
62. Gauger platform frame and supports (corrosion, broken):
63. Gauger platform deck (corrosion, thinning, weld failure):
64. Gauger platform (coating or paint failure):
65. Rolling roof ladder (corrosion, weld failure):
66. Rolling roof ladder handrail (corrosion, weld failure):
67. Rolling roof ladder and handrail (coating or paint failure):
68. Rolling roof ladder attachment to shell (corrosion, wear):
69. Rolling roof ladder rails (welds, corrosion, wear):
70. Rolling roof ladder wheels and securing pins to axles:
71. Rolling roof ladder to roof static cable (frayed, connections):
72. Rolling roof ladder to shell static cable (frayed, connections):

N/A Not applicable
Client :
ROOF - CONE 1 2 3 4 U/A NE N/A

73. Roof plate distortions:
74. Roof plates (corrosion, pitting, holes API 653 4.2.1.2):
75. Roof plates (coating or paint failure):
76 Remnant weld tags (API 652 4.3)(API 653 9.6.5):
77. Roof plate lap joints (API 650 3.1.3.4, 3.1.3.5)
78. Indications of standing water:
79. External rafter spacing (API 650 3.10.4.4):
80. Frangible joint (API 650 3.10.2.5, 3.10.2.6):
81. Curb angle size (API 650 3.1.5.9):
ROOF - EXTERNAL FLOATER 1 2 3 4 U/A NE N/A

82. Floating roof cleanliness (clean and free of debris):
83. Roof plates (corrosion, pitting, holes, API 653 4.2.1.2):
84. Remnant weld tags (API 652 4.3)(API 653 9.6.5):
85. Levelness of floating roof:
86. Standing water or product on floating roof deck:
87. Water or product in the pontoon compartments:
88. Flexibility and resilience of wedge type wiper seals:
89. Cracks or tears in wedge type wiper seals:
90. Wiper seal static cables:
91. Mechanical shoes damaging shell or coating:
92. Condition of the floating roof ground connections:
93. Tightness of rim and column seals (API 650 C3.13):
94. Primary shoe seal fabric pulling away from shell:
95. Deterioration of primary seal fabric:
96. Holes, tears and cracks in primary seal fabric:
97. Binding with shell or columns:
98. Damage or slack in anti rotational cable:
99. Missing roof support legs:
100. Damage to ladder or column wells and covers:

N/A Not applicable
Client :
ROOF APPURTENANCES 1 2 3 4 U/A NE N/A

101. Manway covers secured in place, condition:
102. Vacuum-pressure vent pallet assembly:
103. Vacuum-pressure vent screens (clean and free of debris):
104. Flame arrester (mechanical integrity):
105. Dip hatch (clean, operates freely, seals properly):
106. Floating roof support legs (corrosion, pitting bending):
107. Roof leg sleeves (bending, corrosion):
108. Roof leg pins (corrosion, sticking):
109. Roof leg reinforcement pads (bending cracking):
110. All roof legs at same level:
111. Emergency overflow screens clean and free of debris:
112. Roof drain sumps clean and free of debris, corrosion:
113. Floating roof manhole diameter (API 650 C3.11):
114. Pontoon manhole seals condition (API 650 C3.5):
115. Nozzles  6” require reinforcement (API 650 table 3-14):

N/A Not applicable
Client :
TANK OUT-OF-SERVICE CHECKLIST
ROOF INTERNAL 1 2 3 4 U/A NE N/A

1. Structural/mechanical integrity:
2. Underside of roof:
3. Roof plate lap joints (API 650 3.1.3.4, 3.1.3.5):
4. Roof support rafters condition:
5. Rafter spacing (API 650 3.10.4.4):
6. Rafter attachment to shell (API 650 3.10.4.6):
7. Shell clips/brackets condition:
8. Column support verticality :
9. Roof venting nozzles trimmed flush (API 650 fig. 3-16)
10. Internal floater underside:
11. Floating roof seal (Internal/external API 650 H.4.4, C3.13):
12. Floating cover legs:
ROOF – INTERNAL FLOATER 1 2 3 4 U/A NE N/A

13. Floater panels vapour tight (API 650 H.4.2):
14. Evidence of leaking panels (water spots on internal floater):
15. Rim or skirt fitted around all opening (API 650 H.4.5):
16. Roof/shell static cables (API 650 H.4.6):
17. Tightness of rim and column seals (API 650 H.4.5):
18. Foam logs fill roof rim space:
19. Foam logs or fabric deteriorating:
SHELL INTERNAL 1 2 3 4 U/A NE N/A

20. Structural/mechanical integrity:
21. Shell corrosion (API 653 4.3):
22. Weld seam undercut (API 653 10.4.2.5):
23. Remnant weld tags (API 650 3.8.1.2C)(API620 4.3)(API 653 9.6):
24. Arc Strikes (API 653 9.6.5):
FLOOR INTERNAL 1 2 3 4 U/A NE N/A

25. Floor condition (corrosion, pitting):
26. Remnant weld tags (API 620 4.3, 4.4)(API 653 9.6):
27. Arc strikes (API 653 9.6.5):
28. Bulges/depressions (API 653 B3.3):
29. Weld profile (API 653 9.6.4):
30. Standing water:
31. Dip plate condition:

N/A Not applicable
Client :
TANK OUT-OF-SERVICE CHECKLIST – Cont’d
FLOOR INTERNAL – Cont’d 1 2 3 4 U/A NE N/A

32. Protective coating deterioration/disbonds:
33. Bottom lap weld joints (API 650 3.1.3.4, 3.1.3.5):
34. Edge settlement (API 653 B2.3, B2.4, B3.4):
35. Three way joint spacing (API 650 3.1.5.4):
36. Floor/shell joggle joints (API 650 3.1.5.4):
37. Annular bottom width (API 650 3.5):
38. Floor plate critical zone patches (API 653 9.10.1.1, 9.10.1.2):
39. Floor plate joints from shell vertical joints (API653 Fig.9-1):
40. Shell-to-bottom fillet weld (API 650 3.1.5.7):
41. Shell-to-bottom HAZ:
42. Sump condition:

N/A Not applicable
Client :
ROOF PLATE THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS
Plate No. A B C D E
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Client :
ROOF PLATE THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS – Cont’d
Plate No. A B C D E
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Client :
ROOF PLATE LAYOUT

WITH NUMBERING SYSTEM
Space allocated for roof plate layout (please delete this row of text)
Client :
MINIMUM SHELL THICKNESS CALCULATIONS
 Diameter: ________ m (________ ft)  Material Spec.:
M inimum Calculation
Course Calculation Joint Allowable
Course Yield/Tensile Thickness Calculation Thickness
Height Height Effeciency Stress
Strength SG: 1.0 (Water) SG: 0.85 (Product)
No. (ft.) (ft.) (T) (psi) (mm) (mm)
1 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
2 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
3 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
4 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
5 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
6 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
7 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
8 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
9 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
10 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
* Minimum Code Thickness is 2.54 mm (API 653).
API STANDARD 653, THIRD EDITION, ADDM 1, SEPTEMBER 2003
4.3.3 Minimum Thickness calculation for Welded Tank Shell
4.3.3.1 The minimum acceptable shell plate thickness for continued service shall be determined by one or more of the methods
noted here in. These methods are limited to tanks with diameters equal to or less than 200 ft or less :
a. When determining the minimum acceptable thickness for an entire shell course, t min is calculated as follows:
tmin = 2.6 (H – 1) DG
SE
b. When determining the minimum acceptable thickness for any other portions of a shell course (such as a locally thinned
area or any other location of interest), tmin is calculated as follows:
tmin = 2.6 (HDG)
SE
Where :
tmin = The minimum acceptable thickness, in in. for each course as calculated from the above formula; however, t min
shall not be less than 0.1 in. for any tank course,
D = Nominal diameter of tank, in ft.,
H = height from the bottom of the shell course under consideration to the maximum liquid level when evaluating an
entire shell course, in ft; or
= height from the bottom of the length L (see 4.3.2.1) from the lowest point of the bottom of L of the locally
thinned area to the maximum liquid level, in ft; or
= height from the lowest point within any location of interest to the maximum liquid level, in ft,
G = Highest specific gravity of the contents,
S = Maximum allowable stress in lbf/in.2; use the smaller of 0.80Y or 0.429T for bottom and second course; use the
smaller of 0.88Y or 0.472T for all other courses. Allowable shell stresses are shown Table 4-1 for materials
listed in the current and previous editions of API Std 12C and Std 650. Note: For reconstructed tanks, S shall
be in accordance with the current applicable standard.
Y = Specified minimum yield strength of the plate; use 30,000 lbf/in. 2 if not known.
T = The smaller of the specified minimum tensile strength of the plate or 80,000 lbf/in. 2 ; use 55,000 lbf/in.2 if not
known.
Client :
SHELL PLATE THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS
STRAKE 1 N NE E SE S SW W NW
Bottom 1
2
3
4
5
Min 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mean #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Max 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Original "t"
Code "t"(min)
Bottom 1
2
3
4
5
Min 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Max 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Original "t"
Code "t"(min)
Bottom 1
2
3
4
5
Min 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Max 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Original "t"
Code "t"(min)
Client :
Bottom 1
2
3
4
5
Min 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Max 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Original "t"
Code "t"(min)
Bottom 1
2
3
4
5
Min 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Max 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Original "t"
Code "t"(min)
Bottom 1
2
3
4
5
Min 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Max 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Original "t"
Code "t"(min)
Client :
Bottom 1
2
3
4
5
Min 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Max 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Original "t"
Code "t"(min)
Bottom 1
2
3
4
5
Min 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Max 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Original "t"
Code "t"(min)
Bottom 1
2
3
4
5
Min 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Max 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Original "t"
Code "t"(min)
Client :
Space allocated for shell plate layout (please delete this row of text)
Client :
FLOOR PLATE THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS
Plate No. A B C D E
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Client :
FLOOR PLATE LAYOUT

WITH NUMBERING SYSTEM
Space allocated for (UT inspection) floor plate layout (please delete this row of text)
Client :
SHELL SETTLEMENT SURVEY RESULTS (EXTERNAL)
 Diameter: _______ m (_______ ft)  Height: _______ m (_______ ft)

 Distance between points : _____ m (____ ft)  Material Spec.: _____________
Point Staff Readings Settlement Readings Point Staff Readings Settlement Readings
1(N) 13
2 14
3 15
4 16
5 17
6 18
7 19
8 20
9 21
10 22
11 23
12 24
All readings are in mm.
Differential Settlement (API 653) :-
 API 653 Limit (Para. B.3.2.) : ________ mm
 Calculations (API 653, B2.2.4) show maximum differential settlement of ______ mm
Differential Settlement (EEMUA 159) :-

 EEMUA 159 Limit (Para 2.2.6) : Maximum 100 mm (1%) between any two (2) points at maximum 10 metre
interval.
 Calculations show maximum differential settlement between points ________ and 5, 10 and 11 of 14.0 mm
 EEMUA 159 Limit : ________ mm over ________ metres.
Planar Tilt (Proportional against API 653 verticality limit) :-

 Proportional Limit : ________ mm
 API 653 calculations (Fig. B-3) show planar tilt of ________ mm
Planar Tilt (EEMUA 159) :-

 EEMUA 159 Limit (Para. 2.2.6 Fig 5) : ________ mm
 Calculations show planar tilt of ________ mm
Verticality (API 653) :-

 Limit (Para. 10.5.2.1) : ________ mm
Verticality (EEMUA 159) :-

 Limit (Para. 2.2.6) : ________ mm
Theoretical Verticality (Proportional Against Maximum Plannar Tilt ) :-

 Calculations show verticality of ________ mm
Client :
SHELL SETTLEMENT SURVEY GRAPHS
Graph : Differential Settlement vs Planar Tilt
Graph : Tank Settlement Readings
Client :
SHELL SETTLEMENT SURVEY LOCATIONS
Client :
EDGE SETTLEMENT SURVEY RESULTS (INTERNAL)
 Diameter: _______ m (_______ ft)  Height: _______ m (_______ ft)

 Distance between points : _____ m (____ ft)  Material Spec.: _____________
Point Settlement Readings

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Edge Settlement :-
 API Limit : ______ mm
 EEMUA Limit : 125 mm over 750 mm.
 Calculations show maximum Edge settlement of ______ mm
Client :
EDGE SETTLEMENT SURVEY LOCATIONS
Client :
PHOTOGRAPHS
Client :
PHOTOGRAPHS – Cont’d
Client :
FLOOR PLATE LAYOUT

WITH PLATEMAP NUMBERING SYSTEM
Space allocated for (MFL Inspection) floor plate layout (please delete this row of text)
* TANK DATUM
Client :
GUIDELINES FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF THE MFL FLOORMAP DATA SHEETS
1. FLOOR PLATE NUMBERING SCHEME
 The floormap system supports the use of row/column plate numbering system. These are usually numbered from the top left of the tank
sequentially.
2. TANK DATUM
 The Tank datum point is a chosen coordinate for all references of position that are made when defining plates during an inspection. This
datum point refers to the bottom left corner of the tank, as illustrated on the tank floor layout sheet enclosed.
 Vertical and Horizontal Plates
Vertical plates are plates that are orientated in the vertical plane.
Horizontal plates are plates that are orientated in the horizontal plane.
Note: If a plate is square, then it can be defined as being either vertical or horizontal.
3. FLOOR PLATE COLOUR CODING
 Pertaining to the complete overview of the floor plates, individual plates are colour coded in relation to the thickness loss encountered.
Four colour bands are usually adopted and relate directly to set threshold values. These graduated threshold values denoting the total
material loss in percentage terms.
4. INDIVIDUAL PLATE MAP INTERPRETATION AND COLOUR CODING
 Individual plates are presented for viewing and analysis at a 15 mm resolution. The plate is graduated along its length and across its width
in 15 mm divisions.
 Each 15 x 15 mm resolved area is also colour coded in relation to the minimum remaining thickness encountered. Again four (4) colour
bands are adopted and relate directly to set threshold values. These values denoting total material loss in percentage terms.
 Orientation of the plate has a direct relationship to the tank datum, which is located in the left hand bottom corner.
 The x, y coordinate reference is taken from the left hand top corner of each plate map profile and relates directly to the tank floor plate.
5. LIMITATIONS ON THE INTERPRETATION OF FLOORMAP RESULTS.
 Pipework: Any pipework which is too close to the floor to allow access of the Floormap unit will be subject to B-scan ultrasonic inspection
to supplement the Floormap inspection.
 Lapped Welds: At welds between adjacent plates the Floormap is able to scan the edge of the weld on the upper plate, but is not able to scan
closer than 30mm to the weld on the lower plate. If inspection results indicate the plate to be of suspect condition then B-scan ultrasonic
inspection is used to supplement the Floormap inspection along this narrow band.
 Shell-to-Floor Fillet Weld : The floormap is unable to scan closer than 100 mm to shell/floor fillet weld due to curvature of shell. This area is
inspected via ultrasonic B-scan around the full circumference.
 Plate Configuration: The Floormap is unable to examine annular or sketch plates adjacent to the tank shell, if the width of the plate has
reduced to less than approximately 400mm. This is because the Floormap unit becomes wedged against the tank shell. B-scan ultrasonic
inspection is used to examine this critical region.
 Note : Ultrasonic B-scan inspection of restrictive areas is only possible on tank floors which do not contain a GRP (Glass Reinforced Plastic)
lining. When a GRP lining is present no ultrasonic B-scan back-up is possible due to thickness, composition and bonding to the steel plate.
Epoxy coated and uncoated floors are acceptable.
 Previous Remedial Work: Any previous welding on the plate gives rise to spurious indications, as the Floormap interprets the change in flux
density at such areas as defects. The indications are generally in the range 80% of floor thickness and ultrasonic inspection is used to
confirm results at these positions.
 On dirty or oily floor surfaces, the wheel on the positional encoder may slip and cause small errors in the coordinates locating areas of
corrosion pitting.

Tank Inspection Report Template (28april2004)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tank Inspection Report Template (28april2004)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Client :

IRS Job No.: Revision: 0

IRS Date Completed : Page : 1 of 37

MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE FLOORMAPPING

INSPECTED BY : International Refinery Services Pte Ltd

AUSTRALIA PHILIPPINES BRUNEI

IRS Job No.: Revision: 0

IRS Date Completed : Page : 2 of 37

ITEM CONTENTS PAGE

2 General Tank Information 4

4 Repair Recommendations / API 653 Assessment

6 Tank In-Service Checklist

7 Tank Out-of-Service Checklist

8 Roof Plate Readings

9 Minimum Shell Thickness Calculations

10 Shell Plate Readings

11 Floor Plate Readings

12 Shell Settlement Survey Results (External)

13 Edge Settlement Survey Results (Internal)

Floor Plate Layout with Platemap Number System

16 Magnetic Flux Leakage Floormap Results :-

IRS Job No.: Revision: 0

IRS Date Completed : Page : 3 of 37

 To carry out a Magnetic flux leakage floormap inspection supported by an ultrasonic

IRS Job No.: Revision: 0

IRS Date Completed : Page : 4 of 37

GENERAL TANK INFORMATION

 Client Representative:  Tank Number:

 Locations:  Year Built:

 Field/Lease Name:  Original Manufacturer:

 Height:  Original Construction

 Service Height:  Material Spec.:

 Product Stored:  Drawing Ref:

 Specific Gravity:  Roof Type:

 Design Temp.:  Internal Pres.:

 Course Number:  Floor Plate Number:

 Roof Plate Number:  Floor Plate Thickness:

 Wind Girder:  Annular Plate Number:

 Insulated:  Annular Plate Thickness:

Previous Inspection History

IRS Job No.: Revision: 0

IRS Date Completed : Page : 5 of 37

IRS Job No.: Revision: 0

IRS Date Completed : Page : 6 of 37

INSPECTION REPORT - Cont’d

Shell Plate Corrosion Rate/Course Calculations

IRS Job No.: Revision: 0

IRS Date Completed : Page : 7 of 37

INSPECTION REPORT - Cont’d

Roof Plate Corrosion Rate Calculations

IRS Job No.: Revision: 0

IRS Date Completed : Page : 8 of 37

INSPECTION REPORT - Cont’d

FLOOR INTERNAL (CONE UP or DOWN)

IRS Job No.: Revision: 0

IRS Date Completed : Page : 9 of 37

INSPECTION REPORT - Cont’d

IRS Job No.: Revision: 0

IRS Date Completed : Page : 10 of 37

REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS / API 653 ASSESSMENT

IRS Job No.: Revision: 0

IRS Date Completed : Page : 11 of 37

REPAIR RECOMMENDATIONS / API 653 ASSESSMENT – Cont’d

 Surface Preparation:  Surface Preparation:

 Diameter: m ( ft)  Material Spec.: