Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10
Material and methods. The aim of the study: to evaluate Vilnius pre-school
teachers’ psychosocial environment at work and its relationship to the subjective health
assessment and stress. In order to evaluate Vilnius pre-schools teacher’s psychosocial
environment at work there was performed anonymous questionnaire survey. The survey
involved 231 respondents. For the statistic analysis of the data there were used chi-square
test (χ2), Fisher‘s exact test, Spearman correlation analysis and Mann-Whitney test.
Results. 1. Most of the teachers in their work are exposed to the risk of psychosocial
risk factors such as the risk that someone could be hurt or be injured, conflicts with parents,
lack of time to carry out the tasks properly, gratitude for the good work, conflicts with co-
workers, not explained job tasks, have no influence at work.
2. According to the pre-school principals, teachers experience psychosocial risk
such as conflicts with co-workers and the risk that someone could hurt or be injured.
Pre-school principles evaluate better psychosocial risks at work, than teachers.
3. It was found, that psychosocial risk factors such as ignored teachers opinions
and offers, working meaningfulness, conflicts with parents, conflicts with pre-school
principles, lack of feedback, loneliness at work and job dissatisfaction is related to
teachers subjective assessment of health and stress at work.
Conclusion. It has been observed a number of psychosocial risk factors that are
associated with subjective assessment of health and stress at work, so suggestion for
the pre-school education institutions are to carry out work related stress prevention
programs.
115
comportment. One of them define the Burnout Syndrome (А.А. Рукавишников,
Definition of mental burnout). The Cronbach Alfa coefficient for this test was 0.82. In
this paper are presented the results of 2 tests “Stress coping response ways” (S.
Lazarus) and “Determination of Stress Level” (Julian Melgosa). The internal
consistency of the items (Cronbach alpha coefficient) is 0.846 and 0.828, respectively.
Results. The level of stress at teachers was identified by applying the test
proposed by J. Melgosa (2000). The first zone, which corresponds to the dangerously
low level of stress, no person was recorded. In the second zone that indicates low level
of stress, only one teacher was placed. The third zone which corresponds to normal
stress levels, include 21 teachers (39.6%). The fourth zone is the equivalent to the high
level of stress, includes 24 teachers (45.3%) and the fifth zone 5, with high-level
stressors (13.2%) included 7 respondents. Using the test developed by S. Lazarus
(1966), it was established that the majority of teachers (72%) apply the coping
strategies in the struggle with stress; 23% of pedagogues use relatively constructive
strategies and only 5% of them use destructive strategies. Also, an analysis was made
to highlight the link between the level of stress and the type of strategy applied. Most
pedagogues with both normal stress (third zone) and high stress (fourth zone) apply
stressful constructive strategies. At the same time, about one-third of high-stressed
teachers (fourth zone) apply relatively constructive strategies. Very high-level teachers
(fifth zone) increase the proportion of those who apply destructive strategies.
Conclusion. The pilot study on stress at teachers confirms the hypothesis of stress in
teachers and it that constructive response strategies are not always applied, which requires
carrying out this research on a representative sample of teachers at a country level.
116