AL BAKER TOWER HOTEL

Structural Calculation of Structural

Calculation for Corner Cladding
Document No.: ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS- Revision No.: 00

Issue Status: For Approval Project Phase: Construction

Prepared by: Checked by: Reviewed by Approved by:

Name Eng. Mariam Mousa Eng. Andre Rezk Eng. Hassan Elsayed Eng. Carl Gebara

Job Title Structural Engineer Technical Manager Technical Manager Project Manager

Signature

Date

Controlled Copy No: 1 * Copy Issued to: Al Baker Architects

Controlled Copy No: 2 * Copy Issued to: REDCO

Document No. ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-0033 Page 1

DOCUMENT HISTORY LOG:
Rev
Document No. No. Issue Date Purpose of issue Revised sections

ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-00 00 For Approval

Controlled Copy Issue Log:

This document has been issued in a controlled manner to the following recipients:
(In the event of a revision, the parties listed below will automatically be issued with the updated version)

Copy No. Company Name QA Representative

01. Al Baker Architects

02. REDCO

Document No. ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-00Page 2

 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction…......…………………………………………………………………………………………...1

Project data ..................................................................................................................................................... 2

Material ........................................................................................................................................................... 2

Design .............................................................................................................................................................. 2

Beams and columns ........................................................................................................................................ 2

Anchors ........................................................................................................................................................... 5

Welds (Plastic redistribution) ....................................................................................................................... 6

Concrete block ................................................................................................................................................ 7

Shear in contact plane .................................................................................................................................... 7

Buckling .......................................................................................................................................................... 7

Appendix A

Sketeches………...………………………………………………………………………....……………..….9

Appendix B

Page 55 to 60 of Structural Calculation ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-0033…………......………………….10

Document No. ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-00

Page 3
 1. Introduction

Document No. ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-0033 Page 5

 Material

Steel S 355
Concrete C25/30, C40/50

Design code EN

1/8
Document No. ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-
 Design
Name Al Baker Tower - Corner Bracket
Description
Analysis Stress, strain/ simplified loading

Beams and columns

β – Direction γ - Pitch α - Rotation Offset ex Offset ey Offset ez X
Name Cross-section Forces in
[°] [°] [°] [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]
M1 1 - RHSCF200/120/10.0 0.0 -90.0 0.0 0 0 0 Node 0

Cross-sections
Name Material
1 - RHSCF200/120/10.0 S 355

Anchors / Bolts
Diameter fu Gross area
Name Bolt assembly
[mm] [MPa] [mm2]
M12 8.8 M12 8.8 12 800.0 113
M20 8.8 M20 8.8 20 800.0 314
M16 8.8 M16 8.8 16 800.0 201

Load effects (equilibrium not required)

N Vy Vz Mx My Mz
Name Member
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kNm] [kNm] [kNm]
LE1 M1 -13.5 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Document No. ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-

2/8
Foundation block
Item Value Unit
CB 1
Dimensions 525 x 400 mm
Depth 600 mm
Anchor M16 8.8
Anchoring length 200 mm
Shear force transfer Friction
CB 2
Dimensions 525 x 400 mm
Depth 600 mm
Anchor M16 8.8
Anchoring length 250 mm
Shear force transfer Friction

Check

Summary
Name Value Status
Analysis 100.0% OK
Plates 0.5 < 5% OK
Bolts 43.2 < 100% OK
Anchors 99.0 < 100% OK
Welds 98.2 < 100% OK
Concrete block 74.2 < 100% OK
Shear 84.9 < 100% OK
Buckling Not calculated

Plates
Thickness σEd εPl
Name Loads Status
[mm] [MPa] [1e-4]
M1 10.0 LE1 226.6 0.0 OK
SP1 12.0 LE1 355.1 2.7 OK
SP2 10.0 LE1 212.8 0.0 OK
SP3 10.0 LE1 214.5 0.0 OK
SP4 12.0 LE1 356.0 49.4 OK
SP5 10.0 LE1 356.1 53.7 OK
SP6 12.0 LE1 355.4 18.2 OK
SP7 10.0 LE1 273.5 0.0 OK

Design data

fy εlim
Material
[MPa] [1e-4]
S 355 355.0 500.0

3/8
Symbol explanation
εPl Strain
σEd Eq. stress

Overall check, LE1

Strain check, LE1

4/8
Equivalent stress, LE1

Anchors
Ft,Ed V Nrdc Utt Fb,Rd Uts VRd,cp VRd,c
Name Loads Cpf Cef Status
[kN] [kN] [kN] [%] [kN] [%] [kN] [kN]
A6 LE1 2.1 0.0 42.8 5.0 188.2 0.0 0.0 OK 0.0 OK OK

A7 LE1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.4 188.2 0.0 0.0 OK 0.0 OK OK

A8 LE1 42.6 0.0 43.1 99.0 188.2 0.0 0.0 OK 0.0 OK OK

A9 LE1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 188.2 0.0 0.0 OK 0.0 OK OK

Design data
Ft,Rd Bp,Rd Fv,Rd Vrds Stf
Name
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kN] [MN/m]
M16 8.8 - 1 76.9 221.7 0.0 0.0 330

5/8
Bolts
Ft,Ed V Utt Fb,Rd Uts Utts
Name Grade Loads Status
[kN] [kN] [%] [kN] [%] [%]

B1 M12 8.8 - 1 LE1 4.9 5.6 10.0 106.8 17.3 24.5 OK

B2 M12 8.8 - 1 LE1 5.5 4.6 11.3 117.6 14.4 22.5 OK

B3 M12 8.8 - 1 LE1 18.8 5.0 38.9 117.6 15.4 43.2 OK

B4 M20 8.8 - 2 LE1 0.0 25.6 0.0 217.0 27.2 27.2 OK

B5 M20 8.8 - 2 LE1 11.0 23.3 7.8 99.1 24.8 30.4 OK

Design data
Ft,Rd Bp,Rd Fv,Rd
Name
[kN] [kN] [kN]
M12 8.8 - 1 48.4 147.8 32.3
M20 8.8 - 2 141.1 232.8 94.1

Symbol explanation
Ft,Rd Bolt tension resistance EN 1993-1-8 tab. 3.4
Ft,Ed Tension force
Bp,Rd Punching shear resistance
V Resultant of shear forces Vy, Vz in bolt
Fv,Rd Bolt shear resistance EN_1993-1-8 table 3.4
Vrds Characteristic anchor resistance ETAG 001 Annex C (5.2.3.2)
Stf Anchor longitudinal stiffness
Fb,Rd Plate bearing resistance EN 1993-1-8 tab. 3.4
Nrd,c Concrete breakout resistance
Utt Utilization in tension
Uts Utilization in shear
Vrd,cp Concrete pry-out failure ETAG 001 Annex C (5.2.3.3)
Vrd,c Concrete edge failure ETAG 001 Annex C (5.2.3.4)
Cpf Concrete pry-out failure ETAG 001 Annex C (5.2.3.3)
Cef Concrete edge failure ETAG 001 Annex C (5.2.3.4)

Welds (Plastic redistribution)

Throat th. Length σw,Ed εPl σ⏊ τ|| τ⏊ Ut Utc
Item Edge Loads Status
[mm] [mm] [MPa] [%] [MPa] [MPa] [MPa] [%] [%]
SP6 SP4 ◢6.0◣ 150 LE1 370.1 0.0 -249.0 -122.3 -100.0 85.0 47.1 OK
◢6.0◣ 150 LE1 305.8 0.0 130.4 -81.8 -137.2 70.2 42.1 OK
SP6 SP5 ◢5.0◣ 150 LE1 427.5 0.4 182.9 -87.3 205.3 98.2 77.1 OK
◢5.0◣ 150 LE1 426.9 0.0 -188.9 -52.4 214.7 98.0 80.8 OK
SP5 SP7 ◢5.0◣ 161 LE1 427.1 0.1 -174.8 -181.7 -132.6 98.1 56.3 OK
◢5.0◣ 161 LE1 427.4 0.3 146.5 -187.0 -137.0 98.1 53.1 OK
6/8
Design data

βw σw,Rd 0.9 σ
[-] [MPa] [MPa]
S 355 0.90 435.6 352.8

Symbol explanation
εPl Strain
σw,Ed Equivalent stress
σw,Rd Equivalent stress resistance
σ⏊ Perpendicular stress
τ|| Shear stress parallel to weld axis
τ⏊ Shear stress perpendicular to weld axis
0.9 σ Perpendicular stress resistance - 0.9*fu/γM2
βw Corelation factor EN 1993-1-8 tab. 4.1
Ut Utilization
Utc Weld capacity utilization

Concrete block

c Aeff σ Kj Fjd Ut
Item Loads 2 Status
[mm] [mm ] [MPa] [-] [MPa] [%]
CB 1 LE1 18 1600 39.8 3.00 53.6 74.2 OK
CB 2 LE1 18 1600 39.8 3.00 53.6 74.2 OK

Symbol explanation
Aeff Effective area
o Average stress in concrete
Kj Concentration factor
Fjd The ultimate bearing strength of the concrete block
Ut Utilization

Shear in contact plane

Vy Vz VRd,y VRd,z Vc,Rd Ut
Name Loads Status
[kN] [kN] [kN] [kN] [kN] [%]
SP6 LE1 -0.1 -13.5 15.9 15.9 0.0 84.9 OK

Symbol explanation
VRd,y Shear resistance
VRd,z Shear resistance
Vc,Rd Concrete bearing resistance
Ut Utilization

Buckling
Buckling analysis was not calculated.

Code settings
Item Value Unit Reference
γM0 1.00 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
7/8
 Item Value Unit Reference
γM1 1.00 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM2 1.25 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM3 1.25 - EN 1993-1-8: 2.2
γC 1.50 - EN 1992-1-1: 2.4.2.4
γInst 1.20 - ETAG 001-C: 3.2.1
Joint coefficient βj 0.67 - EN 1993-1-8: 6.2.5
Effective area - influence of mesh size 0.10 -
Friction coefficient - concrete 0.25 - EN 1993-1-8
Friction coefficient in slip-resistance 0.30 - EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.7
Limit plastic strain 0.05 - EN 1993-1-5
Weld stress evaluation Plastic redistribution
Detailing No
Distance between bolts [d] 2.20 - EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.3
Distance between bolts and edge [d] 1.20 - EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.3
Concrete breakout resistance Yes ETAG 001-C
Use calculated αb in bearing check. Yes EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.4

8/8
 9. Appendix A- Sketches

Document No. ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-0033 Page 5

Sketches

9/8
10. Appendix B- Page 55 to 60 of Structural Calculation ATH-
TWS-ALM-ST-CS-0033

Document No. ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-0033 Page 5

LOAD CALCULATION AND APPLICATION

DEAD LOAD:

Self-weight is automatically calculated by STAAD. Pro.

Total Glass thickness = 14 mm

Glass weight at each location for Spandrel = (14/1000 x 25 x 0.9 x 1.575)/2 = 0.25 kN

Glass weight at each location for Vision = (14/1000 x 25 x 2.7 x 1.575)/2 = 0.75 kN

Document No. ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-0033 Page 55

POSITIVE WIND LOAD (WLP)

Considered Positive wind load of Zone-2 = 3 kPa

Load from top panel on head transom = 3 x 3.6/2 = 5.4 kN/m (3.6m is panel height)

Document No. ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-0033 Page 56

NEGATIVE WIND LOAD (WLN)

Considered Negative wind load of Zone-2 = 3 kPa

Load from top panel on head transom = 3 x 3.6/2 = 5.4 kN/m (3.6m is panel height)

LOAD COMBINATIONS

Document No. ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-0033 Page 57

CHECK FOR DEFLECTION

DEAD LOAD DEFLECTIONS

Maximum dead load deflection = 1.10 mm

Allowable dead load deflection = Span / 360 (Project Specification Cl 4.5.2)

= 1575 / 360

= 4.375 mm

Document No. ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-0033 Page 58

DEAD+WIND LOAD DEFLECTIONS

Maximum deflection = 34.45 mm

Allowable deflection = Span / 200 (Project Specification Cl 4.5.2)

= 3600 / 200

= 18 mm

The actual deflections will be much lesser than the above shown values because of the following reasons:

As can be seen in the deflection diagram above, most of the deflection is in the Lateral Direction
(X-Axis). Since the glass is bonded to the Mullions is very rigid in this plane, it will act as a rigid
diaphragm and prevent any lateral deflection within the panel.
The above model is considering only half Mullions. But after installation of the Panel, the male
and female mullions will act as one unit and reduce the deflections. This combined deflection is
already shown in the Zone-2 report (ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-0021) and are within the specified
limits.

Hence we can conclude that the actual deflections will be much less than the deflections in the
model.

Document No. ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-0033 Page 59

FACTORED MEMBER FORCES ON MULLIONS

Note: The bending about minor axis (Y axis) can be safely ignored since the glass is rigid in this plane and
will prevent the bending of the mullion about this axis

FACTORED MEMBER FORCES ON TRANSOMS

Document No. ATH-TWS-ALM-ST-CS-0033 Page 60