Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article A Article B
Step 1 a. Write down the exact statement They were analyzing about the first and They were investigate hoe students
in which the authors describe what second languange acquisition of a child in arguments improve through collaborative
they were testing. the indonesia language and english. learning.
Step 2 a. Briefly summarize the main first they look for theories about the They use kuantitatif method
steps or measurements that the research to be carried out - find
authors used in their methods. Try respondents - analyze the data obtained -
to explain in your own words as find results
much as possible.
b. How did the authors analyse they are looking for people to be They use data
their data? What test/s did they respondents and analyzing them
use?
Step 3 a. Make some notes about the it can be concluded that factors affecting this research can be considered
authors’ major conclusions or children acquisition include linguistic input as a teaching framework to fulfill the
findings as written in the article. or exposure, which will support demand of
Include quotation marks whenever and develop their linguistic ability; classroom practices in the industrial
you use their exact wording, and language acquisition device that motivate revolution of
indicate page number(s). the children to learn; imitation, which such 4.0. Collaborative learning is proved to
habits are formed by practice and be
repetition; environment and immediate applicable as a learning model that can
family. 25 improve
student’s argument quality taping to
lower thinking
skills (remember, understand and apply)
and a
higher order thinking skill (analyze) in the
learning
process. 9
b. Now write those conclusions (as The conclusion is that there are a number improve argument student quality
you understand them) in your own of factors for children in understanding certainly brings a good impact and
words. language, so we cannot use this study to improves the learning process
generalize with all children because of
course everything is different.
Step 4 Based on the accuracy of the can be trusted but just like what I said yes it can be trusted because this
methodology and the reliability of before, this research is only valid with this research uses reliable examples and
the results as described in Steps 3 one respondent. because every child has theoretical data
and 4, do you think the a distinguishing factor in understanding
conclusions can be believed? If something
yes/no, Why?