Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Determine the minimum velocity v which the wheel must have to just roll over the
obstruction. The centroidal radius of gyration of the wheel is k, and it is assumed that the
1 3
wheel does not slip. Plot v versus h for three cases: k = , and 1 m. For each case take r
2 4
= 1 m.
Solution:
Since no slipping or rebounding occurs, the wheel pivots about point A. The force at A is
much greater than the weight, and since the time of impact is very short, the weight can be
considered non-impulsive. The reaction force at A is a problem as we don’t know either its
direction or magnitude. This force can be eliminated by applying the conservation of angular
momentum equation about A.
Minimum velocity v would be found from work energy principle, but to find it we have to
apply conservation of angular momentum also.
A careful examination of the free-body diagram of the particle will disclose whether the
moment of the resultant force on the particle about a fixed point is zero, in which case, the
angular momentum about that point is unchanged (conserved).
Conservation of angular
momentum around point A
After impact we will use primes to denote the state. Since the wheel now rotates about A we
can use the simpler formula H A= IA ω. We note that, by the parallel axis theorem:
IA = m(k +r )
2 2
So we have:
v'
HA` = 2 2
m(k +r )
r
Since we have conversation of angular moment we have:
H A =H 'A
By replacing we have:
'
2 v 2 2 v
mk +mv ( r −h ) =m( k +r )
r r
We use this equation to find symbolically the velocity after impact v' :
m k 2 +rm ( r−h )
v' =v
m(k 2 +r 2 )
We eleminate m and we can arrive at this formula:
1−rh
v' =v [ ]
( k 2 +r 2 )
3) Work – Energy
After impact, the wheel rolls on curb point A against gravity. Thus :
ΔT+ΔVg = 0
For minimum v, kinetic energy after impact is totally expended in rolling over the
obstruction:
2
1 ( 2 2 ) v'
2
m k +r
r
=mgh ()
We replace v` that we found before and me get:
1−rh 2
1
2
m ( k 2 +r 2 ) ( v[
r
)
( k 2 +r 2 )
]
=mgh
We solve for v:
1 3
4) We plot v versus h for three cases: k = , and 1 m:
2 4
5) Conclusions:
For k =1 less velocity is needed, because less energy is absorbed by buckling.