Professional Documents
Culture Documents
xn 2 1
n 1
2n 2n 2n 1
1 1 1
We know that n 1 k n
n 1 2 k 0 2 n0 2
1
We know that 2
n 0
n is convergent
xn
By Comparision test the series 2
n 1
n is convergent.
n
xk xn
Write sn k ,So n is a partial sum of sequence of
s 2 n
k 1 2 n 1
xn
Now we prove that
n 1 2
s x
n converges to x. n
1
Clearly sn 0, x1 , x2 ,......xn Clearly sn n ; n
2n
1
We know that Lt ,So Lt sn x
n 2 n
1
Let 0 choose a ve int eger n 2n
n N s x 1 1
n
2 n
2 N
Lt s x
n n
2) Ternary representation of x:
Divide [0,1) into 3 disjoint
[0,1/4) [1/4,1/2) [1/2,1)
Partially ordered sets and Lattices:
Let P be a non-empty set . A binary relation on P is called a partial order relation
on P if the following conditions are satisfied.
1. is reflexive: a, a i.e a a a P
2. is antisymmetric: a, b , b, a a b
i.e a b, b a a b
3. is Transitive: a, b , b, c a, c
i.e a b, b c a c
Def:
Any pair P, where P is non-empty set and is a partial ordered P is called a
partially ordered set.( i.e poset).
Ex: 16. Let R be the set of all real numbers. Define a binary relation on R by
a b (a, b R ) either a b (in usual addition) or a b then is a partial ordering on R.
Sol:
i) is is reflexive :
For any a R, a a and hence a a
So is reflexive
ii) is anti symmetric:
Let a, b R a b, b a
a b a b or a b
b a b a or b a
Suppose a b So a b and b a
This is a contradiction to the law of trichtony.
a b
is anti symmetric
iii) is transitive:
Let a, b, c R a b & b c
a b a b or a b
b c b c or b c
a b, b c : a c
a b, b c : a c
a b, b c : a c
a b, b c : a c
ac
is a partial ordering on R.
This ordering is called usual ordering on R.
Ex 17. Let N be the set of all natural numbers define a binary relation on N by a b a
divides b i.e c N ac b. Prove that is a partial ordering. This ordering is called
divisibility ordering.
Sol: N be the set of all natural numbers.
i) is is reflexive :
For any a N a a
a a x N ax a x N
We must have x 1 a a
is reflexive
ii) is anti symmetric:
Let a, b N be such that a b and b a
a b x N ax b
b a y N by a
a by ax y a xy
Since x N , y N we have xy N
Since a a ( xy ) and xy N
We must have xy 1
x 1, y 1
is anti symmetric
iii) is transitive:
Let a, b N be such that a b and b c
a b x N ax b
b c y N by c
c by ax y a xy
Since x N , y N we have xy N
Since c a( xy ) and xy N
We must have x 1 & y 1
a c
is transitive
Ex:
Let F be a non-empty family of sets. Define a binary relations on F by
A B A B A, B F then is a partial ordering on F. This ordering is called
“contained in”
Sol:
i) is is reflexive :
Clearly for any A F .So A A
i.e A A
is reflexive
ii) is anti symmetric:
Let A, B f , A B, B A
A B, B A
A B (by definition of equality of sets)
is anti symmetric
iii) is transitive:
Let A, B, C F A B & B C
A B & B C A B, B C
AC
AC
is transitive
is a partial ordering on R.
Note:
Thus any non-empty family of sets is a partial ordering set with respect to the ordering
contained in
Def:
Let P, be a poset.
i) Two elements a, b P are called comparable if either a b or ba
ii) If a,b are in comparable then we write a/b.
Def:
A poset P, is called a totally ordered set (or) a simply ordered set (or) a chain if any
two elements in P are comparable.
Ex:1
If the poset K , where K is the set of all real numbers and is the usual ordering a
chain.
Sol:
Let a, b R
By the law of trichonomy we have either a<b (or) a=b (or) b<a
i.e a b (or ) b a
So, a and b are comparable.
Thus any two elements in R are comparable.
So, R, is a chain.
Prob:2
If the poset N , where N is the set of all natural numbers and is the divisibility
ordering a chain.
Sol:
Clearly 3,5 N
We know that 3 does not divide 5 and 5 does not divide 3
So, 3 and 5 are incomparable elements.
So N , is not a chain.
Def:
Let P, be a poset. Let A P
i) An element a0 A is called a least element of A if a0 A
ii) An element a1 A is called a greatest element of A if a a a A
iii) An element a0 A is called a minimal element of A if no x in A x a0
iv) An element a1 A is called a maximal element of A if no x in A a1 x
v) An element x P is called an upper bound of A if a x a A
vi) An element y P is called an lower bound of A if y a a A
Note:
PROBLEMS:
1.Prove that any subset of a poset can have atmost one least element.
Sol: Let P, be a poset, let A P
Suppose x, y A are least elements of A
x A is a least element of A, y A x y
y A is a least element of A, x A y x
Since is antisymmetric with x y
2. Prove that any subset of a poset can have atmost one greatest element.
Sol:
Let P, be a poset, let A P
Suppose x, y A are least element of A
x A is a greatest element of A, y A y x
y A is a greatest element of A, x A x y
Since is antisymmetric with x y
3. Prove that any subset of a poset can have atmost one greatest lower bound.
Sol:
Let P, be a poset, let A P
Suppose x, y A are G.L.B’s of A
x is a G.LB of A so x,&y are L.B’s of A
x is a G.LB of A, y is a L.B of A
x is a G.LB of A, y is a L.B of A
Since is antigymmetric with x=y
4. Prove that any subset of a poset can has at most one least upper bound.
Sol:
Let P, be a poset, let A P
Suppose x, y P are L.U.B’S of A
So x and y are U.B of A
x is LUB of A, y is U.B OF A x y
y is LUB of A, x is U.B OF A y x
Since is antigymmetric with x y
5. Let P, be a poset .Let A be a subset of P. Prove that following.
i)An element a0 A is minimal element of A x A, x a0 x a0
ii)An element a1 A is a maximal element of A x A, a1 x a1 x
Sol:
i ) Assume a0 A is minimal element of A.
Let x A & x a0
If x a0 then x a0
which is a contradiction due to that a0 A a minimal element of A. so x a0
: Assume that x A, x a0 x a0
Suppose a0 A is not a minimal element of A.
So x A x a0 i.e x a0 & x a0 a contradiction to that x a0
a0 A is a minimal element of A
Assume that a A is a maximal element of A
Let x A and a x
If x a then a1 x, a contradiction to that ai A is a maximal element of A. So a x
: Assume that x A, a1 x x a1
Suppose ai A is not a maximal element of A.
So x A a1 x i.e a1 x & x a1
x A, a1 x x a1 (by our assumption) a to that x a1
a1 A is minimal element of A
6. Prove that every least element is a minimal element. Is converse true? Justify your answer.
Sol:
Let P, be a poset. Let A P
Suppose a0 A is a least element of A.
Let x A & x a0 .Since x A and a0 A is a least element of A.
We have a0 x since x a0
We have x a0 is antisymmetric
a0 A is a minimal element of A.
Hence least element of A is a minimal element of A.
Converse of the statement “least element of A is a minimal element of A is “minimal
element of A is a element of A”
This converse is not true.
Ex: Let X a, b , a b
We know that P X , a , b
A B A B
Take A a , b
Clearly A P X
We know that P X , a , b
Take A a , b
Clearly A P X
glb x, y exist in L.
4) x x y x x x y x (Absorption law)
Sol:
1.
i ).x x x x L
Let x L x x glb x, x glb x, x x
ii ).x x x x L
Let x L x x l u b x, x x
2.
i ).Let x, y L
x y glb x, y glb y , x y x
ii ).Let x, y L
x y l u b x , y l u b y , x y x
3.
i ).Let x, y, z L
Let c x y z & d x y z
Claim : c d
Let x y z glb x, y z
So c is lb of x, y z
i.e c x, c y z
y z glb y, z
So, y z is a lb of y , z
So y z y y z z
c y z, y z y, y z z
c y, c z is transitive
c x, c y c is a lb of x, y
c x y
c x y, c z c is lb of x y , z
c x y z
i.e c d
Similarly we can prove d c
c d
x y z x y z
ii ).Let x, y, z L
Let c x y z & d x y z
Claim : c d
So c is ub of x, y z
i.e c x, c y z
y z u b y , z
So, y z is a ub of y, z
So y z y y z z
c y, c z is transitive
c x, c y c is a ub of x, y
c x y
c x y, c z c is ub of x y , z
c x y z
c d
Similarly we can prove d c
c d
x y z x y z
4.
i ).Let x, y L
x y lub x, y
x y is an ub of x, y
x x y, y x y
x x y x x y x
4.
ii ).Let x, y L
x y gl b x, y
x y is a lb of x, y
x y x, x y y
x y x x x y lub x, x y x
Prob:
Let P, be a poset. Prove that any two comparable elements in P have both lub & glb.
Sol:
Let x, y P be comparable.
So either x y (or ) y x
Case i: x y
a)
lub x, y y i.e i ) y is an ub x, y &
ii ) z P is an ub of x, y y z
if x y ( given)
y y (reflexive) y is an ub of x, y
ii) z P is an ub of x, y x z & y z
lub x, y y i.e x y y
b)
glb x, y x
i.e i ) x is an lb x, y &
ii ) z P is an ub of x, y z x & z y
glb x, y x i.e x y x
Case ii: y x
By case i y x x & y x y
x, y P be comparable x y (or ) y x
Prob:
Prove that every chain is a lattice.
Sol:
Let P, be a chain.
P, be a ordered set.
Let x, y P since P is totally ordered set.
x & y are compared.
We know that in poset any two comparable elements have both lub & glb
So
lub x, y x y
glb x, y x y
Prob:
Consider the set P 1, 2,3, 4,5 with respect to the usual ordering on P
i) What are the maximum element of P.
ii). With respect to the divisibility on P what are the maximal element of P.
Sol:
i) Let be the usual ordering on P.
1 2 3 4 5
Clearly 5 is greatest element and also a maximal element of P.
ii). Let is the divisibility ordering on P.
1 2 4
1 3
1 4
1 5
4 is maximal element of P.
3 is maximal element of P.
5 is a maximal element of P.
Prob:
.Prove that every chain is lattice we conversely true. Justify your answer.
Sol:
Let- every chain is a lattice
Let P, is a chain.
Clearly P x , is a Lattice
a) A B LUB A, B A B A, B P X
Let A, B P X
Claim: AUB=LUB={A,B}
i.e i. AUB is an UB of{A,B}
ii. C P X is an UB of {A,B}
A B C
i. A B is an upper bound of A, B
i.e A A B B A B
A A B B A B
Which includes form the property of sets
A B is an lb of A, B
ii. C P X is an lb of A, B
C A &C B
C A &C B
C A B (By the property sets)
C A B
A B glb A, B A B
P X , is a lattice
There for any non-empty set X , P X , is a lattice
Clearly
, x P X & A X A P X
i.e A X A P X
i.e & X are least and greatest element P X ,
Suppose X contain atleast two elements.
Let a, b X be a b
a , b P X
If a b then a=b
Which is contradiction.
If b a then b=a
Which is contradiction.
a b & b a
So a , b are in comparable element in P(X)
So P ( X ), is not a chain
Suppose x 1 i.e x a
P X a X
So X i.e X
So P X , is a chain
Hence P X , is not a chain otherwise it is a chain.
P X , is always lattice.
Ex:
Let R be the set of real numbers. Let X be a non-empty set. Let R f / f : X R
*
2. R , is a lattice.
*
A:
1. is a partial ordering on R*
i. is reflexive:
i.e f f f R*
Let f R* clearly for any x X
f x f x So f f
is reflexive
ii. is antisymmetric:
i.e f g , g f f g
Let f , g R* be f g & g f
f g, g f
f x g x , g x f x x X
f x g x x X
f g
is antisymmetric:
iii. is transitive:
i.e f g , g h f h
f g , g h f x g x and g x h x x X
f x h x x X
is a transitive
is a partially ordering on R*
2. R , is a lattice
*
Let f , g R*
Define f g : X R and f g : X R by
f g x max f x , g x
f g x min f x , g x
Clearly f g R*
i. f g lub f , g
a) f g is an ub of f , g
i.e f f g and g f g
Clearly for any x X
i.e f x f g x & g x f g x
f f g, g f g
f g is an ub of f , g
b) h R* is an ub of f , g
f h, g h
f x h x , g x h x x X
max f x , g x h x x X
f gh
f g is an lub of f , g
ii. f g glb f , g
a) f g is an lb of f , g
i.e f g f & f gg
Clearly for any x X , f x min f x , g x
g x min f x , g x
i.e f g x f x & f g x g x
f g f, f gg
f f is an lb of f , g
b) h R* is an lb of f , g
h f ,h g
h x f x , h x g x x X
h x min f x , g x x X
h x min f x , g x
h f g
f g is an glb of f , g
R* , is a lattice.
DEFINITIONS:
Set:
A set is a collection or aggregrate of such elements considered together or as a whole .
Eg: Set of all natural Numbers.
Set of all real numbers on real line R.
Universal set:
Equality of sets:
Two sets A & B are equal if they consists of exactly same elements. It is denoted by
A=B.
If A is subset of B, each element of A, is also element of B & it is denoted by
If A is the proper sub set of B ,A is the subset of B. A is not equal to B.
Note: the c is usually called as set inclusion .
Finite set: A set is said to be finite if it is empty it consists of elements otherwise it is said
to be infinite.
Function set :let X and Y be two non empty sets A subset F on XY is called a Function
from X to Y if to each , there exist a unique
The other terms used for functions are mapping transformations and operations.
A function whose range consists of just one element is called constant function.
Inverse set: if is both one- one and onto then we define its mapping
Theorem :let X and Y be non empty sets and f mapping of X into Y show the
following
a)f is one- one a mapping g of y into X
b) f is onto a mapping h of y in X
Empty set :If A set containing no elements is called empty set & it is denoted by
relation contained in i.e
Clearly
Are least &greatest element suppose X contain atleast two elements