You are on page 1of 8

ANNEX 11 SRC

Summary of Information

Data Data
Period of
School Profile Description Remarks Presentat Source/Form
Reporting
ion s
1. Academic MPS per subject Base on SF5 Year-end Bar graph Report from
Achievement Test End of SY2018- by MPS of NETRC
by Mean Grade 6 2019 each
Percentage Score 4th Quarter Grade6 subject
(MPS) Filipino=32.94 Did not meet
English=49.60 Expectations
1st Quarter Math=34.83 Male-0
English AP=40.26 Female-0
Grade3-63.26% Science=37.20 Total=0
Grade6-58.83% ESP=64.00
EPP=39.33 Fairly
2nd Quarter MAPEH=45.67 Satisfactory
English Male-3
Grade3-40.09% Female-1
Grade6-43.47% Total=4

3rd Quarter Satisfactory


English Male-4
Grade3-60.23% Female-3
Grade6-54.80% Total=7

4th Quarter Very


English Satisfactory
Grade3-46.33% Male-1
Grade6-49.60% Female-2
Total=3

Outstanding
Male-1
Female-0
Total=1

2. Health and Number of learners No. of Mid-year Stacked Nutritional


nutritional status who are severely severely Year-end bar graph Status Report
wasted/wasted wasted or   by gender
Baseline Data
wasted   per key
Wasted-23
SW -9 stage
Total=32

3. Learners The count of Year-end Table per SF-3: Books


materials* shortages/excess grade Issued and
learners materials level that Returned;
per grade level
shows the Physical Count
based on what the
students are using number of of Inventories
during the School shortage/e
Year xcess
learners
Shortage/No materials
available of Books (by
Grade 6 subject)
Filipino-1
English-1
Science-1
AP-1
Math-1
4. Teachers’ Number of teachers   Mid-year Bar graph Accomplishment
professional who attended Year-end by report
development* training/further  GAD kind/type of
studies/SEF=2 professional
developmen
Professional t
Development ICT=1
Further studies=2
INSET=8
ANNEX 11 SRC
Summary of Information

LAC=8
DAP ELLEN=2
PRIMALS=4
5. Funding Funding amount and   Mid-year Pie graph Financial reports;
sources* sources   Year-end by funding Monthly
source liquidation
1.MOOE reports
2016-2017-
Ph162,450.

2017-2018-
Ph219,000

2018-2019-
Ph234,000

2.Donation45,000

3.LGU-48,000

4.GAA-36,000
6. School awards Awards/ recognition   Mid-year Table Accomplishment
and recognitions* from Division Year-end report
1.Technolympics-3rd
Placer
2.Festival of Talents
Kinder-1st Placer
3.Arnis-4th Placer
4.MTAP Grade1-6th
Placer

Division
1.Student-
Technolympics-3rd
Placer
2.Teachers Seminar
in DAP ELLN
PRIMALS
ARNIS
PINCAK SILAT
3.School Head
Seminar in DAP
ELLN, PINCAK SILAT
School Award
ESWM-
*Data not found in the EBEIS

Period of Data Data


Performanc
Description Remarks Reportin Presentatio Source/Form
e Indicators
g n s
ACCESS
7. Drop-Out Rate ● Count and percentage   Year-end Stacked bar SF-4: Monthly
2016-2017-0% of learners who do not graph by Learner’s
2017-2018-0% finish a particular grade cause per Movement and
2018-2019-0% level. (It does not year; Attendance;
capture learners who percentage SF-2: Daily
finish a grade level but can be shown Attendance
do not enrol in the next through a line Report of
grade level the following graph over Learners;
school year) the bar graph EBEIS
QUALITY
8.Promotion Rate ●  Percentage of learners   Year-end Bar graph EBEIS:
2016-2017 who completed the Enrolment
Grade1-6=135 school year data; SF-6:
ANNEX 11 SRC
Summary of Information

2017-2018 2016-2017=98.54% Summarized


Grade1-6=131 2017-2018=100.00% Report on
2018-2019 2018-2019=100.00% Promotion and
Garde1-6=87 ●  Number of promoted Level of
learners over number of Proficiency
total learners x 100
●  Per grade level
2016-2017
Grade
1=21/135=91.30%
Grade2=19/135=100%
Grade3=18/135=100%
Grade4=20/135=100%
Grade5=37/135=100%
Grade6=20/135=100%

2017-2018
Grade 1=23/131=100%
Grade2=16/131=100%
Grade3=16/131=100%
Grade4=20/131=100%
Grade5=21/131=100%
Grade6=35/131=100%

2018-2019
Grade 1=1/118=100%
Grade2=20/118=100%
Grade3=12/118=100%
Grade4=15/118=100%
Grade5=15/118=100%
Grade6=15/118=100%

9. Enrolment ●  Total number of ●  Optional Mid-year Stacked bar SF-1: School


learners enrolled Grade (BoSY graph by Register;
1 t0 Grade 6 data) gender per EBEIS
o By gender Year-end year
o Last 3 years (EoSY  For types of
o 2016-2017 data) learners, a
Male-64   pie graph can
Female-71   be used
Total=135  
2017-2018 Year-End
Male-63 data can be a
Female-68 comparison
Total=131 with the Mid-
2018-2019 Year data
Male-37 (line on bar
Female-50 graph)
Total=87
10. Literacy level ●  Total number of ●  In the Mid-year Bar graphs Philippine
learners who are in: absence of Year-end showing oral Informal
a tool to 5 and silent Reading
PRE-TEST RESULTS: Emeasure reading Inventory
Frustration literacy, results (one (PHIL-IRI);
Level(English-Oral) schools can for English McCall-Crab
Male-14 use PHIL- and Filipino) Reading
Female-6 IRI results Comprehension
Total=20 or any Examination or
existing tool its equivalent
Instructional to measure
Level(English-Oral) literacy
Male-3
ANNEX 11 SRC
Summary of Information

Female-12
Total=15

Independent levels
(English Oral)
Male-1
Female-5
Total=6

Frustration
Level(English-Silent)
Male
Female

Instructional
Level(English-Silent)
Male
Female

Independent levels
(English-Silent)
Male
Female

POST-TEST RESULTS:
Frustration
Level(English-Oral)
Male-9
Female-4
Total=13

Instructional
Level(English-Oral)
Male-7
Female-8
Total=15

Independent levels
(English Oral)
Male-4
Female-13
Total=17

Frustration
Level(English-Silent)
Male
Female

Instructional
Level(English-Silent)
Male
Female

Independent levels
(English-Silent)
Male
Female

PRE-TEST RESULTS:
Frustration
Level(Filipino-Oral)
ANNEX 11 SRC
Summary of Information

Male-2
Female-2
Total=4

Instructional
Level(Filipino-Oral)
Male-4
Female-8
Total=12

Independent levels
(Filipino- Oral)
Male-10
Female-18

Frustration
Level(Filipino-Silent)
Male
Female

Instructional
Level(Filipino-Silent)
Male
Female

Independent levels
(Filipino-Silent)
Male
Female

POST-TEST RESULTS:
Frustration
Level(Filipino-Oral)
Male
Female

Instructional
Level(Filipino-Oral)
Male
Female

Independent levels
(Filipino- Oral)
Male
Female

Frustration
Level(Filipino-Silent)
Male
Female

Instructional
Level(Filipino-Silent)
Male
Female

Independent levels
(Filipino-Silent)
Male
Female
ANNEX 11 SRC
Summary of Information

GOVERNANCE
11. School- ●  School level based on ●  Use SBM Year-end SBM Level SBM
Based SBM Assessment Assessmen and its Assessment
Management t correspondin
Assessment g qualitative
Level interpretation
12. Child- ●  Survey to be ●  Use Year-end Points and Child-Friendly
Friendly accomplished by the School Child- status School Self-
School Planning Team Friendly Assessment
Survey ●  Based on CFSS point School
result* system: Self-
o  25-29 points: Child- Assessmen
Friendly School t Guide
o  30-34 points:  
Outstanding Child-  
Friendly School  
o  35 and above points:  
Very Outstanding Child-  
Friendly School
●  Current year
13. There will be two (2) data Mid-year For Attendance
Stakeholders’ sets: Year-end percentage: sheets;
participation* 1. Percentage stacked bar DepEd order
(number of graph by 18: School
attendees over activity (co- Calendar
those invited) of curricular,
parents/guardians extra-
and other curricular,
stakeholders who meetings/
attend during: assemblies)
o Co-curricular per
activities stakeholder
(Science month,  
Reading month, For total
contests, etc.) contribution:
o Extra-curricular stacked bar
activities (Boy graph by type
Scouts, Brigada of
Eskwela, sports contribution
fests, etc.) per reporting
o Meetings and period, with
Assemblies total
(SIP, CI,
General PTA,
etc.)
 Current year
2. Total contribution
(in kind, man-
hours, etc.) of
stakeholders which
are accounted
 Current year
 By reporting
period (Mid-
year and Year-
end)

14. ●  Comparison of the actual   Year- Ratio per SF-7: School


Learner- ratio of learners to teachers end grade level Personnel
Teacher against the standard: shown as bar Assignment List
ratio o  Kinder (25:1) graph; and Basic Profile;
o  Grades 1 & 2 (40:1) Standard can SF-1: School
ANNEX 11 SRC
Summary of Information

o  Grades 3 to 10 (45:1) be shown as Register; EBEIS


o  SHS (40:1) line graph
●  Per grade level over the bar
●  Current year graph  
 
 
15. ●  Comparison of the actual   Year- Ratio per EBEIS: Facilities
Learner- ratio of learners to end grade level and Structures
Classroom classrooms against the shown as bar
ratio standard: graph;
o  Kinder (25:1)
o  Grades 1 & 2 (40:1) Standard can
o  Grades 3 to 10 (45:1) be shown as
o  SHS (40:1) line graph
●  Per grade level over the bar
●  Current year graph
 
 
16.  Comparison of the Year- Line graph EBEIS: Facilities
Learner- actual ratio of learners end and Structures
Toilet to functional toilets
ratio against standards
(50:1)
 Total number
 By gender
 Current year
17. ●  Comparison of the actual   Year- Line graph Consolidated
Learner- ratio of learners to seats end Report on
Seat ratio against the standard (1:1) Desk/Armchairs for
●  Total number ES and SS; EBEIS
●  Current year
Note: CFS – Child-Friendly School (The Child-Friendly School Assessment was made by UNICEF. The concept for
establishing a Child-Friendly School System (CFSS) in the Philippines was introduced in 1999 and is currently
being reviewed so it can be utilized/integrated in school planning, monitoring and evaluation).
SF – School Forms
*Data not found in the EBEIS

Status of School Period of


Description Remarks Data P
Projects Reporting
18. Status of Annual ●  The progress of CI projects ●  The school will decide Mid-year Graphs m
Implementation Plan ●  Data sets may differ depending which major projects to Year-end
(AIP)/Continuous on what the school wants to present put in the SRC but our
Improvement (CI) ●  Current year recommendation is to
Projects* report the top 3 priority
projects
●  Include the report on
baseline, and also the
endline when applicable
ANNEX 11 SRC
Summary of Information

19. Other stakeholders’ ● Reports done by other ●  The school may Mid-year Graphs m
accomplishments* stakeholders on their choose the top 3 Year-end
initiatives/activities independent stakeholder
from the PIA/CI projects (e.g. accomplishments/initiati
activities of the SGC, SPG/SSG, ves/activities
etc.)
●  Data sets may differ depending
on the initiatives/activities of the
stakeholders
●  Current year

*Data not found in the EBEIS

You might also like