Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer Rates on Vegetative Growth and, Yield
Components of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Fitche, Central Highlands of Ethiopia.
By
Elias Gaisa
(Id no: AGR/1934/10)
Group Members ID No
1. Almaz Meku AGR/1806/10
2. Yesewuzer Mamaru AGR/2259/10
3. Mintamer Mulugeta AGR/2105/10
4. Getane Mulugeta AGR/1983/10
5. Ateref Getnet AGR/1839/10
6. Belaynesh Agegn AGR/1861/10
Fitche, Ethiopia
January, 2019
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, we would like to thank almighty God who gives us patience to pass the ups and down
during our everyday life. While we done this senior research by our genuine appreciation advisor
Mr. Mesfin Nigussie (MSc) for his constructive comments, guidance encouragement and by his
polite behavior. We would like to thank Salale University College of Agriculture and Natural
Resource Department of Horticulture for the financial support provided to undertake this paper.
i
Table of Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT................................................................................................................i
Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ii
List of Abbreviations......................................................................................................................iv
List of tables....................................................................................................................................v
CHAPTER ONE..............................................................................................................................1
1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................1
1.1. Back Ground Information.........................................................................................................1
1.2. Statement of problem................................................................................................................1
1.3. Significance of the study..........................................................................................................2
1.4. Objectives of the Study.............................................................................................................2
1.4.1. General objective...................................................................................................................2
1.4.2. Specific objectives.................................................................................................................2
Hypothesis.......................................................................................................................................2
CHAPTER TWO.............................................................................................................................3
2. LITERATURE REVIEW............................................................................................................3
2.1. Origin and Distribution of potato.............................................................................................3
2.2. Morphology of Potato...............................................................................................................3
2.3. Ecology of potato......................................................................................................................4
2.3.1. Climatic and growth requirements of potato.........................................................................4
2.3.2. Soil Requirements..................................................................................................................4
2.3.3. Fertilizer application in potato production............................................................................4
3. Materials and methods.................................................................................................................5
3.1. Description of the Study Area..................................................................................................5
3.2. Experimental Material..............................................................................................................5
3.4. Experimental Design and Treatment........................................................................................6
3.4.1. Experimental design..............................................................................................................6
3.4.2. Treatments.............................................................................................................................7
3.4.3. Experimental Procedures.......................................................................................................8
3.5. Data collection..........................................................................................................................8
3.5.1. Growth parameters.................................................................................................................8
ii
3.5.2. Yield parameters....................................................................................................................9
3.6. Data Analysis............................................................................................................................9
3.7. Expected out come..................................................................................................................10
3.8. Beneficiaries...........................................................................................................................10
4. Work plan..................................................................................................................................10
5. Budget breakdown.....................................................................................................................11
6. References..................................................................................................................................12
iii
List of Abbreviations
ANOVA Analysis of variance
DAP Di Ammonium phosphate
FAO Food and Agricultural Organization
LSD Least significance difference
RCBD Randomized complete block design
SAS Statistical Analysis Software
MoA Ministry of Agriculture
IAR Institute of Agricultural researches
EIAR Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research
CSA Central Statistical Agency
FAOSTAT Food and Agriculture Organization Data of Statistics
iv
List of tables
Table 3: Labor cost
Table 4: Equipment and supplies
Table 5: Stationary costs
Table 6: Budget summary
v
CHAPTER ONE
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Back Ground Information
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is a crop of the world’s major economic importance and number
one non-grain food commodity (Rykaczewska, 2013 (). . American Journal Of Plant Sciences,
04, –. doi:). It contains practically all essential dietary constituents like carbohydrates, essential
nutrients, protein, vitamins, and minerals (Sriom et al., 2017, , , , , & (). . International Journal
Of Current Microbiology And Applied Sciences, 6, –. doi:,). Even though the productivity of
potato could reach up to 30 t ha−1 attainable yield (Haverkort et al., 2012, , , , , & (). Potato
prospects for Ethiopia: On the road to value addition. .), its productivity in Ethiopia is very low
which is below 11.88 t/ha (CSA, 2016 CSA. (). Agricultural sample survey. Report on . In Ed.,
Agricultural sample survey. 125p. : .). There are many complicated reasons for this low actual
yield of potato in the country. Soil fertility, lack of good quality seed, unbalanced mineral
nutrition, inadequate application of fertilizers, pests and disease, irregularity of water supply and
traditional irrigation schemes and schedules are the main reason which accounts for the low
productivity of potato (Bezabih and Mengistu, 2011, & (). Potato value chain analysis and
development in Ethiopia. Addis Abeba, Ethiopia.). Plants require a variety of elements for the
growth and development of which N and P are the most important of the essential nutrients to
plants because they are required in large quantities. Potato is a high yielding and exhaustive crop,
thus requiring a variety of balanced plant nutrients for growth and development.
Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorus (P) are among the most important elements that are essential for
potato productivity (Pervez et al., 2013). According to FAOSTAT, (2008) about 70% of
cultivated agricultural land of Ethiopia is suitable for potato production due to the availability of
diverse climate and soil conditions. In relation to climate, for example, there are long frost free
periods, which allow production during both the rainy and off seasons. A good supply of
nitrogen stimulates root growth and development as well as the uptake of other nutrients (Brady
and Weil, 2008). Adequate phosphorus nutrition enhances many aspects of plant physiology,
including the fundamental processes of photosynthesis, root growth particularly the development
of lateral roots and fibrous rootlets (Brady and Weil, 2008).
1
2
1.2. Statement of problem
Many researchers have been revealed that lack of appropriate level NP fertilizer practice on
potato has been a limited factor to obtain the potential yield. Knowing the effect of different NP
fertilizer is very important because most of the time producers of potato do not consider about
the effect of NP fertilizer rate. The rates of NP fertilizer have different effect on the growth
performance yield of potato. Therefore, this study will be undertaken to identify the best rate of
NP fertilizer for potato; Salale University.
Hypothesis
Ho: NP fertilizer has no effect on growth and yield component of potato.
H1: NP fertilizer has effect on growth and yield component of potato.
3
CHAPTER TWO
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1. Origin and Distribution of potato
The plant potato was first domesticated in the area around Lake Titicaca, which is located 3800
meters above sea level on the border of modern-day, Bolivia and Peru, in the Andes mountain
range of South America (Hielke et al., 2011) and today it is cultivated in 158 Countries in the
tropical, subtropical and temperate zones of the world (FAO, 2010; FAOSTAT, 2014). Western
South America is the primary center of the origin and diversity of the potato crop and its wild
relatives. The genetic diversity of landraces and wild relatives has been and continues to be an
extremely valuable source of variation for genetic enhancement, crop improvement, and
understanding of chemical variability (Osman et al., 1978; Hanneman, 1989; Brown et al., 2007;
Väänänen, 2007; Jansky et al., 2013).
4
2.3. Ecology of potato
2.3.1. Climatic and growth requirements of potato
Potato prefers a cool climate for growth and development. Best suited altitudes ranged between
1500-2800m.a.s.l. However, for healthy tuber production, particularly for planting purpose, it
should strictly cultivate in high altitude areas. For high yields, the total crop water requirements
about 500 to 700 mm (MOA, 2011). A temperature ranged between 15-25 0C is ideal for potato
tuber development (Mondal and Chatterjee, 1993).
At higher temperatures the plant fails to initiate tuber formation and at low temperatures
vegetative growth is restricted by frost (Horton, 1987). The number of tubers produced per plant
is higher at lower than at higher temperature.
5
height (Najm et al., 2010). Phosphorus is claimed to be the second most often limiting plant
nutrient. Some specific growth factors that have been associated with phosphorus are: stimulated
root development, increased stalk and stem strength, improved flower formation and seed
production, more uniform and earlier crop maturity (Mosaic, 2016). The interaction of nitrogen
and phosphorus was significantly affected the marketable tuber yield per hectare (Birtukan,
2016).
6
3.4. Experimental Design and Treatment
3.4.1. Experimental design
A Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with four (4) treatments and three (3)
replications will be used. The four treatments, were included, (0 kg N/ha, 56 kg N/ha, 112kg
N/ha, and 168 kg N/ha), is assigned to each block. Phosphorus fertilizer (40Kg P ha -1) will be
applied to each plot as control treatment. Urea (46% N), and Triple Super Phosphate, TSP (46%
P2O5), will be used as fertilizer sources for nitrogen and phosphorus, respectively. The national
fertilizer recommendation for potato production (110 kg N ha-1 and 90 kg P2O5 or 40 kg P ha-1)
will be used as a benchmark in the experiment (Birtukan Belachew, 2016). The method of
application is band and NP fertilizer is applied at the time of seed sowing. Total experimental
area will be 11mx13.5m= 148.5m2.
The experimental area is divided into three homogenous blocks and each replication contains
complete set of treatment. Treatments will be assigned to each plot randomly. Each plot is
comprise of 3mx3m= 9m2 area and the space between rows and between plants is 75cm and
30cm respectively as recommended by EIAR (2007). The space between blocks and between
plots will be 1m and 0.5m, respectively. Plots consist of four (4) rows with 10 plants each, which
made up a total of forty (40) plants per plot.
7
3.4.2. Treatments
Table 1: Treatment numbers
Number of treatments Treatments
T1 0Kg N ha-1
T2 56Kg N ha-1
T3 112Kg N ha-1
T4 168Kg N ha-1
3m
0.5m
3m
1m
11m
13.5m
8
3.4.3. Experimental Procedures
The experimental site will be selected and all unwanted materials such as stones, straw weed,
and plant remain and other substances will be removed. The selected site will be prepared by
plough at least three times using human labor. Then, the layout of the experimental area will be
sketched using 3m x 4m x 5m triangular system. Potato tuber will be bought from Fitche market.
The potato tuber will be planted. Application of phosphorus fertilizer at different rate of P 2O5 ha-1
were done by banding the granules of DAP (Di-ammonium phosphate) at the depth of 10 cm
below and around the seed tuber at planting. Nitrogen at the rates of (56 kg N/ha, 112kg N/ha,
and 168 kg N/ha) will be applied in the form of urea in three splits [(1/3 rd at planting, 1/3rd at
mid-stage of (at about 45 days after planting), and 1/3 rd at the initiation of tubers (start of
flowering)]. Watering will be continued with the recommended rate of watering (day to day)
until potato finished its growth and development. Other cultural practices like weeding,
cultivation and plant protection methods will be done uniformly for all experimental plots as
recommended by EIAR (2007). Weeding the plot (bed) with the interval of a week. Data will be
collected accordingly with growth.
Number of leaves per plant: It will be taken by counting all leaves on randomly selected the
plant and the values recorded.
Number of stems per hill: Number of stems per hill will be taken by counting all stems per hill
on randomly selected the plant and the values recorded.
9
3.5.2. Yield parameters
Marketable tuber number per hill: Mean number of tubers produced from ten plants of middle
rows. It will be counted at harvest and those tubers which are healthy, large sized and greater
than 50g were considered as marketable tubers.
Unmarketable tuber number per hill: It will be recorded by counting average number of
tubers of ten plants, and rotten, diseased, insect infected, and green tubers and those with less
than 50g, weight will regarded as unmarketable tuber.
Total tuber number per hill: Mean number of tubers produced from the middle rows, will be
counted at harvest and expressed as number of tubers per hill.
10
3.7. Expected out come
From this experiment NP fertilizer which enhance good growth and yield component potato
will be identified.
3.8. Beneficiaries
From this research we believe that the following bodies who are interested in conducting
research on this crop will be benefited: farmer, researcher, students, horticulturalist, and
development agent.
4. Work plan
Table 2: A six month research plan
11
5. Budget breakdown
Table 3: Labor cost
Number Qualification Duration Quantity Payment Total
1 Field assistant 3 Months 1 150 150
2 Daily labors 6 days 3 100 600
Total 3.6 Months 4 250 750
12
6. References
AGRISNET, 2010. Department of Agriculture Government of Sikkim. India.
Alexander, S., J. Caldwell, H. Hohlt, B. Nault, C. O'Dell, S.Sterrett, and Wilson, H. 2001.
Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendations (No. 456-420) Virginia
Cooperative.
Bezabih, E., & Mengistu, N. (2011). Potato value chain analysis and development in Ethiopia.
Addis Abeba, Ethiopia.
Birtukan B., 2016. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer rates on growth, yield, yield
components and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Dedo, South west Ethiopia.
Brady, N.C. and R.R. Weil, 2002. The nature and properties of soils. Thirteen the edition.
Pearson Education Asia. Delhi, India. 960p.
Brady, N. C., & Weil, R. R. (2008). The nature and properties of soils. 14th Edition. Pearson
Education International, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. 975p. Macmillan Publishing
Co. Inc.
Brown, C.R., Culley, D., Bonierbale, M., Amoros, W., 2007. Anthocyanin, carotenoid content,
and antioxidant values in native South American potato cultivars. Horticulture Science
42, 1733–1736.
Central Statistical Agency (CSA), (2016). Agricultural sample survey. Report on area and
production of major crops. In S. Bulletin Ed., Agricultural sample survey. 125p. Addis
Ababa.
Chatterjee, 1993.Potao. In: Bose TK, Som MG, Kabir J (Eds). Vegetable crops. NayaProkash,
Calcutta, India. 382 - 469.
Decoteau, R. 2005. Principles of plant science. Educational factors and technology in growing
plants. Pearson education; Inc. New Jersey. 412.
Ethiopia Institute of Agricultural Research, (2007). Crop Technologies Guideline. Addis Ababa:
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research.
FAOSTAT (Food and Agriculture Organization Data of Statistics). 2014. Food and Agriculture
Organization Data of statistics. One hundred fifty eight countries data base.
http://faostat.fao.org /site/567/.
Hanneman, R.E., 1989. The potato germplasm resource. American Potato Journal 66, 655–667.
Haverkort, A., Van Koesveld, M., Schepers, H., Wijnands, J., Wustman, R., and Zhang, X. X.
(2012). Potato prospects for Ethiopia: On the road to value addition. PpoAgv.
13
Hielke D. J., Joseph, B. Sieczka and Walter. D. J. 2011. The complete book of potatoes what
every grower and gardener needs to know, 259.
Horton, D. E. 1987. Potatoes: Production, marketing, and programs for developing countries.
International Potato Center.
Jansky, S.H., Dempewolf, H., Camadro, E.L., Simon, R., Zimnoch-Guzowska, E., Bisognin,
D.A., Bonierbale, M., 2013. A case for crop wild relative preservation and use in potato.
Crop Science 53, 746–754.
Osman, S.F., Herb, S.F., Fitzpatrick, P.J., Schmiediche, P., 1978. Glycoalkaloid composition of
wild and cultivated tuber-bearing Solanum species of potential value in potato breeding
programs. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 26, 1246–1248.
Pervez, M. A., Ayyub, C. M., Shaheen, M. R., & Noor, M. A. (2013). Determination of physio
morphological characteristics of potato crop regulated by potassium management.
Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 50, 611–615.
Rykaczewska, K. 2013. The impact of high temperature during growing season on potato
cultivars with different response to environmental stresses. American Journal of Plant
Sciences, 4:2386-2393.
Sriom, S., Mishra, D. P., Rajbhar, P., Singh, D., Singh, R. K., & Mishra, S. K. (2017). Effect of
different levels of nitrogen on growth and yield in potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) Cv.
KufriKhyati. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6,
1456–1460. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608-428.
Tanner, C.B., G.G. Wells and Curwen, D. 1982. Russet Burbank rooting in sandy soils withpans
following deep ploughing American Potato Journal, 59: 107-112.
14