Why insurance wins over mutual funds

Insurance policies serve the purpose of 'mental accounting', which gives them a more
favourable positioning

By Vivek Kaul | Feb 10, 2017, Valueresearchonline.com

In my previous avatar as a full-time journalist I regularly wrote against the perils of investing
in unit- linked insurance plans, or ULIPs. There was almost no way of figuring out which was
the best ULIP going around. The commissions were high. And you couldn't just move from
one ULIP to another seamlessly as was the case with mutual funds. I also wrote about the
risks of investing in endowment plans offered by insurance companies. They were a low
return-high commission and totally non-transparent product. The high commissions on offer
were a major reason why most agents and distributors were interested in selling ULIPs and
other forms of insurance rather than mutual funds. It needs to be pointed out here that almost
all of what gets sold as insurance in India is a form of investment. Term insurance, which is
the real insurance, is barely sold.

Over the years, the commissions on ULIPs and other forms of insurance have been coming
down. Nevertheless, they still remain a popular form of investment. Why is that the case? The
answer might perhaps lie in what behavioural economists call mental accounting. Richard
Thaler, a pioneer in the field of behavioural economics and who coined the term 'mental
accounting', defines it as 'the inclination to categorise and treat money differently depending
on where it comes from, where it is kept and how it is spent.' Daniel Kahneman, a
psychologist who won the Nobel Prize in economics, explains mental accounting in further
detail in his book Thinking Fast and Slow. He writes, 'We hold our money in different
accounts, which are sometimes physical, sometimes only mental. We have spending money,
general savings, earmarked savings for our children's education or for medical emergencies.
There is a clear hierarchy in our willingness to draw on these accounts to cover current
needs.' He further points othat we use mental accounts for self-control purposes as well.

The concept of mental accounting is beautifully explained by Thaler and Cass Sunstein in
their book Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness through the
example of Hollywood actors Gene Hackman and Dustin Hoffman. As Thaler and Suntein
write, 'Hackman and Hoffman were friends back in their starving artist days, and Hackman
tells the story of visiting Hoffman's apartment and having his host ask him for a loan.
Hackman agreed to the loan, but then they went into Hoffman's kitchen, where several mason
jars were lined up on the counter each containing money. One jar was labelled 'rent', another
'utilities', and so forth. Hackman asked why, if Hoffmanhad so much money in jars, he could
possibly need a loan, whereupon Hoffman pointed to the food jar, which was empty.'

What this example clearly tells us is that in the minds of human beings cash or money or even
wealth is not fungible. As Thaler writes in Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioural
Economics, 'Money is fungible, meaning that it has no labels restricting what it can be spent
on....The failure to treat various pots of money as fungible... is what makes... [mental]
accounting... feasible.' Hence, money or wealth is also divided into mental accounts. As
Thaler writes: 'Wealth, too, is often separated into various mental accounts... This can lead to
the odd behaviour of simultaneously borrowing at a high rate of interest and saving at a low
rate, for example by keeping money in a savings account... while maintaining an outstanding
balance on a credit card that charges interest at more than 20% per year.'

How is all this linked to insurance and mutual funds? Insurance policies as they are sold are
more attuned to the concept of mental accounts. If you buy a child-plan ULIP, you are
essentially saving money for the education needs of your child. If you buy a pension plan,
you are saving money for retirement. These days there are even women only insurance plans,
which are apparently structured to meet the investment needs of women rather men.

As mentioned earlier cash is fungible. You can run a systematic investment plan (SIP) in a
mutual fund and still save money for your retirement or your child's education. It is just that it
doesn't sound the same. In your head you are not doing enough for your child. Neither are
you planning for a comfortable retirement. The mental accounts are not being satisfied.
Sometime back I remember seeing an insurance advertisement which shows a young woman
planning to study abroad and her father being worried about it until he comes to know that
she has already saved money for her education by investing in an insurance policy. I know
the phrase 'investing in an insurance policy' sounds odd, but that's how things have evolved in
India.

The point is that the woman in the advertisement did not have to buy an insurance policy to
save money for education. She could have bought a mutual fund as well. But she did not. To
conclude, it is important that mutual funds play the mental accounting game as well. Just
talking about fantastic annual returns over a period of five or ten years is just not enough.
Their approach towards marketing mutual funds is very cliched. They also need to tell the
potential consumer what mutual funds can be used to save money for. It is a simple yet very
powerful insight.