Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com
ScienceDirect

Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324

www.elsevier.com/locate/egyr

Tmrees, EURACA, 13 to 16 April 2020, Athens, Greece

Review of photovoltaic water pumping system research

Olga V. Shepovalova ∗, Alexander T. Belenov, Sergei V. Chirkov
Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center VIM (FSAC VIM), 1-st Institutskiy proezd, 5, Moscow, 109428, Russia
Received 12 August 2020; accepted 31 August 2020
Available online xxxx

Abstract
Currently a considerable and the most economically justified potential of making the solar energy conversion more efficient
and making the solar energy more attractive for consumers involves the coordination of the entire equipment from generation
to consumption while considering all this equipment as a unified system and taking the degree of satisfaction of the consumer
needs as the measure of efficiency. A photovoltaic water pumping system (PVWPS) is the first and one of few types of
ground photovoltaic systems where the consumption equipment was always considered from the onset as part of the system.
So a retrospective analysis of PVWPS research is of particular interest. This article contains the PVWPS research analysis
beginning with the first research conducted in 1964–1966 to date. Discussed herein are the main problems that arose in the
PVWPS development, operation, and optimization as well as options of their solution. Various areas of PVWPS improvement
research were analyzed, including research involving photovoltaic array structure and photovoltaic modules interconnection;
development and improvement of special structures of any components (pumps and invertors, etc.); improvement of photovoltaic
array and electric motor interaction, electric motor and pump interaction against the backdrop of irradiance variation and in
conjunction with consumption optimization and control improvement, to start with maximum power point tracing. It would make
sense to aim further research involving cost reduction, productivity gain, and PVWPS service life extension at the expansion
of the fields of PVWPS application, improvement of individual PVWPS components, and a more efficient use of water that
is drawn. One of the prospective lines of PVWPS improvement and upgrading is to include them in the system of end user
consumption equipment and assess the system efficiency not at the pump output and not in the point of end consumption
equipment but after the water consumption. Studying PVWPS with the account of the fact that, in real conditions, the average
output power of photovoltaic array depends not only on irradiance but also on the combined effect of all environmental
conditions (climatic parameters, current state of atmosphere and air, surrounding objects, etc.) is of great importance, today.
⃝c 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the Tmrees, EURACA, 2020.

Keywords: Photovoltaic water pumping system; Efficiency; Performance analysis; Optimization of components and controls; Water supply;
Irrigation

1. Introduction
Today an increase in photovoltaic water pumping system (PVWPS) efficiency using the inherent properties of
photovoltaic equipment (varying the design and manufacturing technology of photovoltaic (PV) modules and PV
∗ Corresponding author.
E-mail address: shepovalovaolga@mail.ru (O.V. Shepovalova).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.08.053
2352-4847/⃝ c 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the Tmrees, EURACA, 2020.
 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324 307

Nomenclature
AC alternating current
CP centrifugal pump
DC direct current
G irradiance (W/m2 )
Gmin minimum irradiance level within the operating range (W/m2 )
I motor-pump current (A)
Iopt PV array current in maximum power point (in optimal point) (A)
MC mechanic characteristics with the reflecting surface
MPPT maximum power point tracing
P array PV array power (W)
array
Pmax maximum PV array power (W)
Pmax STC maximum PV array power at STC (W)
PV photovoltaic
PVWPS photovoltaic water pumping system
Q CP flow rate (m3 /h)
R multiplier resistance (Ω )
STC Standard Test Conditions
V motor-pump voltage (V)
Vopt PV array voltage in maximum power point (in optimal point) (V)
WG working gear

cells) in many instances is technologically inexpedient and unprofitable for production in bulk. The PV modules and
cells efficiency has reached such a level where the costs of introducing new, more efficient devices into production
are often not sufficiently justified.
A considerable and more economically justified potential of making the solar energy conversion more efficient
and also making the solar energy more attractive for consumers involves the coordination of the entire equipment
from generation to consumption while considering all this equipment as a unified system and taking the degree
of satisfaction of the consumer needs as the measure of efficiency (Izmailov et al. 2019 [1]). The more so as it
is accepted for quite some time now that an efficient PV system, by virtue of its peculiarities, should comprise
consumption equipment even if implicitly (as represented by all characteristics and parameters of components and
detailed description).
Such an approach is in line with the general trends of increasing efficiency of any energy supply systems. The
PV systems are the most critical case of energy supply systems with the most obvious necessity of having regard
to all the particularities of energy conversion from generation to consumption. And a PVWPS is the first and one
of few types of ground PV systems where the consumption equipment was always explicitly considered as part of
the system (Izmailov et al. 2018 [2]).
PVWPS are supplied in their complete set of equipment in which photoelectric part and PV equipment (electric
pump assembly) are sized to fit each other. In optimal design and manufacture conditions, this concept shall be
applied to any type of PV systems dedicated not only for energy generation into power networks, in order to insure
the maximum effectiveness of their application.
Many-year studies of PVWPS were focused mainly on achieving coordinated interactions between various
components of photoelectric part and PV equipment of systems. At the same time, such studies for PV systems used
in a majority of other applications, on a level of generic solutions in the field of compatibility between photoelectric
part and PV equipment have not been intensive and significant.
In this connection, expanding the experience of PVWPS development onto PV systems of other types is of
considerable interest. Detailed analysis of experience obtained in the course of PVWPS development is of great
importance for designers and manufacturers of PV systems, as well as for enterprises operating such systems.
308 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324

Therefore, a wide-scale use of PVWPS is rather desirable since they have a number of substantial advantages
compared to other water supply systems, particularly in remote areas and locations with high solar energy potential.
Solar water pump systems require minimum of maintenance and do not consume organic fuels. Unlike conventional
water pumps, correctly designed and sized PVWPS are capable to provide essential long-term savings.
Taking this into account, a retrospective analysis of PVWPS research and improvement stages in terms of a
consistent enhancement of components, improvement of interaction between the photovoltaic part of the systems
and consumption equipment in combination with consumption accounting and optimization is of particular interest.

2. Photovoltaic water pumping system research

The research involving PVWPS began in 1964 (Lidorenko et al. 1965 [3]; Tarnizhevsky and Rodichev, 1966 [4];
Tarnizhevsky and Rodichev, 1968 [5]). In the first phase, several options of power supply to a motor-pump from a PV
array were considered, including those with or without application of a buffer battery of any capacity (Belenov, and
Tarnizhevsky, 1969 [6]). The analysis was performed while observing in all of the options the equality of average
daily power consumption by the pump’s electrical motor with a 9-hour PV array generation per day; minimum
difference between the actually generated PV array power P array and maximum PV array power Pmax array at the
minimum irradiance level within the operating range Gmin ; and provided that equally uninterrupted water supply to
the consumer is guaranteed. The options were compared by PV array rated power (maximum PV array power at
Standard Test Conditions (STC)); by its relative cost and generated electrical energy utilization factor; by battery
capacity and water tank volume; by the number and complexity of automatic control system components; and by
the pump electric motor start-up conditions at Gmin .
The comparisons showed that the lowest relative PV array cost and the highest probability of commercial
application is provided by the option at which P array = Pmax array with G = G min and the battery is only used
for power supply to the automatic control system. Hence the simplest schematic block diagram without a buffer
battery was taken as a basis of further research: PV array–DC motor–working gear (WG). A centrifugal pump (CP)
or centrifugal-vortex pump was used as WG the PV array and electric motor powers being commensurable. It was
supposed that in the most commercial option the ratio of PV array rated power to the pump electric motors rated
power should be equal to 1.2–1.25. The subsequent construction and operation of PVWPS having the same structure
confirmed the results obtained in various countries. For example, in Akker and Lipp. (2004) [7] CPs with electric
motor of rated power 1450 W were directly powered by a PV array of rated power 1800 W (the ratio being 1.24).
The research Belenov (1967) [8], Belenov and Voronetsky (1968) [9], Belenov and Voronetsky (1971) [10],
Belenov and Shepovalova (2017) [11] showed that the power supply to the electric motor from the PV array of a
commensurable power entails a substantial change in the parameters of mechanic characteristics (MC) n = f (T ),
i.e. dependences of the electric motor shaft speed on developed torque in all types of direct current (DC) motors: an
independent, parallel or series excitation of magnetic field. Furthermore, the research showed that the MC parameters
are influenced by the PV array rated power and, therefore, irradiance and its variation during daylight hours, as well
as the connection circuits of PV modules.
As presented in Chilikin and Sandler (1981) [12] in conditions of stable electric grid voltage supply natural MCs
of one and the same DC motor operating in modes of independent or parallel excitation are practically identical.
They are absolutely linear, they exhibit insignificant rotation speed reduction with the rising DC motor output torque
and they can be characterized by relatively high value of starting torque that 5 to 10 times exceeds normal values.
The natural MC of serially excited DC motor, according to Chilikin and Sandler (1981) [12] data, has a hyperbolic
shape with abnormally high rotation speed corresponding to operation conditions when the load on shaft is lower
than 15% to its rated value. It also has a very high value of starting torque (higher than that of DC motor with
independent and parallel excitation).
As carried out by research Belenov (1967) [8], Belenov and Voronetsky (1968) [9], Belenov and Voronetsky
(1971) [10], Belenov and Shepovalova (2017) [11] these typical characteristics change significantly when DC motor
is supplied from PV array of comparable power. Particularly, starting torque ratio deceases to values 0.3 to 1.5
compared to those corresponding to optimal DC motor’s operation mode depending on excitation method. The
characteristics of DC motors with parallel and independent excitation appear to have completely different shapes
and they become non-linear and smoother ones. DC motors with series excitation can operate in full-load loss mode
while for torques exceeding their nominal values this dependence loses its hyperbolic character, and rotation speed
falls abruptly up to zero. Fig. 1 shows the families of natural MC for three DC motors of practically equal rated
 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324 309

Fig. 1. Mechanic characteristics of DC motors with series, MV-42 motor (1), independent, SL-570S motor (2), and parallel , SL-571K
motor (3) excitation fed from PV array of comparable power. Pmax STC = 280 W and G = 800 ± 10 W/m2 (Belenov and Shepovalova,
2017 [11]).
array
Symbol # indicates operation condition P array = Pmax .

power with different excitation systems (i.e. of series, independent and parallel types) fed from directly connected
by the same PV array having rated power equal to 280 W, for solar radiation intensity G = 800 ± 10 W/m2 .
Substantial change in shape of curves and varying parameters of DC motors’ mechanic characteristics for DC
motors fed from PV array of comparable power was conditioned by:
– low starting current ratio (1.15 to 1.35) of electric motor armature defined by PV array short-circuit current in
relation to its value for nominal operation mode,
– abrupt decrease of voltage across windings of electric motor with parallel excitation during startup,
– nearly linear dependence of short-circuit current and optimal current of PV array on the irradiance,
– variability of these PV array currents depending on incoming radiation parameters and on temperature of PV
cells.
The MC research was model-based and carried out by solving nonlinear equation systems and using a graphic
analytic method. The obtained results were affirmed experimentally with the electric motor powered by the PV array
in natural sunlight conditions in Lidorenko et al. (1966) [13]. When performing research, two types of specially
developed samples of electromagnetic torque meter brakes were used. As a PV array, a photovoltaic installation
with parabolic concentrators was used (concentration ratio 8.5; PmaxSTC = 500 W; actually measured power level
P array = 420 W with a direct irradiance of 800 W/m2 and optimal voltage of 34 V; open circuit voltage: 45.8 V;
short-circuit current: 16.1 A, 6 strings of 7 PV modules in each).
Analysis of the PV array–electric motor–WG system for actual operation environment and conditions was carried
out based on family of curves of MC for various values of irradiance (G = var), various values of PV array rated
power and different variants of PV modules interconnection in PV array. These families of mechanic characteristic
curves for G = var actualizes in real conditions following the daily cycle of irradiance, change in ambient temperature
and wind conditions. With rising or decreasing solar radiation intensity, values of starting and optimal torque
increase or decrease, proportionally. In these conditions, values of DC motor’s idle speed (i.e. shaft speed) without
any external load do not vary at all (for parallel excitation) or vary insignificantly (for independent and series
excitation). Some results of experimental research into the families of MC of motors with series, independent and
parallel excitation (which are the same as in Fig. 1) are shown in Fig. 2 (Belenov and Shepovalova, 2017 [11]).
The subsequent research into the interaction of commutator DC motors and PV arrays, when they are
directly connected, completely confirmed the results of our theoretic approaches, calculated data, and experiments
(Appelbaum and Bany, 1979 [14]; Appelbaum, 1981 [15]; Roger, 1979 [16]; Singh and Wahi, 1981 [17]; Hsiao and
Blevins, 1984 [18]; Abete et al. [19]).
310 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324

Fig. 2. Family of DC motors mechanic characteristics with various excitation (Belenov and Shepovalova, 2017 [11]).
(a) series (MV-42 motor); (b) parallel (SL-571K motor); (c, d) independent (SL-570S and SL-571K motors, respectively). (a, b) varying
irradiance; (c, d) various values of PV array parameters.
Symbol # indicates operation condition R array = Rmax array .

Autonomously operated system comprising PV array, DC motor and WG is characterized by instability of

maximal possible generated power Pmax array (for constant G value) and power P array actually generated in these
conditions depending on, first of all, radiation intensity varying during solar time. Real shape and parameters of
DC motors’ mechanic characteristics, shape and parameters of the load characteristics of the WG (pump), as well
as an eventual variation of water lift height and water consumption in the period of system operation significantly
affect the values of P array . So dependences Pmax array = Iopt × Vopt = f (G) and P array = I array × V array = ϕ (G) are
not identical. For a wide range of irradiance variation, difference ∆P = Pmax array − P array characterizing utilization
rate of PV array’s rated power may attain rather high values, in the self-adaptive PV array–electric motors–WG
system, in spite that for calculated irradiance level parameters values of Pmax array and P array are practically equal to
each other
This is thrown into sharp relief in Fig. 3 where the family of PV array current–voltage curves is shown within
the limits of irradiance variation from 200 W/m2 to 1000 W/m2 . The maximum power points P array = Pmax array are
dotted and two load characteristics I = ψ1 (V ) and I = ψ2 (V ) are shown in respect of different electric motors and
pumps. The load characteristic No. 1 I = ψ1 (V ) meets the condition of P array = Pmax array at G = 200 W/m2 and
the calculated point for the load characteristic No. 2 I = ψ2 (V ) is the equation of P array = Pmax array at G = 1000
W/m2 (Standard Test Conditions).
The analysis of the characteristics in Fig. 3 demonstrated that in a stand-alone and self-adaptive PV array–electric
motors–WG system there is no possibility of fully using the PV array power except in calculated points. Owing to
the natural daily variation of irradiance, the utilization factor Pmax STC and, therefore, PV cells efficiency decreases,
at first inconsiderably and then substantially. Thus, for the load characteristic 1, at G = 600 W/m2 the utilization
factor of PV array power is only 0.59, while at G = 1000 W/m2 it decreases to 0.48. For the load characteristic 2,
 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324 311

Fig. 3. Interrelation of PV array and electric motor–WG characteristics at irradiance variation within 200–1000 W/m2 (Roger et al. 1980 [20]).

when the irradiance goes down to 600 W/m2 , the PV array rated power falls to 0.75 and at 400 W/m2 it falls to
0.26. The PV cells efficiency diminishes in the same proportion.
No PV arrays were used in the researched stand-alone and self-adaptive systems with full power throughout the
light day and the high values of PV cells efficiency, as a matter of fact, were solely utilized during a small portion
of light day periods. So for the purposes of more efficiently using the PV array power, increasing the daily energy
generation, and, accordingly, the system’s rate of water output, it was proposed to forcibly control the value of
P array at irradiance variable bringing it up, as much as possible, to the value of Pmax array . As a result, a number of
alternate technical solutions arose to eliminate or reduce the impact of this unfavorable effect.
In late 1960s it was proposed to employ a step (discrete) control of a stand-alone PV array–electric motors–WG
system for securing its operation in near-optimum modes. Particularly, in Belenov and Tarnizhevsky (1969) [21]
three ways were outlined and developed in general terms:
– series–parallel automatic switching of PV modules;
– use of PV array fractional load, i.e. connection PV array with two or more different power consumers;
– forced variation of the pump flow rate (and, hence, consumed power P array ) through a change of the pump
impellers’ rotation speed by under-fluxing the exciting winding of power motor.
The method of discrete series–parallel switching of PV modules can be implemented if they are in sufficient
quantity and there are no unused PV modules when the required PV modules connection circuits are created. The
sufficient quantity of artificially created circuits may be 3 or 4 subject to the width of the operating range of
irradiance variation. Efficiency of this optimization method for a stand-alone PV array–electric motors–WG system
is illustrated in Figs. 4 and 5. Fig. 4 shows three families of PV array current–voltage curves with three circuits
of series–parallel PV modules connection (4×6, 3×8, 2×12) and at irradiance variation 250 to 950 W/m2 . It also
includes the load characteristic of the consumer that is motor-pump: I = ψ(V). The boundary values of irradiance
at which circuit switching is required were determined based on equality of the power outputs of the two adjacent
connection circuits. The calculations demonstrated that for the chosen PV array option assembled of 24 PV modules
the conditions of a connection circuit switching should correspond to the data in Table 1.

Table 1. Calculation results for switching moment of PV module connection circuits.

Initial connection circuits (number of parallel strings × number of series 6 × 4 4 × 6 3 × 8
connected modules in a string)
Finite connection circuits (number of parallel strings × number of series 4 × 6 3 × 8 2 × 12
connected modules in a string)
Expected level of irradiance at the moment of switch (W/m2 ) 202 390 618
312 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324

Fig. 4. Experimental families of current–voltage curves with different PV array connection circuits and different values of irradiance and
load characteristic of the consumer I = ψ (V) by Belenov and Metlov (2014) [22].

Fig. 5. Dependence of power generated by PV array (P array ) on irradiance with different PV array connection circuits and under motor-pump
operation with load characteristics I = ψ(V ) by Belenov and Metlov (2014) [22].

A positive influence of using different PV module connection circuits on the PVWPS productivity was
demonstrated in other studies such as Belenov and Aliev (1987) [23], Belenov and Shkatov (1989) [24], Matam
(2018) [25]. However the application of the circuit switching method was associated with a considerably higher
consumption of copper conductors, use of supplementary interposing relays with power-plant contact units, growth
of ohmic losses in wires and contact joints. The PV module circuit switch control turned out to be relatively
expensive and with regard to PVWPS for low-debit wells the water output gain was not justified by purchase,
adjustment, maintenance, and repair costs for such a device as a whole. Thereafter in Askarov et al. (1983) [26] it
was proposed to substitute some contact joints by diodes functioning as switches upon current reversal which made
the method more reliable by reducing the number of contacts but did not curtail the copper conductor consumption.
Beginning in the mid-1970s several patents for PV module switching circuits were obtained with the aim of
power take-off optimization, a number of articles on series–parallel PV module connection circuits were published
(e.g. Turfler et al. (1980) [27]) but these solutions scarcely found commercial application, inter alia, due to
substantially more sophisticated connection circuits, a higher consumption of copper conducting material, and a
higher ohmic losses in wires and contacts.
The use of fractional load for optimizing the power take-off mode in a stand-alone PV array–electric motors–
WG system showed that 2 consumers would be enough in such systems with a 1:2 power proportion and actuation
algorithm based on irradiance increase 0.5; 1.0; 1.5 (Grigoyan, 1969 [28]). During research in the period of service
testing at the watering point of Ovez-Shikh (Turkmenistan), two PV array–electric motors–WG system units were
 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324 313

in operation drawing salt water from the well and pumping sweet water into the impounding basin (Lidorenko.
1969 [29]). The input power P array was generally close to Pmax array . Considered in Gasque et al. (2020) [30] is a
typical example of optimization through the distribution of PV array generated power in a pumping system composed
of two equal power pumps operating in parallel. Nevertheless the connection of more than one consumers of different
or equal power to the same PV array not always may be translated into practice.
The method of PV array–electric motors–WG system optimization through a forced change of the power motor
shaft rotation speed driven by weakening the magnetic flux created by its exciting winding requires to use neither
supplementary wires in PV array connection circuits nor another electric motors–WG unit. This technique is based
on the quadratic dependence of the CP shaft input power on the pump impellers’ rotation speed with a relatively
low value of its breakaway torque. The implementation of this method is simple and does not require any material
additional costs because the speed of a DC motor of any kind of electromagnetic excitement may be easily controlled
by means of magnetic flux weakening.
These optimization methods have been developed in Sharma et al. (2017) [31], Mahmoud et al. (2019) [32], Talbi
et al. (2018) [33], Ksentini and Azzag (2019) [34], Xie and Deng (2006) [35], Cbergui and Benaissa (2015) [36].
Studies Chilikin, and Sandler (1981) [12] have shown that the DC motor speed control by magnetic flux
weakening is the most energy saving and may be quite simply implemented in independent, parallel or series
excited electric motors. Such control reliably ensures control limits in relation to the magnitude of velocity with
a rated magnetic flux of 1.5:1 to 4:1 for an independent or parallel excited motors and to 2:1 for a series excited
motors. Therefore, where necessary, the CP flow rate and, accordingly, power consumed from the PV array P array
may be forcibly increased 1.5 times at least.
While conducting experiments with a Kama centrifugal–whirling pump and DC motor SL-570 (see MC in Figs. 1
and 2) in independent and parallel excitement modes, a magnetic flux weakening was achieved by introducing
multiplier resistance R into the motor excitation winding circuit (Belenov, 2000 [37]). In the experimental PV
array–electric motors–CP system the dependences Pmax array = f (G) and P array = ϕ(G) were researched at R = var
and irradiance variation within 450–900 W/m2 . The analysis of the obtained dependencies confirmed efficiency of
the proposed input power control method. The experiment allowed to determine the values of multiplier resistance
that secures, for a specific PV array–electric motors–CP system with a specific type of motors, the PV array operation
near maximum power point and relevant parameters at the moment of switching from one multiplier resistance value
to another. It enabled to appraise the resulting PV array efficiency growth and increase in the system’s rate of water
output.
In Shermazanyan et al. (1970) [38] the adopted method of power control in a PV array–electric motors–CP system
was implemented on the basis of the developed four-stage discrete speed controller of a tracking type ensuring a
variation of the R value in the irradiance value function. Individual PV cells in short-circuit conditions were used
as primary sensors of the controller. They were located in conditions being similar, by external influence, to the
PV array operation conditions. Consequently, the sensors current values were virtually proportional to the PV array
energetic capabilities.
In on-site conditions (Gelendzhik, Russia), the quantitative efficiency evaluation of automatic control of CP flow
rate Q and increase in power take-off from the PV array by the electric motors–CP aggregate using the proposed
technique was carried out at irradiance 450 to 805 W/m2 owing to which only two (of four) controller stages actuated
(Belenov, 2000 [37]). The daily G, Q and Pmax array variation diagrams related to the parallel excited electric motors
experiment are represented in Fig. 6. Dotted are the modes that could take place without control and with a one-stage
actuation of the controller. The experimental data analysis showed that even with a two-stage control the PVWPS
capacity by daily water supply volume was up 15% and the CP hourly flow rate was up 9%–19%. Thus, at 10 a.m.
and 03 p.m. the water supply rose by 9.1%–10%, while at 11 a.m.–02 p.m. by 18–19.4%. The graphic analytic
evaluation of the maximally possible control efficiency with irradiance variation in a wider range of 420–950 W/m2
and calculations showed that the daily energy generation and water supply increment in a controlled system could
be 18–29%. Further research in this area led to the development of a host of devices used to regulate the efficiency
of photovoltaic water pumping systems fitted out with commutator motors of all the three types of excitation, in
particular Belenov et al. (2018) [39].
The method of raising the PVWPS performance by automatic discrete control of the shaft rotation speed in the
electric motor–CP set within the irradiance variation function is quite efficient and simple to implement. However
it was not translated into practice due to the then existing high mortality of the DC commutator motor’s brush
314 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324

Fig. 6. Daily performance curve of motor-pump powered by the PV array of a commensurable power using the speed controller of a power
motor in the irradiance value function (Belenov, 2000 [37]).

assembly when used in outdoor apparatuses, as well as in connection with the change-over from DC motor-driven
pumps to alternating current (AC) vibration pumps, more convenient in service.
To enhance the utilization efficiency of the PV array power even more, it was proposed in the research Zinger,
and Braunstein (1981) [40] to combine a PV module connection circuit switch called ‘direct-current transformer’
(DCT) with magnetic flux variations of the electric motor whose excitation winding is connected to the PV array
in parallel with the DCT. With small mechanical load changes, the PV array and electric motor operation was
coordinated by relevant variation of the excitation winding magnetic flux. In case of considerable load variations,
including a change-over from the start-up mode to a normal one, a DCT with a two or three-stage switching system
is put into action. In the research author’s opinion, the proposed method is expedient to apply in water-pumping
installations powered by PV arrays. Such coordination between the PV array optimal mode and load allows to
prevent up to 50% loss of energy which the PV array could potentially generate during the daily irradiance and
load variation.
One of the options of increasing electric energy generation in the PVWPS’s PV array–electric motor system
by weakening the motor magnetic flux is considered in Aidan et al. (1983) [41] with regard to refrigeration units
powered by PV arrays. The results of experimental corroboration of this technical solution carried out using a
750 W electric motor powered by PV array over an area of 7.5 m2 are represented in Fig. 7. To implement this
method, it was proposed to build two supplementary (compound) magnetizing windings in the electric motors; the
windings would be connected in series to the motor armature circuit and their magnetic flux in steady-state operation
would creep counter-currently with respect to the main magnetic flux. When irradiance grew, the armature current
stepped up and, hence, back induction of these supplementary excitation windings increased. So this weakened
the total magnetic field, picked up the compressor’s electric motor speed, and increased the power take-off from
the PV array. During the motor start-up and acceleration, these supplementary (compound) electric motors would
temporarily actuate according to the main magnetic flow to facilitate a more reliable electric motors starting at low
levels of irradiance, and only after full electric motor acceleration, on speed sensor signal, they would switch over
to the proposed speed and power control mode (counter-currently in relation to the main magnetic flux) securing a
smooth speed variation as a feedback link in accordance with the required trend.
In early 1980s in Roger et al. (1980) [20] for reducing the difference ∆P = Pmax array − P array , it was proposed
to install in a stand-alone PV array–load system, between PV modules and load, special means of an electronic
 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324 315

Fig. 7. Family of PV array current–voltage curves and load characteristic of electric motor integral with compound excitation windings for
driving the compressor (area of PV array active surface is 7,5 m2 ; G = 250÷1000 W/m2 ) by Aidan et al. (1983) [41].

adaptor so that the PV array could always run in the maximum power point bringing all the usable electric energy
into load. A circuit breaker was chosen as a matching device base. Two types of breakers were studied and tested:
a series one and a parallel one. Series breakers were used for a maximum power of 1.5 kW, while parallel breakers
for the power range of 1 to 10 kW. The efficiency of a series matching device was 0.9 for 80 W load and 0.98 for
300 W or higher load; transistors were used in its technology. In case of a parallel breaker, two technologies were
implemented: transistor and thyristor for each of which efficiency amounted on average to 0.93 with load power
1–5 kW.
Each matching device, irrespective of its type, should satisfy the following conditions: be powered by a PV
array only; couple the PV array to its optimal impedance (i.e. overall pure resistance and reactance), whatever is
the level of radiance; ensure high reliability and need no periodic tune-up; respond to the thermal bias of the PV
module current–voltage curves caused by PV cells heating. The operating principle of the matching device was as
follows. A power capacitor forming a part of the device charged until the PV array voltage achieved the value V1
and discharged when the voltage reached the value V2 the values V1 and V2 being in vicinity of the optimal value
Vopt . As the value Vopt could change when the PV modules temperature varied, a platinum temperature sensor was
employed with a feedback circuit for automatic adjustment of the values V1 and V2 . Block diagram for parallel
adaptor is shown in Fig. 8.

Fig. 8. Block diagram of parallel matching device (Roger et al. 1980 [20]).

The series matching device had a very high efficiency and was suitable for powers below 1.5 kW. It prevented a
loss of portion of the obtained power in poorly coordinated systems, such as water pumping systems, refrigerator
316 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324

compressors, and resistance loads. On the other hand, the interest in parallel matching devices involved the
possibility of using high-voltage loads under a low-voltage connection circuit of PV modules that would reduce,
firstly, ohmic losses in the motors and interconnecting wires and, secondly, would enable to obsolete high-voltage
connection circuits of PV modules.
The further development of this technical solution resulted in the creation of individual devices Maximum Power
Point Tracing (MPPT) controllers based on improved and more reliable electronic components. The research of
recent years involving the use of MPPT controllers in PVWPS was devoted to the improvement of control algorithm,
application of various up-to-date programs, extension of relations, and optimization of influencing parameters
accounting (Rahrah et al. 2015 [42]; Khatib et al. 2017 [43]; Khazane and Tissir, 2018 [44]; Ehssein et al. 2018 [45];
Rafika et al. 2018 [46]; Yahyaoui et al. 2015 [47]. They are widely applied in the systems fitted out with DC and
AC motors and PVWPS circuits containing intermediate batteries or energy-intensive power capacitors (Das and
Mandal, 2018 [48]).
A direct connection of a PV array and a DC motor is the simplest, cheapest, and most reliable technique of
converting solar energy into mechanical one. That is why it is just this option which was chosen in the initial
phases of developing PVWPS. The AC motors of the then existing motor-pumps were replaced with commutator
DC motors suitable by power and speed the latter being generally installed on the surface for easier access to the
electric motors terminals and brush assembly. Subsequently special pumps were developed with a submersible DC
or AC motors, centrifugal-type floating motor-pumps with a DC motors, etc.
When creating a stand-alone PVWPS, for the purpose of minimizing the cost, the water delivery height was
taken as a maximum of 30 m with the maximal daily supply volume of 7.5 m3 which met the requirements of
the bulk of primary PVWPS consumers. To minimize the preliminary designing costs, series-produced pumps were
used. As basic ones, series-produced Malysh-type vibration pumps were chosen which were capable of providing
for the required water delivery heights and volumes and were easy to operate. Main efforts were made to develop
an invertor converting the direct current generated by PV array into alternating current, suitable for powering the
vibration pump, and matching the PV array parameters with the pump parameters, as well as develop PV modules
for implementing the necessary connection circuits best suited, by current and voltage values, to operate as a specific
packaged system ‘invertor–pump.’ For this purpose, the PV array parameters (power, current, voltage) were supposed
to be differentiated subject to the range of daily water supply volumes (0.5 m3 , 1.5 m3 , 6 m3 ) and water lift heights
(10 m, 20 m, 25 m, 30 m).
Beginning in late 1970s PVWPS were developed, manufactured, and put into operation in the Kazakh, Turkmen,
and Armenian Soviet Socialist Republics (Bazarov et al. 1977 [49]). They contained a special invertor worked out
for converting direct current into alternating current and configured to being powered by a high-voltage connection
circuit of PV modules with the use of some PV modules for invertor power feeding. As a powering source, a PV
array was employed consisting of 24 or 36 units of 10 W that created at the invertor inlet an operating voltage of
about 200 V and auxiliary voltage of 20 V for powering the invertor circuit. With powering by a PV array, the
invertor–pump set, when it was tested in Kazakhstan at a dug well with a static water level of 12 m, went into
operation at G > 680 W/m2 and went out at G < 345 W/m2 , while at G = 800 W/m2 it ensured a pumping flow
rate of 800 l/h. During the tests in Erevan, the same invertor–pump set powered by the same PV array, with G =
915÷950 W/m2 and a maximum water head of 15 m, ensured the water supply of 500–600 l/h. Nevertheless these
invertor circuits required to single out a separate source from several PV modules with a 20 V electric tension for
powering the circuit which thereafter led to their abandonment in terms of production and use.
Within the same period (since July 1979), the implementation of Project ‘Small-Scale Solar-Powered Pumping
System’ started on the initiative of UN humanitarian departments and the World Bank (UNDP Project GLO/80/003,
1983 [50]). On the second stage of Project (from April 1981 to March 1983) comparative test were carried out
followed by the evaluation of operability and effectiveness of 12 anticipatorily selected PVWPS produced by various
manufacturers, and a general economical characterization of PVWPS was made. All selected PVWPS were divided
into 3 categories according to their hydraulic parameters:
– category A applies to systems with 60 m3 /day flow rate, for 2 m lift (water head), designed mainly for irrigation
applications,
– category B applies to systems with 60 m3 /day flow rate, for 7 m water head, designed for application in
irrigation or/and water supply installations,
– category C applies to systems with 20 m3 /day flow rate, for 20 m water head, designed for water supply of
dwellings and farms.
 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324 317

All comparative tests were performed in conditions of sunny weather characterized by the aggregate solar
radiation incoming onto horizontal surface 5 kWh/m2 per day. It made it possible to compare systems with high
reliability based on their output parameters of water supply. Four installations were tested in each category. Operation
in conditions of daily solar radiation of 4 kWh/m2 was permitted with 70% reduction of performance. In the course
of tests, efficiency had to be not less than 75% of its design value, for water head variations within the range 75%
to 150%.
One of the systems in category A failed to perform its functions (Manegon manufacturer, USA). Besides, only
six installations of twelve (2 samples in each category) had complete set of equipment, i.e. were equipped with
PV arrays. Therefore, in category A, only products of Solar Electric International (Malta) and installation by TPK
(Canada) passed the tests. Systems of the first type were equipped with PV modules manufactured by Solar Power
(USA), electric motor by AEG (Germany), floating CP by KSB (Germany) while the other system had PV modules
and water pump of original manufacture and electric motor by Boston Gear (Canada) These two systems had daily
performance 90 m3 and 16 m3 for PV arrays rated power 350 W and 210 W, respectively. In category B, two systems
passed the complete test program. One was manufactured by AEG and equipped with original PV modules, electric
motor produced by Engel and floating CP by Loewe. This system had daily performance 73 m3 , for 614 W rated
power of PV array. The other system manufactured by KSB having PV array with rated power 480 W had electric
motor by AEG and original floating CP of type Aquasol-50M. It was able to supply 48 m3 water per day.
In category C, PVWPS manufactured by Grundfos demonstrated good performance. I was equipped with three-
phase AC motor, inverter with controlled frequency and multi-stage rotary pump of original design. This system
was capable to supply 33 m3 per day, for rated power of PV array of 840 W. Among systems that have passed
the tests was that by Vmlamb (USA) with PV modules manufactured by Arco Solar having aggregate rated power
555 W. It was equipped with Honeywell DC motor and pump jack by Baker. Its daily performance was about 15 m3
to 16 m3 .
Generally, average daily efficiency of PVWPSs that have passed the tests was within the range from 0.6% to
3.8%, for specified values of water head. According to these tests, the best results in category A demonstrated the
system by Solar Electrical International with 2.3% efficiency, while in category B those were products by KSB
(3.4%) and AEG (2.8%). In category C, the highest efficiency was obtained for systems manufactured by Grundfos
(3.8%) and Vmlamb (2.5%). Of all of the 12 systems selected for tests only that by Grundfos included AC electric
motor and DC-AC inverter with variable AC frequency. All other systems were equipped with DC motor connected
to PV array either directly or via maximum power point tracking blok.
It was found out, in the course of tests that operational energy efficiency of subsystem ‘motor-pump’ and the
effectiveness of factual use of PV array maximum power by this subsystem differ for different PVWPS architectures
and for various water heads (McNelis, 1987 [51]). Floating and submersible units use most effectively the PV array
maximum power. Such assemblies comprise DC motor (either with or without brushes) installed exteriorly and CP.
Their mean value of this parameter, for water head 7 m, was 40% while the maximum value was as high as 60%.
Other PVWPS architectures (for other values of water heads) were, in general, characterized by lower effectiveness
with its mean values 30%, 35% and 40%, and maximum values 40%, 45% and 50%. As far as energy efficiency
of ‘motor-pump’ subsystems is concerned, the best indicators were obtained for water heads 50 m and higher (but
not exceeding 100 m). Their average daily efficiency was 35%, while its maximum value was 45%. For other water
heads, average efficiency values were in the range from 25% to 32% while the best results were 30% to 42%.
Since 1985, two-year field test of PVWPSs have been carried out in various areas of Jordan, in the frames of
the program on reliable round-the-clock water supply for habitants of deserted areas with the use of PV batteries
(Odeh and Mahmoud, 1995 [52]). One of the principal goals of this program was to demonstrate ability of
PVWPS to ensure high operability and reliability in environmental conditions of deserts compared to conventional
water-pumping systems equipped with diesel engine drive. Measurements were performed automatically with the
use of dedicated data samplers having the functions of statistical processing and storage of sampled data in data
bases for further use and analysis. As an example, the following information on water pump station Shara El-Hasa
may be of particular interest: PV array rated power having the surface area of PV modules 45.36 m2 was 6300 W.
Its daily performance was 47 m3 , for average water head 81.3 m. This performance value was achieved for average
daily insolation 6.2 kWh/m2 during Spring–Autumn season of the year. The mean daily value of energy efficiency
varied from 2.45%, in September, to 3.7%, in January.
In 1986, Electrotechnical department of State New Mexico (USA) initiated and carried out a survey by
questioning the users of 111 photovoltaic water-pumping systems installed during the period of 1981–1985 of which
318 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324

74 stations had DC motors while the rest of them were equipped with AC electric motors operating from 60 Hz
power supply (Schaefer, 1986 [53]). The PV arrays maximum power was in the range 110 W to 2080 W. This
study had shown that 86.5% of installations retained their operability. 15 systems that were not operable of which
6 stations had failed converters, 4 stations failed to operate due to the damage of pump and 5 stations had problems
that were not related to PVWPS. It was found out that AC PVWPSs were not so reliable compared to those powered
from DC supply in which electric motor is connected to PV array either directly or via converter. Major problems
were associated with charging control of battery used to power electric motor in cloudy weather (24%), with inverter
operation (17%), with electric motor failure (11%) and with mechanical problems in pump (11%). Among all end
users participated in this survey, 84% characterized PVWPS as a reliable system while only 13% gave a negative
feedback. In 94% of all cases, systems were installed and commissioned by manufacturer representatives having
adequate qualification. Similarly to research made in [6], the most effective were DC PVWPSs without buffer
battery. Such systems included DC-AC converter, when it was necessary.
Fig. 9 presents application fields for various types of pumps having various types of electric motor for
PVWPS depending on the required water head and daily supply rate by PDA Center Sandia National Laboratories
(1987) [54]. Presented diagram is a result of summarizing research and operation of PVWPSs, first of all, those
with especially designed pumps (such as electric pump with submersible AC or DC electric motor, floating motor-
pump of centrifugal type with DC electric motor, etc.). In Fig. 9, symbol ‘#’ denotes possible application fields of
stand-alone PVWPSs with vibration pumps of type ‘Malysh’.
When analyzing the diagrams in Fig. 9, what calls attention to itself is the extensive area of application (both by
water head and productivity) of rotor pumps integral with submersible AC motors or forming part of submersible
alternating-current motor-pump sets. Grundfos are the pioneer in using AC motors in PVWPS completed with
rotor pumps; this firm as far back as 1979–1983 presented such system with home-built pumps for comparative
testing (UNDP Project GLO/80/003, 1983 [50]). The high metrics of this firm’s stand-alone PVWPS are also due
to reliability of new invertors suitable for regulating the alternating current frequency as a command function of
MPPT in order to increase the pump flow rate through a change of the electric motor shaft’s and pump impellers’
rotation speed subject to the level of irradiance and PV module temperature [55].

Fig. 9. Application areas of different types of pumps integral with different types of electric motors powered by PV arrays subject to average
daily flow rate and water head by Sandia National Laboratories (1987) [54].

Inverter with AC frequency control [55] was used in the course of research Maranhão et al. (2016) [56], where a
calibrated PV cell and a sensor module installed on the same plane of PV array were applied as an auxiliary device,
along with MPPT. As a result, daily performance has increased from 21% to 23% compared to fixed PVWPS.
Analysis of technical, energy-related and hydraulic characteristics of various types of PVWPS by Metlov
(1986) [57] has shown that the average daily rated output power of PV array required for lifting 1 m3 water to
the height of 1 m3 , during daylight hours, is about 2 W independently of the type of pump equipment. Besides, it
 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324 319

was found out, in the course of practical operation of PVWPSs, that each 100 W of PV array output power can
save from 120 kg to 150 kg of liquid fuel.
The use of high-efficiency PV modules, including bifacial modules and modules based on the high-voltage PV
cells, expands the possibility of the increase of pumping systems efficiency (Shepovalova, 2018 [58]; Arbuzov et al.
2017 [59]; Shepovalova, 2017 [60]). The use of modules based on high-voltage cells also significantly increases
the pumping systems’ compactness.
Inverter for vibration electric pump without separate power supply was developed in late 1980-s at Kharkov
Polytechnic Institute based on the technical design specification by VIESH (Belenov and Eresko, 2002 [61]). One
other specific feature of this inverter was that it generated 220 V (r.m.s.) series of pulses with 50 Hz frequency that
were applied to the winding of vibration electric pump. Number of pulses in series and their repetition rate increased
with PV array output power. Therefore, performance of pump grew automatically with solar radiation intensity and,
vice versa, it fell with decreasing illumination. In case of power supply from PV array having rated power 330 W,
the unit comprising inverter an vibration pump had the aggregate energy efficiency from 3.3% to 4.0%, 3.5% to
4.5% and 4% to 5%, for H = 10 m, 20 m and 30 m, respectively. For G in the range 790 W/m2 to 800 W/m2 , system
performance attained 600 l/h, 490 l/h and 360 l/h, for water head 10 m, 20 m and 30 m, respectively. Electronic
module of such inverter was mounted into a special cylindrical casing designed for installing in the upper part of
water well cap with the aim to stabilize environmental temperature thus ensuring safe operation of condensers and
of the entire electronic assembly.
Transition to a wide-scale manufacturing of PV modules on the basis of PV cells with wafer diameter of 100 mm
and larger (or pseudo-quadratic wafers with the size of side of 100 mm, 125 mm, 150 mm and larger) that,
correspondently, resulted in increasing the PV modules rated power made it difficult to manufacture solar batteries
with output voltage of about 160 V to 200 V having rated power less than 300 W by interconnecting large PV
sells. That is why it was necessary to design inverters of advanced electronic circuitry and input voltage 24 V
to 27 V avoiding application of additional specialized power supply, for inverter. Block diagram of one of such
inverters Loskutov inverter I–200) is shown in Fig. 10. Voltage stabilizer is used to power pulse generator, control
unit for switches VS1, VS2 and voltage comparing circuit. Voltage converter serves to raise the voltage to 200 V
for charging storage condenser C2. Pulse generator forms impulses with frequency 100 Hz that are directed into
the control unit of switches. The latter, in its turn, gives signals for alternative opening of switches VS1 and VS2
with frequency 50 Hz. Optothyristors play the role of switches VS1 and VS2. They provide galvanic isolation of
the high-voltage output circuits of electronic assembly thus ensuring operation reliability and safety.

Fig. 10. Block diagram of invertor I–200 with an input voltage of 24–27 V for PVWPS integral with vibration pumps (Belenov and Metlov,
2014 [22]).

Condenser C3 and inductance of vibration pump winding form an oscillating circuit tuned to this frequency
(50 Hz). Voltage comparing circuit initiates signal into the control unit of switches so that the latter generates
impulses on condenser C1 of upper limit (30 V). Comparing circuit initiates the signal to stop generating these
320 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324

impulses when voltage falls to its lower limit (25 V). In this way, pulse transformation takes place whose repetition
period depends on voltage and current in the output of PV array that are functions of solar radiation and temperature
of PV cells. Threshold voltage levels of 30 V and 25 V correspond to the limits of maximum power modes of PV
array in the range of solar radiation variations from 350 W/m2 to 850 W/m2 , for PV module temperature in the
range of 20 ◦ C to 55 ◦ C.
The inverter allows the system to operate in lower irradiance conditions. The use of the I-200 inverter makes it
possible to increase the duration of the system average daily operation by an average of 1.5 times and consequently
to increase the average daily output by about 15%–20% depending on weather conditions.
Application of the designed inverters made it possible to use low-potential solar energy G ≤ 300 W/m2 , and
to attain high effectiveness in normal solar radiation conditions. Therefore, PV array operation mode was close to
its optimum. It means that PV array output power was always in the vicinity of its maximum point. Field tests of
PVWPS comprising inverter, given in Fig. 10, vibration pump ‘Malysh’ and PV array with maximum output power
120 W carried out Tveryanovich et al. (1994) [62] in the period from May to October showed the following results:
– water lift to the height 10 m and 20 m began when G = 120÷140 W/m2 and G = 140÷180 W/m2 ; respectively.
– for G ≥ 800 W/m2 , performance was from 818 l/h to 857 l/h and from 620 l/h to 645 l/h, for H = 10 m and
H = 20 m, respectively.
– in conditions of variable cloud when solar radiation intensity, in midday hours, varied from 650 W/m2 to
750 W/m2 , daily average performance was 1.8 m3 and 1.57 m3 , for H = 10 m and H = 20 m, respectively.
– in cloudy whether, PVWPS operated, as well, but with lower effectively, and its daily average performance
was in the range from 50 l to 100 l, for water head 10 m.
Initially, PVWPSs were studied only in stationary operation mode. At the same time, studies of transient processes
occurring in the course of PVWPS operation are of essential importance. Such processes may take place while
starting the system ‘electric motor–WG’ powered from PV array of comparable power, in conditions of fast changing
of solar radiation, after system shutout. It happens, for example, when the water storage tank is full. Studying
transient processes is also of great practical interest in terms of reducing energy loss and preventing negative effect
of step-wise parameter change on PVWPS components. Partially these issues have been considered by Vissarionov
et al. (1994) [63], and the results of this work were used to develop calculation methods for transient phenomena in
PVWPS. Research was made with the application of mathematical simulation of dynamical systems. The principal
results of this research were checked with the help of mathematical model and in the course of field tests with
the use of physical analog. Development of computer facilities and software made it possible to study transient
processes in greater depth. (Maranhão et al. 2016 [56]; Mokhlis et al. 2017 [64]; Ammar et al. 2017 [65]; Dridi
et al. 2017 [66]).
By 2011, the experience of PVWPS operation and results of their studying were sufficient for establishing
generic requirements for their designing and output parameters definition. Results of research and the specifics of
system design were taken in consideration, generalized and systematized in the frames of standard IEC 62253:2011
‘Photovoltaic pumping systems. Design qualification and performance measurements’ issued by the International
Electrotechnical Commission and in GOST R 57903–2017 ‘Photovoltaic systems. Stand-alone pumping systems for
water supply. Performance determination. Selection and verification’ developed on the basis of IEC 62253.
The major scope of research of the last years in the field of PVWPS belong to scientific-application studies
dedicated to the specifics of local use of PVWPSs in a number of countries (Rahrah et al. 2015 [42]; Kazem et al.
2017 [67]; Togola, 2003 [68], Abdellakh, 2006 [69]; Valer et al. 2016 [70]; Ibrakhim et al. 2016 [71]). Otherwise,
they a related to the application of more advanced components equipment.
In recent years, considerable part of studies deals with problems of practical use of solar energy for irrigation
(Valer et al. 2016 [70]; Belenov et al. 2016 [72]; Chandel et al. 2015 [73]; Shindel and Wandre, 2015 [74]; Sobor,
2017 [75]; Khaled et al. 2015 [76]; Reca et al. 2016 [77]; Brahmi et al. 2018 [78]). The advantages of solar
energy application in water supply systems for irrigation are associated with the seasonal correlation between the
annual maximum of solar energy income and that of water demand characterized by low probability of cloudy
weather, during spring-summer period. The main problems of irrigation PVWPS: (1) this PVWPS needs to take
account of the fact that demand for irrigation system water will vary throughout the year. Peak demand during
the irrigation system seasons is often more than twice the average demand. This means that PVWPS for irrigation
are under-utilized for most of the year; (2) attention should be paid to the system of irrigation water distribution
and application to the crops; (3) irrigation PVWPS should minimize water losses, without imposing significant
 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324 321

additional head on the irrigation pumping system and be of low cost. One of the most perspective technologies of
PVWPS application may be their use in combination with drip lines for watering various arable crops along ribs.
Such systems comprise flat piping made of polymers. The main advantageous feature of such systems is that water
head not exceeding 1 m to 3 m is required for water feed from open irrigation network. Besides, plants are protected
against thermal shocks since water in such systems is supplied into ribs between the rows, and system may operate
during daylight hours. In order to reduce energy consumption, application of low-pressure water pipes is advisable
in combination with pump units having axial flow wheels.

3. Conclusions
This article contains the PVWPS research analysis beginning with the first research conducted in 1964–1966
to date. The research and practice has affirmed the energetic and economic expediency of PVWPS application for
local water supply to any industrial and domestic consumers, especially in rural regions away from power lines.
The using PVWPS is an attractive alternative for irrigation and drinking-water supply in urban and rural regions of
the countries having huge potential of solar energy where a considerable part of rural population lives in remote
areas, such as India, China, other countries of Asia and Africa, in sunny under-populated and mountainous areas
of Russia, and other countries.
Application of PVWPS, in areas of the Arctic where solar radiation is rather high, during a certain period of the
year, is not studied, so far. Low temperatures, high transparency of atmosphere, clean air and radiation reflection
from snow and ice may contribute considerably to the efficiency of photoelectric modules. However, these areas
are under-populated and difficult to access.
Various areas of PVWPS improvement research were analyzed, including research involving PV array structure
and PV modules interconnection; development and improvement of special structures of any components (pumps and
invertors, etc.); improvement of PV array and electric motor interaction, electric motor and pump interaction against
the backdrop of irradiance variation and in conjunction with consumption optimization and control improvement,
to start with MPPT.
It would make sense to aim further research involving cost reduction, productivity gain, and PVWPS service life
extension at the expansion of the fields of PVWPS application, improvement of individual PVWPS components
(including the use of highly-efficient photovoltaic modules, such as bifacial PV modules, and reduction in their
performance deterioration), and a more efficient use of water that is drawn. One of the prospective lines of PVWPS
improvement and upgrading is to include them in the system of end user consumption equipment and assess the
system efficiency not at the pump output and not in the point of end consumption equipment but after the water
consumption. Studying PVWPS with the account of the fact that, in real conditions, the average output power of
PV array depends not only on irradiance but also on the combined effect of all environmental conditions (climatic
parameters, current state of atmosphere and air, surrounding objects, etc.) is of great importance, today.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could
have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References
[1] Izmailov AYu, Lobachevsky YaP, Shepovalova OV. Complex energy supply systems for individual sites. Energy Procedia
2019;157:1445–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.309.
[2] Izmailov AYu, Lobachevsky YaP, Shepovalova OV. Comparison and selection of off-grid PV systems. AIP Conf Proc
2018;1968(2018):030001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5039188.
[3] Lidorenko NS, Nabiullin FKh, Tarnizhevsky BV. Experimental solar power plant [for powering electric pump]. Geliotekhnika 1965;3.
[4] Tarnizhevsky BV, Rodichev BYa. Test results for solar energy installations with photoelectric converters [for powering electric pump].
Geliotekhnika 1966;2.
[5] Tarnizhevsky BV, Rodichev BYa. Characteristics of water lifting system powered from solar energy plants. Geliotekhnika 1968;3.
[6] Belenov AT, Tarnizhevsky BV. Selecting optimal diagrams for solar generator connection to electric drives. Geliotechnika 1969;3:6–11.
[7] Akker J, Ju Lipp. The power of human unity: Renewable energy in Auroville. Lipp, Ju REFOCUS 2004;28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S1471-0846(04)00139-8.
[8] Belenov AT. Some characteristics of electric drives of solar water pump unit. In: Abstracts of scientific-methodical conf. on problem
‘Designing of systems of electric drives for agricultural machinery, Zernograd, 1967, pp. 114–5.
322 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324

[9] Belenov AT, Voronetsky BB. Mechanical characteristics of DC motors powered from solar photovoltaic generator. Electrotechnics
1968;8.
[10] Belenov AT, Voronetsky BB. Mechanical characteristics of electric motors for agricultural drives powered from photovoltaic generator
of comparable capacity. In: Automated electric drives in national economy. proc. all-union conf. on automated electric drives, vol. 4.
Moscow: Energiya Publ.; 1971, p. 173–5.
[11] Belenov AT, Shepovalova OV. Investigation of DC motors mechanical characteristics with powered by comparable capacity PV array.
Energy Procedia 2017;119:990–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.132.
[12] Chilikin MG, Sandler AS. Geberal course of electric drive. Moscow: Energoizdat Publ; 1981.
[13] Lidorenko NS, Nabiullin FKh, et al. Design of solar power units with photovoltaic converters. Geliotekhnika 1966;2.
[14] Appelbaum J, Bany J. Performance analysis of DC motor photovoltaic converter system – I. Separately excited motor. Sol Energy
1979;22(5):439–45.
[15] Appelbaum J, Bany J. Performance analysis of d.c. motor photovoltaic converter system – II. Series and shunt excited motor. Sol
Energy 1981;27(5):421–31.
[16] Roger JA. Theory of the direct coupling between d.c. motors and photovoltaic solar arrays. Sol Energy 1979;23(3):193–8.
[17] Singh SN, Wahi AR. Analytical model of powered separate excited d.c. motor. J Inst Eng (India) Elec Eng Div 1981;62(1):17–21.
[18] Hsiao YR, Blevins BA. Direct coupling of photovoltaic power source to water pumping system. Sol Energy 1984;32(4):489.
[19] Abete A, Barbisio E, Tommasini R. A graphic-analytical method to study the direct coupling photovoltaic generators – DC motors.
In: 10-th E.C. Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conf. 8-12 April 1991, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 1037–41.
[20] Roger JA, Pivot J, Gucher P. Optimization of the p.V. Array-load energy transfer by means of an electronic adaptator. Revue de Phys
Appl 1980;15:603–7.
[21] Belenov AT, Tarnizhevsky BV. Optimization of electric energy generation modes in stand-alone system comprising photovoltaic
generator and DC motor. In: Collection of reports of all-union conf. on application of solar energy (yerevan), section 2.. Moscow:
VNIIT Publ.; 1969, p. 151–66.
[22] Belenov AT, Metlov GN. Solar photoelectric water-pump systems. second ed.. Moscow: VIESH; 2014.
[23] Belenov AT, Aliev RK. Some ways to improve energy production by photovoltaic array in installations of agricultural application.
Geliotekhnika 1987;6.
[24] Belenov AT, Shkatov IV. Effect of switching circuits of photoelectric batteries on performance of water pumping system. In: NTB on
electrification in agriculture, Vol. 2, No. 65. Moscow: VIESH; 1989.
[25] Matam M, Barry VR, Govind AR. Optimized re configurable PV array based PV water-pumping system. Sol Energy 2018;170:1063–73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.046.
[26] Askarov SM, Grigoriev VA, Irodionov AE, et al. Device for powering loads with DC current. certificate of authorship USSR no. SU
1124854. 1983.
[27] Turfler RM, Zanbarski TG, Rogers CB. Technique for aggregating cells in series and parallel. In: Proc. of the 14th IEEE photovolt.
spec. conference, vol. 4, 1980, pp. 518–22.
[28] Grigoyan RC. Rational use of solar photoelectric conversion unit for power supply of several consumers. In: Report selection of
all-union conference on application of solar energy (Yerevan). Moscow: VNIIT Publ.; 1969, p. 167–82.
[29] Lidorenko NS. Current state of research in direct conversion of solar energy into electricity. Geliotekhnika 1969;6.
[30] Gasque M, Gonzalez-Altozano P, García-Marí E. Optimization of the distribution of power from a PV generation between two pumps
working in parallel. Sol Energy 2020;198:324–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.01.013.
[31] Sharma U, Singh B, Jain C. Vienna converter fed two stage grid connected photovoltaic pumping system. In: Proc. of the 2017 7th
international conference on power systems (ICPS), Pune. 2017, p. 236–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICPES.2017.8387299.
[32] Mohamed El Mamy Mohamed Mahmoud, Moubarrack JY, Ehssein S, Yahya AM, Mahmoud AK, Youm I. Performance optimization
and modelization of a photovoltaic pumping system. Am J Energy Eng 2019;7(1):1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20190701.11.
[33] Talbi B, Krim F, Rekioua T, Mekhilef S, Laib A, Belaout A. A high-performance control scheme for photovoltaic pumping system
under sudden irradiance and load changes. Sol Energy 2018;159:353–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.11.009.
[34] Ksentini A, Azzag B, Bensalem A. Sizing and optimisation of a photovoltaic pumping system. Int J Energy Technol Policy
2019;15(1):71–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJETP.2019.096619.
[35] Xie L, Deng W. Research on water output optimization of photovoltaic pumping system. Energy Convers Manage
2006;47(11–12):1449–63.
[36] Cbergui MI, Benaissa MO. Strategy photovoltaic pumping system in scattered area. In: Proc. of the 4th international conference on
renewable energy research and applications, Palermo, Italy. 2015, p. 283–6.
[37] Belenov AT. Method of improvement of performance of photovoltaic water pumping unit. Geliotekhnika 2000;1.
[38] Shermazanyan YT, Tarnizhevsky BV, Belenov AT, et al. Power sensor of a solar power plant. author’s certificate of the USSR no.
SU 259259. 1970.
[39] Belenov AT, Gusarov VA, Shepovalova OV. Device for improvement of effectiveness of electric energy use in DC electric drives.
patent RF no. RU 2673460. 2018.
[40] Zinger Z, Braunstein A. Optimum operation of a combined system of a solar cell array and DC motor. IEEE Trans Power App Syst
1981;100(3):1193–7.
[41] Aidan M, Hamam Y, Poirier JP, Rocaries F. Optimal coupling of photovoltaic solar panels to compression cold room. In: Proc. of
the 6th miami int. conference alternative energy source. conf. pap, 1983, pp. 10–3.
[42] Rahrah K, Rekioua D, Rekioua T, Seddik B. PV Pumping system in bejaia climate with battery storage. Int J Hidrogen Energy
2015;4:1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2015.04.048.
 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324 323

[43] Khatib MF, Shaaban S, Sebah MIA. A proposed advanced maximum power point tracking control for a PV-solar pump system. Sol
Energy 2017;158:321–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.09.051.
[44] Khazane J, Tissir H. Achievement of MPPT by finite time convergence sliding mode control for PV pumping system. Sol Energy
2018;166:13–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.03.026.
[45] Ehssein CO, Ba A, Dah NO, Lam MI, Amadou D, Hassan AE. Monitoring a maximum power point tracking photovoltaic pumping
system, In: Proceedings of the 9th international renewable energy congress (IREC), Hammamet, 2018.
[46] Idrissi R, Abbou A, Mohcine M, Salimi M. A comparative study of MPPT controllers for photovoltaic pumping system. In: Proceedings
of the 9th international renewable energy congress (IREC), Hammamet, 018).
[47] Yahyaoui I, Nafaa J, Charfi S, Chaabene M, Tadeo F. MPPT techniques for a photovoltaic pumping system. In: Proceedings of the
irec2015 the sixth international renewable energy congress, Sousse. 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IREC.2015.7110905.
[48] Das M, Mandal R. A comparative performance analysis of direct, with battery, supercapacitor and battery- supercapacitor enabled PV
water pumping system using centrifugal pump. Sol Energy 2018;171:302–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.06.
[49] Bazarov BA, Shaymerdangulyev G, Strebkov DS. Studies of photovoltaic water pumping complex. Report selection of All-Union
Conference ‘Application of solar energy’, Turkmen SSR: Ashkhabad. Publ. of Acad. of Sci; 1977, p. 323–7.
[50] UNDP Project GLO/80/003. Main report: small-scale solar-powered pumping system: the technology, its economics and advancement.
- London, Swindon and Reading, UK. 1983.
[51] McNelis B. Photovoltaic water pumping. In: Presentations of the photovoltaics: Investing in development conf. 1987, New Orleans
Louis. Arlington, VA: SEIA; 1987.
[52] Odeh I, Mahmoud M. Field results of photovoltaic water pumping systems. Geliotekhnika 1995;1–3:231–40.
[53] Schaefer JF. Photovoltaic well pumping in New Mexico, in Proceedings of the 21st intersoc. conwers. eng. conf. San Diego, Calif.,
vol. 2, 1986, pp. 1269–74.
[54] PDA Center Sandia National Laboratories. Water pumping: The solar alternative. In: Presentations of the photovoltaics: Investing in
development conf. May 1987, New Orleans Louis. Arlington, VA: SEIA; 1987, ν-75-ν-85.
[55] RSI Renewable solar inverter – three-phase pumps. 2020, https://www.grundfos.com/products/find-product/rsi.html [Accessed 25 June
2020].
[56] Maranhão GNA, Brito AU, Pinho JT, Fonseca JKS, Leal AM, Macêdo WN. Experimental results of a fuzzy controlled variable-speed
drive for photovoltaic pumping systems: A review. IEEE Sens J 2016;16(9):2854–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2016.2524530.
[57] Metlov GN. Photovoltaic water-pumping plants. Water Supply Sanit Tech 1986;7.
[58] Shepovalova OV. Planar high-voltage photoelectric module. Patent RF No. RU 2686449. 2018.
[59] Arbuzov Yu D, Evdokimov VM, Shepovalova OV. Angle-depended photocurrent characteristics of upper-limit efficient cascade PV
cells on the base of homogeneous semiconductor. Energy Procedia 2017;119:980–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.131.
[60] Shepovalova OV. Fabrication process study for matrix silicon solar cells. AIP Conf Proc 2017;1814(2017):020077. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1063/1.4976296.
[61] Belenov AT, Eresko AB. Solar photovoltaic water pumping unit SVU-6-10. Geliotekhnika 2002;3.
[62] Tveryanovich EV, Belenov AT, Kidyashev Yu K. Solar photovoltaic installations of small capacity. J. Energeticheskoe stroitelstvo
1994;12.
[63] Vissarionov VI, Buranov RM. Methods of calc ulating transient processes in pumping system powered from solar battery. In: Current
problems of non-traditional power industry: Abstracts of int. sci-technical conference, 1-2 Sept. 1994, Saint-Petersburg, 1994, p. 82.
[64] Mokhlis M, Ferfra M, Chraygane M. Nonlinear control of a photovoltaic pumping system under partial shading. In: Proc. of the 2017
international renewable and sustainable energy conference (IRSEC), Tangier. 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IRSEC.2017.8477413.
[65] Ammar H, Benbaha N, Boukebbous SE. P & O control of a photovoltaic pumping system to efficiency improvement using PSIM. In:
Proceedings of the 2017 international renewable and sustainable energy conference (IRSEC), Tangier. 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
IRSEC.2017.8477404.
[66] Dridi T, Aouani N, Mami A. V/f controlled photovoltaic pumping system under LPV model. In: Proc. of the 2017 international
conference on control, automation and diagnosis (ICCAD), Hammamet. 2017, p. 516–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CADIAG.2017.
8075712.
[67] Kazem HA, Waeli AHA, Chaichan MT, Mamari AS, Kabi AH. Design, measurement and evaluation of photovoltaic pumping system
for rural areas in Oman. Environ Dev Sustain 2017;19:1041–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9773-z.
[68] Togola I. Solar energy use for water supply of rural areas in East Africa. [PhD. Thesis], 2003.
[69] Abdellakh B. Use of solar photovoltaic units for powering stand-alone water-pumping installations in Morocco. [Ph.D. Thesis], 2006.
[70] Valer LR, Melendez TA, Fedrizzi MC, Zilles R, Moraes AM. Variable-speed drives in photovoltaic pumping systems for irrigation in
Brazil. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 2016;15:20–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2016.03.003.
[71] Ibrakhim IAKh. Energy complex on the basis of solar converters for water supply of consumers in climatic conditions of Iraq. [PhD.
Thesis], 2016.
[72] Belenov AT, Korolev VA, Metlov GN, Sokolsky AK. Optimal composition and parameters of mobile solar photovoltaic water-pumping
plants for irrigation. Innov Agricult 2016;5(20):193–8.
[73] Chandel SS, Naik MN, Chandel R. Review of solar photovoltaic water pumping system technology for irrigation and community
drinking water supplies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015;40:1084–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.083.
[74] Shindel VB, Wandre SS. Solar photovoltaic water pumping system for irrigation: A review. Afr J Agricult Res 2015;10(22):2267–73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2015.9879.
[75] Sobor I. Photovoltaic pump system design for small irrigation. In: Proc. of the 2017 international conference on electromechanical and
power systems (SIELMEN), Iasi. 2017, p. 315–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SIELMEN.2017.8123339.
324 O.V. Shepovalova, A.T. Belenov and S.V. Chirkov / Energy Reports 6 (2020) 306–324

[76] Khaled A, Boubakeur H, Essounbouli N, Ait-cheikh SM, Cheknane A. Improvement of a photovoltaic pumping system for irrigation of
greenhouses: case study for laghouat, algeria. In: Proceedings of the 3r d international conference on control, engineering & information
technology (CEIT), Tlemcen. 2015, p. 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CEIT.2015.7233006.
[77] Reca J, Torrente C, López-Luque R, Martinez J. Feasibility of standalone direct pumping PV system for irrigation in mediterranean
greenhouses. Renew Energy 2016;85:1143–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.056.
[78] Brahmi A, Abounada A, Chbirik G, Amrani A. Design and optimal choice of a 1.5 kW photovoltaic pumping system for irrigation
purposes. AIP Conf Proc 2018;2056(2018):020004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5084977.