Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This is the same “No True Scotsman” game Socialists play when they are
questioned about North Korea or Venezuela. Kristian Niemietz documents this in
"Socialism: The Failed Idea That Never Dies".
“That’s not REAL Critical Race Theory!”
“There hasn’t been a shred of socialism in the
Soviet Union. It’s got nothing to do with
socialism.”
“What is Critical Whiteness Doing in OUR Nice Field like Critical Race
Theory?” Applying CRT and CWS to Understand the White Imaginations of
White Teacher Candidates
Critical Race Theorists refer to Whiteness Studies Scholars as Critical Race Scholars
"Why Whiteness Studies Is Important to Rhetoric and Composition Studies", Krista Ratcliffe
“Current forms of Critical Discourse Analysis “Bell and other legal scholars began using the
are almost all strongly influenced by Critical phrase ‘Critical Race Theory’ (CRT) in the
Theory.” 1970s as a takeoff on ‘Critical Legal Theory’, a
branch of legal scholarship that challenges the
"Cultural Studies, Critical Theory and Critical validity of concepts such as rationality, objective
Discourse Analysis", Terry Threadgold truth, and judicial neutrality. Critical Legal
Theory was itself a takeoff on Critical Theory,
a philosophical framework with roots in Marxist
thought.”
“[Critical Discourse Analysis] draws from “Critical scholars derive their vision of legal
social theory—and contributions from Karl ideology in part from the work of Antonio
Marx, Antonio Gramsci, Louis Gramsci, an Italian neo-Marxist theorist…”
Althusser, Jürgen Habermas, Michel
Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu—in order to “Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That
examine ideologies and power relations Formed the Movement”, Kimberlé Crenshaw, Pg
involved in discourse.[1]” 108
How does consulting discredit DiAngelo as a Critical Race Scholar? Critical Race
Theory has a “Praxis” (Revolutionary Action) component.
DiAngelo’s diversity consulting is doing just that. It’s Critical Race “Praxis”.
Why all the effort to discredit Robin DiAngelo?
Why do Critical Race Apologists spend so much effort on obscurantist apologia?
Critical Race Theory rejects the concept of objective truth, so they can
simply say CRT is whatever they want at any moment, in order to “win” the
argument with the Disbelievers:
“For the critical race theorist, objective truth, like merit, does not exist, at least
in social science and politics. In these realms, truth is a social construct
created to suit the purposes of the dominant group.”