Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Source: Internet
Analysis of Information
Primarly Details
A woman stands on a street corner and takes out a small cylinder
of a drug rolled in paper. A policeman walks by and glances over.
Could this woman be in trouble? Well, that depends on whether or
Thesis: not the drug has been repeatedly proven to cause lung cancer, even
to second-hand users. If so, the woman has nothing to worry
about; but if the drug is a largely harmless, non-addictive, and
medicinally useful plant, she could be arrested.
Limits: USA
Those who disagree will most likely point to the opioid epidemic,
arguing that legalizing heroin would exacerbate what’s already a
national health crisis. While users harming themselves does not
provide legitimate grounds to violate the principle of bodily
autonomy, this argument fails to hold up to close scrutiny anyway.
According to The New York Times, the opioid epidemic
originated with the over-prescription of legal drugs, which still
cause nearly half of opioid-related deaths. The spike in deaths
from illegal substances comes largely from fentanyl, an opioid far
more potent and dangerous than heroin. However, buyers rarely
seek out fentanyl because it’s so dangerous. In most cases fentanyl
cases, buyers unknowingly purchase heroin laced with fentanyl or
pure fentanyl marketed as heroin.
Implications:
Evaluation
This article explains appoint of view, were why legal drugs are
Personal Reaction:
legal if they harm us more than illegal drugs.