SP5101 30093019

Company: JG SUMMIT PETROCHEMICALS GROUP Date
PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019
DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

Doc.Title Revision: 1
EXPANSION PROJECT
Doc. No. PAX-XXXXX-XX
REPORT FOR SP 5101
Table of Contents
Page 1 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
1. Purpose & Scope......................................................................................................................... 3
2. Design Input................................................................................................................................. 3
3. Methodology and Assumption......................................................................................................3
4. Geometry of Structure.................................................................................................................. 4
5. Calculations............................................................................................................................... 11
5.1 Dead Load:.............................................................................................................................. 11
5.2 Live Load :............................................................................................................................... 13
5.3 Equipment Empty Load Calculations:......................................................................................14
5.4 Equipment Testing Load Calculations:-...................................................................................15
5.5 Equipment Operating Load Calculations:-...............................................................................16
5.6 Nozzle Load:............................................................................................................................ 17
5.7 Wind Load:............................................................................................................................... 19
5.8 Seismic Load:.......................................................................................................................... 25
6. NODE DISPLACEMENT SUMMARY:........................................................................................28
7. STAAD INPUT/ANALYSIS.........................................................................................................29
7.1 SECTION PROPERTIES......................................................................................................... 29
7.2 MATERIAL PROPERTIES.....................................................................................................29
7.3 SUPPORTS............................................................................................................................ 29
7.4 Basic Load Cases................................................................................................................... 30
7.5 Combination Load Cases........................................................................................................30
8. STAAD OUTPUTS / RESULTS................................................................................................34

8.1 Support Reaction [FOR INDIVIDUAL LOADS].......................................................................34
8.2 Support Reaction Summary...................................................................................................35
8.3 Member Utlization Ratio:.........................................................................................................35
8.4 Base Plate design calculation......................................................................................................................37
8.5 Anchor Bolt Design
Calc ......................................................................................................................38
Page 2 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
1. Purpose & Scope

The purpose of this calculation is to analyze and design the SP 5101 Air Cooler
Supporting Structure, as per AISC code, for Strength and Stability.
2. Design Input
Reference Mechanical General Arrangment Drawing TJ01-CE-VD-LG023SP5101001_RA
A4-JGS1EP-DB-15-001_R1 (DESIGN BASIS FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS & DESIGN)
3. Methodology and Assumption

A Space frame is modeled in STAAD Pro. On which Basic Loads are applied as separate
load cases, and the structure is analyzed for various load combinations, to satisfy the
strength and stability requirements, as per AISC LRFD.
Support Conditions.
X‐ Direction Pinned
Z – Direction Pinned
Page 3 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
4. Geometry of Structure
Isometric View With Dimensions
Page 4 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Isometric View With Node Numbers
Page 5 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Isometric View With Member Numbers
Page 6 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Sectional Properties
Page 7 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Sectional Properties
Page 8 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
TIE LEVEL BEAMS
Page 9 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Operating Platform
Page 10 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
5. Calculations
5.1 Dead Load:
In this Load case, STAAD Pro command “Self Weight Y ‐1.1”, is defined to take care of
the self weight of the supporting steel structure. Dead Load due to a) Service Operating
Plat form with Gratings are Shown Below .
1] Self Weight of the Structure:-

Self Weight of the Structure will be assigned as (-1.1) for Whole Structure + Connections
in Staad Pro Software Itself.
2] Dead Load for the Service Operating PlatForm with Gratings :-

Assuming, Dead Load of the Service Platform with Gratings = 1 KN/m²
Applied as UDL for all Platform Members,
Width of the Plat Form = 1 m
Therefore, Load Acting on the Member = 1 x (1/2) = 0.50 = 0.50 KN / m
Page 11 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Fig. Isometric Views Showing Dead Load Acting on the Members
Page 12 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
5.2 Live Load :
1] Live Load for the Service Operating PlatForm with Gratings :-

Live Load on service platform with grating = 5.0 Kn/m²
Load on the members on Both Sides (5.0x(1/2)) = 2.5 Kn / m
Fig. Isometric Views Showing Live Load Acting on the Members
Page 13 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
5.3 Equipment Empty Load Calculations:
1] Bundle Empty Weight + structure wt. :-
Dead Load from Equipment Consists of weight of tubes and Headers, structural
members, Nozzles and C frames
Weight of Tube Bundles per Bay = 1320 kgs
(Reference : PEX-REF GA 70519-02)

Total Area for loads distribution per bundle is 1.150 m X 0.887 m = 1.02 Sq.m
Area Load applicable in Staad is = 1320 / 1.02 = 12.69 KN / sq.m
UDL Applied in center Beam = 12.69 X 0.575 = 7.29 kN/m
UDL Apploed in End Beams = 7.29 kN/m
Fig. Isometric Views Showing Equipment Empty Load Acting on the Members
Page 14 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
5.4 Equipment Testing Load Calculations:-
Equipment Load Testing = 1320 kgs

(Reference : PAX- GA 70519-02)
Fig. Isometric Views Showing Equipment Testing Load Acting on the Members
Page 15 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
5.5 Equipment Operating Load Calculations:-
Equipment Operating Testing = 1320 kgs

(Reference : PAX- GA 70519-02)
Fig. Isometric Views Showing Equipment Operating Load Acting on the Members
Page 16 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
5.6 Nozzle Load:
4 inch Nozzle load - 2 times of API Allowable load applied
And 1.5 inch Nozzle load - 2 times of API Allowable load applied
Page 17 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Fig. Isometric Views Showing Nozzle Load Acting on the Members
Page 18 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
5.7 Wind Load:
Wind Load Calculations as per NSCP

2015

0.613XKzXKztXKdXV
= 2
Velocity Pressure N/m2

Velocity Prssure Exposure coefficient (Kz) For cat C @ 25m = 1.21
Topographic Factor (Kzt) = 1
Wind Directionlity factor Table 207A 6-1 NSCP
=
(Kd) 0.85 2015
Basic Wind speed = 250 Km/hour
Basic Wind speed = 69.44 m/sec

Velocity Pressure = 3040.46 N/m2
= 3.04 kN/m 2
Wind Load on Steel
Structures
Wind load on MC 200 Channel Web
=
Side 0.61 kN/m
Wind load on MC 200 Channel Flange side = 0.23 kN/m
Wind load on Angle 75 = 0.23 kN/m
Wind load on MC 150 Channel Web
=
Side 0.46 kN/m
Wind load on MC 150 Channel Flange side = 0.23 kN/m

Wind Load on Coolers

Length of Cooler (meters) C FRAME End to END = 1.90 meters
Width of cooler (meters) C FRAME End to END = 0.98 meters
Depth of cooler (meters) = 0.47 meters
Approximate C.G of cooler = 0.24 meters

Total Wind load along length of cooler 2.71 KN
Number of supports 4.00 Nos
wind load per support 0.68 KN

Total Moment because of wind load in Length direction = 0.64 KN-m
PUSH/PULL = 0.65 KN
PUSH/PULL per support = 0.33 KN

Page 19 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Total Wind load along width of cooler 1.40 KN

Number of supports 4.00 Nos
wind load per support 0.35 KN

Total Moment because of wind load in Width direction = 0.33 KN-m
PUSH/PULL = 0.17 KN
PUSH/PULL per support = 0.09 KN

Wind Load (+) X ‐ Direction Fig. Isometric Views Showing Wind Load Acting X-Direction
Page 20 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Wind Load (-) X ‐ Direction Fig. Isometric Views Showing Wind Load Acting -X-Direction
Page 21 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Wind load in Z directon are applied as per Reaction recieved from Fire water pipe design
Page 22 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Wind Load (+) Z ‐ Direction Fig. Isometric Views Showing Wind Load Acting Z-Direction
Page 23 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Wind Load (-) Z ‐ Direction Fig. Isometric Views Showing Wind Load Acting -Z-Direction
Page 24 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
5.8 Seismic Load:
Seismic Load calculated as shown below:
SEISMIC Calculations as per NSCP 2015

(STATIC FORCE PROCEDURE)
SEISMIC FACTORS
As per Design Basis Spec -JGS!
Importance Factor, I = 1.25
EP-DB-15-001
Soil profile type, S = SD
EP-DB-15-001
Seismic Zone factor, Z = 0.4
EP-DB-15-001
Siesmic source Type = A
EP-DB-15-001
Near source factor, Na = 1.0
EP-DB-15-001
Near source factor, Nv = 1.04
EP-DB-15-001
Seismic coefficient, Ca 0.44 X Na = 0.440
EP-DB-15-001
Seismic coefficient, Cv 0.64 X Nv = 0.666
EP-DB-15-001
NSCP 2015 (Table 208‐11A to
Structural System Factor, R = 8.5
208‐11D)
Frame material factor, Ct = 0.0853
EP-DB-15-001
Base Shear Computation:
Fundamental Period of Vibration
Height of Structures = 2.40 m
NSCP 2015 Sec 208.5.2.2
Fundamental Period of Vibration (T) = C (h) 3/4
(Method A)
= 0.16 sec
Total Design Base Shear: (v) NSCP 2015 Section 208.5.2.2

= (Cv I / R T) x W
(Eq. 208‐8)
= 16.23 kN
The total design base shear need not exceed: NSCP 2015 Section 208.5.2.2
(v) = (2.5 Ca I / R) x W
(Eq. 208‐9)
= 4.41 kN
GOVERNS
The total base shear shall not be less than: (v) = (0.11 Ca I) x W NSCP 2015 Section 208.5.2.2
Page 25 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
(Eq. 208‐10)
= 1.65 kN
For seismic Zone 4, the total base

design shear shall not be less than: (0.8 Z NV I / R) x NSCP 2015 Section 208.5.2.2
=
W (Eq. 208‐11)
= 1.33 kN
The Total Base Design Shear:(v) = 4.41 kN
Load calculations
Dead Load Equipment (KN) - Taken From STAAD = 11.95
Platform Dead load (KN) - Taken From STAAD = 11.58
Live Load (KN) - Taken From STAAD = 14.97
25 percentge of Live Load (KN) - As per Design Basis = 3.7425
Total Dead Loads (KN) 27.27
MOMENT Percentage Force Distribution at

HEIGHT (meters) S (KN-M) contribution each level KN Percentage applied in Staad
2.4 28.68 0.51 2.25 0.19
1.9 20.84 0.37 1.63 0.14

1.9 6.74 0.12 0.53 0.14

Summation 56.26 1.00 4.41

Page 26 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Seismic Load in (+) X – Direction Fig. Isometric Views Showing Seismic Load Acting X-
Direction
Page 27 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Seismic Load in (+) Z – Direction Fig. Isometric Views Showing Seismic Load Acting Z-
6. NODE DISPLACEMENT SUMMARY:
Page 28 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
7. STAAD INPUT/ANALYSIS
7.1 SECTION PROPERTIES
7.2 MATERIAL PROPERTIES
E Density 
Mat Name 
(kN/m2) (kN/m3) (/°F)
1 STEEL 205E 6 0.300 76.823 12E -6
2 STAINLESSSTEEL 193E 6 0.300 76.822 10E -6
3 ALUMINUM 68.9E 6 0.330 26.603 13E -6
4 CONCRETE 21.7E 6 0.170 23.617 5E -6
7.3 SUPPORTS
7.4 Basic Load Cases

Number Name
Page 29 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
EQ X
1
EQ Z
2
DEAD LOAD
3
LIVE LOAD
4
EEL
5
ETL
6
EOL
7
NOZZLE LOAD
8
WIND LOAD X
9
WIND LOAD Z
10
WIND LOAD -X
11
WIND LOAD -Z
12
7.5 Combination Load Cases
Comb. Combination L/C Name Primary Primary L/C Name Factor
101 COMBINATION LOAD CASE 101 3 DEAD LOAD 0.9
5 EEL 0.9
9 WIND LOAD X 1
5 EEL 0.9
10 WIND LOAD Z 1
5 EEL 0.9
11 WIND LOAD -X 1
5 EEL 0.9
Page 30 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
12 WIND LOAD -Z 1
5 EEL 0.9
1 EQ X 1
5 EEL 0.9
2 EQ Z 1
7 EOL 1.4
8 NOZZLE LOAD 1.4
7 EOL 1.2
4 LIVE LOAD 1.6
8 NOZZLE LOAD 1.2
7 EOL 1.2
8 NOZZLE LOAD 1.2
4 LIVE LOAD 1
9 WIND LOAD X 1
7 EOL 1.2
8 NOZZLE LOAD 1.2
4 LIVE LOAD 1
10 WIND LOAD Z 1
7 EOL 1.2
8 NOZZLE LOAD 1.2
4 LIVE LOAD 1
11 WIND LOAD -X 1
Page 31 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
7 EOL 1.2
8 NOZZLE LOAD 1.2
4 LIVE LOAD 1
12 WIND LOAD -Z 1
7 EOL 1.2
8 NOZZLE LOAD 1.2
4 LIVE LOAD 1
1 EQ X 1
7 EOL 1.2
8 NOZZLE LOAD 1.2
4 LIVE LOAD 1
2 EQ Z 1
7 EOL 0.9
8 NOZZLE LOAD 0.9
1 EQ X 1
7 EOL 0.9
8 NOZZLE LOAD 0.9
2 EQ Z 1
6 ETL 1.4
8 NOZZLE LOAD 1.4
6 ETL 1.2
8 NOZZLE LOAD 1.2
4 LIVE LOAD 1.6
Page 32 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
6 ETL 1.2
8 NOZZLE LOAD 1.2
4 LIVE LOAD 1
9 WIND LOAD X 1
6 ETL 1.2
8 NOZZLE LOAD 1.2
4 LIVE LOAD 1
10 WIND LOAD Z 1
6 ETL 1.2
8 NOZZLE LOAD 1.2
4 LIVE LOAD 1
11 WIND LOAD -X 1
6 ETL 1.2
8 NOZZLE LOAD 1.2
4 LIVE LOAD 1
12 WIND LOAD -Z 1
5 EEL 1.2
4 LIVE LOAD 1.6
8. STAAD OUTPUTS / RESULTS
8.1 Support Reaction [FOR INDIVIDUAL LOADS]
Node L/C FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
Page 33 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm)
Page 34 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
8.2 Support Reaction Summary
8.3 Member Utlization Ratio:
Analysis Design Actual Allowable Ratio

Beam Clause L/C
Property Property Ratio Ratio (Act./Allow.)
Page 35 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
Page 36 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
8.4 Base plate design calculation
Page 37 of 38

EXPANSION PROJECT
8.5 Anchor Bolt Design Calc
Anchor Rod Shear and Tension - As Per AISC LRFD
LRFD Spec Requirements :

The LRFD Specification defines the Anchor rod (Bolts) Shear and Tension limit states in section J3.6 & J3.7
and Table J3.2 & J 3.5
Anchor Bolt diameter = 16 mm V ub ≤ Ø Fv Ab

= 0.63 inch
Anchor Bolt Grade = A325 T ub ≤ Ø Ft Ab
From Table J3.2
Nominal Shear Strength Fv = 54 KSI
Nominal Shear Strength FT = 90 KSI
Number of Bolts taking Shear = 2 Nos
Number of Bolts Taking Tension = 1 Nos
Anchor Rod resistance factor Ø = 0.75
From STAAD, 2062
MAXIMUM TENSION LOAD, = 54 KN
SHEAR = 15 KN
SHEAR = 5 KN
Resultant = 15.81 KN
calculated Shear Strength of bolt Group V ub = 25.2305785 Kips

= 112.226 KN > 15.81 KN
Hence OK 3.55 KIPS 0.14 Percentage
calculated Tensile Strength of bolt Group Tub = Ø Ft Ab

= 21.03 Kips
= 93.5213 KN > 54 KN
12.14 KIPS 0.58 Percentage
Since the Percentage is less than 30 percentage combined shear and Tebnsion need not be checked. 16.1-1.34 LRFD
Anchor Rod Shear Stress fv = Vu / Number of Bolts X Area of Anchor Bolt

= 5.706017 Kips
Nominal Tensile Strength Ksi = 117 - 1.5 f v ≤ 90

Table J3.5 = 108.44 Kips ≤ 90
Hence Ft used is 90 KSI
calculated Tensile Strength of bolt Group Tub

= Ø Ft Ab
= 21.02548 KIPS
= 93.52 kN > 54 KN
Hence OK
Page 38 of 38

SP5101 30093019

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SP5101 30093019

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Company: JG SUMMIT PETROCHEMICALS GROUP Date

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

REPORT FOR SP 5101

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

1. Purpose & Scope......................................................................................................................... 3

3. Methodology and Assumption......................................................................................................3

6. NODE DISPLACEMENT SUMMARY:........................................................................................28

8. STAAD OUTPUTS / RESULTS................................................................................................34

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

1. Purpose & Scope

3. Methodology and Assumption

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

Isometric View With Dimensions

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

Isometric View With Node Numbers

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

Isometric View With Member Numbers

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

TIE LEVEL BEAMS

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

5.1 Dead Load:

1] Self Weight of the Structure:-

2] Dead Load for the Service Operating PlatForm with Gratings :-

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

Fig. Isometric Views Showing Dead Load Acting on the Members

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

5.2 Live Load :

1] Live Load for the Service Operating PlatForm with Gratings :-

Fig. Isometric Views Showing Live Load Acting on the Members

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

5.3 Equipment Empty Load Calculations:

1] Bundle Empty Weight + structure wt. :-

(Reference : PEX-REF GA 70519-02)

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

5.4 Equipment Testing Load Calculations:-

Equipment Load Testing = 1320 kgs

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

5.5 Equipment Operating Load Calculations:-

Equipment Operating Testing = 1320 kgs

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1

5.6 Nozzle Load:

4 inch Nozzle load - 2 times of API Allowable load applied

PROJECT: JG SUMMIT STAGE 1 EXPANSION PROJECT 30/09/2019

DESIGN CALCULATION & ANALYSIS REPORT JG SUMMIT STAGE 1