PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET

PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

GAS CYLINDER BASKET STRUCTURE

DESIGN REPORT

DOCUMENT NUMBER: 1622-DES-CR-01 R0

OIL AND GAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY L.L.C

P.O BOX 53266, ABU-DHABI, UAE

SUBMITTED BY

ASMECH Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd.

Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India – 751019

Page 1 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

Revision Control Page

Prepared Checked Approved
Rev. Date Description
By By By
R0 28-MAR-2019 Issued for Fabrication JR AJ DD

Page 2 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

Contents
S. NO. Description Page

1.0 Introduction 4

2.0 Appendix 1: Gas cylinder basket Design (Forklift case) 7

3.0 Appendix 2: Gas cylinder basket in Lifting Condition 13

4.0 Appendix 3: Lifting Eye Design 22

5.0 Appendix 4: Lifting Set Design (Sling & Shackle) 23

6.0 Appendix 5: Calculation of Side Wall and Bottom plate 24

7.0 Appendix 6: Shear area calculation and fillet weld check 25

Page 3 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

1. INTRODUCTION
This report covers design of GAS CYLINDER BASKET, a closed top container. The size of
the basket is 1330 (L) x 600 (W) x 1450 (H) mm and has a capacity to hold 3 nos. of
Oxygen/Acetylene gas cylinder. The purpose of Analysis is to check the Integrity of Structural
members.

Methodology
The Structural analysis is done in STADD PRO software. The structural members are first
modelled and then the applicable loads and moments are applied on the members for analysis.
The GAS CYLINDER BASKET is also designed for lifting condition, while lifted by the forklift and
lifting lug. Pay Eyes, Sling & Shackle calculation is done manually as per BS EN 12079-1: 2006,
DNV 2.7-1.

Assumptions:
The following are the assumptions which are considered for the Analysis:

1. It is assumed that the material behaviour is linear elastic and changes in the shape &
orientation of the body are small.
2. The material of construction is assumed to be isotropic and homogenous.
3. Boundary conditions do not change from the point of load application to the final
deformed shape.
4. It is assumed that all loads are gradually applied to their full magnitude.

Material of construction
The following material of construction is used in analysis.

Material of Construction
Poisson
E Yield Stress Density
Material ratio
MPa MPa (kg/m3)
µ
Frame/ Pad Steel
1.95 x 105 300x 10-3 275 7850
eye (S275JR)
Sling Confirming to EN 13414-1
Shackle Confirming to EN 13889

Page 4 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

Code & Standard

BS EN 12079-1 Off-shore containers and associated lifting set

DNV 2.7-1 Offshore containers

BS EN 13889 Forged steel shackles for general lifting purposes

Structural Section
Square/Rectangular Tube 50 X 50 X 5 THK, 200 X 100 X 6 THK.

C- Channel (Fork Pocket) 200 X 100 X 6 THK.

Loads considered
1. Self-weight of the GAS CYLINDER BASKET structure (S) = 750 kg (Max. load) including
structure, side mesh cover, Top/Bottom plate, etc.
2. Payload (P) = 100 kg (Max. Design load per cylinder)*3 = 300 Kg
R= (Payload (P) + Tare weight (S))*load factor is considered for design .This load is
uniformly distributed on the Floor area and primary structure. Load factor = 1.6 and 2
respectively for Forklift and Lifting condition.
3. Impact loads:
Horizontal impact = 0.25* R (for corner posts)
= 0.15* R (for other members, including top rail)
Vertical impact = 0.25* R
4. For Lifting with Pad eye, the load considered is 3*R.
Allowable stress = 0.85 * Yield stress of the material.
Max. Allowable deflection = L/250.

In lifting analysis:
1. Sling leg angle to vertical = 45 degree

Page 5 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

2. Boundary conditions

Result and conclusion:

The Structure analysis of the Gas cylinder basket frame is checked in both Padeye and Forlift lifting
cases. The utilization ratio is checked for all the members and is kept less than one. Therefore, the
Stresses are within permissible limit. Deflection in beam members is checked and kept less than
maximum allowable deflection. Relative beam displacement table is attached in the reports below. The
Shear area at the forklift location and the fillet weld check at main connections are shown in the
appendix.

In lifting case: the location of pad eye is considered at a suitable distance, so that in case of tilting or
shifting of cog of the container, the container remains intact while lifting. Also, the shackles are attached
at the top of the basket, thereby keeping the c.g. of the basket below the lifting points.

The Pad eye and the Lifting sets are designed as per DNV 2.7-1 and EN 13889, are shown in the
Appendix below.

Page 6 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

2. Appendix 1

GAS CYLINDER BASKET Design in Lifting

Condition (Forklift)

Page 7 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

Staad Report:

Nodes
X Y Z
Node
(mm) (mm) (mm)
1 0.000 0.000 0.000
2 1.33E 3 0.000 0.000
3 1.33E 3 0.000 600.000
4 0.000 0.000 600.000
5 0.000 -450.000 0.000
6 1.33E 3 -450.000 0.000
7 1.33E 3 -450.000 600.000
8 0.000 -450.000 600.000
9 0.000 -900.000 0.000
10 1.33E 3 -900.000 0.000
11 1.33E 3 -900.000 600.000
12 0.000 -900.000 600.000
13 0.000 -1.45E 3 0.000
14 1.33E 3 -1.45E 3 0.000
15 1.33E 3 -1.45E 3 600.000
16 0.000 -1.45E 3 600.000
29 250.000 -1.45E 3 600.000
30 1.08E 3 -1.45E 3 600.000
31 250.000 -1.45E 3 0.000
32 1.08E 3 -1.45E 3 0.000

Beams
Length 
Beam Node A Node B Property
(mm) (degrees)
2 2 3 600.000 1 0
4 4 1 600.000 1 0
5 1 5 450.000 1 0
6 2 6 450.000 1 0
7 3 7 450.000 1 0
8 4 8 450.000 1 0
10 6 7 600.000 1 0
12 8 5 600.000 1 0
13 9 12 600.000 1 0
15 10 11 600.000 1 0
17 9 5 450.000 1 0
18 8 12 450.000 1 0
19 10 6 450.000 1 0
20 11 7 450.000 1 0
21 13 31 250.000 2 0
22 14 15 600.000 2 0
23 15 30 250.000 2 0
24 13 16 600.000 2 0
25 13 9 550.000 1 0
26 12 16 550.000 1 0
27 14 10 550.000 1 0
28 11 15 550.000 1 0
48 29 16 250.000 2 0
51 32 14 250.000 2 0
52 31 29 600.000 3 90

Page 8 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

53 32 30 600.000 3 90
54 31 32 830.000 2 0
55 29 30 830.000 2 0
56 1 2 1.33E 3 1 0
57 5 6 1.33E 3 1 0
58 9 10 1.33E 3 1 0
59 4 3 1.33E 3 1 0

Section Properties
Area Iyy Izz J
Prop Section Material
(cm2) (cm4) (cm4) (cm4)
1 TUB50505 8.880 29.600 29.600 45.563 STEEL
2 TUB2001006 36.000 618.000 1.85E 3 1.44E 3 STEEL
3 UPE200 29.000 187.300 1.91E 3 8.459 STEEL

Supports
X Y Z rX rY rZ
Node
(kN/mm) (kN/mm) (kN/mm) (kN-m/deg) (kN-m/deg) (kN-m/deg)
29 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed
30 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed
31 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed
32 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed

Basic Load Cases

Number Name
1 TARE+PAYLOAD
2 IMPACT LOAD

Combination Load Cases

Comb. Combination L/C Name Primary Primary L/C Name Factor

3 COMBINATION LOAD CASE 3 1 TARE+PAYLOAD 1.60
2 IMPACT LOAD 1.60

Floor Loads : 1 TARE+PAYLOAD

Page 9 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

Load Min Ht. Max Ht. Min X Max X Min Y Max Y

(N/mm2) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
-0.002 0.000 0.000 - - - -

Selfweight : 1 TARE+PAYLOAD

Direction Factor
Y -3.000

3D Rendered View

Page 10 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

Node number

Beam Numbers

Page 11 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

Payload + Tare weight

Impact load

Page 12 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

Utilization ratio

Beam Displacement Detail Summary

d X Y Z Resultant
Beam L/C
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
Max X 20 3:COMBINATION LOAD CASE 3 270.000 0.449 -0.017 -0.038 0.451
Min X 18 3:COMBINATION LOAD CASE 3 180.000 -0.449 -0.017 -0.038 0.451
Max Y 58 2:IMPACT LOAD 665.000 -0.000 0.004 -0.131 0.131
Min Y 59 3:COMBINATION LOAD CASE 3 665.000 -0.000 -0.593 0.354 0.691
Max Z 59 3:COMBINATION LOAD CASE 3 665.000 -0.000 -0.593 0.354 0.691
Min Z 58 3:COMBINATION LOAD CASE 3 665.000 -0.000 -0.066 -0.185 0.196
Max Rst 59 3:COMBINATION LOAD CASE 3 665.000 -0.000 -0.593 0.354 0.691

Reactions
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Moment
FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
Node L/C
(N) (N) (N) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm)
29 1:TARE+PAYLOAD 53.804 4.22E 3 -2.150 0.139 0.001 -0.272
2:IMPACT LOAD 846.871 -7.194 -312.963 -0.005 0.072 -0.152
3:COMBINATION 1.44E 3 6.74E 3 -504.181 0.215 0.117 -0.679
30 LOAD CASE 3
1:TARE+PAYLOAD -53.804 4.22E 3 -2.150 0.139 -0.001 0.272
2:IMPACT LOAD -846.871 -7.194 -312.963 -0.005 -0.072 0.152
3:COMBINATION -1.44E 3 6.74E 3 -504.181 0.215 -0.117 0.679
31 LOAD CASE 3
1:TARE+PAYLOAD 6.934 4.47E 3 2.150 -0.133 0.002 -0.312
2:IMPACT LOAD 327.308 7.194 312.963 0.001 -0.009 -0.036
3:COMBINATION 534.788 7.17E 3 504.181 -0.212 -0.012 -0.558
32 LOAD CASE 3
1:TARE+PAYLOAD -6.934 4.47E 3 2.150 -0.133 -0.002 0.312
2:IMPACT LOAD -327.308 7.194 312.963 0.001 0.009 0.036
3:COMBINATION -534.788 7.17E 3 504.181 -0.212 0.012 0.558
LOAD CASE 3

Page 13 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

Utilization Ratio
Analysis Design Actual Allowable Ratio Ax Iz Iy Ix
Beam Clause L/C
Property Property Ratio Ratio (Act./Allow.) (cm2) (cm4) (cm4) (cm4)
2 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.106 0.850 0.125 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
4 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.106 0.850 0.125 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
5 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.100 0.850 0.117 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
6 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.100 0.850 0.117 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
7 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.121 0.850 0.142 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
8 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.121 0.850 0.142 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
10 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.134 0.850 0.157 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
12 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.134 0.850 0.157 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
13 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.133 0.850 0.157 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
15 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.133 0.850 0.157 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
17 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.024 0.850 0.028 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
18 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.096 0.850 0.113 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
19 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.024 0.850 0.028 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
20 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.096 0.850 0.113 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
21 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.029 0.850 0.034 AISC- H2-1 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
22 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.005 0.850 0.006 AISC- H2-1 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
23 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.033 0.850 0.039 AISC- H2-1 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
24 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.005 0.850 0.006 AISC- H2-1 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
25 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.056 0.850 0.065 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
26 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.162 0.850 0.190 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
27 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.056 0.850 0.065 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
28 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.162 0.850 0.190 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
48 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.033 0.850 0.039 AISC- H2-1 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
51 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.029 0.850 0.034 AISC- H2-1 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
52 UPE200 UPE200 0.034 0.850 0.040 AISC- H1-3 3 29.000 1.91E 3 187.300 8.890
53 UPE200 UPE200 0.034 0.850 0.040 AISC- H1-3 3 29.000 1.91E 3 187.300 8.890
54 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.012 0.850 0.014 AISC- H1-3 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
55 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.014 0.850 0.016 AISC- H1-3 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
56 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.114 0.850 0.135 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
57 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.153 0.850 0.180 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
58 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.156 0.850 0.183 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
59 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.194 0.850 0.228 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600

Page 14 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

3. Appendix 2

GAS CYLINDER BASKET in Lifting

Condition (Lifting Eye)

Page 15 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

Staad Report:

Nodes
X Y Z
Node
(mm) (mm) (mm)
1 0.000 0.000 0.000
2 1.33E 3 0.000 0.000
3 1.33E 3 0.000 600.000
4 0.000 0.000 600.000
5 0.000 -450.000 0.000
6 1.33E 3 -450.000 0.000
7 1.33E 3 -450.000 600.000
8 0.000 -450.000 600.000
9 0.000 -900.000 0.000
10 1.33E 3 -900.000 0.000
11 1.33E 3 -900.000 600.000
12 0.000 -900.000 600.000
13 0.000 -1.45E 3 0.000
14 1.33E 3 -1.45E 3 0.000
15 1.33E 3 -1.45E 3 600.000
16 0.000 -1.45E 3 600.000
29 250.000 -1.45E 3 600.000
30 1.08E 3 -1.45E 3 600.000
31 250.000 -1.45E 3 0.000
32 1.08E 3 -1.45E 3 0.000
33 665.000 500.000 300.000

Beams
Length 
Beam Node A Node B Property
(mm) (degrees)
2 2 3 600.000 1 0
4 4 1 600.000 1 0
5 1 5 450.000 1 0
6 2 6 450.000 1 0
7 3 7 450.000 1 0
8 4 8 450.000 1 0
10 6 7 600.000 1 0
12 8 5 600.000 1 0
13 9 12 600.000 1 0
15 10 11 600.000 1 0
17 9 5 450.000 1 0
18 8 12 450.000 1 0
19 10 6 450.000 1 0
20 11 7 450.000 1 0
21 13 31 250.000 2 0
22 14 15 600.000 2 0
23 15 30 250.000 2 0
24 13 16 600.000 2 0
25 13 9 550.000 1 0
26 12 16 550.000 1 0
27 14 10 550.000 1 0
28 11 15 550.000 1 0
48 29 16 250.000 2 0
51 32 14 250.000 2 0
52 31 29 600.000 3 90

Page 16 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

53 32 30 600.000 3 90
54 31 32 830.000 2 0
55 29 30 830.000 2 0
56 1 2 1.33E 3 1 0
57 5 6 1.33E 3 1 0
58 9 10 1.33E 3 1 0
59 4 3 1.33E 3 1 0
60 1 33 761.150 4 0
61 2 33 761.150 4 0
62 4 33 761.150 4 0
63 3 33 761.150 4 0

Section Properties
Area Iyy Izz J
Prop Section Material
(cm2) (cm4) (cm4) (cm4)
1 TUB50505 8.880 29.600 29.600 45.563 STEEL
2 TUB2001006 36.000 618.000 1.85E 3 1.44E 3 STEEL
3 UPE200 29.000 187.300 1.91E 3 8.459 STEEL
4 Cir 0.02 2.545 0.515 0.515 1.031 STEEL

Supports
X Y Z rX rY rZ
Node
(kN/mm) (kN/mm) (kN/mm) (kN-m/deg) (kN-m/deg) (kN-m/deg)
13 0.010 0.010 - - - -
14 0.010 0.010 - - - -
15 0.010 0.010 - - - -
16 0.010 0.010 - - - -
33 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed

Basic Load Cases

Number Name
1 TARE+PAYLOAD
2 IMPACT LOAD

Combination Load Cases

Comb. Combination L/C Name Primary Primary L/C Name Factor

3 COMBINATION LOAD CASE 3 1 TARE+PAYLOAD 2.00
2 IMPACT LOAD 2.00

Floor Loads : 1 TARE+PAYLOAD

Page 17 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

Load Min Ht. Max Ht. Min X Max X Min Y Max Y

(N/mm2) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
-0.002 0.000 0.000 - - - -

Selfweight : 1 TARE+PAYLOAD

Direction Factor
Y -2.500

3D Rendered View

Page 18 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

Node number

Beam number

Page 19 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

Utilization ratio

Utilization Ratio
Analysis Design Actual Allowable Ratio Ax Iz Iy Ix
Beam Clause L/C
Property Property Ratio Ratio (Act./Allow.) (cm2) (cm4) (cm4) (cm4)
2 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.296 0.850 0.348 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
4 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.296 0.850 0.348 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
5 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.338 0.850 0.398 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
6 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.338 0.850 0.398 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
7 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.185 0.850 0.218 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
8 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.185 0.850 0.218 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
10 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.206 0.850 0.242 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
12 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.206 0.850 0.242 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
13 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.174 0.850 0.205 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
15 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.174 0.850 0.205 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
17 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.091 0.850 0.107 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
18 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.159 0.850 0.187 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
19 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.091 0.850 0.107 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
20 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.159 0.850 0.187 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
21 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.033 0.850 0.039 AISC- H2-1 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
22 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.011 0.850 0.013 AISC- H2-1 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
23 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.027 0.850 0.031 AISC- H2-1 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
24 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.011 0.850 0.013 AISC- H2-1 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
25 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.130 0.850 0.153 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
26 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.263 0.850 0.310 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
27 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.130 0.850 0.153 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
28 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.263 0.850 0.310 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
48 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.027 0.850 0.031 AISC- H2-1 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
51 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.033 0.850 0.039 AISC- H2-1 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
52 UPE200 UPE200 0.039 0.850 0.045 AISC- H2-1 3 29.000 1.91E 3 187.300 8.890

Page 20 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

53 UPE200 UPE200 0.039 0.850 0.045 AISC- H2-1 3 29.000 1.91E 3 187.300 8.890
54 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.049 0.850 0.057 AISC- H2-1 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
55 TUB2001006 TUB2001006 0.048 0.850 0.057 AISC- H2-1 3 36.000 1.85E 3 618.000 1.47E 3
56 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.334 0.850 0.393 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
57 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.183 0.850 0.216 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
58 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.189 0.850 0.222 AISC- H2-1 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
59 TUB50505 TUB50505 0.418 0.850 0.492 AISC- H1-3 3 8.880 29.600 29.600 47.600
60 Cir 0.02 2.545 0.515 0.515 1.031
61 Cir 0.02 2.545 0.515 0.515 1.031
62 Cir 0.02 2.545 0.515 0.515 1.031
63 Cir 0.02 2.545 0.515 0.515 1.031

Page 21 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

4. Appendix 3: Lifting Eye Design

Resulting Sling Load (RSL) = 12 kN(+5% of sling force)

Material Grade = S 275 JR

Re = 275 N/sq.mm

Eye Dimensions:-

Bolt hole Diameter Dh = 20.0 mm

Outer Radius H = 40.0 mm

Pad Eye Thickness t = 16.0 mm

1) Tear out Stress

= 37.5 N/Sq.mm < Re Hence Safe.

2) Contact Stress

= 145.2 N/Sq.mm < Re Hence Safe.

Page 22 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

5. Appendix 4: Lifting Set Design (Sling & Shackle)

Lifting set is included with Wire rope Sling & Shackle with forerunner. The design of
lifting set is done as per BS EN 12079 and DNV 2.7-1.

5.1) DESIGN OF WIREROPE SLING

Maximum Gross Mass (R) = 1050 kg

Number of Slings (n) = 4 No

Maximum Sling Angle (β) = 45 degree

Working Load Limit (WLLmin) = 7t (Table 8-1)

Check for 4-Leg wire rope Sling

Nominal size of sling = 18 mm

Nominal size of forerunner = 26 mm

Working Load Limit (WLL) = 7.8 t (Table E-4)

WLL > WLLmin Hence Safe

Hence use 18mm Wire rope Sling confirming to EN 13414-1, steel cored rope,
grade 1770.

5.2) DESIGN OF SHACKLE

Working Load Limit (WLLmin) = 7t (Table 8-1)

Min. Shackle Working Load (WLL) = 3.0 t

Standard Shackle Working Load (WLL) = 3.25 t

Hence, use the Standard Shackle of 3.25 t capacity confirming to EN 13889.

Clearance between shackle pin and pin hole diameter should not exceed 6% of
the nominal shackle pin diameter.

Page 23 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

6. Appendix 5: Calculation of Wall and Bottom plate

Calculation for Bottom plates

Dimension of Plate L*H 1100 x 375 mm
Assumed Plate Thickness for Design Tc 6 mm
Plate Area Area 412500 mm2
Load W=1.6*P 4800.00 N
Pressure on the plate P=W/Area 0.01164 N/mm2
Material of Construction S275 JR
Yield stress of Plate Sy 275 N/mm2
Density of plate Rho 7850 kg/m3
Modulus of Elasticity E 198000 N/mm2
Allowable stress of Plate Sb =0.8*Sy 220.0 N/mm2
Stress at the Center of Plate 20.1 N/mm2
Deflection at the center of the plate  0.5 mm
Permissible Maximum Deflection min ( Tc/2, b/360) 3.0 mm
Stress at the Center < Allowable Stress . And, Deflection at the Center of the Plate is less
than permissible. Hence,the selected plate thickness is safe.

Calculation for Wall plates (Mesh)

Dimension of Plate L*H 1100 x 1100 mm
Assumed Plate Thickness for Design Tc 6 mm
Plate Area Area 1210000 mm2
Load W=0.6*P 1800.00 N
Pressure on the plate P=W/Area 0.00149 N/mm2
Material of Construction S275 JR, Expandable mesh
Yield stress of Plate Sy 275 N/mm2
Density of plate Rho 7850 kg/m3
Modulus of Elasticity E 198000 N/mm2
Allowable stress of Plate Sb =0.8*Sy 220.0 N/mm2
Stress at the Center of Plate 22.1 N/mm2
Deflection at the center of the plate  1.0 mm
Permissible Maximum Deflection min ( Tc/2, b/360) 3.0 mm
Stress at the Center < Allowable Stress . And, Deflection at the Center of the Plate is less
than permissible. Hence,the selected plate thickness is safe.

Page 24 of 25
PROJECT NAME: GAS CYLINDER BASKET
PROJECT NO.: 1622 Date: 28th March 2019

7. Appendix 6: Shear area calculation and fillet

weld check

Shear Area in Forklift calculation

Lifting from fork pockets:
The fork length are usually 600 mm. Considering, length of shear = 600mm.
Thickness of forklift Pocket at the Top 6 mm
Min. Shear Area A 1200.00 mm2
Shear Force F=2.5*P 750.0 kg
7358 N
Shear Stress in forklift τ=F/A 6.13 N/mm2
Permissible Shear Stress Sall=0.4*Sy 110 N/mm2
where,
Sy is the Yield stress of the Material
While forklift lifting, the shear stress is well within the permissible limit. Hence, Design is
OK.

Fillet weld check

Checking weld size between SHS 50x50x 5thk members around lifting area, in shear.
Allowable stress in shear welding =0.49.Sa Ss 80.9 N/mm2
where, Sa= Allowable stress of material in Tension
Max. Load on the Weld is at the lifting point. Considering the Load equal to the tension in the
steel wire rope.
W 1066.67 kg
10464.0 N
Fillet weld size 5 mm
Min. weld length I 200 mm
Total weld Area A 1000 mm2
Actual Weld stress Sr 10.46 N/mm2
Therefore, the selected weld size is well within the permissible limit and thus, 5 mm weld
will be sufficient at all the other member connections too.

Page 25 of 25