Professional Documents
Culture Documents
: 705077
PROJECT TITLE:-
QAFCO-3 SHUTDOWN 2019
DOCUMENT TITLE:
ADEQUACY CHECK REPORT FOR PRIMARY REFORMER STACK
CONTENTS
U U Page
ABBREVIATION......................................................................................................... 3
1- General ................................................................................................................. 4
1.1- Introduction
1.2- Design Methodology/Sketch
1.3- Input References
1.4- Codes and standard
1.5- Software
1.6- Input Data
2- Design Load............................................................................................................... 9
2.1- Dead and Live Load
2.2- Wind Load calculation
2.3- Vortex shedding (Dynamic effect)
2.4- Earthquake Load
3- Design of Stack Shell............................................................................................ 14
3.1- Basic Condition for Determining Allowable Stress
3.2- Longitudinal Compression (Case#1)
3.3- Longitudinal Compression and Bending Combination (Case#2)
3.4- Circumferential Stress (Case#3)
3.5- Combined Longitudinal and Circumferential Compressive Stress (Case#4)
3.6- Circumferential Compression in Stiffener
3.7- Ovalling Check
4- Design Of Stack Base Part ............................................................................................. 19
4.1- Anchor chair calculation
5- Deflection check.......................................................................................................... 25
6- Breeching Opening Stiffener Design............................................................................ 26
7- Platform cleat to Shell connection check................................................................... 28
8- Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 33
ABBREVIATION:
1. GENERAL
13B
1.1 Introduction:
This report document contains the structural verification for the Primary reformer stack
that is installed in Qafco, Qatar. The stack is 34.8 meters in height, and external
diameter is 3460 mm from the base to the top. Wall thickness is 10 mm from base to
the elevation of 9195mm, 8mm for another 9550 mm meters and 6 mm for the 16000
mm.
Lining 50 mm, LWI 20 Castable 1204 degree C. Density: 930 kg/m3 on C.S chain link
reinforcement, inside of the shell.
There are 5 existing platforms located at an elevation of 5200, 11200, 17200, 23200 and
28475 mm, for maintenance and inspection purpose. Opening for gas inlet is provided
near the base of the stack, and the opening size is 3060 mm high and 2240 mm wide.
Now, a new platform will be constructed in the top section of the stack, located below
the nozzle elevation 27500 mm, shell thickness of 6 mm. The objective of this report is
to include this additional platform load in the stack design calculation and check if the
stack is adequately strengthened.
5. Deflection check:
Pressure vessel Handbook by Moss, Procedure4.4 “deflection in towers” is used to
check the deflection in the stack. Deflection due to Uniform Vessel, Non-uniform load
case is considered.
Sketch
U
Design Condition
Wind Data: (Reference document: CEMS-PT-S700.01004)
U
Dead Load includes Stack wall, platforms and ladders, stiffeners. Miscellaneous weight of
10% will be considered to the dead weight calculated.
Live load, uniformly distributed over the platform region: 5kN/m2
Lining 50 mm, LWI 20 Castable 1204 degree C. Density: 930 kg/m3 on C.S chain link
reinforcement.
Corrosion Allowance :0 mm
Internal Lining : 50 mm
Yield Strength @design temperature : 275 N/mm2
Elasticity Modulus : 190.95 KN/mm2
Minimum Shell Thickness : 6 mm
2.DESIGN LOADS
Where:
No.: Section No.
Hz: Height above ground
Hi: Height of ith section
Ti: Un-corroded shell thickness of i section
Di: Stack inside diameter
Total
Wsi : Stack shell weight 225 kN
Wli : Live loads (5.0 kN/m²,Platform/Ladder ( 4 nos)) 190 kN
Wa : Wsi +Wli 415 kN
Wco: Lining and chain reinforcement weight 55 kN
Wt : Total load 495 kN
( including 10% additional load on Dead weight)
Where:
Where,
qz: Velocity Pressure at height ‘h’
G: Gust-effect factor = 0.85 (sec 6.5.8.1)
Cf: Shape factor = 0.83 (Round chimney, H/D>7, figure 6-19)
Af: Projected Area Normal to the wind = Do*Hi*1.2
(Additional factor of 1.2 is multiplied to take into account the platform and ladder, Stiffener
projections)
where :
No.: section No.
Hz : height above ground
Hi : height of i section qz=Wind pressure
Ti : uncorroded shell thickness Fx : force by wind on the shell section
th
of i section Vtotal = Total Shear force by wind
Do : stack outside diameter=2600mm Mtotal = Total moment by wind
c.o.g: center of force is considered at 0.6h, which is safe above the actual point.
Wind Loads:
Stack Natural Frequency in First Mode (in accordance with Gaylord Gaylord’s Handbook)
Where:
D : diameter (in) 136.2 in= 3460 (mm)
H : height of stack 1370 in= 34800 (mm)
E: modulus of elasticity (psi) 27740000 psi= 1950315
(kg/cm2)
3
WS: unit weight of shell (lb/in3 ) 0.284 lb/in³= 0.00785(kg/cm )
where :
f1 : natural frequency in first mode (Hz) 2.8 Hz
α'
Vzcr = b'(Zcr/33) *22*Vr/15 : mean hourly wind speed at Zcr 89.9 ft/sec = 27.4 (m/s)
Where:
C=Cv*I/(RT) 0.099
Cmax=2.5CaI/R 0.103
Cmin=0.11Ca I 0.013
Seismic zone : 1
Z : seismic zone factor (Table 16-I) 0.075
Cv : seismic coefficient given in table 16-R of UBC 0.18
Soil profile type : according to the contract spec Sd
Note: Since, the Seismic load is lesser than the Wind loads, the governing case for the stack design
will be Wind case.
Stack structural integrity and stability is checked for the various design loads calculated in the
earlier section. The actual and allowable stresses for the different load cases are determined as
per ASME STS-1 (clause 4.4). The calculation shown below verifies that the requirements of the
code are met and the stresses are well within the permissible limits.
t/D ≤ (10*FY)/E,
6B
Since, this requirement is met; the stack must satisfy following four load cases:
7B
9B fc = qz*D/(288*t) (psi)
The circumferential stress shall be less than the allowable stress, Scc
fc ≤ Scc
where, Scc = 1.3*E*K*(t/D)1.5/(F.S*ls /D)
when 0≤ t/D ≤ 2.8*FY/E, K = 1
Sccs = 0.25*E*I/(F.S*R2)
where,
Le = two times the overall stack height for cantilever stack : 69600 mm
Scl = Allowable longitudinal compressive stress
Sbl = Allowable combined longitudinal compressive and bending stress
Scc = Allowable circumferential compressive stress
q = The external wind pressure or stack draft pressure
TABLE-3 SHELL
STRENGTH CHECK (1/2)
Hz1 A Sp ISECTION qz
(mm) (N/m^2)
No. Hz (mm) tr (mm) D (mm) (cm^2) (cm^3) (cm^4)
Section Properties
U
Where:
No.: section no.
Hz: height above ground Hi: height of i section
Table-4 SHELL
STRENGTH CHECK (2/2)
M A B C D E F G (F+G)
(kN-m) fc P/A MD/2I Sbl=Scl Scc Unity
(N/mm^2) (N/mm^2) (kN/mm2) (N/mm2) check
No. (N/mm^2) (B+C)/D (A/E) Combined
Stress
Ratio
1 1525.9 0.111 3.8575 16.33 98.525 9.994 0.205 0.01114 0.205
2 1346.0 0.111 3.7218 14.41 98.525 9.994 0.184 0.01114 0.184
3 1153.9 0.123 3.5247 12.35 98.525 9.994 0.161 0.01232 0.161
4 969.0 0.128 3.2345 10.37 98.525 9.994 0.138 0.01284 0.138
5 797.0 0.170 3.7901 10.66 78.728 7.147 0.184 0.02385 0.184
6 637.7 0.179 3.4770 8.53 78.728 7.147 0.152 0.02499 0.153
7 492.9 0.185 3.2800 6.59 78.728 7.147 0.125 0.02591 0.126
8 364.4 0.185 3.0829 4.87 78.728 7.147 0.101 0.02591 0.102
9 260.6 0.256 3.7308 4.64 58.977 4.639 0.142 0.05517 0.145
10 166.7 0.265 3.5338 2.97 58.977 4.639 0.110 0.05706 0.114
11 91.3 0.271 3.1825 1.63 58.977 4.639 0.082 0.05847 0.085
12 42.5 0.276 2.9856 0.76 58.977 4.639 0.063 0.05941 0.067
13 58.6 0.276 0.4726 1.04 58.977 4.639 0.026 0.05941 0.029
14 20.9 0.280 0.2757 0.37 58.977 4.639 0.011 0.06036 0.015
15 2.1 0.284 0.0788 0.04 58.977 4.639 0.002 0.06130 0.006
Stresses check
U
The Stresses under different load cases are checked and are found to be well within the
acceptable limit.
f0=1.25 Hz
where,
S = Strouhl number =
0.2
Since, Vco<Vz (mean hourly wind speed), therefore stiffeners are required.
=0.291 in4
=0.26 in2
3. Required Section modulus:
=3.29 in3
Note: Min. section modulus of plate section alone is more than the required. Therefore,
stiffener size selected is OK.
Input:
Analyze or Design the Basering AORD Analyze
Design Temperature for Basering RNGTMP 85.00 C
Thickness of Basering TBA 25.0000 mm
Basering Material S275
Basering Material UNS Number
Inside Diameter of Basering DI 3410.000 mm
Outside Diameter of Basering DO 3740.000 mm
Calculation:
U
Required Area for Each Bolt, Based on Max Load 290.9302 mm^2
Area Available in a Single Bolt 1018.2180 mm^2
Area Available in all the Bolts 24437.2305 mm^2
Bolt Stress Based on Approximate Analysis 49.25 MPa
Note: The anchor bolt size and quantity is ok as the available area is more than the
required bolt area.
Geometry property:
Concrete Contact Area of Base Ring 1853147.00 mm^2 (Base ring area)
Concrete Contact Section Modulus of Base Ring 1586552832.00 mm^3
(Circular ring section modulus)
Thickness of cantilever, t :
Method 1:
Calculation of Basering Thickness, (Simplified):
TB = RW * SQRT( 3 * SC / S ) + CA per Jawad & Farr Eq. 12.12
TB = 140.0000 * SQRT( 3 * 3 / 352 ) + 0.0000
TB = 24.1664 mm
Method 2:
Results of Neutral Axis Shift Calculation:
Bearing Pressure on Concrete 1.60 MPa
Stress in Bolt 30.00 MPa
T = SQRT( 6 * RM / ( SB * WT )) + CA
T = SQRT( 6 * 3071518 / ( 352 * 88.0000 )) + 0.0000
T = 24.3743 mm
Method 2:
Required Thickness of Continuous Top Ring per Moss:
a = ( Dc-Ds )/2 Skirt Distance to Bolt Circle
P = Sa * Abss Maximum Bolt Load
l = Avgwdt Average Gusset Width
g1 = Gamma 1 Constant Term f( b/l )
g2 = Gamma 2 Constant Term f( b/l )
g = Flat distance/2 Nut 1/2 Dimension (from Tema)
Fb = ( 1.5 * Basope ) Allowable Stress
In Tension:
Tensile stress is force ( derived from allowable bolt stress times bolt area)
by the area of the gusset ( thickness * half times width of the gusset)
In Compression:
In Compression, the software uses iterative process to calculate the required
thickness. Calculation is performed as per AISC 1.5.1.3. The actual compression is
calculated and compared with allowable compression per AISC. The thickness is then
modified and another calculation performed until the actual and allowed compression
is within one half of one percent of one another.
Note: The stresses in base ring, Top ring, gusset and bolts are within the allowable
limit. The actual thickness is more than the required thickness. Therefore the Anchor
chair design is safe.
5. Deflection Check
L = Length of stack, in
I = Moment of inertia (Mid section), in^4
wmax = uniformly distributed load at top of vessel , lb/in.
wmin = uniformly distributed load at bottom of vessel , lb/in.
E = Modulus of Elasticity, psi
d = deflection, inch
L = 1370.1 (34.8 m) in
I = 116329 in^4
Wmin = 12.6 (224.2 kg/m) lb/in
Wmax = 19.2 (342.5 kg/m) lb/in
E = 27740000 psi
Deflection, d = 2.4 inch
= 61 mm
Permissible Deflection h/200 = 174 mm
6. Breaching
B Op
pening Stifffener Design
n
Breeeching ope ening Stiffeener desig
gn (Type I)
( As per "Steel Plate
P Engineeering Data" ,P
Part V, Self supported
s sta
acks)
Input Datta
Breechingg opening sizze(length x width)
w : 3060
0mmx 2240 mm m 10
0624.34 in22
Maximum width w=2/3
3.Do 7.57 ft
Inside Are
ea of Stack A= π.D^2/4 14
4573.86 in22
Duct locattion around 7.5' abovee ground
Vertical Stiffener
S des
sign:
Area Required:
= 21.10 in2
2
where,
W': Arc length off the 2400 mm
m
opening
94.49 in
hickness of sttack at opening location
t: Max. th 10.00 mm m
0.39 in
de Diameter of Stack
Do: Outsid 3460 mm m
11.35 feeet
C: As sho
own in figure 3
3050.00 mm m
10.01 feeet
Stiffener size
s selected
d : 20 thk platte
Stack Wall Area (Corrroded) 130.66 in2
2
Total Area
A Provide
ed 135.31 in2
2
UDL Load
d carried by Ring
R :
= 1
1186.86 lb//in
where,
V: Total Direct
D load 495.00 kN
N
111375 lb
M1: Wind Moment at the
t given poiint 1525.9 kN
N.m
135
504215 lb.in
Bending moment
m in sttack cut-out region
r 'Mq'
= 883
3024.09 lb.in
Stiffener size
s selectedd : 6 thk plate
e +10thk ring g
Section modulus
m in Sttack wall = 5701 in3 3
Note: Secction moduluss of stack sh hell is sufficie
ent. Thereforre, the stiffen
ner plate prov
vided
is OK.
| Stress Values at |
| ( MPa) |
Type of | |
Stress Load| Au Al Bu Bl Cu Cl Du Dl |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Circ. Memb. P | -112.7 -112.7 -112.7 -112.7 -56.1 -56.1 -56.1 -56.1|
Circ. Bend. P | -182.1 182.1 -182.1 182.1 -406.0 406.0 -406.0 406.0|
Circ. Memb. MC | 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.4 -0.4 0.4 0.4|
Circ. Memb. MC | 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -9.0 9.0 9.0 -9.0|
Circ. Memb. ML | -13.3 -13.3 13.3 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0|
Circ. Bend. ML | -21.7 21.7 21.7 -21.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0|
| |
Tot. Circ. Str.| -329.7 77.8 -259.8 61.0 -471.5 358.5 -452.6 341.3|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long. Memb. P | -65.5 -65.5 -65.5 -65.5 -120.4 -120.4 -120.4 -120.4|
Long. Bend. P | -304.0 304.0 -304.0 304.0 -210.5 210.5 -210.5 210.5|
Long. Memb. MC | 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -1.3 -1.3 1.3 1.3|
Long. Bend. MC | 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.2 3.2 3.2 -3.2|
Long. Memb. ML | -7.9 -7.9 7.9 7.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0|
Long. Bend. ML | -24.2 24.2 24.2 -24.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0|
| |
Tot. Long. Str.| -401.6 254.8 -337.5 222.2 -335.4 92.0 -326.4 88.2|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shear VC | 13.8 13.8 -13.8 -13.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0|
Shear VL | 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -11.8 -11.8 11.8 11.8|
Shear MT | 66.6 66.6 66.6 66.6 66.6 66.6 66.6 66.6|
| |
Tot. Shear| 80.4 80.4 52.9 52.9 54.9 54.9 78.4 78.4|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Str. Int. | 453.8 285.9 364.3 238.0 490.8 369.4 490.2 363.7|
Note: From the reaction table, the maximum load case is selected and the Platform cleat to
shell region analysis is performed for that load case. The stresses are checked and are within
the limit.
8. Conclusion:
The Stack is checked under different failure scenarios and the existing design is safe for the
additional platform loads.
The maximum combined longitudinal and circumferential compressive stress ratio in Stack
shell is 0.205, which is less than 1. The section property at the duct opening region is also
sufficient.
The dynamic wind load effects on the steel structure are ignored as the critical velocity is
1.2 times more than the mean hourly speed.
The maximum deflection at the top of the stack is 61mm, which is less than permissible
value of 174 mm.
The required thickness in anchor chair base ring, gusset plate, and top ring are less than the
actual thickness. Also, the bolt size and quantity provided are sufficient to withstand the
bending moment caused by wind.
Platform cleat –RF pad--Shell junction attachment detail is shown in the report above. The
analysis is performed with the maximum reaction loads coming at this region and the safe
pad and the cleat dimensions are determined.