Lifting Analysis Report - Mahadi Kurniawan

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM
LIFTING ANALYSIS
0 APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUTION
B ISSUED FOR APPROVAL
A 20/05/05 ANA ISSUED FOR CLIENT

COMMENTS
CHECK APPR. APPR. APPR.
REV. DATE BY DESCRIPTION
ENGINEER APPROVAL CONTRACTOR COMPANY
STATUS CODE : A = Issued for comments - B = Issued for approval - C = Approved
TOTAL OR PARTIAL REPRODUCTION AND/OR UTILIZATION OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE FORBIDDEN

WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE OWNER
CLASS REVISION STATUS

DOCUMENT NUMBER AG-03-002
1 A A
TABULATION OF REVISED PAGES
ATTACHMENTS
REVISIONS
PAGE REMARKS REVISIONS REMARKS
APP PAGES
A B C D E A B C D E
1 X A 8 X X
DATE: 05/03/14
DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 2 of 31
2 X B 22 X X
3 X C 2 X X
4 X D 2 X X
5 X E 16 X X
6 X F 10 X X
7 X G 2 X X
8 X
9 X
10 X
11 X
12 X
13 X
14 X
15 X
16 X
17 X
18 X
19 X
20 X
21 X
22 X
23 X
24 X
25 X REVISIONS
EXHI. PAGES REMARKS
26 X A B C D E
27 X
28 X
29 X
30 X
31 X
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 3 of 31
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 6
1.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE ANALYSIS...............................................................................6
2 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSION............................................................................................7
2.1 WEIGHT SUMMARY..................................................................................................7
2.2 CENTRE OF GRAVITY..............................................................................................7
2.3 MAXIMUM SLING LOAD............................................................................................8
2.4 API/AISC MEMBER STRESS RATIOS......................................................................9
2.5 API/AISC JOINT PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS RATIOS..........................................9
2.6 API/AISC JOINT MINIMUM REQUIRED STRENGTH RATIOS................................10
2.7 JOINT DEFLECTION...............................................................................................10
3 DESIGN PREMISES.......................................................................................................... 11
3.1 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS...................................................................................11
3.2 MATERIAL............................................................................................................... 11
3.3 COMPUTER PROGRAM.........................................................................................12
3.4 UNIT SYSTEM......................................................................................................... 12
4 COMPUTER MODEL......................................................................................................... 14
4.1 METHOD OF ANALYSIS.........................................................................................14
4.1.1 GENERAL.................................................................................................................... 14
4.1.2 ALLOWABLE STRESS............................................................................................... 14
4.1.3 CONTINGENCY FACTOR........................................................................................... 14
4.1.4 DYNAMIC AMPLIFICATION FACTOR........................................................................15
4.1.5 CONSEQUENCE FACTOR..........................................................................................15
4.1.6 SKEW EFFECT............................................................................................................ 15
4.1.7 RIGGING ARRANGEMENT.........................................................................................15
4.1.8 COG VARIATION......................................................................................................... 16
4.2 STRUCTURAL MODEL............................................................................................18
4.2.1 GENERAL VIEW.......................................................................................................... 18
4.2.2 DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................. 19
4.3 GLOBAL AXIS SYSTEM..........................................................................................19
4.4 LOCAL AXIS SYSTEM.............................................................................................19
4.5 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS......................................................................................19
4.5.1 HOOK POINT............................................................................................................... 19
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 4 of 31
4.5.2 SLINGS........................................................................................................................ 19
4.5.3 MODEL GLOBAL STABILITY.....................................................................................19
5 LOADING........................................................................................................................... 21
5.1 ELEMENTARY LOAD DEFINITION.........................................................................21
5.2 COG SHIFT FORCE CALCULATION.......................................................................21
5.3 LOADING COMBINATIONS.....................................................................................23
5.3.1 PRE-LOADING COMBINATION..................................................................................23
5.3.2 LOADING COMBINATION WITHOUT CONSEQUENCE FACTOR............................24
5.3.3 LOADING COMBINATION FOR MEMBER CONNECTING TO PADEYE..................24
5.3.4 LOADING COMBINATION FOR MEMBER NOT CONNECTING TO PADEYE..........25
6 ANALYSIS RESULTS........................................................................................................ 26
6.1 LOADING SUMMARY..............................................................................................26
6.1.1 ELEMENTARY LOAD.................................................................................................. 26
6.1.2 PRE-LOADINGS AND LOADING COMBINATION.....................................................26
6.1.3 LOADING SUMMARY AND COG................................................................................27
6.2 DEFLECTION PLOTS..............................................................................................28
6.3 SLINGS LOAD......................................................................................................... 28
6.4 MEMBER CODE CHECKS.......................................................................................29
6.4.1 MEMBER CONNECTED TO PADEYE........................................................................29
6.4.2 MEMBER NOT CONNECTED TO PADEYE................................................................29
6.5 REACTION............................................................................................................... 29
6.6 CONNECTION CODE CHECKS..............................................................................31
ATTACHMENTS
APPENDIX A PADEYE DESIGN AND CALCULATION
APPENDIX B STRUCTURAL GEOMETRY
APPENDIX C JOINT DEFLECTION PLOTS
APPENDIX D UNITY CHECK RATIO PLOTS
APPENDIX E SACS INPUT FILE
APPENDIX F SACS OUTPUT FILE
Appendix F1 Maximum Joint Deflection List
Appendix F2 Member Unity Check Summary

DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 5 of 31
APPENDIX G REFERENCES DRAWING

DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 6 of 31
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE ANALYSIS

The purpose of this calculation is to check the adequacy of DIESEL STORAGE to sustain the loads
that may occur during the lifting conditions, which comprise of :
 The dead weight of Diesel Storage Platform
 The dynamic amplification due to offshore site.
 The lifting sling load distribution accounting for CoG variation and sling length inaccuracy.
 The design of lifting padeyes
The calculation is based on the design data and the requirements in the Structural Design Basis ,
General Specification, General Specification for Design of Offshore Topside Structure (Ref. 7),
General Specification for Load-out, Sea-fastening, Transportation and Installation of Offshore
Structures (Ref. 10) & API RP2A-WSD 21st – 2000 Edition (Ref. 11).
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 7 of 31
2 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSION
2.1 WEIGHT SUMMARY

The detail weight summary of DIESEL lifting condition without contingency as well as with
contingency is given in the following table. Definition and detail of the loading condition is given in
chapter 5.1.
Unit : kN
Actual Weight
with
Structure Loading Condition Actual Weight Cont's Contingencies
Main Structure Self Weight 247.680 1.150 284.832
DIESEL Structural Appurtenance 121.691 1.200 146.030
STORAGE Diesel Storage Tanks Opt. 403.081 1.200 483.697
Diesel Fuel Transfer Pump 9.808 1.200 11.770
Piping Dry 29.200 1.200 35.040
Electrical/Instrumentations 45.112 1.250 56.390
2.2 CENTRE OF GRAVITY

The centre of gravity and origin co-ordinates are shown below :
A B Platform North
8.40 m
PL09
1
PL12
Diesel DIESEL STORAGE
Storage Deck Center
Y
(-0.00, 0.00)
11.75 m
X
DIESEL CoG
(-0.88,0.33)
2
PL05 PL06
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 8 of 31
The centre of gravity from SACS calculation are as follow :
CoG (m)
Structure x y
DIESEL STORAGE -0.88 0.33
2.3 MAXIMUM SLING LOAD

The maximum sling loads is performed with considering the 1.30 dynamic amplification factor and
shifted of centre of gravity location. The slings angles are measured between slings and the
horizontal plane (degree) see sketch below.
3 4
HOOK
POINT
1 2
Diesel Storage
Point Vertical Angle(
No. Point Member Degree
1 PL03 PL03 - HP 60.02
2 PL06 PL06 - HP 56.68
3 PL09 PL09 - HP 62.09
4 PL12 PL12 - HP 58.35
The maximum sling loads are shown in the table below:

DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 9 of 31
Padeye on the DIESEL STORAGE:
Lifting Point Type Attached to: Load Case Member Load (kN)
Padeye PL03 – Plan (+) 7.80 m LPA1 PL03 - HP 703.57
Padaye PL12 – Plan (+) 7.80 m LPA4 PL12 - HP 582.76
From the above member sling load table, the maximum sling load DIESEL STORAGE is 737.75 kN.
Thus, this load will be used for pad-eyes design. The pad-eye design and calculation will be
explained in Appendix A in this report.
File dari pltlst.LPA, keyword : member forces
2.4 API/AISC MEMBER STRESS RATIOS

Maximum stress ratios obtained for members are :
Members connected to padeye :
The maximum interaction ratio below is checked with the consequence factor of 1.35.
Load
Location Member Properties Case UC
G1A D030-D044 NLP3 0.60

DIESEL
STORAGE

Pstlst.NLP, key word : r than 1

Members not connected to padeye :
These member below are not connected to the lift points. These members are checked with
the consequence factor of 1.15.
Load
Location Member Properties Case UC
B02 D061-D073 FLP3 0.96

G02 D034-D035 FLP3 0.28
DIESEL
G1B D034-D048 FLP3 0.41
STORAGE

Pstlst.FLP, key word : r than 1
All member have satisfied the API RP2A WSD – 21 st Edition / AISC 9th Edition code checking
requirements in lifting condition.
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 10 of 31
2.5 API/AISC JOINT PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS RATIOS

No tubular intersection is found during structure lifting analysis. Therefore, punching shear check is
not performed in the analysis.
2.6 API/AISC JOINT MINIMUM REQUIRED STRENGTH RATIOS

No tubular intersection is found during structure lifting analysis. Therefore, joint minimum required
strength ratios is not resulted in the analysis.
2.7 JOINT DEFLECTION

The maximum joint deflection occurred on the lifting analysis (included lifting in shifted position) are
shown below :
Displacements given are relative displacements with regard to the extremities of span
(mm).
Span Deflection Load

Location Member Properties d/l
(l) Relative (d) Case

DIESEL

STORAGE
All deflections are acceptable, which are less than 1/360 for main beam and 1/300 for other beam
(for cantilever “l” design value is twice the cantilever length).
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 11 of 31
3 DESIGN PREMISES
3.1 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

The present analysis is carried out based on the design criteria described in the following documents
1) Document no. Design of Offshore Topside Structure
2) Document no. MTO -Structural
3) Document no. Equipment List
4) Drawings References:
a. DIESEL STORAGE Platform Deck Framing Sheet 1
b. DIESEL STORAGE Platform Deck Framing Sheet 1
1.1.1 Project Specification and Reports

1) Document No. Structural Design Basis
2) Document No. Platforms Weight Control Report
1.1.2 Company General Specification

3) Document No. Weight Monitoring and Weighing Offshore Units, Rev. 02.
4) Document No. Design of Offshore Topsides Structures, Rev. 02.
5) Document No. Material for Offshore Steel Structures, Rev. 01.
6) Document No. Fabrication of Offshore Steel Structures, Rev. 02.
7) Document No. Load-out, Sea-Fastening, Transportation and Installation of Offshore Structures,
Rev.01.
1.1.3 Codes and Standards

8) API RP2A-WSD. 21st Edition, Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Construction
Fixed Offshore Platforms – 2000.
9) AISC 9th Edition/ASD, American Institute of Steel Construction/Allowable Stress Design – 1989.
3.2 MATERIAL
All structures will be made of steel, using the following properties:
Steel density : 7.850 t/m3
Elastic modulus : 205000 MPa
Poisson's ratio : 0.3
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 12 of 31
Steel grades are per basic engineering drawings with the following corresponding yield stresses:
for grade S355 Fy = 355 MPa thk  16 mm
Fy = 345 MPa 16 mm < thk  40 mm
Fy = 335 MPa 40 mm < thk
for grade S235 Fy = 235 MPa thk  16 mm
Fy = 225 MPa 16 mm < thk  40 mm
Fy = 215 MPa 40 mm < thk
Material strength refer to general COMPANY specification of reference GS-STR-201.

See hereunder the steel category specification and yield stress.
SPECIAL CATEGORY FIRST CATEGORY SECOND CATEGORY
S 1 2
Piles S355 Tubular OD < 12” S235

Tubular S235
Deck leg S355 Tubular OD > 12” S355
WPG S355 WPG S235

(Web height > 600mm) (*) (Web height > 600mm) (*)
Rolled section S235

Padeyes S355 Rolled section S235
(Web height < 600mm) (*)
Plates S355 Plates S235 Plates S235

(*) Welded plate girder shall be preferred for web height is superior to 600mm, else rolled section
shall be used.
3.3 COMPUTER PROGRAM

The following software will be used for modelling and designing of structures :
 SACS version 5.2.
This software is developed and produced by EDI (Engineering Dynamics Inc.)
The analysis uses the following co-ordinates :
X : Plant east Y : Plant north Z : Vertical up
3.4 UNIT SYSTEM

The following unit system shall be adopted in the SACS analysis files and design documents:
- Great length : in meter (member length, joint co-ordinates)
- Small length : in mm or inches (tube diameter, tube wall thickness, etc)
- Forces and moments : in kN or kNm
- Masses : in kg or metric tons
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 13 of 31
- Stresses : in kN/cm2
- Angles : in degree
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 14 of 31
4 COMPUTER MODEL
4.1 METHOD OF ANALYSIS
4.1.1 General
The lifting analysis to be carried out are classical static linear analysis of a three dimensional space
frame computer model comprising the Diesel Storage main structure.
Each loading case, an equivalent linear stiffness matrix simulating the behaviour of the structure
automatically computed by the software before the structural analysis of the whole frame proceeds.
The lift arrangement is based on a hook position above the deck CoG and such that the minimum
sling angle with the horizontal is 60° (+/-) 5°.
In addition to the nominal CoG position, 2 extreme positions of the CoG are investigated in a
variation along X ans 2 other positions in a variation along Y, which are equal to 10% of the Diesel
Storage dimensions, but not less than within a 2.0 m.
Member stress checking and joint check are performed according to API RP2A – WSD 21 st edition
4.1.2 Allowable Stress

Code checking is done using basic allowable stresses
4.1.3 Contingency Factor
4.1.3.1 Provisions
Gravity loads :
- equipment dry weights,
- piping dry weight,
- structural dead weight,
- Instrumentation & Electrical bulk,
- live loads,
are calculated based upon the Loading Diagrams, Equipment List and also taking into account the
latest up-dated equipment weight including the following provision:
10 % provision on equipment dry weight is accounted for supporting structure accesses &
walkways,
15 % provision on piping dry weight is accounted for pipe supports,
5% provision on structural weight is accounted for stiffening & welding,
5% provision on pile weight is accounted for welding,
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 15 of 31
4.1.3.2 Weight Contingencies

Contingencies are covered by applying where appropriate in the load combinations the following
contingency factors.
15 % on main structural weight,
15 % on secondary structural weight,
25 % on mechanical weight,
20 % on dry piping weight,
25 % on bulk electrical weight,
25 % on bulk instrumentation weight,
25 % on itemised electrical weight,
25 % on itemised instrumentation weight,
25 % for safety items,
0% on environmental loads,
0% on live loads.
The weight contingency factor as specified above are applied on “dry weight plus provision”.
4.1.4 Dynamic Amplification Factor

The dynamic amplification factor is 1.30 for lifted weight less than 100 tonnes.
4.1.5 Consequence Factor

A consequence factor of 1.35 is applied for the code checking of any member attached to lifting
points, as well as joints to which these members are connected for punching shear verification.
A consequence factor of 1.15 is applied for the other members and joints.
4.1.6 Skew Effect

The skew effect is applied to take into account shortening or stretching of slings. The load is factored
by 1.33 as a skew load factored (SKL) for flexible object (module) as per GS-STR-401 Section
6.2.2.5 skew load distribution for Single Hook Lifts and 1.15 skew load factored for lifting using
spreader bar
4.1.7 Rigging Arrangement

Diesel Storage is lifted with 4-off slings from a single hook point to padeyes. The hook point is
managed to locate above the centre of gravity of structure. The slings are modeled by tubular
3”ODX1.25”WT with a Young’s modulus of 100000 Mpa, in order to take into account slings stiffness
for analysis. The minimum angle for the all slings is 60 (+/-) 5 degree. The slings arrangement is
shown below.
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 16 of 31
4.1.8 CoG Variation

The effect of the variation of the position of the centre of gravity is investigated. The 4-off positions
are investigated in a variation along X and Y equal to 10% of the structure dimensions, but not less
than within a 2.0 m. The minimum 2.0 m CoG variations along X and Y to be used for this lifting
analysis.
CoG positions are given in the table :
Diesel Storage
CoG shifts Longitudinal Transversal
X (m) Y (m)
Deck dimension
8.40 11.75
Shift +/- (%)
5% 5%
Shifts +/- (m)
0.42 < 1.00 0.58 < 1.00
Shifts to be used 1.00
1.00
COG THEORITICAL POSITION
CoG Original -0.88 0.33
COG SHIFTED POSITIONS
CoG 1 (-,-) -1.88 -0.67
CoG 2 (+,-) 0.12 -0.67
CoG 3 (-,+) -1.88 1.33
CoG 4 (+,+) 0.12 1.33
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 17 of 31
The sketch showing the variation of CoG are shown in figure below :
3 4
Platform
North
CoG
3 4
1 2
1 2
CoG shifted (4 Location)

2 m x 2 m Box
The shifts of centre of gravity are obtained by applying dummy forces with zero resultant at four
joints. Dummy forces calculations are presented in Section 5.2 CoG Shift Force Calculation.
The loaded joints at Diesel Storage are node 001L, 002L, 003L and 004L. Those loaded joints are
located at pile heads of the structures.
This is illustrated by figure below :
Diesel Storage – SHIFT X

DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 18 of 31
Diesel Storage – SHIFT Y
4.2 STRUCTURAL MODEL
The computer structural model plot are shown in the Appendix B.
4.2.1 General View

The following plot shows the general model of the Diesel Storage
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 19 of 31
4.2.2 Description
The different elements included in the structural model are defined here below:
- Structural part
Primary and secondary structures together with flooring (including the deck plating, grating, handrail,
stringers and joists) are in the structural section. Only the main structure is modelled in this report,
the other structural components will be input as uniform member load or joint load.
4.3 GLOBAL AXIS SYSTEM

Nodes of the structural model are described in a global axis system defined as follows:
- The origin of the global axis system is taken at the Chart Datum/LAT and comes up to the centre
of the main deck legs.
- Z is vertical from the Chart Datum/LAT
- Y is horizontal parallel to the platform north
- X is horizontal parallel to the platform east
4.4 LOCAL AXIS SYSTEM

Each member of the structural model has its own local axis system in which calculated internal
forces and moments are expressed. It can also be used to introduce loads on the members.
4.5 BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
4.5.1 Hook Point

The hook point is modelled using 1-off node, as explained in section 4.1.6 Skew Effect. Basically,
this node is fixed for the 6 degrees of freedom.
4.5.2 Slings
All slings are released in local moment Y and Z at hook end point an in moment X, Y, and Z at the
other end, to present the shear force and moment generation.
4.5.3 Model Global Stability

To avoid the numerical instability, joint 001L of Diesel Storage is fixed in horizontal X and Y-axis
displacement, however, joints 004L of Diesel Storage is fixed in horizontal X-axis displacement.
Hook point is fixed in 6 degree of freedom. See figure below.
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 20 of 31
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 21 of 31
5 LOADING
The loading diagram shown in the Appendix A has been used to establish the loading.
5.1 ELEMENTARY LOAD DEFINITION

Elementary loads to be considered are summarised in the table below. Description of each loading
type is detailed thereafter.
Loading
Discipline of loads Description
Structure name
1 Structural Self Weight
Structural
2 Structural Appurtenance
Diesel Storage 4 Diesel Storage Tank Operation

6 Diesel Fuel Transfer Pump
Equipment
7 Piping Dry
8 Electrical/Instrumentations
+X Enforce loads along X direction
Balancing Forces (couple)
+Y Enforce loads along Y direction
5.2 COG SHIFT FORCE CALCULATION

Diesel Storage Platform
The CoG shift forces are applied at the joints connecting slings to boat landing. Those forces allow
for enforced shifting of CoG.
The load ‘+X’ causes the shift of the CoG along X :
2 x F+x x Lx = Fz x Δx
F+x = (Fz x Δx) / (2 x Lx)
F+x = (1017.76 x 1.00) / (2 x 8.4) = 60.581 kN
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 22 of 31
These load are applied at :

Node 001L -60.581 kN
Node 003L -60.581 kN
Node 002L 60.581 kN
Node 004L 60.581 kN
The load ‘+Y’ causes the shift of the CoG along Y:
2 x F+y x Ly = Fz x Δy
F +y = (Fz x Δy) / (2 x Ly)
F+y = (1017.76 x 1.00) / (2 x 11.75) = 43.309 kN
These load are applied at :

Node 001L -43.309 kN
Node 003L 43.309 kN
Node 002L -43.309 kN
Node 004L 43.309 kN
This is illustrated by figure below :
Load Condition +X Enforce Loads along X Direction

DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 23 of 31
Load Condition +Y Enforce Loads along Y Direction
The resultants of these forces are equal to zero in order to keep the same weight of the boat landing.
5.3 LOADING COMBINATIONS
5.3.1 Pre-loading Combination

Prior to make a load combination, the pre-loading combination is required to easier to make load
combination.
The pre-loading combination definition are shown below:
Load Label Description
WGHT Lift weight with contingencies
DAF Lift weight with contingencies and dynamic amplification factor
NLP Lift weight with contingencies, DAF and 1.35 consequence factor
FLP Lift weight with contingencies, DAF and 1.15 consequence factor
The pre-loading combination factor are shown in the table below:

Loading Description WGHT
1 Structural Self Weight 1.1500
2 Structural Appurtunances 1.1500
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 24 of 31
Loading DAF
WGHT 1.20
Loading PAD NPAD

DAF 1.350 1.150
The loading combination for CSF (common solution file) module will be explained below:
The loading definition:
Loading Type Definition
Loading 0 Origin position with 1.33 skew load factor
Loading 1 Shift 1 with 1.33 skew load factor
Loading 2 Shift 2 with 1.33 skew load factor
The final result will be a combination of all shifted condition and origin position both for 1.15
consequence factor, 1.35 consequence factor and no consequence factor.
5.3.2 Loading Combination without Consequence Factor

The load factors to be used in the load combination are as follows:
Diesel Storage module
Loading LPA0 LPA1 LPA2 LPA3 LPA4

DAF 1.330 1.330 1.330 1.330 1.330
+X 1.330 1.330 -1.330 -1.330
+Y 1.330 -1.330 -1.330 1.330
5.3.3 Loading Combination for Member Connecting to Padeye

The corresponding factors to be applied for maximum slings load are:
For +X = 1.33 x 1.35
= 1.7955
For +Y = 1.33 x 1.35
= 1.7955
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 25 of 31
Loading combination with contingencies, DAF, consequence factor have 1.35 and skew
effect
Loading NLP0 NLP1 NLP2 NLP3 NLP4
DAF 1.330 1.330 1.330 1.330 1.330
+X 1.7955 1.7955 -1.7955 -1.7955
+Y 1.7955 -1.7955 -1.7955 1.7955
5.3.4 Loading Combination for Member not Connecting to Padeye

The corresponding factors to be applied for maximum slings load are:
For +X = 1.33 x 1.15
= 1.5295
For +Y = 1.33 x 1.15
= 1.5295
Loading combination with contingencies, DAF, consequence factor of 1.15 and skew effect
Loading FLP0 FLP1 FLP2 FLP3 FLP4
DAF 1.330 1.330 1.330 1.330 1.330
+X 1.5295 1.5295 -1.5295 -1.5295
+Y 1.5295 -1.5295 -1.5295 1.5295
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 26 of 31
6 ANALYSIS RESULTS
6.1 LOADING SUMMARY
6.1.1 Elementary Load

****** SEASTATE BASIC LOAD CASE SUMMARY ******
RELATIVE TO MUDLINE ELEVATION
LOAD LOAD FX FY FZ MX MY MZ DEAD LOAD BUOYANCY
CASE LABEL
(KN) (KN) (KN) (KN-M) (KN-M) (KN-M) (KN) (KN)
1 1 0.000 0.000 -247.680 -55.437 -147.532 0.000 247.680 0.000

2 2 0.000 0.000 -121.691 -109.679 -212.862 0.000 0.000 0.000
3 4 0.000 0.000 -403.081 -143.094 -322.465 0.000 0.000 0.000
4 6 0.000 0.000 -9.808 46.833 -25.501 0.000 0.000 0.000
5 7 0.000 0.000 -29.200 0.000 -11.538 0.000 0.000 0.000
6 8 0.000 0.000 -45.112 -21.204 -33.256 0.000 0.000 0.000
7 +X 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1017.744 0.000 0.000 0.000
8 +Y 0.000 0.000 0.000 -1017.549 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Didapar dari saclst cog 1, keyword : basic load
6.1.2 Pre-Loadings and Loading Combination

G0 – Position
***** SEASTATE COMBINED LOAD CASE SUMMARY *****
LOAD LOAD FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
CASE LABEL
(KN) (KN) (KN) (KN-M) (KN-M) (KN-M)
7 WGHT 0.000 0.000 -1017.759 -337.385 -898.072 0.000

8 DAF 0.000 0.000 -1221.311 -404.862 -1077.686 0.000
9 PAD 0.000 0.000 -1648.770 -546.564 -1454.876 0.000
10 NPAD 0.000 0.000 -1404.508 -465.591 -1239.339 0.000
11 FLP0 0.000 0.000 -1867.996 -619.236 -1648.321 0.000
12 NLP0 0.000 0.000 -2192.865 -726.930 -1934.985 0.000
13 LPA0 0.000 0.000 -1624.344 -538.466 -1433.322 0.000
Dari saclst.cog0 , keyword : combined load
G1 – Position
CASE LABEL
9 WGHT 0.000 0.000 -1017.759 680.165 -1915.815 0.000

10 DAF 0.000 0.000 -1221.311 816.198 -2298.978 0.000
11 PAD 0.000 0.000 -1648.770 1101.867 -3103.621 0.000
12 NPAD 0.000 0.000 -1404.508 938.627 -2643.825 0.000
13 FLP1 0.000 0.000 -1867.996 1248.374 -3516.287 0.000
14 LPA1 0.000 0.000 -1624.344 1085.543 -3057.641 0.000
15 NLP1 0.000 0.000 -2192.865 1465.483 -4127.815 0.000
Keyword : relative
G2 – Position
CASE LABEL
9 WGHT 0.000 0.000 -1017.759 680.165 119.672 0.000

10 DAF 0.000 0.000 -1221.311 816.198 143.606 0.000
11 PAD 0.000 0.000 -1648.770 1101.867 193.869 0.000
12 NPAD 0.000 0.000 -1404.508 938.627 165.147 0.000
13 FLP2 0.000 0.000 -1867.996 1248.374 219.646 0.000
14 LPA2 0.000 0.000 -1624.344 1085.543 190.997 0.000
15 NLP2 0.000 0.000 -2192.865 1465.483 257.845 0.000
G3 – Position
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 27 of 31

CASE LABEL
9 WGHT 0.000 0.000 -1017.759 -1354.934 -1915.815 0.000

10 DAF 0.000 0.000 -1221.311 -1625.921 -2298.978 0.000
11 PAD 0.000 0.000 -1648.770 -2194.994 -3103.621 0.000
12 NPAD 0.000 0.000 -1404.508 -1869.809 -2643.825 0.000
13 FLP3 0.000 0.000 -1867.996 -2486.847 -3516.287 0.000
14 LPA3 0.000 0.000 -1624.344 -2162.475 -3057.641 0.000
15 NLP3 0.000 0.000 -2192.865 -2919.342 -4127.815 0.000
G4 – Position
CASE LABEL
9 WGHT 0.000 0.000 -1017.759 -1354.934 119.672 0.000

10 DAF 0.000 0.000 -1221.311 -1625.921 143.606 0.000
11 PAD 0.000 0.000 -1648.770 -2194.994 193.869 0.000
12 NPAD 0.000 0.000 -1404.508 -1869.809 165.147 0.000
13 FLP4 0.000 0.000 -1867.996 -2486.847 219.646 0.000
14 LPA4 0.000 0.000 -1624.344 -2162.475 190.997 0.000
15 NLP4 0.000 0.000 -2192.865 -2919.342 257.845 0.000
6.1.3 Loading Summary and CoG

G0 – Position
************* SEASTATE LOAD CASE CENTER REPORT *************
RELATIVE TO STRUCTURAL ORIGIN
LOAD LOAD ********* X - DIRECTION ********* ********* Y - DIRECTION ********* ********* Z - DIRECTION *********
CASE LABEL FORCE X Y Z FORCE X Y Z FORCE X Y Z
(KN) (M) (M) (M) (KN) (M) (M) (M) (KN) (M) (M) (M)
1 1 0.00 0.00 -247.68 -0.60 0.22 7.36

2 2 0.00 0.00 -121.69 -1.75 0.90 7.48
3 4 0.00 0.00 -403.08 -0.80 0.35 7.30
4 6 0.00 0.00 -9.81 -2.60 -4.78 7.67
5 7 0.00 0.00 -29.20 -0.40 0.00 7.33
6 8 0.00 0.00 -45.11 -0.74 0.47 7.49
7 WGHT 0.00 0.00 -1017.76 -0.88 0.33 7.36
8 DAF 0.00 0.00 -1221.31 -0.88 0.33 7.36
9 PAD 0.00 0.00 -1648.77 -0.88 0.33 7.36
10 NPAD 0.00 0.00 -1404.51 -0.88 0.33 7.36
11 FLP0 0.00 0.00 -1868.00 -0.88 0.33 7.36
12 NLP0 0.00 0.00 -2192.86 -0.88 0.33 7.36
13 LPA0 0.00 0.00 -1624.34 -0.88 0.33 7.36
Pada saclst cogota, keyword relative
G1 – Position

1 1 0.00 0.00 -247.68 -0.60 0.22 7.36

2 2 0.00 0.00 -121.69 -1.75 0.90 7.48
3 4 0.00 0.00 -403.08 -0.80 0.35 7.30
4 6 0.00 0.00 -9.81 -2.60 -4.78 7.67
5 7 0.00 0.00 -29.20 -0.40 0.00 7.33
6 8 0.00 0.00 -45.11 -0.74 0.47 7.49
7 +X 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.03
8 +Y 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.03
9 WGHT 0.00 0.00 -1017.76 -1.88 -0.67 7.36
10 DAF 0.00 0.00 -1221.31 -1.88 -0.67 7.36
11 PAD 0.00 0.00 -1648.77 -1.88 -0.67 7.36
12 NPAD 0.00 0.00 -1404.51 -1.88 -0.67 7.36
13 FLP1 0.00 0.00 -1868.00 -1.88 -0.67 7.36
14 LPA1 0.00 0.00 -1624.34 -1.88 -0.67 7.36
15 NLP1 0.00 0.00 -2192.86 -1.88 -0.67 7.36
Pada saclst cog1, keyword relative
Harga x y z harus sama dengan xyz rencana
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 28 of 31
G2 – Position
1 1 0.00 0.00 -247.68 -0.60 0.22 7.36

2 2 0.00 0.00 -121.69 -1.75 0.90 7.48
3 4 0.00 0.00 -403.08 -0.80 0.35 7.30
4 6 0.00 0.00 -9.81 -2.60 -4.78 7.67
5 7 0.00 0.00 -29.20 -0.40 0.00 7.33
6 8 0.00 0.00 -45.11 -0.74 0.47 7.49
7 +X 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.03
8 +Y 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.03
9 WGHT 0.00 0.00 -1017.76 0.12 -0.67 7.36
10 DAF 0.00 0.00 -1221.31 0.12 -0.67 7.36
11 PAD 0.00 0.00 -1648.77 0.12 -0.67 7.36
12 NPAD 0.00 0.00 -1404.51 0.12 -0.67 7.36
13 FLP2 0.00 0.00 -1868.00 0.12 -0.67 7.36
14 LPA2 0.00 0.00 -1624.34 0.12 -0.67 7.36
15 NLP2 0.00 0.00 -2192.86 0.12 -0.67 7.36
G3 – Position
1 1 0.00 0.00 -247.68 -0.60 0.22 7.36

2 2 0.00 0.00 -121.69 -1.75 0.90 7.48
3 4 0.00 0.00 -403.08 -0.80 0.35 7.30
4 6 0.00 0.00 -9.81 -2.60 -4.78 7.67
5 7 0.00 0.00 -29.20 -0.40 0.00 7.33
6 8 0.00 0.00 -45.11 -0.74 0.47 7.49
7 +X 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.03
8 +Y 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.03
9 WGHT 0.00 0.00 -1017.76 -1.88 1.33 7.36
10 DAF 0.00 0.00 -1221.31 -1.88 1.33 7.36
11 PAD 0.00 0.00 -1648.77 -1.88 1.33 7.36
12 NPAD 0.00 0.00 -1404.51 -1.88 1.33 7.36
13 FLP3 0.00 0.00 -1868.00 -1.88 1.33 7.36
14 LPA3 0.00 0.00 -1624.34 -1.88 1.33 7.36
15 NLP3 0.00 0.00 -2192.86 -1.88 1.33 7.36
G4 – Position
1 1 0.00 0.00 -247.68 -0.60 0.22 7.36

2 2 0.00 0.00 -121.69 -1.75 0.90 7.48
3 4 0.00 0.00 -403.08 -0.80 0.35 7.30
4 6 0.00 0.00 -9.81 -2.60 -4.78 7.67
5 7 0.00 0.00 -29.20 -0.40 0.00 7.33
6 8 0.00 0.00 -45.11 -0.74 0.47 7.49
7 +X 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.03
8 +Y 0.00 0.00 COUPLE 0.00 0.00 0.03
9 WGHT 0.00 0.00 -1017.76 0.12 1.33 7.36
10 DAF 0.00 0.00 -1221.31 0.12 1.33 7.36
11 PAD 0.00 0.00 -1648.77 0.12 1.33 7.36
12 NPAD 0.00 0.00 -1404.51 0.12 1.33 7.36
13 FLP4 0.00 0.00 -1868.00 0.12 1.33 7.36
14 LPA4 0.00 0.00 -1624.34 0.12 1.33 7.36
15 NLP4 0.00 0.00 -2192.86 0.12 1.33 7.36
6.2 DEFLECTION PLOTS

See Appendix C – Deflection Output Plots
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 29 of 31
6.3 SLINGS LOADAmbil di pstlst.lpa, keyword : member forces

SACS-IV SYSTEM MEMBER FORCES AND MOMENTS
******************** KN ********************* ******************* KN-M ********************

MEMBER MEMBER GROUP LOAD FORCE(X) FORCE(Y) FORCE(Z) MOMENT(X) MOMENT(Y) MOMENT(Z)
NUMBER END ID CASE
PL03- HP PL03 SL LPA0 540.94 0.00 -7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00

LPA1 703.57 0.00 -9.52 -0.01 0.00 0.00
LPA2 504.82 0.00 -8.65 -0.01 0.00 0.00
LPA3 577.05 0.00 -5.95 0.02 0.00 0.00
LPA4 378.31 0.00 -5.09 0.02 0.00 0.00
PL06- HP PL06 SL LPA0 351.12 0.00 -3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00

LPA1 324.88 0.00 -13.81 -0.01 0.00 0.00
LPA2 530.20 0.00 -16.15 -0.02 0.00 0.00
LPA3 172.05 0.00 8.78 0.01 0.00 0.00
LPA4 377.37 0.00 6.44 0.00 0.00 0.00
PL09- HP PL09 SL LPA0 578.39 0.00 1.29 -0.01 0.00 0.00

LPA1 613.49 0.00 2.50 -0.02 0.00 0.00
LPA2 419.03 0.00 3.25 -0.02 0.00 0.00
LPA3 737.75 0.00 -0.66 0.01 0.00 0.00
LPA4 543.28 0.00 0.08 0.01 0.00 0.00
PL12- HP PL12 SL LPA0 406.14 0.00 -0.86 0.01 0.00 0.00

LPA1 229.53 0.00 10.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
LPA2 431.73 0.00 10.44 0.00 0.00 0.00
LPA3 380.55 0.00 -12.17 0.02 0.00 0.00
LPA4 582.76 0.00 -11.77 0.02 0.00 0.00
6.4 MEMBER CODE CHECKS
6.4.1 Member Connected to Padeye

Di pstlst.nlp
* * * M E M B E R G R O U P S U M M A R Y * * *
API RP2A 21ST/AISC 9TH
MAX. DIST EFFECTIVE CM
GRUP CRITICAL LOAD UNITY FROM * APPLIED STRESSES * *** ALLOWABLE STRESSES *** CRIT LENGTHS * VALUES *
ID MEMBER COND CHECK END AXIAL BEND-Y BEND-Z AXIAL EULER BEND-Y BEND-Z COND KLY KLZ Y Z
M N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 M M
B01 D005-PL03 NLP3 0.35 0.2 -0.03 -42.41 -38.06 174.151774.56 234.30 266.25 C<.15 5.3 0.2 0.85 0.85
B02 D061-D073 NLP3 1.12 0.0 2.66-148.83 24.33 141.00 784.30 155.10 176.25 TN+BN 0.8 1.2 0.85 0.85
G02 D034-D035 NLP3 0.33 0.0 0.27 15.41 -69.47 213.005116.35 234.30 266.25 TN+BN 3.4 0.9 0.85 0.85
G1A D030-D044 NLP3 0.60 4.6 -11.74 88.93 -29.64 175.28 463.73 213.00 266.25 C<.15 7.6 4.6 0.85 0.85
G1B D034-D048 NLP3 0.48 0.0 0.33 74.52 34.86 213.00 463.73 213.00 266.25 TN+BN 7.6 4.6 0.85 0.85
P02 PL02-PL03 NLP4 0.19 1.5 -4.52 33.77 26.61 184.86 954.13 258.75 258.75 C<.15 7.0 1.5 0.85 0.85
6.4.2 Member Not Connected to Padeye

Di pstlst.flp
* * * M E M B E R G R O U P S U M M A R Y * * *
API RP2A 21ST/AISC 9TH
MAX. DIST EFFECTIVE CM
GRUP CRITICAL LOAD UNITY FROM * APPLIED STRESSES * *** ALLOWABLE STRESSES *** CRIT LENGTHS * VALUES *
ID MEMBER COND CHECK END AXIAL BEND-Y BEND-Z AXIAL EULER BEND-Y BEND-Z COND KLY KLZ Y Z
M N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 N/MM2 M M
B01 D005-PL03 FLP3 0.30 0.2 -0.03 -36.12 -32.42 174.151774.56 234.30 266.25 C<.15 5.3 0.2 0.85 0.85
B02 D061-D073 FLP3 0.96 0.0 2.27-126.78 20.73 141.00 784.30 155.10 176.25 TN+BN 0.8 1.2 0.85 0.85
G02 D034-D035 FLP3 0.28 0.0 0.23 13.12 -59.18 213.005116.35 234.30 266.25 TN+BN 3.4 0.9 0.85 0.85
G1A D030-D044 FLP3 0.51 4.6 -10.00 75.75 -25.25 175.28 463.73 213.00 266.25 C<.15 7.6 4.6 0.85 0.85
G1B D034-D048 FLP3 0.41 0.0 0.28 63.48 29.70 213.00 463.73 213.00 266.25 TN+BN 7.6 4.6 0.85 0.85
P02 PL02-PL03 FLP4 0.16 1.5 -3.85 28.77 22.66 184.86 954.13 258.75 258.75 C<.15 7.0 1.5 0.85 0.85
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 30 of 31
6.5 REACTION
Reaction force without consequence factor

Dari pstlst.LPA
SACS-IV SYSTEM REACTION FORCES AND MOMENTS
********************* KN ******************** ******************** KN-M *******************

JOINT LOAD FORCE(X) FORCE(Y) FORCE(Z) MOMENT(X) MOMENT(Y) MOMENT(Z)
NUMBER CASE
HD LPA0 -0.490 0.351 1629.991 -0.027 -0.002 0.000

LPA1 -0.490 0.350 1629.984 -0.039 -0.002 -0.003
LPA2 -0.489 0.351 1629.984 -0.029 0.002 -0.001
LPA3 -0.490 0.353 1629.984 -0.010 -0.006 0.004
LPA4 -0.489 0.351 1629.984 -0.034 0.000 -0.002
001L LPA0 0.132 -0.351 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

LPA1 0.204 -0.350 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA2 0.144 -0.351 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA3 0.120 -0.353 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA4 0.060 -0.351 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
004L LPA0 0.358 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

LPA1 0.286 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA2 0.345 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA3 0.370 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LPA4 0.428 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
SACS-IV SYSTEM REACTION FORCES AND MOMENTS SUMMARY

*** MOMENTS SUMMED ABOUT ORIGIN ***
********************* KN ******************** ******************** KN-M *******************

LOAD FORCE(X) FORCE(Y) FORCE(Z) MOMENT(X) MOMENT(Y) MOMENT(Z)
CASE
LPA0 0.000 0.000 1629.991 548.747 1459.433 0.000
LPA1 0.000 0.000 1629.984 548.753 1459.423 0.840
LPA2 0.000 0.000 1629.984 548.753 1459.444 0.138
LPA3 0.000 0.000 1629.984 548.741 1459.423 -0.137
LPA4 0.000 0.000 1629.984 548.741 1459.444 -0.840
Reaction force with consequence factor of 1.15

Dari pstlst.flp
********************* KN ******************** ******************** KN-M *******************

NUMBER CASE
HP FLP0 0.587 -11.831 1868.016 -159.271 -3.551 0.001

FLP1 135.421 101.709 1868.024 -471.431 17.219 -0.045
FLP2 -134.862 99.298 1868.024 -504.471 -15.908 -0.052
FLP3 136.035 -122.961 1868.024 185.912 8.807 0.055
FLP4 -134.248 -125.370 1868.024 152.902 -24.321 0.047
PL02 FLP0 3.066 11.831 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

FLP1 -92.642 -101.709 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP2 35.591 -99.298 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP3 -29.459 122.961 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP4 98.773 125.370 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
PL11 FLP0 -3.653 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

FLP1 -42.779 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP2 99.271 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP3 -106.576 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
FLP4 35.474 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

********************* KN ******************** ******************** KN-M *******************

CASE
FLP0 0.000 0.000 1868.016 619.259 1648.343 0.000
FLP1 0.000 0.000 1868.024 -1248.401 3516.338 0.000
FLP2 0.000 0.000 1868.024 -1248.401 -219.651 0.000
FLP3 0.000 0.000 1868.024 2486.918 3516.338 0.000
FLP4 0.000 0.000 1868.024 2486.918 -219.651 0.000
DATE: 05/03/14

LIFTING ANALYSIS
PAGE: 31 of 31
Reaction force with consequence factor of 1.35

Dari pstlst.nlp
********************* KN ******************** ******************** KN-M *******************

NUMBER CASE
HD NLP0 -0.660 0.474 2200.502 -0.037 -0.002 -0.001

NLP1 -0.662 0.470 2200.490 -0.053 -0.003 -0.005
NLP2 -0.657 0.471 2200.490 -0.038 0.003 -0.001
NLP3 -0.662 0.477 2200.490 -0.014 -0.008 0.006
NLP4 -0.657 0.475 2200.490 -0.046 0.001 -0.002
001L NLP0 0.178 -0.474 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

NLP1 0.277 -0.470 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP2 0.193 -0.471 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP3 0.162 -0.477 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP4 0.080 -0.475 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
004L NLP0 0.482 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

NLP1 0.386 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP2 0.464 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP3 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
NLP4 0.577 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

********************* KN ******************** ******************** KN-M *******************

CASE
NLP0 0.000 0.000 2200.502 740.823 1970.257 0.000
NLP1 0.000 0.000 2200.490 740.858 1970.216 1.132
NLP2 0.000 0.000 2200.490 740.858 1970.297 0.186
NLP3 0.000 0.000 2200.490 740.788 1970.217 -0.185
NLP4 0.000 0.000 2200.490 740.788 1970.297 -1.132
6.6 CONNECTION CODE CHECKS
Since no tubular intersection is found during lifting analysis, joint can analysis is not
performed in this calculation.

Lifting Analysis Report - Mahadi Kurniawan

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lifting Analysis Report - Mahadi Kurniawan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM

A 20/05/05 ANA ISSUED FOR CLIENT

STATUS CODE : A = Issued for comments - B = Issued for approval - C = Approved

TOTAL OR PARTIAL REPRODUCTION AND/OR UTILIZATION OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE FORBIDDEN

CLASS REVISION STATUS

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

APPENDIX A PADEYE DESIGN AND CALCULATION

APPENDIX B STRUCTURAL GEOMETRY

APPENDIX C JOINT DEFLECTION PLOTS

APPENDIX D UNITY CHECK RATIO PLOTS

APPENDIX E SACS INPUT FILE

APPENDIX F SACS OUTPUT FILE

Appendix F1 Maximum Joint Deflection List

Appendix F2 Member Unity Check Summary

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

APPENDIX G REFERENCES DRAWING

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

1.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE ANALYSIS

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

2.1 WEIGHT SUMMARY

2.2 CENTRE OF GRAVITY

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

The centre of gravity from SACS calculation are as follow :

2.3 MAXIMUM SLING LOAD

The maximum sling loads are shown in the table below:

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

Padeye on the DIESEL STORAGE:

2.4 API/AISC MEMBER STRESS RATIOS

Pstlst.NLP, key word : r than 1

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

2.5 API/AISC JOINT PUNCHING SHEAR STRESS RATIOS

2.6 API/AISC JOINT MINIMUM REQUIRED STRENGTH RATIOS

2.7 JOINT DEFLECTION

Span Deflection Load

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

3.1 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

1.1.1 Project Specification and Reports

1.1.2 Company General Specification

1.1.3 Codes and Standards

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

Material strength refer to general COMPANY specification of reference GS-STR-201.

Piles S355 Tubular OD < 12” S235

WPG S355 WPG S235

Rolled section S235

Plates S355 Plates S235 Plates S235

3.3 COMPUTER PROGRAM

3.4 UNIT SYSTEM

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

4.1 METHOD OF ANALYSIS

4.1.2 Allowable Stress

4.1.3 Contingency Factor

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

4.1.3.2 Weight Contingencies

4.1.4 Dynamic Amplification Factor

4.1.5 Consequence Factor

4.1.6 Skew Effect

4.1.7 Rigging Arrangement

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

4.1.8 CoG Variation

DIESEL STORAGE PLATFORM REVISION: A

* SEASTATE COMBINED LOAD CASE SUMMARY *

* SEASTATE LOAD CASE CENTER REPORT *

********** KN * * KN-M ************