Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PHANRATANAMALA Susira
27-1
3. Bamboo Structural Frame System Proposal 4.1.3 Material Basic Strength Tests Results
3.1 Frame Truss System Proposal for KHFA The compression test of bamboo showed that its average
2
The structural design principle for bamboo is to use it for compression strength was 80 N/mm , and tensile strength was
2
tension and compression. Nevertheless, from joints concern and 180-200 N/mm . The results revealed that bamboo had an
project limitations, the structural system was limited to the two- inherent high tensile strength in parallel direction, in comparison
dimensional frame behavior. Thus, achieving with a triangular to compression. However, the results from each specimen were
pattern or trusses system would provide stability by making the varied even if they were taken from the same bamboo piece. In
entire structure more rigid. Further, it would keep the bamboo fact, the mechanical property of bamboo varies according to its
pole from buckling, bending and shear. age, species, location, or the specific portion of bamboo used.
3.2 Weakest Joint Points at KHFA Structural Frame Truss 4.2 Bamboo Joint System: Experiments
The weakest joint points are illustrated in Fig.3. It is The significant point in bolted joint connecting bamboo was
necessary to fill concrete-mortar at these points, and joint type the tensile force from bolt, applied towards the end of the
would be tested. bamboo joint, resulting in shear. (Janssen, 2000). Thus, to
examine the possibility of the construction joints, joint tests were
conducted to investigate the critical load impact, durability of
bamboo, and bolted joint (with/without concrete-mortar). A
Sheath Steel Tube of ø18-19 mm (inner size of ø16 mm) was
used to put through the drilled hole. A ø16 mm Steel Bolt(M16)
was used to connect bamboo altogether. The purpose is to
enable the joint to be detachable from the concrete-mortar infill.
Concrete-mortar was infilled into the bamboo after sheath
steel tube was inserted. Plugging plasticine clay was then applied
around the drilled holes to prevent mortar leakage.
1. Drilling ø19mm of the
hole on bamboo.
2. Removing the diaphragm
inside the bamboo. And
inserting the ø18-19mm of
the sheath steel tube through
the drilled hole.
3. Pasting plasticine clay
around the drilled hole. And
putting concrete-mortar into
the bamboo.
Weakest Point Weak Point Neutral Point 4. After concrete-mortar
setting, removing plasticine
Requiring CFB and Requiring CFB and Not Require CFB but clay, and inserting ø16mm
Joint Test Joint Test Requiring Joint Test steel bolt through sheath steel
tube, assembling members,
Fig.3 Frame Proposal and Critical Weakness Point Probability 1 2 3 4 and tightening with steel
washers and nuts.
27-2
The Tensile load was applied on the In this experiment, 3 bamboos were connected altogether.
loading machine from both sides, upper One was orientated in vertical direction between another two
and lower head. The machine was able to bamboos, which were orientated in horizontal direction. The
produce the maximum load of 200 kN. 2 purpose was to investigate the impact of bolted joint on bamboo
displacement transducers were placed at in perpendicular direction.
the steel strap, which were attached on The post-failures joint in NFB occurred on both of horizontal
the U-shape steel plate, to record the
bamboos, which were cracked in parallel. The friction from
displacement and rotation of specimen.
The specimen was lopsidedly set up on washers caused indented trace on bamboo. Meanwhile, the CFB
load machine due to the machine case initially occurred on bolt. It was severely curved and bended
limitation, but it did not influence the upward but was not torn apart. The second damage occurred on
strength. vertical bamboo around the hole of bolted joint. The result was a
Fig.8 Experiment set up for joint in Group 1 – Tensile Load Test
longitudinal crack on bamboo, but only few damages occurred
on the horizontal bamboos except for slight longitudinal crack,
The experiments demonstrated that all typical failure in NFB
and nothing happened on perpendicular to grain. The results of
and CFB were similar, mainly at the bamboo itself. Failure of NFB
concrete-mortar inside bamboos were the same as Group 1.
occurred earlier than that of CFB. Fig.9 showed the longitudinal
Sheath steel tube had less damage than expected.
crack from the joint point to the end of culm. The crack was
NFB CFB
particularly noticeable since bamboos moved vertically from the
joint point. Washers were then slipped out, and drilled hole
could be seen. There was no damage on bolt and sheath steel
tube unless it was angular displaced. Furthermore, the concrete-
mortar in CFB case showed different kind of results. Some of
them did not have any damage, some were lightly cracked, and
some were broken in 2 pieces but it did not slip out.
NFB CFB
Ave. Ave.
0.715 kN 2.42 kN
Fig.12 Comparison of Typical Failures of Group 1 Joint – NFB and CFB Type
Ave. Ave.
1.66 kN 3.70 kN The average of tolerance strength level of this joint group
could be assumed that 0.715 kN for NFB, and 2.42 kN for CFB.
4.2.3 Results
The experiment demonstrated that using bamboo bolted
Fig.9 Comparison of Typical Failures of Group 1 Joint – NFB and CFB Type
joint with concrete-mortar infill was very effective.
The average of tolerance strength level of this joint group Such joint could make the bolts to endure the load capacity, and
could be assumed that 1.66 kN for NFB, and 3.70 kN for CFB. made bamboo more rigid, and acted as bonding to tightly
4.2.2 Group 2–Bamboo Bolted Joint in Perpendicular Direction attached bamboo and fastener altogether. However, bolted joint
in Group 2 was weaker than Group 1. Steel bolt could not endure
the compression load. Although, sheath steel tube was not
effective on strength, it could be the alternative method to apply
for detachable system.
4.3 Bamboo Structural Frame: Experiments
This experiment conducted the pulling test in Vertical and
Lateral Direction. The purpose was to analyze the potential
Fig.10 Group 2 – Bamboo joint in perpendicular direction. strength, and impact of joint on overall bamboo frame for
The compression load building structures. The experiment also investigated different
was applied on the structural behavior when each load was activated on the frame.
loading machine, which 4.3.1 Experimental Setup
was the same as that in The prototype frame was constructed with concrete-mortar
Group 1. Putting the load infill at the selective joint points. The frame was laid down on
on the vertical bamboo. ground, and its bottom part was fastened by steel pipes. The
Both of horizontal load was applied by the use of a manual winch anchored to an
bamboos were placed on
external reaction frame. The maximum load could increase up to
blocks. Two displacement
transducers were placed 350 - 400 kg. The strength has to meet the load to be carried
under the movable plate. with sufficient safety and the displacements were recorded.
4.3.2 Vertical Load Test Performance and Investigation
Fig.11 Experiment set up for joint in Group 2 – Compression Load Test
27-3
To investigate the dead load effect from the rooftop, the 5. The Processes of KHFA Project
vertical load was applied as shown in Fig.13. However, this 5.1 Pre-Construction
project was decided to use fabric membrane for covering the
whole structure, thus the load application number was
considered to be acceptable and adequate for such light-weight
structure. Most importantly, the post-failure did not occur on the
prototype frame.
Vertical Test Setup
Damage Points
(1) Frame Assembling and Setup – Put the frames on bricks. Setup in parallel.
(2) Floor Installation – Two plane of wooden floor were set on bamboo frame.
(1) (3) Wall Installation – Brick dry process system was used for wall component.
(4) Covering Installation – Installing bamboo lintels for supporting fabric
membrane under the bamboo frames. Attaching membrane by plastic ropes.
Load: 3189.96 N
at 164.80 mm
27-4