Professional Documents
Culture Documents
its effctts rtele as:r',..rrl (nr tlx.nrost conruron ol sleep disordcrr, ,(lccp onset I
insonrrria. Thr, proscrrt rc.crlr,h l-ls rlcsigued to nvoid tltc irradcquacies of (
preliou,. i vcstigntiorrs l^ ut rrsilg a clouble Llirul l)roccdurc; l)r usirg ob- (
jcctivc ey:rlu.ltior) pl'o(.(h[('s lIjlic recordirlgs); {r](l cl njillg thc r( coDr- i
nrendcd ;tutrrLcl ru(l (lirtril)rliou of trcatDrcnts. Arlditioralh', ruLj.cti!e
slcep claluittion rrrrrl 1x,r'.orulit1'-I-.1'cholrathology clrtt $-rrc ol)tniu('rl. t
l-cn lolLrnt(r(x,i $itlr ol)jot,tircl) rstibliihcrl in.onrrria rrcrc Ianclotttly ts- t
sigrrerl to one of tlo r,\l)crin)cntrl con{litions. 'fhcse cortditiolr: \rerc clcctro- T
slccp ireatnnrrt rrr(l sinnlhtcrl clo(troslorl) ttcietllt{rltt. Itritirllll', eacll stll) I
ject (S) spentl 3 ;rrcccssilc rights in lllc slcep l:rborator!' for tlre liE( l-liOG
moDitoring of hi-. r'isht{irnc sktt) t)rttct,rs- 'l'hi! $rti IolloNcd Iry Ir .c cs I
oI 24 rlaytimc "tr{,ntr)x,rt!," cr(h l5 rnir)utos iu drrration. Ioilowiril this
phasc, cach ,S rrguin s|c[t 2 rrighls ir tl)(' sl{\]) l*borato$', at \\'hi(11 time c
posli-trcatmcxt (lli{1s $(,rc rncrstrrc(1. ,{ftcl i4 lx)-trcaln)cllt rILr's, r'rrclt S T
rcttrr)cd to thc sl{{'l) Iill)ollllorY lor follon-uI tl).ilslllcttlcrrt. l)
Oll the basis ol lili(i rrrorr'rtrr'.,, tlr(r aotutll troatlllcrlt grolll) oxhil)il({l a I
strtistically significn l (l(clirrc ill th('lat(,rrc) oI slfi]] otl-.ct, lxjrceDtngc of e
total Lod timo tNrrkc, arrrl t,(.r(cntagc ol totrtl sl('cl) tirnc' irr sttrgc I slocp d
A significani iDcl0asc iI tLe t)crro trrge of total slc(,t) tiru! ir stagc 4 rrnd i
tolrrl (lelta sle{rt) \'rls foLlrl..\rlrlilionolll', sul}icctivcl}' rot)o}l({ ltrtcrx,ics of il
slcep oDSet de(iin(l sigrilirrllrtll'. Thcso l)ost-tlcstrncnt rc-.tllts \\'cre txBin- 8
tained at follorv-uP. Signili( rIrl ilillcr(rl(ros tcre Dot foun(l irr thc sirnuLited ll
lrellirncnt grolrl,. h
arc discounted bcfore con(lu( lirrg thrt clc(:troslccp is truly an cffectiYo thcta_ ir
peutic prccedulc in tht tr'('atructrt of slecp otrset insomnia.
cl
sl
Electmsleep has been dcscribed as "a guishable Irom ordilary slcep, ])roduced bX
sirte of consciousDess grossly il)Llistin- tlro direct action oI tt rvcak rhytbmic cu' si
rent on the Lrain of a co-oper,rting subjeci
'Tl)is ro|ort is based in polL on a mastcr's ll,csis in a nondistraciing cnvironmcnt" (2, p 9),
strbmitl€d to the graduate fsculty oI thc UDilersitv h
of Illinois :rl Chicaso Circlc, Dcpartmeni of Psy- To initiate this state loriotts clectmslcel 8(
cl olosr, Chicaso. Illinois 60630. devices manufacturcd in thc L)lited Stat€s,
The autlor $isles to cxpre$ his de.rsl 8r'nti- u
tude to his advisor, Dr. Rosdind D. Crrtrvrisht, Errrope ond .lapan hnve becn uscd. tr
for srrl,crvisiDe thi-. rcseorch. The ilnleius lor elcctroslonp rcscarch n0! sl.
TLis r.searclr Nns support.d bI finil,al Sirl.s ri
Public Heatth Service Grsnt 1R0 r MH 18040 lo ILL Lnivur:ir\' of Illinois sl Cl,i,-su CrLcl'. Dc
Dr. F.osalind D. Cart{riBht. r.",'i,,""r iir*t.Lgr. Bor 3438. Cr,i.igo. IlhooiJ
Beprints E1ry bc reqncsted Irom the author at: 60680. "i
108
TREAaMENT OF INSO:\rNId BY ELE(yI&OSLIEP 109
.,,*Itillx
fro6 the rheoretical anJ experimFnEal Ss had "partial remission" oI symptoms
-"
*j-i pu"tou. He s{ates, "forcign stimuli and 13 $'as a "trcotment failure." The
E USE
"t
l.li"i uay t" rcr,crtcA titl,u'rt furrlrcl ron- roost ma,rked change \r&s on the clinical
the arlilnal al'o tlrrnrrglr lheir sleep distulbance and aDxictl sclf-ratings.
I'o,,uen,a fot
"'"- flc"ts alono l, ad to ll.n delnlol,rnnn' of Duc to Urc fuct thrt the 8s in this study
l" tnt,iUito.l condilion irr ILP(.ltenr cor'{e\" (8 p' \\'ele undergoing "psychiatric treatmeni"
c ploceclure, "1. -r.:"
""ninnl inLil,itiou r,rotects fo: 15 Lo 30 mirutes on a rnoDthly or bi-
, -.lccl) onsct T' -l]ii""-i
lIe (u' _"_' ""1. tior,r s,irlii,c l,c'oi,.l their uroDtl)lt' blsis &nd $cre suddenl]' stitched
rlrlrrrrcics oI Ir.tl,".n,ot, , tlre otr I r, olliing of to {r 60-minute l)eriocl on rr daill' basis, it
lrt u.irrg ob-
"."n.i1 . i' r.lilod to nourojii:rnd \'rl- \\'a,. r'cxsoned th{lt thc cfrects of the treet-
-'rti"otcells disortlels lneni could be aihiblltccl io suggestion. In a
itllc r(,cotl)- inus functional 1261
', suLjcciive EloctxoslepP lroalmen{' rra ttpicslll 30 sinele blind stud) (12) Ss s'oe nssigned to
,l ,t il ir ), 1l
to m minutes in
!lrrritinn, lol I l,criod of 5 trcainreoi and simulotecl trr:atmcllt condi-
ro i0 days. sitl, no si,lc
lrrrdorrlt lts- nflecti lrcing re- tions. Thc cvaluatioD proccdrrrcs used in
oor[ed. This mflJ-bo 'onrrl.l'LI
sil)r 1'lrrr- this study wcre idcnLicll to those employed
i, r.rch sub- m11rcutically indunr'l slnnp llr'rrlrl- in iu thc previous -<tudy. In the trcahnent con-
. dition I Ss lrtrd "r'e)atively total rernission"
$.hich treetmcnts c conti lous over &
, I.tI.t(
l-DoG
L5' rt sr:rics mn0h longer pcriod tnd hrtve associ:lted &d_ of thcir syrnt,loms, , S had l,rrtifll r.mis-
,llotlirrg this vcrbc sidc effc(t:. Tlre'e offcr"ts lrnro itl- sioD" und 2 Ss $cre "lt.caimcnt lailures." In
Ir'hir.h time cfudcd altcrations of tlc
"normal" slccp the sinrulatcd trcatmcn[ conditiol 4 Ss e\-
LLvs, cacL S 0[licrns, !hal i. l In,]rr.tiorr in rr1,id ele hibittxl an "improvemcni" \\'hereas 2 Ss
inovcmnnt (RE\lr an,l dpllrL rprimarily r\.cre unclunged. HoNcler', thoso rrho did
cxlriLitcd a stnge 4) sleep, Ps5'chophysical and bio- sllov rtn ilnl)rovement did not displa-v the
alccrtrgc oI chcmicrl changes suclt as drug withdra.1\-ol, "nrarkrtl imprrcvemeut" found irt the nctual
rgc I slccp. dcpcndence, and adclictiolr trc {rlso encortn- irc&trDcnt condiiion. Jt rvas corcluded that
sla,Ic .t and tclcd (3). Thus, there is fl grc^t need fol o iDrprolcmenI can be attribrrtcd partially to
lrt(lx ic! of t[cmpeutic proccdure, \lithout associated slrggcsiion.
1\1 r'0 rnaill- si,lc cflects, to rl,':rl s itl tlr,' "vcr-irrnrcasinS Tiocgl.r ca al. (5) $'uludled thc eflccis of
rc sinnllatcd rlln of slcop di'turl, rrcls. not\ r major ,hcrrn.lrr'P 11,, n,,,\ orr l6 l,.vcLiatric pr-
hcrlth prcblem in groups of all ages. ticnts u lro rcpltscnie(l l1 different diognos-
,l chopathol- In an uncontrolled studl', Roscnthal an(l tit clussifir.ations. Evsluation Drocedures
suggestibil- \\rrlleohn (11) L&vc relorlcd thc r:llctts of ronsisLrtl of clhical clecklist rntings filled
<etrrtives clcctrosleep thcrapy oD luticnts rcgistcrcd out l)r' thc l)trticr)t, frien(1 or rcl&ii1'c of
r(lir'c thera- in rl psychiatri( "mcdicxtion clinic." Ss
^
thc plrlirnt, hcatment psyclliatrists, and the
trorc givcn I0 ,lail\ lrc:ilm, lrl. lollor\ing puticDt's rcgular tLcrapist. AdditionaJll',
clinical rttillgs oI onxiety, delrressio11 rnd th. fIIIPI rvas administered l)rior to and
slccp disturbance-s oD lr ?-poiDt sc8lc and Iollo\\ ing tl)o trc&im.Dt-
' slccp, produced bY
first tvo treatments Ss remained quietly in he&tment effecLs 1vere obtained. Afte! l{ lerct
the 6ame position for thc rcmeinder of l,he "off" clays the &s egain slcpt in the laborq. t{ ec
l5-minute period. Treatments rvere admin- tory for 2 successive nights, Here follon.lro .t52)
istered at 8 to l0 hours prior to the Ss nor- effcci.q rere obtaincd. Again Sleep Q16x. fl
mal bed time. At the end of this phase, Ss tiornnire 2 and the Cornell Index wers q4. cicnt
rvere asked to complete a second Sleep miristcrcd. 1I both instances tbe 1s..,4 bct$
Questiorraire 2 nu,l tlu'Colncll lndex. frou tLe 2nd riglrt \ras uscd for thq ,r,. ihc l
The folloNilrg irstructiolls $cre tlsed: po-rcs of :rnal]'si-.. Trbl
"You are to lie qtietll' during the treat- -{t tl)c complctior of tLc cxpcrimqn6.l
rnent. Sholtll', as thc cu ent, is iDcreased, Ss r\crc infornrr,cl of thc purpose of this in-
you wi)l fecl i tingling or prickling sensa- vostigaiion. Thosc T\'bo l)atii(ipated in the Addi
tio ol'er ]'oul cl'es. Report this immedi- simulatcd treatmcrt contlition Nere ofrsmd N&s
atel). \Yhen tlris sensation habiiuatcs or r scrics of clcctroslcep treatmcnts iI they 60 SCOr(
subsides, please repod th&t too. This eensa- cltsilcd. Trvo of thc 5 Ss rcquc-.ted 10 "lcgit. tohl
tior is necesssrJ' to determiDe the ploper ilnatc" trcetDlcrts. Icitl
Drachine scttiugs. Iinally, you will bc re_ simtr
quircd to report ADd descrih nny visuol im- sconlrc cltITEIu.{. in bt
agcly and or sensnl ionr ilat you e\perience 'l'hc EEG records r.ere scorcd by ihc cri- rrc
in group grccl
duliDg the treatment." Orrc S each teliu outliled by llechtschnffcu and I(aleg
0gy.
Iound ii mole comfortablc to sit rather than (r0).
lie dosn. l.hol(
disot
Afier the tingling sensation rxa,s repo(ed, TIDSULTS
11
ihe following proce(lures wcre condttctcd: TTtE.l.ItEAlMENI' SLI'EP IIIiASI'IIIIS
a) the output culrcnt o{ thc Eiectrodorm I ofl
n'as increased 0.1 rnA; b) a cover \tas To determine if any initial group dif- s[o!
placed over tlrc output meter to guard lerences cxisted on slcep rncasrrtes, all prc-
agoinst E secilg a changc in ouiput x'iih iro&tment sleep mc&sures for tle actual ond
cD8
the institution of urc double b)ind proce- tlrc simulated treatment groups \vere com- hibi{
tlurc; and c) { rot3{'switch on a separ&te parcd through the usc oI ihe lrlmn Wltitney
contlol box \ras rolatcd. This s$itch wss I/ tcst. No signiflca,nt diffcrcnccs rvere found
ro{urn,l lo a 1,r'c,lnlornircd Jro.ition lposi- bctwccn groups on any oI the lretreatmcnl
(p
tioD 2-23) $hi(h had becn previously 6up- objcciiye or sulJjective slecp mcasures >
plicd to ,8. Of tl)e 23 tottl positions only the 05)
fir'st w:rs knoNn by -E to bc "live," tllrt is,
PRE,I&EATI|IENT PERSONALITY.
position 1 was uscd only cluring ihc iniiial
PSI'OIIOPAf IIOLOCY MEASUR]IS
"adjustment" pcliod. Of the remaining 22
positions 6 \rerc "li1'e" and ryould continue To detcrmine if groups diffclcd in'iprcs'
th. trcnlmert, \'ln,rcrs thc tcmaining l'osi- cncc" or' "dcgree" of psychopnthology, Cor'
tions tcrminaLc.l tLc current, &nd Icsultcd in noll In(lcx scores (see Table 6) *'ere scorcd
a simulated trcotment. Po$itions were prc- in accordance rvith mcthod IJ of thc Comell
nircd lithout Z's knollledge. Siuce S Index mrnual, disi butcd to i 2 x 2 co0'
adnl)ts io the "adjustmcnt" tingle verl' tingcncy tablc, and analyzcd tlrrough the
quickly, neiihcl E nor 3 can diffcrcntiate usc of Fishcr's exa,ct probtbiliiy test,
bctvcen acturl &nd 6imuloted trcatmeni Mcthod B uses a cut-off score ol 13
aftcr lhis "tinglc" period. Through the usc of Sicgcl's (14) iables, no
Tcn hours lolloring tltc list trc&tmeDt, significant diffcrcnce between groups \r'as
Ss \-ere monitored duriDg their night-time lound (p > .05). Additionally, the Modt rI
.1
slccp on 2 successir.e nights. Hclc post- lvhiincy U tesL revealed no significant dif'
TRDATMENT OF INSOMNIA BT EI,ECTEOSIEEP 113
-" i,' Corn.ll Itr'ler ralt scorcs be_ use of Siegel's (14) iables, no Eignificont
obtained. Altcr
srorrlJ rI' = 4 5 0e6 < P < dilierence betNccn gloups l\'Rs JouDd (p >
slerrt in thc hi;{1ir [#;1]';i"; .05). ^{ filrther anall-sis n'as conducted on
glrts. Here Iollo\.; 't5|1,.,r.orno,, Rirrli.corrcl0rion..( ocm- tbc l.arious subscales of the lItr{PI. Table 1
.A.gain Sleep
Q6i no'isrri,6clnt rclniionrl'ip irdicated that, iluouglr the use of the r\Iann
rnell Inrlcx \.ers ..ni-r"iu"tnA
rr,. (-nrr,nll tbrlu\ m\\ :cotcs rllrrl \\'hilncl tcchniquc, gtoups difieled on the
thc rccod
q6.
""' -
'tAnces- Tj'1,','"x;;,,,;,' l.tcn' r' or slccp orr'nr t'ec Pd lpsl'chopathic tlevirte), Sc (schizophle-
Ls uscd lor thc pur.
I
[',],,1" zt i, ,t'" 0crtrrl
lrci+rrrnrrt grorrp rr' lia), anrl lla (hvporlanie) scale,r. In exch
,f ihc cxDcri cnt ltl l-;"Or, in tl'" sinrrrl:tl.,l lrrrrim'rri grorl' inltrrlce thc sinNrlatcd treatll)ent group ex-
,c purposc ol tlis i6 , I = .:OO), nra in I'orh arorrl' i/, = lsR) )rilritld rL higlrcl rr.rLn'f s(orc. 1'hrough the
Ii,titlor"ltl , no "iJrnili'xr,r r" lLrtions)'ip u"c of Fislrcr''s test, thcsc scorcs lere then
r l)arlicipatcd in the Ind'\ tclt cllluated iol groul) diffetences in "pres-
)rrdiiioD \ticre ollqcd oil forlrd l-,"1s",,, Corn'll rccrr{xA" |rrrr"'of Dsyc]ropatho)ogy. T scores ahor'c 70
...*. L,,d tl," l'l'lrorllrr'lrl l" of
trcstmcrts if thc]. so ; f:'l'l' 3) il tIo rrr,r'c rrsorl as cut-off scorcs. On all lour
L rcqrestcd 10 "lcgit. ,"ial lrcd tirn" asakc tsoo
_- 800, irr tlrc
.nrrrnl trnr,itrront lrro'll' rrs sclLlcs, .rignificant dillercnces bet$cen
tleatrnolrr gr" ll' { r" - .300 r ' nnd g: ou1rs strc not found (p > .05). Therefole,
6leep onset (latenc)'), percent&ge of total oI total sleep time in stage 4 sleep, I furth€t
bed time awake, and perceDt{ge o{ total enalysis rcrealcd {r significant increase jI
sleep time in stage 1 sleep. Though a signif- total delta slecp. This latter analysis $as
i(ant increase vas elidenced in percentagc performcd to equalize an1' scodng irade.
I
rluacies in diffelcntiating stagc 3 aDd stage
T,IBI,IJ 2
i, 4 slcel). Olr sul,iectil'c me8sures, a signiff.
EEG Laten.iei o! Sleep O sct llinntes at
Pfttr.atrrc t, Po*l1rcatNttl, d d calt dcclirre i)r rcl)orted tirnc to slecp q05.1
|'olht tp lvco' r.ncrl (latcnct') r\as rcpolted by thc actual trcq1-
cr@n . n* l,*, Drer)t groul) (TsLlc 51. No significanl dil-
Acr,nl i
l--.- fercrrces $'cr.c cxtribiterl l))' thc simulatcd
trt,atlncnt group.
i
067
somnia-rolulcd qucstions conld conlound
thc gcncral'!)s),ctrologic&l disturbancc"
2 t7 _vl 25u 2 _47
(i 22.82 11.8.r 7.40
7 0.llr 1.66 0.60 IIELATIOT*SIIIP OF SIBJDCTIVD .{ND OBJDCTIVE
I 25.98 2.3.1 r. l0
\i SLDI'P MEISTRDS
tl 19.33J J t!t2
x/2
p:
2.418
= 10.00
-ooo77
The Spcarmun Itank Corrclation Cocff'
ciFn{ t\'c( rspd i'l ordcr to coml:Lrc various
sin,'rrated I subjectire and obiective (EOC) sletl
r8 18.22
measures. In tl)e actu&l trcatmerlt group tho
3 18. 12.45
4 25.58 25.68 11.46 re)rtionship bct$'ccn the trvo ntoasures ol
16.75 9.20 6.19 time io slcep onset was signifrcaDt at tle
I 6.61 18 05 5.90
prctrcrtrn.nt mcasllre-< (r" = .900, p < .05)
10 r9.3d 27.06 l5 98
(l
x 17 296 t8.500 1t .550 and noDsignificant at the post-trc4tment
r', = 2.80 = .238) &nd Jollow-up measurcs (r, =
P = -gti7
.575). In the simulated treaiment group, sll
nal Tins lot Sct)?t Skep St&ges Taken ot Pre-Iftotmenl' Porl'.Jealment' atlil Follou-up
'
Sleep
Moasurcmant
in stage 4 rleer
a signific&ntl I 43.42 1.86 t.02
Ihis latter q'i; 2 1.71 1.90 0.55
6 10.62 33.58 7 -99
tlize any scorini
7 6.90
tiating stage g s 1.06 5.40 0.92
8
:live measures, & x 9.700
:
xrz
2.606
7 _60
orted l,ime to slccp p = -o21
)rted bJ the acl,ual
e 5). No ri 1 7 -72 18.07 t4 75
2 26.35 19.23 18.30
ibited by the sin 7.02
6 9.48 10.45
7 21-45 19.60 24. 18
8 10.03 9.00 18 00
s-tEB80tidLlTr- x 15.486 75.270 16.462
IEASUnES xf, = 0_4o
P = .954
Two-l\ray Ane
:B 1la6 employed to & REM+A I 7 .12 18.07 14-75
2 26.35 19.23 18.36
rent. posi.trestlncnt; 6 19.82 10.45 18.91
s on the Comell Ii 7 .45 20.06
21.80
_t8
r8.00
ndex scores no si 8 15 &3
i r8 ?14 17.992 18.840
nd lor eibher the ar xrl = O.40
a p < .691) or the
p : ,9&
oup (1rz = 0.70, .691 40.40 34.58
1
3). Co ecLd Comeil 2 50 72 &.s1 4a 77
similar nouignificani 6 50.11 37.13 42.69
7 48.43 53 -29 48.80
I treatment (xr' = 8 57.26 50.00 47 .04
and the siuulat€d x 45.788 {t -t4o 44.5t)4
xr, = 3.60
'0.10,.954<p?1
Iaiter arelysis
P : .182
3 sod 4
" Delt& sleep is compised of the sum oI steges
116
TEEATTTEMI OF INSOI[NIA Bv ELEqIROSI]IEP 117
-.------.-......
-."". nretreirlment (r. - .675), post- TABLE 5
Ldte cies oJ Sleep Ons.t in
8. (i9 6e!:''l:i ?'- = .3Jo) and follo\-tr) (r' - Subje.tiDely Repotted
---:_=-i\
trcntrneni,
post-l'cn11nent'.ax'l lollon_lll) 6 150 15.0 r00
16.12 l,".ura,. .Aa onc nnn readil] sec. x lrelld \ 660 11.6 13.0
17 {l{ xr':6.70
x,.! = 0 {0 i"nard tess difhc',tt1 in fclling cslncp is tc- .02.1 < p < .{Ii9
thc a.llrnl trcltment gro'rI. Ftlt-
P = .951
-rtc,i bf
ircDrorc, tl,ey lenorl bping mor' r''nl'd
the
2t 90 Hot(cr'er, in tcrrrr' of
r2.95 intlonhrg mornirrg. 3 600 30.0 30.0
16 ?3 ihcsc sabjert;ue iclor'ls sirrrilrr' tlrorrglr rrot .1 15.0 150
22.2t
idcnti.il, trpnrls ro\\of'd, in'p;outnenl rt
i' 5 20 {l 150 10.0
17 63 9 30.0 30.0 200
18 606 1r.t rel,orted lrJ tLc sim.ll1r.,l trexlmcnL l0 ,15. O 70.o 45.0
1r1 = 1.60 groul:. This, rlr,'rr, clarifics tLc qucstiorrabl' I !10 0 21.0
rc.lllts in ciulicr rasr'ol(lr'
xr, = 1.i,0
.12J <p <.1E2
{9.60 At the complction oI tle sttrdy, all Ss
56 15 {illliD thc actusl treatl]t(xrt group fc]t ilcy
31 4i hnd bclcfited frorD tLc olectroslecp treat_ morc extrcme sens:ltion and lor'!, longer dtl-
6r.0J
50 3E lrcDts. In the simulrttcd treatrneni, grouP 3 rotion of t,ime throughout the "trextment."
50.92E Ss fe,lt thcy had berrefitr{ frorn the clcctto- That iE, on occasion thet' expericncecl sensa-
- 0 .10
xri slccf trettnents, 1 S "henofitcd tlroLrgl) tLc tions to tlle yery end ol thc "trcctment,"
P = 9i! lsL $cck of tr0xlnt,rrl.., lnlt lll.n iolrn tlritrg $h.rcas thc actlal trc&tmrnt group rlid not.
14 69 Ilppcied, it tlirll1't sccnt to gcL 8ny Lcttcr," Of greatcr importencc, tlrr:sc repori,s indi-
11.07
and I S fcli no bcnelits. ccte that the doublc blind proccdurc \!as
1.63 T|l.: Lyl)es ol scr:jllinlrs :'nLl vi- rrl itrr- succcssfully cauied out. Ncithct Z nor Ss
7 -76 dgcry thit $clc 't'xpcriclced" during the rlerc lcally abJc to dillerentiate betl\'cen the
!r 0S'l elcctroslecp "tlcatDlcntl" indi( rtc.l 1.Lat thc two typcs of treatrncnts. This is furthcr
xrt=2il simulatcd trcnilucrl grorrp had r urolc bi- substrtntinfocl l)) thc fact tbet Nhen thc Ss
P - -367 zarte experiencc. l,'ol c\aril)l{), thcl re- irr tl, sir'r'rlr l,,l tri.ulr0,rrr grorln \\'cre in-
5.06 portcd, "no stinelillg todx)', rny hcad n'as formcd tl)tt tllcy ha(l ro[ reccivcd actusl
17.31
27.97 sort ol throbbing;" "I\r realll' dizz]';" "big trcrtrncnts, thcl had difiiculty belicving it
elcciric.hork, lrlrrn lhsl,, rn,l b:rLl fecli'rc in bccnrrse of "allthey felt."
l0 70 my Irouth;" "rr stroDg surge ol l)o\'0r in the Irrfolmaiion lrom Sleep Qucstionlaile 3
15.4?0
:{10 hginning follo*crl Ly thc u"rral prickting to some extent rcveals tho treatrDarrt proc-
"r1
.lZl<p<.182 sensation, liglrt-lrcrrlcdnrss o1l' and oD ... a css. In the sirnulutccl treatment group a
Icnl trip," \yllcrees, the :ictutl trc:ltuer)t marliecl voriability or time to slecp onset
r9.75 ^!s
'!.1 coDmented, "u 11-r: mth oyer the eycballs;" nDd Ss' rcstlulness 1l'as coDtinuoily re-
Jl 69 "prickling sensatiorr on clelids an(l basc of |ortcd. ln t)ro x.tul1l Irc{rIm.nt grorrl, sinri-
l1 8; neck;" "felt ln.ickling on ej'es ind back of )cr r';rriabilitt is cl-o rcPn. but orll dJ'ir)g
25.421
rcck, but, i,heli
it dropped ofl.,' tLc cerly plusc of trelltment-.. IIo1\evcr,
Furthermorc, the Ss in the simulated Tlithin this latter group, at a mc&u of 15.6
P= 954 trcetment group seemed to e*peliencc a, days vari&bilit)' declined sharply.
118 UAEC F. VDISS
TABIE 6
Fo ou'up lledsurement offr
Colnell lttte. S@,es dt Pre\eatne'i, Post-treot Dt.nt' and
sl8
llii
,'dt
Total I l9 12
2 4 0 otll
6 6 6 sio
7 5 6
l
8 t3 1l
I 9.4 70 cti
130 sl.r
p< 00t ol
SiDnrlxted trertmert 3 6 6 for
I 3S clt
5 6 6
tIc
I 5.1 {s
l0 20 18 slcl
I 21.4 23.0 log
070 for
.6S1 < ?< 05{
slcr
13 t2 rnc
0 0 (
5 4
2 5 obl
12 10 cn(
64 62 tet
xr' = 3.l0 ins
.182<'p<.3$7
ma
SimtrlAted trestment 3 4 4 5 coI
.1 42 34
6 5 blc
5 5
I 41 17 Is(
l0 20 l8 16 in
a 22.1 z2.a 220
W}
rr,:0.10
.954<p<1.0m usi
n0
questions) have not been included in thtu conrput8tiotr'
'Questions 20 snd 65 (iusomoia-r€lated It
tle
I]NUSUAI, FINDINGB of slcep onset in
post-treatment latencies
Th
the actusl beatmeni $oup vere signifi' tlt
Four oI 5 Ss in both ihc act.la'l and simu-
cant)y shorier than ihe pretrettrlent laten'
la{.ed lrcalmeDt grorrps revcalcd sleop depri-
cies; b) ihis efect was m&iotained over I
!
vation effects (ambiguous REM) ai least [o-treatment interval; and c) the subjec
thr
once over the 7 laboroiory nighis, Addiiion- ind
tive sleep repo of those Ss changed ac'
ally, 1 S revealed aobigLrous REM charac- cordingly. Furthermue, Do such effects lrerc
iho
terized by sleep spindtes in boih the EEG exhibited by the simulaied iretttrent goup.
gr0
and EOG patterns on three occaeions. This Neither of the placebo hypothesc.' were con'
of
finding suggests that Ss \\'ere "hue" insom- firmed.
Iir
niaes rather than''fttrrctional" insomniacs, Ol prime importance is thaL L" decline in
0n(
The three major hypoiheses of this inves- time arvake and numbe! of sPonianeous gr0
tigation were confirmed. Specifically, a) the awakenings, and etage 1 o! "liglrt" sleep \Yls I
119
'TRE.\'I]ID\T OF INSO}INIA 81" ELECI'BOSI'IJEP
1,
3u
0
rr, r'.'"n""'.111':i1iil"1li,'ll''"'
ii'l'ii,1'."i".r,"*0"'""1:..:Tll:il1l""::.:l o
!,i',
lli.1i'",,,,:,'i'."'ri,. :.r';'rr. i.
,1! 2
f:.,.,.',1,i,..),,.,,,,,
1E
nt'n'',,aLi'' ',:; ,, '., .r 'ri r, 'r'v
lll,-ll .,i :i::,:' \Ld,,ri11.,,r,, :0 I .,
23.0
0.i0
i+ilnr
i]i'ii,. r,n.o"",er,t t:r,"llil*
111: :r::il:
'n 0 l0
.691 < 2< .05'l
12
0 illi'i"io ntr""".."e tlai the res"ults r.c i1,,"
4 xrl_ l'.'lal
,,f,,,,in,a tt"tn
r"orlrr dirf' l'
5
rncc" in rgn. clrroll'rr\,
ol-rollronrlrl,1 ( nnz !1,.,r 7,,"1-
? I;
,
r0
62 i"i,,,ir']9*.1:::l'^:i:,i"":lllii::';"::
on all availablc, infor_ l;::#:i:i1""",".
l;
xr1 =
.182<?<
3.10
i,rsornnia. I{owever, ilTiitJr#ilJ,"il* ;
rnntion nonn ot thn'" r'ptiaLln- rorrlJ I ato -i,,r .
l"i I
,,
"rr 0 u
5 c#"ura.a Ur" final outcomc. These raria- ^. ,
tlli;;1",:;'"'
.
x7
i,ll,.n."Al ,r mrrj rl ''r'rr"..'r'.plevi:1; ,r II rz I
"medicaiion," and participation ii,j.,"i"iy *.t..r
5
11 ,rse
.iu
of slcep
No' v.r)';"br".l
mrr.hed. N:l
I 0 n ?
i6 rrorc \!ell
..rchothcrao, Nere
r,, psychotherapl' rtell "maLched." I1Y i":l*, ]] 9 n
220
xr' = 0.1cr
probability icst rc1'eals
.S54<?<1.000 rusing tr'isher's exacL
lo significant group differenccs (p > ,05) ,rorc s.ggestible or more prone to placebo
It mus'u be further noted that all those in reactiviiy? That is, could ihe simulated
jn thi.s coniprtniion
of sleet) onset io
ilc actual eatment, groirp did improve. brcl,6ncnl ,{oup have been 1".s p.one?
ries
This lss not the case it the simulaLed Thnucl, tl,c area of placebo reactivity ha,s
L group vere signifl'
trcttmcnl group. bcon gilen considcrable attenfioll. liiile in
he pretneaiment lshn'
Though a pretrcetn-rcni staiistical bies on thc *,ay of identilying the placc6o reactor
rlis $aint&ined over i
tlroc Bubscales (Pd, Sc and NIa) seems to hrs bee, uncoveted. Ho1'ever, iherc is
l; and c) ihe subjec' "ume
iDdicele tLat, thc rclatile lclcl of psl'chopa- consursus thxi placebo reactors are signifi-
those 8s chaDged 8t'
thology is higher in the simulated treatment cantly (?, < .05) more anxious thrn non-
re, no such eflects \\er
group, it is dimcult to attribute the outcome
llatsd treatDlent $o!l reaclors. This has been the onl5" replicaied
co!'
oi Uris study to effects of psychopetlology. ffnditg (1, 6, 13, 16-18).
o hYpotheses {'ere
lirst, this bias is not clinical in nature. Sec- ff.itlin tlie research presented her-e iwo
oud, sleep
that t'he decliDs h
ce is depri\lttion cl{ecis *err cxlribited MX{I'I anxiety indices were considered,
thereforr: negsting the possi- trVelsh's (19) anxieiy index (AI) and Tay-
tn Lobh groups,
jimount anti irequenc)'l
of total bed bilily oI fun.bional ilsomnie iri cither lor''s (15) Nlanifest Anxiety Scale (T\IAS)'
crcenL3ae
umler ol slonteneou! i
grouD. Though lo significani differences l'ere
slecp {d linally, is it, possible i]rat one group lras lound bei\Yeen groups on either o{ these tlvo
le 1ot "lighi"
,
I 120
This