You are on page 1of 1

World Literature Assessment Criteria

1 2 3 4 5
Selection of the Aspect and its Little attempt to define the aspect Attempt to define the aspect The aspect is defined and Clearly defined aspect followed Clearly defined aspect followed
Treatments chosen; the treatment of ideas is chosen; the treatment of ideas is followed by a generally by an appropriate treatment of by an highly appropriate
• How well has the candidate generally inappropriate to the to some extent appropriate to the appropriate treatment of ideas ideas treatment of ideas
defined the aspect chosen? assignment assignment • The aspect chosen is • The aspect chosen is • The aspect chosen is highly
• How appropriate is the • The aspect chosen is • The aspect chosen is to some appropriate to the assignment appropriate to the assignment appropriate to the assignment
aspect chosen to the generally not appropriate to extent appropriate to the • The aspect chosen has a • The aspect chosen has a • The aspect chosen has a
assignment? the assignment assignment specific and generally specific and relevant focus specific and relevant focus
• How well has the aspect • The aspect chosen has little • The aspect chosen has focus relevant focus • The ideas show independence • The ideas show independence
chosen been explored in focus but is too wide • The treatment of ideas is of thought and their treatment of thought and their treatment
relation to the assignment? • The treatment of ideas is • The treatment of ideas is relevant and includes a is relevant to the aspect is highly relevant to the
• To what extent has the generally not relevant to the sometimes not relevant to the personal response to the work chosen. aspect chosen.
candidate expressed a aspect chosen aspect chosen
relevant personal response? • The assignment consists • The assignment consists in
mainly of paraphrase. part of paraphrase.
Knowledge and Understanding Little understanding of the Some understanding of the Adequate understanding of the Good understanding of the Excellent understanding of the
of Work(s) work(s) studied work(s) studied work(s) studied work(s) studied work(s) studied
• How well does the candidate • Knowledge but little • Knowledge and some • Knowledge and satisfactory • Detailed knowledge of, and • In-depth knowledge of, and
know the work(s) studied? understanding of the aspects understanding of the aspects understanding of the aspects good insight into, the very good insight into, the
• How much understanding of the work(s) most relevant of the work(s) most relevant of the work(s) most relevant aspects of the work(s) most aspects of the work(s) most
has the candidate shown of to the assignment to the assignment to the assignment relevant to the assignment relevant to the assignment
the work(s) studied in • A few links between works • A link between the work(s)s • Meaningful linking of • Clear and meaningful • Meaningful and perceptive
relation to the assignment? where appropriate where appropriate works, where appropriate linking of works, where linking of works, where
• To what extend does the • Little appreciate of the • Some appreciation of the • Appreciation of the cultural appropriate appropriate
candidate appreciate the cultural setting relative to cultural setting relative to setting relevant to the • Good appreciation of the • Excellent appreciation of the
cultural setting relevant to the assignment, where the assignment, where assignment, where cultural setting relevant to cultural setting relevant to
the assignment, where appropriate. appropriate. appropriate? the assignment, where the assignment, where
appropriate? appropriate appropriate.

Presentation The formal structure and/or The formal structure and/or The formal structure and/or The formal structure and/or The formal structure and/or
• How effectively has the development of ideas are development of ideas are to some development of ideas are effective development of ideas are very development of ideas are highly
candidate presented the generally not effective extent effective • Adequate structure to the effective effective
assignment? • Little evidence of a structure • Evidence of a structure to assignment • Clear and logical structure • Purposeful and effective
• How precise and relevant to the assignment selected the assignment • References are generally to to the assignment structure to the assignment
are the candidate’s • A few references to the • References are occasionally the point • Precise and pertinent • Precise and highly pertinent
references? work(s), but they are to the point • Where appropriate, the references to the work(s) references to the work(s)
• How detailed and meaningful generally not pertinent to the • Where appropriate, the presentation of aims in the • Where appropriate, the • Where appropriate, the
is the statement of intent assignment statement of intent includes statement of intent is statement of intent is clear, statement of intent is clear,
provided, where • Where appropriate, the a few details about the aims generally clear and includes detailed, and relevant detailed and highly relevant
appropriate? statement of intent provides of the assignment. some details • The candidate has remained • The candidate has remained
• Has the candidate remained few details about the aims of • The candidate has remained within the prescribed word- within the prescribed word-
within the prescribed word- the assignment. within the prescribed word limit. limit.
limit? limit.
Language Little use of appropriate language Some use of appropriate language Adequate use of appropriate Good use of appropriate language Excellent use of appropriate
• How clear is the candidate’s • Generally inappropriate • Generally appropriate language • The register is effective and language
written expression? register for the assignment register for the assignment • Appropriate register for the appropriate for the • The register is highly
• How well has the candidate selected selected assignment selected assignment selected effective and appropriate for
observed the conventions of • Frequent lapses in the • Some lapses in the • The conventions of the • The conventions of written the assignment selected
written work? convention of written work. conventions of written work written work are generally work are closely followed • Careful attention is given to
• How appropriate is the • Some consistency or clarity followed • Clarity, consistency and the conventions of written
register selected by the of expression. • Consistency and some general fluency of work
candidate for the particular clarity of expression. expression. • Clarity, consistency, and
assignment? fluency of style.
Mark range: 0–5 6 – 11 12 – 17 18 – 22 23 – 28 29 – 33 34 – 40
IB Grade/Score/Grade: 1 /21 /F 2 / 30 / F 3 / 39 / D 4 / 47 / C 5 /52/ B 6 / 56/ A 7 / 60 / A+

You might also like