Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This Content Downloaded From 146.96.128.36 On Wed, 03 Mar 2021 02:50:38 UTC
This Content Downloaded From 146.96.128.36 On Wed, 03 Mar 2021 02:50:38 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Cambridge University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to The Americas
This article is about the relationship between the early labor movement
of the Andean town of Cuzco and a local student movement that
emerged during the first two decades of the twentieth century an
which produced some of Peru's most distinguished indigenistas. At the tu
of the century signs of "progress" and "modernity" made their appearance
the city of Cuzco and both indigenistas and labor leaders were fascinated
these vague liberal concepts. The article seeks to explore the role these t
groups played in local urban society and to analyze forms of cooperation
conflicts that characterized relations between them. Indigenistas of the ear
twentieth century did not invent what frequently has been called Peru'
"Indian Question," but they pushed the issue to the forefront of regional a
even national debates contending that solving this key problem could he
unify the country and develop a more solid sense of national identity.
The central theme of this study is how Cuzco's leading labor organizatio
of the early twentieth-century, the Sociedad de Artesanos (Artisan Societ
constructed and represented its idea of a strong working class in an urb
society, which was undergoing a process of significant social change, but
which ethnic categories, to a large extent, still determined social status. H
much importance did workers and labor leaders attach to ethnicity as an e
ment of their own social and political identity? Was the "Indian Question"
serious issue for labor representatives? And how can we characterize the
relationship between the labor organization and indigenistas? These ques
tions aim at the problem of how "class" and "ethnicity" were related to ea
other in a town of the Peruvian hinterland and they require a close look
processes of group formation and at patterns of social interactions betwe
* I gratefully acknowledge that research on this article has been made possible by a Summ
Research Grant of the Joint Centers of Latin American Studies of the University of Chicago and the U
versity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I also wish to thank the three anonymous readers for their v
able and encouraging comments.
161
Latin American labor history does not offer many insights into the rela-
tion between ethnicity and class, particularly with respect to provincial labor
movements. In recent years methodological and theoretical progress has
been made mostly by authors who study working classes of dynamic eco-
nomic centers (usually export-oriented enclaves).4 But historians tend to
I On overlaps and intersections of different categories of social stratification see Kathleen Canning,
"Gender and the Politics of Class Formation: Rethinking German Labor History," The American Histor-
ical Review 97:3 (June 1992), 737-768. The article presents a profound discussion of the culturalist
attempts of re-defining the concepts of class and class formation. The term "secondary cities" refers to
James R. Scobie, Secondary Cities of Argentina. The Social History of Corrientes, Salta, and Mendoza,
1850-1910 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988).
2 See the special issue entitled "Race and Ethnicity in the Andes," Bulletin of Latin American
Research, 17:2 (May 1998), particularly the article by Mary Weismantel and Stephen E Eisenman, "Race
in the Andes: Global Movements and Popular Ontologies," 121-142. The quote is taken from p. 122.
3 A superb discussion of ethnicity and racism in Peru is Nelson Manrique, La piel y la pluma.
Escritos sobre literatura, etnicidad y racismo (Lima: SUR Casa de Estudios del Socialismo, 1999).
4 Charles Bergquist, Labor in Latin America. Comparative Essays on Chile, Argentina, Venezuela,
and Colombia (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1986); Bergquist, "What is Being Done? Some
Recent Studies on the Urban Working Class and Organized Labor in Latin America," Latin American
Research Review, 16:2 (1981), 203-223; John D. French, The Brazilian Workers' ABC. Class Conflict
and Alliances in Modern Sdo Paulo (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992); James
At the turn of the century the city of Cuzco reflected the increasing
dynamics of the regional economy, the more optimistic attitude of certain
groups of local society, and these people's ardent desire to make Cuzco a
more "modem" city.5 The completion of a railroad line between Cuzco and
Arequipa in 1908 perhaps best symbolizes this transformation. The city's
population had grown very slowly over the final decades of the nineteenth
century, but it is likely that the annual growth rate increased after 1900. In
1920 the province of Cuzco counted an estimated 37,000 inhabitants and in
1940 the population had grown to almost 55,000.6 According to a census of
1912, whose absolute figures are questionable, 22.1 percent of the urban
population were still considered Indians, while 54.8 percent were mestizos
and 22.5 percent white.7 Quechua, the Indian language, was spoken every-
where in town and many people had no command of Spanish. Even mem-
bers of elite families made use of Quechua when they addressed their work-
ers or domestic servants.
5 On Cuzco during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries see: Magnus Mdrner, Notas sobre el
comercio y los comerciantes del Cusco desde fines de la colonia hasta 1930 (Lima: IEP, 1979); Jos6
Tamayo Herrera, Historia social del Cuzco republicano (Lima: Editorial Universo, 1981); Nils Jacobsen,
"Free Trade, Regional Elites, and the Internal Market in Southern Peru, 1895-1932," in Guiding the
Invisible Hand. Economic Liberalism and the State in Latin American History, Joseph. L. Love and Nils
Jacobsen, eds. (New York: Praeger, 1988), pp. 145-176; and Thomas Kriiggeler, "Unreliable Drunkards
or Honorable Citizens? Artisans in Search of their Place in the Cuzco Society (1825-1930), (Ph.D. diss.,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1993). Luis E. Valcaircel provides an impressive description
of Cuzco during the early-twentieth century in his Memorias, Jos6 Matos Mar, Jos6 Deustua C., and Jos6
Luis Renique, eds. (Lima: IEP, 1981).
6 On the demographic development of Cuzco from the late-colonial period to the early-twentieth cen-
tury the literature presents contradictory and often false data. For a synthesis, see Thomas Kriiggeler "El
mito de la despoblaci6n: Apuntes para una historia demogrifica del Cusco (1792-1940)," Revista Andina
16:1 (July 1998), 119-137.
7 Alberto A. Giesecke, "Informe sobre el censo levantado en la provincia del Cuzco el 10 de setiem-
bre de 1912," Revista Universitaria. Organo de la Universidad del Cuzco, 11:4 (March 1913), 2-51.
8 See numerous articles and municipal decrees on this topic in local newspapers between the 1890s
and the 1910s.
Yet, Cuzco was not on its way to becoming a strong industrial center. The
small group of investors that on the surface appeared to be an industrial
bourgeoisie was, in fact, composed of merchants and landholders. The
elite's vision of the economic future was based mostly on expansion of agri-
cultural production and international trade, either through Arequipa or
through direct access to the Atlantic coast. In an article published in 1990
Magnus Mimrner sharply criticizes the Peruvian historian Jos6 Tamayo Her-
rera for labeling the period 1895-1945 as "la primera etapa de modern-
izacirn."" Mmrner's main argument is that Cuzco did not show any signs of
"autonomous growth" during the early twentieth century. According to the
author, the region's economic recovery was based only on a temporary
alliance between the regional elite and foreign business interests and on
favorable international market conditions. During the first half of the twen-
tieth century in Cuzco "the process of production continues to be primitive
and deficient" and what Tamayo calls modernization, Mmrner concludes,
had little or no impact on the rural society.12 Of course, a modest regional
economic upswing did not turn the area's agricultural sector into thriving
capitalist enterprises and deeply rooted Andean gamonalismo (bossism) as
well as abuse of Indian peasants continued to characterize rural Cuzco. By
modernization Tamayo clearly means such developments as the arrival of
9 La nueva Plaza de Armas de la ciudad del Cuzco. Tributo de gratitud al Sefior Prefecto Don Juan
Jose Ndfiez. Movimiento de la Tesoreria del "Comite de Ornato. " Homenaje Social (Cuzco: Imprenta de
El Comercio, 1912).
10 See Tamayo Herrera, Historia social, p. 108; and Luis E. Valcarcel, Memorias, p. 37.
11 Magnus MSrner, "Alcances y limites del cambio estructural: Cusco, Peru, 1895-1920," Peru: El
problema agrario en debate, SEPIA III, Alberto Chirif (et.al.), eds. (Cuzco: CBC, 1990), pp. 137-156,
especially pp. 152-54.
12 Ibid., p. 154.
The changes Cuzco experienced between the late nineteenth- and the
early twentieth-centuries are more than cosmetic modifications of a hope-
lessly "backward" society. They reflect patterns of social change that could
be found in many secondary cities of Latin America and their hinterlands.
Between 1890 and 1920 at least forty-seven newspapers were founded in the
department's capital alone, covering a spectrum from conservative Catholic
to anarchist thought. Though many of these papers were rather short-lived,
the existence of an active press gives an idea of how intense local political
and ideological debates were. During the same time-span about twenty civic
organizations were founded, not counting labor organizations and branches
of national political parties. Besides the famous "Centro Cientifico del
Cuzco" the list includes the prestigious and elite-dominated "Club Cuzco,"
the "Club Sur," a development promoting organization of merchants and
landholders, but also the "Sociedad Filantropica-Literaria," and the "Club
Tiro al Blanco."" These organizations, some of which proved to be quite
active, as newspaper articles show, fulfilled a crucial role in the urban soci-
ety. They offered a public space where men (and to a much lesser extent
women) would meet to establish business contacts and to cultivate social
relations. Many people, particularly those of the emerging middle class,
needed such clubs and civic association to create or secure their position in
local society.'4 Some of these organizations were clearly dominated by the
elite, but many aimed at a broader range of possible members. Para-military
clubs of riflemen, for instance, allowed patriotic artisans to compete with
hacendados, who were experienced hunters. Others approached cuzquefios
and cuzquefias who were concerned about moral conditions of the town to
join their anti-alcohol campaign. Members of these institutions were among
those who sponsored public projects such as the remodeling of the city's
main square in the early 1910s, by donating material or money. These devel-
opments had a significant impact on urban society, and they show the com-
plexity of its internal structures and its increasing dynamics. In short, a civic
13 These civic organizations have not received much attention so far. Only the Centro Cientifico has
been analyzed in the context of the development of indigenismo. See Jose Deustua and Jos6 Luis
R6nique, Intelectuales, indigenismo y descentralismo en el Peri 1897-1931 (Cuzco: CBC, 1984).
14 On the Cuzco middle-class, see the informative article "Al Margen de la Campagfia Obrera," El
Sol (June 23, 1919).
In places like Cuzco the discussion about the moral and economic condi-
tions of the lower classes meant dealing with the "Indian Question," an issue
that plagued Peru since Independence.17 Almost any newspaper of the nine-
teenth century that dreamt about a "modem" Cuzco had touched this topic,
but the debate became more intense and voices in defense of the Indian
became more numerous in the 1870s.'8 This discussion undoubtedly laid t
foundation for Cuzco indigenismo of the early twentieth century. Luis E
Valcaircel was the most prominent member of the "Generation of 1909."
After he had moved to Lima in the 1920s he became a respected author an
anthropologist and a close friend of Latin America's first major Marxist,
Jos6 Carlos Mariaitegui. Valcaircel's middle-class family background w
somewhat typical for Cuzco indigenistas. His family had moved from th
coastal town of Moquegua to Cuzco in 1891, where his father established
successful business selling coastal goods (olives, wine, etc.) and import
consumer items. Luis Valcaircel spent a comfortable childhood and learne
Quechua from his playmates-the children of his family's domestic se
vants. His mother was a devout Catholic, but his father was more liberal
minded, and influenced his son's intellectual development.19
F6lix and Gabriel Cosio were also fervent indigenistas, but their famil
had belonged to the regional aristocracy for generations. The Cosio fami
was from the province of Paruro, where it owned several haciendas. Jos6
Gabriel and Felix knew the social reality of the Andes better than most
their fellow urban students and they were truly bilingual, speaking Quech
as fluently as Spanish.20 Both, the sons of the landed aristocracy and of t
urban middle class, were fascinated with the Inka past of Peru and tried t
17 Charles Walker, "Voces discordantes: Discursos alternativos sobre el indio a fines de la coloni
Entre la ret6rica y la insurgencia: Las ideas y los movimientos sociales en los Andes, siglo XVIII, Charl
Walker, ed. (Cuzco: CBC, 1996), pp. 89-112.
18 El Rodadero (1877-78) and El Popular (1877) are two of the periodicals in which articles
defense of the Indian can be found. The latter one was highly influenced by the Cuzco university pr
fessor and bookstore owner Pio B. Mesa, who is sometimes called an "early indigenista." See also J
Tamayo Herrera, Historia del indigenismo cuzquenio, siglos XVI-XX (Lima: Instituto Nacional de C
tura, 1980) and Nils Jacobsen, "Civilization and Its Barbarism: The Inevitability of Juan Bustaman
Failure," The Human Tradition in Latin America. The Nineteenth Century, Judith Ewell and William
Beezley, eds, (Wilmington, Delaware: SR Books, 1989), pp. 82-102.
19 Jos6 Luis R6nique, Los suei~os de la sierra. Cuzco en el siglo XX (Lima: CEPES, 1991), p. 49.
20 Valc.ircel, Memorias, p.147.
Indian communities do not slow down progress (... .). They represent a system
of agrarian exploitation that is increasingly productive, because of commer-
cial incentives, which force them [the Indians] to produce more than their own
region can consume. At the same time, communities do not produce second
class land, as privately owned haciendas do, due to the rotational system [of
land use] they rigorously employ. Besides, the control of the group over com-
munity land makes it more difficult for the gamonal to invade it ( . .).22
The Indian is an excellent worker, as long as he works for his own or for his
community's benefit. He does not show the same enthusiasm if his effort
serves his tyrannical lord. Then he works listlessly.23
22 Felix Cosio, "La propiedad colectiva del ayllu," Revista Universitaria. Organo de la Universidad
del Cuzco, V: 17 (1916). The quote is taken from Marfil Francke Ballve, "El movimiento indigenista en
el Cusco," in Indigenismo, clases sociales y problema nacional. La discusirn sobre el "problema indi-
gena" en el Perui, Carlos Ivan Degregori, Mariano Valderrama, Augusta Alfajeme, and Marfil Francke
Ballve, eds. (Lima: Ediciones CELATS, n.d.), pp. 107-186.
23 Valcarcel, El problema del indio (1926), (Lima: Biblioteca Amauta, 1976), p. 15.
24 In her article mentioned above, De la Cadena presents a radical critique of Cuzco indigenistas. She
states: "Resulting from the influence of the everyday notion of decency, more than protecting the Indi-
ans, indigenismo became a pillar of the defense of Cuzquefio gentlemen, including those hacendados
against whom the Indians themselves were struggling. It thus lost its modernizing potential and instead
supported a chimerical provincial aristocracy that had long ago disappeared, but that elite Cuzquefios
kept recreating." Such devastating criticism lacks the necessary sensitivity for the ideological, social, and
political environment in which any historical actor is embedded. Indigenistas were indeed caught in the
set of values and the ideological concepts of the aristocracy. Most indigenistas were no revolutionaries,
but they sincerely struggled with the contradiction between their ideas of modernity and the dizzying
question of what "indianess" was all about. Indigenismo was highly paternalistic and its weakness was
that it did not develop out of the Indian world itself, but that it was a creation of young urban intellectu-
als. Nevertheless, accusing indigenistas of simply perpetuating the elites ideology falls short of explain-
ing a complex historical reality. De la Cadena, "Decencia y cultura polftica." De la Cadena further elab-
orates on her argument in "Silent Racism and Intellectual Superiority in Peru," Bulletin of Latin Ameri-
can Research 17:2 (May 1998), 143-164.
25 See Luis E. Valcarcel, "La cuestion agraria en el Cusco," Revista Universitaria. Organo de la Uni-
versidad del Cuzco, 111:9 (1914), 16-38. This journal, which was founded in 1911, best reflects the intel-
lectual discussions of Cuzco students.
26 See one of the author's most famous works, Jose Carlos Mariitegui, Siete ensayos de inter-
pretaci6n de la realidad (1928) (Lima: Biblioteca Amauta, 1978). Literature on Mariategui is over-
whelming. As an introduction to the topic, see Alberto Flores Galindo, La agonia de Maridtegui (Lima:
Instituto de Apoyo Agrario, 1989), 3rd edition.
27 See, "Acta de fundaci6n de la Sociedad de Artesanos," El Sol (June 10, 1936).
The closer the railroad inched to the city and the sweeter the talk about the
allegedly vast opportunities of the department's semi-tropical areas became,
the more important the Society's mission appeared. Leading members were
convinced that skills, quality work, reliability, and diligence were indispen-
sable attributes, if artisans wanted to play an important part in the region's
modernizing process.28
Relations with the city council became much more formal, almost semi-
official during the 1890s. The council supported attempts by the Society to
revitalize artisan guilds and by the end of the century at least a dozen of these
artisan organizations functioned in the city. Of course, they did not have
much in common with their corporate predecessors of the colonial period and
the first half of the nineteenth century. New guilds did not enjoy any legal
recognition. For the Artisan Society they formed a network of sub-organiza-
tions controlled by loyal members. The city council, on the other hand,
viewed them as instruments that facilitated the control over the city's largest
economic sector. The municipality frequently requested membership lists of
all local guilds from the Artisan Society, insisted on regular meetings and
held officials of the Society responsible when complaints about cheating and
unreliable craftsmen threatened public order. In 1903 the sub-prefect of the
city demanded that the Artisan Society "implement whatever measures nec-
essary to moralize journeymen of all workshops as soon as possible, that they
fulfill their contracts as required and that masters apply repressive measures
if needed."29 Receiving this kind of letter was somewhat embarrassing to
The term "working class" and all its variations (clase obrera, obreros,
proletariado, el pueblo, etc.), which could be frequently found in newspaper
articles since the 1870s, were ill-defined and only the social or political con-
text in which these terms were used determined their specific meaning.
Leading members of the Artisan Society also used the term at their own dis-
cretion. In a historical situation, in which a working class did not yet exist
as a "social fact," and it was not even clearly developed as a form of "social
identity," the term could refer to skilled and organized artisans on one occa-
sion and to the urban poor at large on another.30
30 On the discussion of class as a social fact or a social identity see Canning, "Gender and the Poli-
tics of Class Formation."
earned their daily bread by the "sweat of their brows."31 The image of the
hard-working artisan indirectly included a sideswipe at one of the elite's
most important components of decency: the rejection of manual labor. The
Society made clear that modernity and progress requested the readiness to
roll up one's sleeves. Therefore, artisans and workers were no danger to
society. Quite the opposite, they were a vital element of the modem age and
deserved political support and social recognition.32 With moderate financial
aid for public housing and trade schools and the educational and moralizing
efforts of organizations like the Artisan Society, people of the lower class
could be turned into productive members of society. This frequently
repeated message was effective.33 It pleased ambitious masters, could not be
publicly denied by the elite, and kept large segments of the urban lower
classes somewhat loyal to the organization.
34 Tamayo claims that Manuel Gonzalez Prada became popular in Cuzco only after his death in 1918.
In the early 1920s the Cuzco youth was heavily influenced by the anarchist's work. See Jose Tamayo
Herrera, El Cuzco del Oncenio. Un ensayo de historia regional a traves de la fuente de la revista
"Kosko " (Lima: Universidad de Lima, 1989), pp. 18-19.
35 "Trabajo (primera parte)," La Gaceta Popular (November 27, 1901). "Trabajo, (segunda par
was published in Ibid. (December 9, 1901).
ther Indians nor workers were ready for the industrial age. Ignorance,
lethargy and a pre-capitalist work ethic stood in sharp contrast to the require-
ments of progress, civilization, and a modem society. Both groups more or
less openly acknowledged that the "backwardness" of Indians and workers
was a serious disadvantage of the Cuzco region. Students and middle-class
oriented master craftsmen agreed that the social groups they claimed to rep-
resent needed to become prepared in order to be able to take advantage of
the benefits the future held ready.
However, indigenistas and labor leaders dealt with this central problem in
very different ways. While students readily admitted the "social deficiencies"
of Indians and demanded judicial protection and educational reforms in order
to overcome the problem, the Artisan Society was much more cautious. Its
leading members avoided any public critique of workers' professional or
social conduct. They insisted strongly on their carefully constructed image of
the honest workingman. Any public complaints about lazy workers or any
lamenting about excessive alcohol consumption would have undermined this
positive image. On the other hand, labor leaders did not directly object when
clients or public authorities expressed their frustrations about workers' con-
duct. Working men and their delegates sincerely applauded the city's mayor,
Jose Frisancho, when he addressed Cuzco workers on Labor Day of 1917 and
urged them to be more responsible. According to Frisancho indifference had
to be replaced by a commonly shared sense of duty: "Fulfilling one's obliga-
tion is patriotism. The humble worker is more patriotic if he carries out his
duty."36 Indigenistas and labor leaders agreed with such opinion, because for
them developing a sense of duty was one of the main requirements for turn-
ing lower class people into responsible citizens.
Labor leaders were rather flexible when it came to defining the bound-
However, the rise of the indigenista movement and the academic and
political enthusiasm that characterized the University after the strike of 1909
made it increasingly difficult for the Artisan Society to avoid the "Indian
Question." As early as 1911, the Asociaci6n Universitaria (University Asso-
ciation) formally invited the Society to participate in public events as the
"representative of the Cuzco working class and an important progressive
force." Although individual artisans may have accepted these invitations,
official delegations were not nominated.39 During the 1910s craftsmen did
not go much further than sharing students' fascination with Cuzco's Inkaic
past, and cooperation was limited to inviting Luis E. Valcaircel to give talks
about the glorious history of Cuzco.
The growing urban middle class provided the social and political arena
for indigenistas and labor leaders to present themselves as (self-proclaimed)
representatives of Indians and workers. However, students and master
craftsmen neither shared the comfort of this social background to the same
extent nor did they have the same political agenda. While indigenistas, many
of whom were sons of middle-class families, were securely integrated in this
social class, the position of artisans remained fragile. Students enjoyed the
privilege of being able to put their fingers on the sore spots of society, with-
out putting their social reputation at risk. Representatives of labor organiza-
tions, on the other hand, constantly worked on improving and stabilizing
their social position. Furthermore, indigenistas who aimed at cooperation
with the Artisan Society may have underestimated to what extent craftsmen
and laborers of all ranks were burdened with racial prejudices that were
present in the Cuzco society. I will demonstrate that these prejudices were
stronger than labor's suggested reputation as a "progressive political force."
Artisans were not as firmly rooted in the Cuzco middle class. Few of
them were important tax payers and membership in the city council was not
so much due to their economic success but to their achievements as soldiers
and militia men or as leaders of the Artisan Society. The rather moderate
family background of most craftsmen did not serve as a social buffer either.
Even in 1910 their middle-class position was still somewhat delicate. The
image masters had of themselves as dynamic entrepreneurs was not as
40 Even the Catholic Church welcomed students' activism and encouraged them to organize. See
"Mucho depende de la juventud," La Union, 1232 (March 24, 1909).
The need to emphasize their social respectability and to look for social con-
tacts with other middle-class members and the elite explains why such organ-
izations as associations of riflemen were crucial to provincial artisans. Quite
apart from the fact that many artisans were good marksmen, these clubs
offered the chance to socialize with other members of local society and served
as a platform to break open encrusted social structures to a certain extent. The
development of clubs and associations demonstrates the increasing dynamics
of urban society. In Cuzco the first of these clubs of riflemen, El Club Inter-
nacional del Tiro al Blanco, was founded in 1896 and members met regularly
for practice at Bancopata, a hillside on the outskirts of the city. One of the
main objectives of the clubs was "to create a center which would stimulate and
create a spirit of sociability-so much in decay in our country." Participation in
this semi-military organization helped stimulate the "most noble parts of a
man's soul.""43 These clubs formed master artisans' favorite social environ-
ment. Their practical skills helped them to stand their ground and the club
offered many opportunities to discuss business and political issues.44
Besides, artisans were of course very much caught up in the sets of ideo-
logical constructions and racial prejudices that prevailed not only in Cuzco
but also in Peru at large.46 Master artisans marked their own social distance
from the lower classes by discriminating against cuzquefios they considered
Indians. It is revealing to see what kind of role ethnicity played in workers'
everyday life and to compare it with the public discourse of labor organiza-
tions, where the "Indian Question" and any ethnic division among workers
was ignored until around 1920. Although labor leaders were concerned with
the situation of the poor and the exploitation of the working class, for many
of them the Indian sector was culturally and socially inferior. In fact, key
members of the Artisan Society were even accused of being involved in seri-
ous cases of Indian abuse.
45 On the relation between the debate over the "Indian Question" and the regional power structure,
see R6nique, Los sueihos de la sierra, p. 59.
46 See Weismantel and Eisenman, "Race in the Andes."
Artisans and labor leaders were not enlightened and democratic defend-
ers of any principle of racial equality. Their political project was to become
involved in the modernization of the Cuzco economy and to receive recog-
nition as responsible middle-class citizens. The refusal to link working-class
issues to the "Indian Question" shows that many labor representatives more
or less openly shared basic prejudices that dominated the urban society. Inte-
gration into local power structures (e.g. participation in the city council)
combined with ethnic prejudices corrupted individual labor leaders, which
47 See "Lesiones, Juan Villafuerte," Archivo Departamental del Cuzco, Archivo Oscar Zambrano,
Legajo 109 (1904) and "Lesiones, Santos Cano," Ibid., Legajo 122 (1906). It is interesting to note that
in judicial documents I rarely found any reference to the racial status of an individual involved in a court
case. Only the term "quechua" which in exceptional cases is put after the name of a person identifies a
particular individual as being considered Indian.
48 See "Maltrato, Martin Mendoza," Archivo Departamental del Cuzco, Archivo Oscar Zambrano,
Legajo 74 (1899).
49 "El Gobernador del Cusco," El Sol, 1907. The 1907 volume is not available in the archive of El
Sol. A copy of the article is attached to the court case, Archivo Departamental del Cuzco, Archivo de la
Corte Superior del Cuzco, "Abuso de la libertad de imprenta," Legajo 130 (1907). Following Villa-
fuerte's request, the court forced the author, Tomais Soto, to retract his article. Only in 1923 he was
expelled from the SdA on the basis of similar accusations.
In 1917 some labor leaders took the first steps towards closer cooperat
with the University Association and indigenistas. In May of that year
tailor Asencio Carrasco declared his candidacy as deputy senator for Cu
accompanying the students' candidate for a senator seat, Romualdo Agui
The announcement was made during a meeting at the assembly hall of
Artisan Society with representatives of all guilds and "numerous youngs
of the University Association" present. At this occasion, which according
By 1920 the Cuzco working class had become more "real" and was
clearly identifiable. This social group was less patient and more self-confi-
dent than the poorly defined "working class" master artisans had claimed to
represent and had tried to manipulate for their own purposes. It became
increasingly clear that some segments of the lower classes were in the
process of liberating themselves from master artisans' tutelage. People like
Jara Vidal6n and Palomino realized that the Artisan Society would soon lose
its role as Cuzco's prime labor organization, if the leadership of the organi-
zation did not react. In the early 1920s, the shoemaker guild counted on 300
hundred members of all professional ranks and it explicitly stressed its inde-
pendence from the Artisan Society. Workers of the railroad, construction,
and textile industries also formed their own organizations with only limited
ties to the Artisan Society. The political goal of forging these groups into one
political force made some labor leaders cooperate with students. Further-
more, they saw that the strategy of cooperating with merchants and hacen-
dados in return for more political participation and social integration did not
really pay. Lack of capital had excluded artisans from any local moderniza-
tion project of considerable size and social or political privileges were only
of cosmetic value if they were not backed by economic success.58
The wave of Indian rebellions that swept through the southern Andes
between 1920 and 1925 was provoked by the dramatic decline in wool
prices in 1920/21.60 All over the wool-producing regions, Indian peasants
linked their anger over falling prices of their products with conflicts over
Torre, the man who later founded the Accidn Popular Revolucionaria de America (APRA) and who was
one of Peru's most influential politicians of the twentieth century. Haya, who had spent some time in
Cuzco between 1917 and 1918, was disappointed by what he interpreted as a conservative attitude of the
local labor movement.
In 1921 or 1922 some artisans and workers had founded a rather short-
lived Federaci6n Obrera Local Cuzqueiia (Local Workers' Federation)
which published an equally transitory periodical with the ambiguous title
"Obrero Andino" (Andean Worker). The federation pushed for a Workers'
Congress of the Department of Cuzco in 1922. First planned for the month
of May, later postponed to the Independence-day holidays in July, the event
was finally canceled for unknown reasons. Nevertheless, the program of the
congress was published. Point three of the agenda addressed the difficult
relationship between rural and urban workers:
ans as serious political players and it became clear that relations between
urban and rural workers had to be reconsidered. From the viewpoint of some
labor leaders the allegedly backward Indian had turned into a pioneer of
class struggle.
At the time when Cuzco Indians rose up the Artisan Society was hope-
lessly divided. Animosities between leading members, political factional-
ism, and disputes over the future course of the institution split it into hostile
groups. Occasionally, police were forced to intervene when the Society's
assemblies were on the brink of public fistfights.62 Of course, internal con-
flicts had a lot to do with the radicalization of some leaders and the conser-
vatism of others. When the university professor and president of the "Centro
Manuel Gonzdlez Prada," Luis Velasco Arag6n, in a public speech, charac-
terized the political system of Peru as a "systematized lie" or as "lying
turned into business" and called members of the parliamentary system
"rabble," some members of the Artisan Society were disgusted by such anar-
chist remarks. Others enthusiastically carried the speaker around the city's
main square.63
The temporary influence of more radical forces within the Artisan Soci-
ety not only led to the discovery of the "obrero quechua" as a political
factor. For the first time, in 1923, the Society attacked the social and politi-
cal conditions of the countryside, disregarding of the repercussions it might
produce. The killing of nine Indian peasants in the village of Chinchaypucyo
(Anta province) provoked an unusually strong response. Not only did local
newspapers publish a letter of protest in which the Society stated that the
death of these "sons of Cuzco" demanded a swift response on the part of
public authorities, artisans even telegraphed the letter to the Minister of the
Interior in Lima.6
62 See, for example, "Tumultuosa seci6n de la Sociedad de Artesanos," El Sol, (April 13, 1923).
63 The speech was published as Luis Velasco Arag6n, La verdad sobre el fango. Conferencia leida
ante un comicio popular por el escritor Luis Velasco Arag6n el 22 de Abril de 1923 (Cuzco: H.G. Rozas,
1923). Tamayo Herrera claims that after the event Velasco Arag6n was enthusiastically celebrated by his
audience. Tamayo Herrera, El Cuzco del Oncenio, p. 18.
64 "La masacre de Anta: En6rgica protesta de la Sociedad de Artesanos," El Sol, (March 15, 1923).
65 Tamayo Herrera, El Cuzco del Oncenio, p. 68.
CONCLUSION
social classes gained importance. However, the old social order proved to be
robust and it was not easily replaced by a typical urban class system. But
numerous civic organizations, political clubs, and an active press reflected
the diversity, internal conflicts, and dynamics of the local society. And
although standard procedures of measuring historical processes of modem-
ization ( per capita income, patterns of capital investment etc.) may fail to
detect this social change, it is nevertheless significant and revealing.
The way the Artisan Society presented a vaguely defined local working
class and utilized this social concept for its own interests even before indus-
trialization had reached the Andean town typified early labor organizations
of many Latin American cities. However, the complicated interplay between
class and ethnicity can only be found in cities where elements of Indian cul-
ture (or Black culture in other regions) remained strong. In these cities the
worker could be presented as a class-conscious activist in public and could
be called an Indian scamp in the workplace.