You are on page 1of 28

Microsoft Excel 16.

0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [OPRBD20-3-Dataset2 (1).xlsx]Sensitivity
Report Created: 23-02-2021 23:52:51

Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
$B$7 Variables Product 1 60 0 5 1 1
$C$7 Variables Product 2 10 0 4 1 0.666666667
$D$7 Variables Product 3 0 -1 6 1 1E+030

Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
$F$2 Daily Labour LHS (formula) 160 0 240 1E+030 80
$F$3 Daily Machine Hours LHS (formula) 140 1 140 20 6.666666667
$F$4 Daily Material LHS (formula) 200 1 200 10 40
Coeff x Coeff y Coeff z RHS (valueLHS (formula)

Daily Labour 2 4 3 240 160


Daily Machine
Hours 2 2 3 140 140
Daily Material 3 2 4 200 200
Objective 5 4 6

Product 1 Product 2 Product 3


Variables 60 10 0

Objective 340
Why is not Product 3 called in for optimal solutions?
What happens to optimal profit if it is mandatory to produce 5 units of Product 3? 20 units? 50
units?
How much would the per-unit profit of Product 3 have to be in order for it to enter into the
optimal solution mix?
Can we have a limited number of optimal solutions?
What is the range of optimality for the profit per unit of Product 1?
What would be the values in the optimal solution be if the objective co-efficient of Product 1
were increased by 0.5? By 3?
What is the range of feasibility of the labour constraint?
What would be the values in the optimal solution be if the amount of labour available
decreased by 50 units? By 100 units?
If the manager could obtain additional material, how much more could be used effectively?
What would happen if the manager obtains more than this amount?
If it is possible to obtain an additional amount of one of the resources, which one should be
obtained, and how much can be effectively used? Explain.

If the manager is able to obtain an additional 5 units of material at the usual price, what impact
would that have on the optimal value in the objective function? By paying a premium of
0.4/unit on additional? By paying a premium of 0.4/unit for all units? By paying a premium of
1.4/unit on additional? By paying a premium of 1.4/unit for all units?
If each machine operates 7 hours, and if two of the machines face breakdown for 3 hours, what
impact will this have on the optimal value in the objective function? If three machines face such
breakdown?
Demand 1 Demand 2 Demand 3 Demand 4 Values
Supply 1 2 3 5 6 5
Supply 2 2 1 3 5 10
Supply 3 3 8 4 6 15
12 8 4 6

Demand 1 Demand 2 Demand 3 Demand 4 Values


Supply 1 5 0 0 0 5
Supply 2 2 8 0 0 10
Supply 3 5 0 4 6 15
12 8 4 6

89
cost min E F C D
A 8 13 25 28 150
B 15 12 26 25 200
E 0 6 16 17 350
F 6 0 14 16 350
350 350 130 130

E F C D
A 150 0 0 0 150
B 0 110 0 0 110
E 0 240 0 110 350
F 200 0 130 20 350
350 350 130 130

9170
150 1 6 100
1 3 5

1 3 5 1
3

250 2 8 300
2 4 6
Job1 Job2 Job3 Job4
Machine 1 8 26 17 11
Machine 2 13 28 4 26
Machine 3 38 19 18 15
Machine 4 19 26 14 10

Job1 Job2 Job3 Job4


Machine 1 1 0 0 0 1
Machine 2 0 0 1 0 1
Machine 3 0 1 0 0 1
Machine 4 0 0 0 1 1
1 1 1 1

41
Job1 Job2 Job3 Job4 Job5
Machine 1 5 5 7 4 8
Machine 2 6 5 8 3 7
Machine 3 6 8 9 5 10
Machine 4 7 6 6 3 6
Machine 5 6 7 10 6 11

Job1 Job2 Job3 Job4 Job5


Machine 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
Machine 2 0 1 0 0 0 1
Machine 3 0 0 0 1 0 1
Machine 4 0 0 0 0 1 1
Machine 5 1 0 0 0 0 1
1 1 1 1 1

29
Customer 1 Customer 2 Customer 3
Warehouse 1 15 35 25 40
Warehouse 2 10 50 40 30
30 30 30

Customer 1 Customer 2 Customer 3


Warehouse 1 90 80 110 40
Warehouse 2 90 80 110 30
30 30 30

Customer 1 Customer 2 Customer 3


Warehouse 1 0 10 30 40
Warehouse 2 30 0 0 30
30 10 30

Customer 1 Customer 2 Customer 3


Warehouse 1 0 10 30 40 a) 3000
Warehouse 2 30 0 0 30
30 10 30 b) 3400
Bidder 1 Bidder 2 Bidder 3
Oil field 1 15 35 25 100000
Oil field 2 10 50 40 100000
200000
Bidder 1 Bidder 2 Bidder 3
Oil field 1 40000 60000 0 100000
Oil field 2 0 20000 80000 100000
40000 80000 80000 200000
80000 80000 80000

Bidder 1 Bidder 2 Bidder 3


Oil field 1 0 40000 60000 100000
Oil field 2 80000 0 20000 100000
80000 40000 80000 200000 a) 6900000
80000 80000 80000 b) 4500000
Month Production cost/unit Primary demand Available for secondary demand Sales price/unit
1 13 20 15 15
2 12 15 20 14
3 13 25 15 16

month 1 2 3
1 2 1 0
2 -100000 2 1
3 -100000 -100000 3
20 15 25

month 1 2 3
1 20 0 0
2 0 15 0
3 0 0 25
20 15 25
Profit/unit
2
2
3

2
2
3

35
35
35

20
15
25

145
Painting 1 Painting 2 Painting 3 Painting 4
1 8 11 0 0
2 9 13 12 7
3 9 0 11 0
4 0 0 12 9

Painting 1 Painting 2 Painting 3 Painting 4


1 1 0 0 0 1
2 0 1 0 0 1
3 0 0 1 0 1
4 0 0 0 1 1
1 1 1 1

41
Job 1 Job 2 Job 3 Job 4
1 10 15 10 15
2 12 8 20 16
3 12 9 12 18
4 6 12 5 18
5 16 12 8 12

Job 1 Job 2 Job 3 Job 4


1 1 0 0 0 1
2 0 1 0 0 1
3 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 1 0 1
5 0 0 0 1 1
1 1 1 1 4

35
Bond 1 2 3 4 5 6 supply
Cash 0 0 0 0 0 0 150
1 0.21 0.19 0.17 0.13 0.09 0.05 200
2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.33 0 0 100
3 1 1 1 1 1 0 400
Demand 200 100 50 80 160 140

Bond 1 2 3 4 5 6 supply
Cash 0 0 0 0 0 0 150
1 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.87 0.91 0.95 200
2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.67 1 1 100
3 0 0 0 0 0 1 400
Demand 200 100 50 80 160 140

Bond 1 2 3 4 5 6 supply
Cash 0 0 0 0 0 0 150
1 0.21 0.19 0.17 0.13 0.09 0.05 200
2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.33 0 0 100
3 1 1 1 1 1 0 400
Demand 200 100 50 80 160 140
166.2

150 0 0 0 0 0 150
0 10 50 80 60 0 200
0 0 0 0 100 0 100
50 90 0 0 0 140 280
200 100 50 80 160 140
Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 Project 4
1 50 46 42 40 1
2 51 48 44 10000 2
3 10000 47 45 45 2
1 1 1 1

Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 Project 4


1 0 0 0 1 1
2 1 0 1 0 2
3 0 1 0 0 1
1 1 1 1

182
Coeff x Coeff y RHS
Constraint1 -1 3 11
Constraint2 1 1 7
Constraint3 1 -1 2

Objective 1 5
x y

a b c
7 5 50
3 -2 17
5 2 30
3 4 25

l u
4 9
x y1 y2 y3

a c b1 b2 b3
7 65 2 1 5
3 50 4 6 3
5 50 3 1 1
3 35 2 3 2

m n
4 9

You might also like